Apple Updates Top-End MacBook Pros With Tweaked Keyboard and Faster Processors (theverge.com) 91
Apple is refreshing its top laptops again by announcing newly updated specs for its 15-inch and 13-inch MacBook Pro models. It's bringing faster Intel processors and some slight changes to the much-maligned keyboard that Apple says should reduce issues. From a report: The biggest changes are coming to the 15-inch model, which is getting Intel's 9th Gen Core processors. The base model now starts with a 2.6GHz, 6-core i7 processor, which can turbo boost up to 4.5GHz. The next-step-up model is getting a 2.3GHz, 8-core i9 processor -- the first ever on a MacBook -- which can turbo boost up to 4.8GHz.
And for those of you who want the most power possible, Apple will also offer a custom top configuration of an even more powerful 8-core i9 chip with a 2.4GHz base speed, which can boost all the way up to 5.0GHz for what Apple calls "the fastest Mac notebook ever." The 13-inch Touch Bar models are getting similar (albeit less exciting) processor refreshes: the base model now comes with a 2.4GHz 8th Gen quad-core i5 processor that can boost to 4.1GHz.
And for those of you who want the most power possible, Apple will also offer a custom top configuration of an even more powerful 8-core i9 chip with a 2.4GHz base speed, which can boost all the way up to 5.0GHz for what Apple calls "the fastest Mac notebook ever." The 13-inch Touch Bar models are getting similar (albeit less exciting) processor refreshes: the base model now comes with a 2.4GHz 8th Gen quad-core i5 processor that can boost to 4.1GHz.
Re: (Score:3)
The "Gaius Mucius Scaevola" gesture: The fingerprint reader is on the CPU and the iSight camera is making sure you're not flinching.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, I came here for something along these lines. This thing will never hit that "5ghz" or even close for longer than a second or three then thermal throttle down to probably 3ghz...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Just be glad they still have a headphone socket.
Melting keys (Score:2)
Hopefully the new keyboard uses high-temp plastics else they'll have a new class of issues with the high-end model :-)
Also - it's a Mac-Book, not a Lap-Top - so don't keep it in your lap especially with a high CPU load.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're supposed to put a pan on it to some boil some macaroni under heavy loads. Food for thought, and heatsync expansion. By "tweaked" keyboard maybe it comes with a TIMcooktop attachment.. O.o
Re:Melting keys (Score:5, Funny)
They use Intel processors - Meltdown is expected.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Clock speed (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not sure how any of this is possible as MacBook cooling is inadequate as it is. I am not sure that 8 thermally or power-throttled cores are any better.
They should increase the thickness by a couple millimeters and improve the thermal management, and that would produce more of a real world improvement than this marketing bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ugh, my battery just screwed up my 2015 model. Of the three guys on my team that had 2015 models, all of us had bloated batteries. Mine just went in for service today, hopefully it's salvageable. My boss's just blew up fast within a week and completely ruined his. What a horrible design!
Re: Clock speed (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, but then Apple would be putting functionality as more important than design. Not going to happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually functionality can be achieved by design ... form follows function is the old saying.
Re: (Score:3)
They should increase the thickness by a couple millimeters and improve the thermal management
You can already buy laptops that are thicker and cooler from companies that are way less profitable than Apple.
Why should the winner try to be more like the losers?
Re: (Score:2)
You can already buy laptops that are thicker and cooler from companies that are way less profitable than Apple.
Yes, but they make you run Windows 10. So the choice is between crappy hardware and a crappy OS.
Re: (Score:1)
On a side note, this laptop also runs 5 different operating systems (OS X, Windows 7, CentOS, Ubuntu, and Kali Linux). You would be lucky if you can do that on current Apple products (now that they locked it all down because they want to keep their walled garden with the T2 chip).
Re: (Score:2)
They should increase the thickness by a couple millimeters and improve the thermal management
You can already buy laptops that are thicker and cooler from companies that are way less profitable than Apple.
Why should the winner try to be more like the losers?
Do provide us with links will you, some of us are in the market for a new laptop.
Re: (Score:3)
Here you go, way thicker and way better cooling :-P
https://www.dell.com/en-us/sho... [dell.com]
But for real, moderately thicker, and the Dell Precisions usually have a cooling system designed to handle the load.
https://www.dell.com/en-us/wor... [dell.com]
That's their "thin and light" model, they also have much thicker ones (7520 and 7530) that have 4 DIMM slots and support 128GB of memory, really beefy cooling, and a Quadro P1000.
Re:Clock speed (Score:4, Insightful)
And a side note, the looking at the 7530 manual, replacing the battery is as easy as removing the screws from the bottom, then unscrewing a couple more holding the battery in and unplugging it.
In fact, the manual starts with a table of every screw size used on what part of the computer.
The same bottom hatch gives you access to two of the RAM slots, the hard drive, wireless cards, SIM card, all three (!) m.2 hard drive slots.
The other two ram slots, you have to disconnect the ribbon cables that are also under that hatch, then take the keyboard off (unsnap the trim panel then it's just philips screws) to get to the access hatch on the other side of the mainboard.
Even the power plug is on a little cable with the actual plug held in with screws so it's easy to replace. The graphics card is a separate daughter card. This is how a "pro" machine should be. Everything glued together and nothing replaceable/upgradeable is consumer toy crap.
The manual, for your perusal.
https://topics-cdn.dell.com/pd... [dell.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Why should the winner try to be more like the losers?
Because the losers are actually making billions of dollars and more market share is always a good thing?
They could offer a workstation laptop for people who want MacOS and top performance.
Re:Clock speed (Score:4, Informative)
That depends on the specific use case and duty cycle. For example, after the initial clone/build, most of my development flow is short bursts of activity (15-30 seconds to do an incremental build) followed by long periods of relatively lower CPU usage. In this case, I'd expect that higher turbo would be super helpful and the extra heat would easily dissipate between bursts.
On the other hand, if the use case is rendering video or similar high-duty-cycle tasks, the performance is going to be thermally limited and the only way to improve is better cooling or better perf/watt.
Re: (Score:2)
I really doubt the average everyday Joe has "computationally intensive workloads".
Or maybe I should put it another way, everyone that has computationally intensive workloads is not average and should probably make an effort to understand the differences in peak/sustained performance.
Re: (Score:2)
Counting cores when talking about thermal management is pointless. The question is what is the sustained IPC per watt, and what is the instantaneous peaks before throttling kicks in. In both cases you will very likely find the highend model gives you real world speed improvements especially due to the lower base clock.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Modern laptop clock speeds are about bursts.
The CPU tends to be at a low ( 2 ghz) clock speed when idle or under very light load.
When the workload increases, you've got two levels of boost power available. A higher level boost for short loads, and a lower level one for sustained. The laptop can stay in the higher level boost for a short time - say 30 says, after which it drops to the lower level boost to avoid overheating.
The high level boost is great for a lot of workloads. If you're opening a big program,
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
They did it so I could place my trademarked TIMcooktop attachment joke in the comments here. See above.
Removable SSD? Removable RAM? Battery not glued? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Removable SSD? Removable RAM? Battery not glue (Score:2)
Maybe for 99% of Apple's customers that is true. But the glued/soldered nature of current Mac designs plus the ticking timebomb keyboard reduces the usable life dramatically, which means a plummeting resale value. Which again, probably doesn't matter to the shrinking customer base.
Re: Removable SSD? Removable RAM? Battery not glu (Score:1)
Not for Apple. We get close to 30% residual value after 3 years for our MBPs. That after a 10% discount upfront. So after three years you are looking at a resale value at 40% original. NO other mfg gets that level anywhere.
Re: (Score:1)
Past tense, baby. Those days are over. The ticking timebomb keyboard insures it. I suppose you could rackmount the Macbook and continue to get some value out of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe for 99% of Apple's customers that is true. But the glued/soldered nature of current Mac designs plus the ticking timebomb keyboard reduces the usable life dramatically, which means a plummeting resale value. Which again, probably doesn't matter to the shrinking customer base.
Nonsense. Keyboards get fixed if they break. Apple will replace your battery with no problems. And nobody changes RAM or hard drive - except a very small minority using eBay for their upgrades.
Re: (Score:1)
Keyboards get fixed for four years. They then become very expensive to get fixed. Hence, nobody will want to take the risk of buying the things.
Anybody who has a four year old laptop probably needs to double it's memory to continue to find it useful. Most definitely any new buyer will want to do that.
Re:Removable SSD? Removable RAM? Battery not glued (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
meh; I'd end the era at 2015. To be sure: the 2013 year irked me, because of the soldered RAM and sealed battery. But, I'm still using mine. I'm going to try the battery swap soon. Wish me luck.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Removable SSD? Removable RAM? Battery not glued (Score:5, Insightful)
You used to be able to buy the lowest spec'd RAM and then cheaply max it out. Now you have no choice but to pay 4x market rate for RAM from Apple. And the price they charge for the upgrade does not account for you not getting the base RAM discounted. You're paying for both the base and the upgrade.
As for removable SSDs, that serves multiple purposes. 1) 3+ years later as price comes down and your need for space increases, you could upgrade. 2) If the machine dies, you could remove the SSD to get your data off it 3) If you needed to have the machine serviced, it was easy to swap in a different SSD without any of your personal data on it
Re: (Score:2)
I see that OnePlus are offering an extra 2GB of RAM and 128GB of storage (total 8GB/256GB) on their OnePlus 7 for $30.
30 bucks for 2GB RAM and 128GB flash.
Re: (Score:2)
I have a 2011 MBPro that's still going strong. Maxed it out at 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD and replaced the battery. I still use it as my main machine. There are routinely 3 or 4 virtual machines running, plus Affinity Photo/Designer, BBEdit. Works great.
I look at the latest and greatest from Apple, but I don't want any of them. Expensive, and zero upgradability, and while smaller and lighter than mine, they are apparently less robust. I poke around the used market for something newer on occasion, but even the 2013s
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Removable SSD? Removable RAM? Battery not glued (Score:5, Insightful)
Many Macs prior to 2013 were resold on EBay or Craigslist, then went to people who'd upgrade them and either resell them for a profit or use them. The third-party repair/resale market was huge.
This form of "recycling" was a hell of a lot more environmentally conscious than shredding the whole things and building entirely new units. The best form of "recycling" is long-term use.
Apple essentially destroyed the upgrade/resale market by soldering everything in place and gluing the battery in.
Re: (Score:2)
Chinese resellers are still doing this. They will solder extra RAM to the motherboard, replace the SSD chip etc. Apple has been trying to frustrate them by doing things like pairing the SSD to the security chip. Since DRM never works though they always find a way to save those machines from landfill.
Re: (Score:1)
Obviously, since everything is glued or soldered in. Tim & co. deserve a huge bird-flip for that asinine move.
There was a time, however, when plenty of people did. Maybe not always the original buyer, but the option to do so made it worthwhile to buy someon'e castoff, boost the RAM, install an SSD, swap in a fresh battery and enjoy plenty more useful life from a MacBook. That's a lot "greener" than sending a computer
Re: (Score:2)
For you maybe. For everyone else that doesn't have your specific hardware criteria it's an upgrade. Fortunately there's more than one company on the market. Feel free to buy something from someone else.
Tweaked Keyboard (Score:2)
Can we tweak that back to a Model M [wikipedia.org]?
Re: (Score:2)
Turbo to 4.8ghz for 6 seconds then throttled (Score:2, Interesting)
Too many laptop manufacturers are shoving VERY hot chips in laptops without adequate cooling. In turn they thermal throttle like crazy and are out performed in cpu intensive tasks by cpus far less 'powerful' but simply don't thermal throttle thus keeping higher clocks.
Anybody that buys an i9 laptop that isn't the size of a briefcase is simply throwing their money away to get a number 9 instead of a 7.
Re: (Score:3)
Most customers aren't complaining... (Score:2, Insightful)
I like how Apple claims most customers are not complaining about the keyboards. Well, I'm not a customer any more because of them. They went from having by far the best keyboard of any laptop to having the worst. I cannot type on their current keyboards. The feel of them is horrendous (I have one for work, so I do have experience despite not upgrading my persona late 2012 macbook pro). The trackpads used to be the best as well. The new ones plain suck. I'd give up all the slimming down they've done t
Non-starter (Score:2)
As a long time purchaser of all things Apple and Mac, starting with my SE20, Powerbooks, G4s..and last, a 17" MacBook Pro, ala 2011, it's come to an end. Even though the updates had stopped for a perfectly serviceable MacBook, I used it daily. Then one night, I spilled wine in the keyboard. It would cost a bunch to just bring it back to life. I could buy a used one, but in the end, the new OSes were not being produced for this i7 machine. Ridiculous. I looked at the 15 inch, but my old eyes just can't
Re: (Score:2)
As a long time purchaser of all things Apple and Mac, starting with my SE20 [...]
...you mean the SE/30 [wikipedia.org]?
I looked at the 15 inch, but my old eyes just can't handle the display anymore. Increasing pixel density is something I don't care about. I just wanted a larger screen that I could read.
I know that feeling--I had the same thing when they dropped the 17". My antique 2010 MacBook Pro is still chugging along quite happily.
That said, I use a 15" MacBook Pro at work and these old eyes don't have any problems.
One reason, of course, is you can set the size. Yeah, if I use the "Max resolution" to get my 1920 x 1200, it can be tough to read. But I find that one notch lower (1680 x 1050?) gives me a decent amount of real estate and I can read what's on it.
Second, I attach ex
Re: (Score:2)
I started with a IIsi in the early 1990s. Moved on to a Power clone that lasted 7 years, no problems. Decided to try another Mac, a 2006 iMac. It arrived (from the Apple Store) with a wonky hard drive (kept losing the partitions). Then, a month after the warranty ran out, I became one of thousands whose displays developed colored vertical stripes over a quarter of the screen. Apple ignored us.
Never bought another one. It was a shitshow LONG before Cook arrived.
How accurate are "numbers of cores" (Score:2)
I always wonder what they mean, cores or hyperthreads? ... so is that 3 cores with hyperthreading making it look like 6 or is it really 6 cores which then can run 12 hyperthreads? Intel web site looks like 12 threads.
My 14" MacBook air has an i7 with 2 cores (which displays activity of 4 cores, aka hyperthreads), the article is about an 6 core i7
Anyway, more meaningful names or "type specifications" would be helpful. If you look at Intels web site: there are dozens of i7's etc.
https://ark.intel.com/content/ [intel.com]
Re: (Score:2)
the article is about an 6 core i7 ... so is that 3 cores with hyperthreading making it look like 6 or is it really 6 cores which then can run 12 hyperthreads?
Do you seriously think there is a three-core i7 processor?
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, AMD used to sell 3-core Phenom processors (IIRC quads where one core didn't pass muster and was disabled). It seems like a good way to get rid of stock that would otherwise be a loss. Some revenue is better than none.
But I've never heard of Intel doing this.