Leaked Apple Email Hints at the Possible End of iTunes: Report (cultofmac.com) 145
An anonymous reader shares a report: Apple could kill off iTunes in the near future, a new report suggests. It cites an email that Apple reportedly wrote to people in the music industry recently, announcing the "end of iTunes LPs." The iTunes LP format was first introduced in 2009 and let publishers add interactive artwork, along with assorted iTunes Extras, with their content. The LP format never achieved great popularity. However, the fact that Apple plans to ditch iTunes LPs in 2018 potentially hints at the possibility that Apple may stop selling iTunes music downloads in the near future. The Apple email announcing the change was reportedly sent two weeks ago from an address at "The iTunes Store" and signed by "The Apple Music Team." But its existence has only been highlighted now through a report by the U.K. newspaper The Metro. "Apple will no longer accept new submissions of iTunes LPs after March 2018," the letter notes. "Existing LPs will be deprecated from the store during the remainder of 2018. Customers who have previously purchased an album containing an iTunes LP will still be able to download the additional content using iTunes Match." The news about the possible winding down of iTunes would come as no surprise to many users. Not only has iTunes been outdated for years in terms of its interface and functionality, but Apple clearly aims to move to a streaming model of music selling. Further reading: 'Apple Stole My Music. No, Seriously'; Apple Says It Doesn't Know Why iTunes Users Are Losing Their Music Files; iTunes Turns 13 Today -- Continues To Be 'Awful'.
Good riddance if true (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
So, if iTunes goes away....and I wouldn't mind a better interface, but will there be anything left on MacOS that allows me to catalog, rip and manage MY music local?
I don't stream much really...occasionally I'll plug the phone into the car for Amazon Prime music which comes "free" with my Prime subscription, but I don't ever see myself paying for an independent streaming only product from anyone.
If I find something I like, I buy it....in CD which
Re: (Score:2)
There's no money in it for Apple to build a new app to rip your CDs.
Your only hope is going to be a third party app.
Re: (Score:3)
And there are a staggering variety of third party apps that will merrily rip your CDs, catalog them for you, and make iTunes seem like the 1990s.
Not many of them are for Macs, but there are a few.
My music is still *my music* and Apple's not going to store it on their cloud for me. I'm going to places where cellphones don't work, there's no WiFi, and it's peaceful. I want my music there, not some metered connection to something that will track my every move.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I rip my own CDs (Apple Lossless, just because storage is so relatively cheap so might as well have full quality... the days of having to make sure your 128kbps MP3s sound as good as possible using LAME and EAC are long behind us although EAC is still useful for dealing with CD errors.)
I also have a substantial AAC collection from iTunes. I learned not to trust if I can re-download songs again, so my iTunes collection gets stored on a NAS. This way, if I want to copy songs onto an Android device, it is a
Re: (Score:2)
So, if iTunes goes away....and I wouldn't mind a better interface, but will there be anything left on MacOS that allows me to catalog, rip and manage MY music local?
That's the laugh: There have pretty much ALWAYS been alternatives to iTunes for macOS available from 3rd Parties. I happen to like iTunes; so I don't have much experience with these Applications, but I know they exist, and have for years in one form or another:
Kodi: This was formerly the XBMC Project. It has been available on multiple platforms for years and years. It and Plex (below) are the heavy-hitters in this world, IMHO.
https://kodi.tv/ [kodi.tv]
Plex: Originally grew out of the XBMC Project, as a Mac-specific v
Re: (Score:2)
Not to reply to my own comment, but this Music Librarian has a nice interface, similar to the iTunes Columnar "Song Browser" View. Available for several platforms, including macOS.
Only downside is it doesn't offer an iOS Remote (although it will Upload songs to iOS devices, which is a nice touch) :
https://www.clementine-player.... [clementine-player.org]
Re: (Score:2)
plenty of 3rd party software.
however, majority of people who have itunes installed or are forced to use it use it to update/manage/connect their ios devices, not for loading up music.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you hate free market capitalism? If you prefer, you can always write, record, and produce your own music to listen to. No one is stopping you.
With iTunes gone, how do you get your own-produced music from your PC onto your iPhone?
Re: (Score:2)
With iTunes gone, how do you get your own-produced music from your PC onto your iPhone?
I imagine they will still have some kind of iPhone syncing software to manage backups, music, and photos, even if the iTunes music store dies.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Will it be as reliable and user friendly as itunes?
Re: (Score:2)
Get files onto a so-called "telephone" computer (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can't you just copy *.mp3 and *.ogg onto it? The filesystem mounts as a USB device, doesn't it?
On Android, yes. The file system just mounts and you drag your stuff over. That's what's so nice about Android.
...but on an iPhone? No. The only way to synch local content on and off an iPhone is via iTunes. It's a messy, clumsy procedure on a piece of bloatware, but if you persevere, it can be done.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a computer that you cannot copy a file to? Seriously? I cannot conceive of how that could work.
An iPhone "computer" of course has a file system - But you can't easily mount it. It's similar to early MP3 players of 15-20 years ago where you could only use proprietary software to copy files on and off them.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Realize the "walled garden" thing didn't work out? Purchase something other than an iPhone.
I have an Android Samsung Galaxy S5 - But my wife's iPhone is employer-supplied, so she can't easily switch.
Re:Recurring charges (Score:5, Insightful)
Here's an idea don't use an employer supplied phone for personal use.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Here's an idea don't use an employer supplied phone for personal use.
Most people, including my wife, don't want to carry around two phones.
...and if your employer is going to pick up the tab, why not?
Re: (Score:1)
Apple AAC files do not have DRM on them... convert it to whatever file format you want and play it on whatever device you want.
The walled garden analogy doesn't apply here. Nothing in curated or quality controlled ( except the quality of the source material, but if you don't want that buy CD's and rip them yourself )
Re: (Score:2)
If you prefer, you can always write, record, and produce your own music to listen to. No one is stopping you.
One might argue that the incumbent music publishers are stopping me. Once I've written a song, how do I make sure it isn't substantially similar to any existing copyrighted song in order to avoid a lawsuit alleging accidental infringement?
Free download of recording requires compliance (Score:2)
Once I've written a song, how do I make sure it isn't substantially similar to any existing copyrighted song
No need. You need that only if you're going to sell recordings or perform for pay.
According to 17 USC 106, a paywall is not the threshold for activity that meaningfully infringes exclusive rights in a copyrighted work; distributing or performing publicly is. Someone making a recording of a song available without charge through the Internet is still operating publicly and thus needs to either take a license or somehow certify originality.
Re: (Score:2)
Because keeping it to oneself is unacceptable to many hobbyist musicians, let me narrow my question:
Once I've written a song that I intend to share with others, how do I make sure it isn't substantially similar to any existing copyrighted song in order to avoid a lawsuit alleging accidental infringement?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't anyone teach you what capitalism actually is?
Re: (Score:3)
A free market doesn't preclude criticism of any of its participants, regardless of whether or not you are free to choose not to buy
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Having the choice not to buy Company X's product doesn't preclude criticism of Company X or the product. On top of this, exercising that right and choosing not to buy the product still doesn't shield it from criticism.
It's ironic that this rebuttal comes up so often from would-be white knights of the "free market"- or at least, by those invoking its name to defend their favoured corporate int
Buy all the music you can.... (Score:4, Insightful)
...before you have to rent it
Re: (Score:3)
Music rental is exactly what the music industry has been pushing for since at least 2000...
They like the 'pay per play' model that is used in every streaming subscription even better. None of that "buy once, play a million times" stuff the industry had to suffer with since 1900... And it works -- Netflix, Hulu, Spotify, Pandora... even YouTube monetizes per-play.
If they can figure out a way to charge us for every time a song plays when it gets stuck in our head, they'll do that too...
The ultimate goal, of c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like they don't: "We generally license content for a fixed fee and a defined time period with payment terms varying by agreement. "
https://ir.netflix.com/top-inv... [netflix.com]
Re: (Score:2)
"iTunes LPs" != iTunes. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:"iTunes LPs" != iTunes. (Score:5, Funny)
Stop putting facts in the way of a good Apple Rant. Apple has to be Evil and do no good. Because... because... Microsoft isn't as popular anymore, and Dag-Nabbit! We need a bad guy is the the cause on why I am not happy all the time.
Re: (Score:3)
But the article is suggesting Apple might do something extremely positive for humanity, i.e. eliminating a horribly designed piece of software.
Re: (Score:3)
... and Dag-Nabbit! We need a bad guy is the the cause on why I am not happy all the time.
That's why we have Uber.
Perhaps they should capitalize on this. Get uniforms for their staff, like the one Raul Julia wore in the Mortal Kombat film.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
" Not only has iTunes been outdated for years in terms of its interface and functionality, but Apple clearly aims to move to a streaming model of music selling."
Re:"iTunes LPs" != iTunes. (Score:4)
TFA doesn't provide any evidence of the discontinuation of iTunes. It's purely an opinion of the author that it could mean the end of iTunes.
The only thing they actually report from the leaked email is the discontinuation of iTunes LP.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
but Apple clearly aims to move to a streaming model of music selling
Apple provides a steaming model, but I don't see how this means they clearly aim to move exclusively to a streaming model. I mean, they might be, but no evidence is provided to support this statement.
Even if it ends up being true, that doesn't mean the article is making a sound argument.
Re: (Score:1)
Not to mention that they will still need an app for the streaming model to work.
Re: (Score:2)
I did read it. And the original article on metro (that cult of mac cites). Its pure speculation that because apple is removing a content submission format that barely anyone used, therefore "Apple cancelling itunes".
Which is an utter non sequitur.
Apple isnt going to end iTunes, its one of the most profitable parts of the business, earning apple $8.5 billion last year. Why the f**k would apple forfeit that?
The whole story is a british tabloid making some shit up to sell news, and a bunch of other news site
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, the most utterly ridiculous sentence of TFS is "However, the fact that Apple plans to ditch iTunes LPs in 2018 potentially hints at the possibility that Apple may stop selling iTunes music downloads in the near future."
The fact that they're stopping something unsuccessful hints at the possibility that they may stop something successful?
Re:"iTunes LPs" != iTunes. (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's msmash posting this, what do you really expect? They have some sort of mental issues regarding everything Apple. Did you see the "related" articles included at the end?
Re: (Score:3)
The story acknowledges this, but they don't really explain how this hints at the demise of iTunes itself. It's just stated as if one follows the other. It managed to generate enough clicks to end up on the front page of /., so I guess it worked.
Re:"iTunes LPs" != iTunes. (Score:5, Informative)
To expand on this slightly, there's a couple of similarly named concepts people get tripped up on.
iTunes was and is the name of the music player and organization app on Mac and Windows. It's also what Apple uses to sell people content via the iTunes Store.
Apple has been selling full albums from day one of the iTunes Music Store. They also sell the songs individually for varying amounts - usually $0.99/pop, though after some label finagling they also have $0.69 and $1.29 price points.
The record industry has used the term "LP" for many years to refer to a full length album to be sold at full price. The term comes from "Long Play" and it's a holdover from the early phonograph days. The record industry also uses the term "EP", for "Extended Play" and despite the naming it's the term they use for a smaller, shorter album that sells at a reduced price (the etymology comes from the fact that it's extended compared to a single).
Some artists don't like their albums to be purchased song-by-song and notable examples like Pink Floyd were slow to adapt for that reason.
"iTunes LP" was a format idea Apple came up with. The idea was to both provide incentive to purchase full albums as well as recreate some of the look/feel of albums with liner notes, etc. They borrowed the term "LP" to invoke the notion of it being a more substantial thing than just buying the album. I believe it was designed to help you envision buying an LP record (i.e., gatefold cover, lyric sheet, etc.)
Like a number of half baked Apple ideas it never really got the attention it needed and it never really got used much. So they're phasing it out.
But so everyone is clear:
It is true that Apple does name things somewhat confusingly, with most product offerings having some combination of "iTunes", "iCloud" or other words and it can be tricky to make sure you're referring to the right thing. But the notion that someone could take a memo about the iTunes LP digital music format being phased out and extrapolate it to Apple is finally killing off the main program they have all their users tied in to is just comical.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems to me that Apple was over-thinking this LP business, and the record companies, as usual, weren't thinking at all.
While I don't use Apple products, I have bought quite a few albums online from places like Amazon and Google. I could never understand why the record companies couldn't simply throw in a .pdf of the CD booklet along with full album sales. It's not like they would have to do any extra work to support this; the booklets are already created for physical sales. As it is, you get absolutely z
Re: (Score:2)
If they would just add the .pdf booklets ... I guess at least Apple realized that this is an issue, but true to form, they had to invent a new locked-in proprietary format even though a perfectly adequate solution already exists.
You can get pdf booklets with some iTunes purchases. I have pdf booklets with a few of my iTunes albums. As this article [techwalla.com] states,
The iTunes Store offers a "digital booklet" with the purchase of many complete albums. The booklet provides a PDF version of the paper booklet insert you would receive if you bought the album as a CD. ... ... Double-clicking the booklet will activate your default PDF reader, such as Adobe Acrobat Reader on a PC or Preview on a Mac, and open the file. ... You will then be able to view the contents of the booklet on your computer and even print it if desired.
Most digital booklets from iTunes are available in PDF format.
Local iPhone synch (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What will replace the local iPhone synchronization features if iTunes dies?
Exactly. If I want to copy a several-dozen .MP3s from our PC into a playlist on my wife's phone, how do I do that if iTunes is gone?
...and please don't say "you'll be upload them to the cloud." I shouldn't need to eat up bandwidth and route traffic between Vancouver and Cupertino simply to copy data between two devices 10 inches apart.
Re: (Score:1)
Exactly. If I want to copy a several-dozen .MP3s from our PC into a playlist on my wife's phone, how do I do that if iTunes is gone?
Buy your wife a phone not made by Apple as a gift.
Re: (Score:2)
Buy your wife a phone not made by Apple as a gift.
I have an Android Samsung Galaxy S5 - But my wife's iPhone is employer-supplied, so she can't easily switch.
Re: (Score:2)
Its very easy to switch careers nowadays.
Not in my wife's case, Anonymous Coward. She's been trying for years, but there are very few roles at her level in our city, and moving cities isn't an option right now.
Re: (Score:2)
"I shouldn't need to eat up bandwidth and route traffic between Vancouver and Cupertino simply to copy data between two devices 10 inches apart."
I shouldn't be so quick to broadcast that sort of obvious nonsense to the world citizen. Just keep in mind that without profits there is no progress, and that progress is the only reason for your continued existence. Next, you'll probably be asking questions like where it is, exactly, that you are progressing toward.
Re: (Score:2)
Without iCloud, iPhone's Notes do not even show in Mac's Notes. :(
Re: (Score:2)
Come on guy, you can troll better than that.
There's the overpriced status symbol smartphone, the missing headphone jack, the stupid notch on the iPhone X, the lack of microSD slot, the non-removable battery...
Oh, right - the other companies copied those "features" so you can't make fun of that anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
Two sentences to see the headline is bunk. (Score:5, Informative)
That's all I had to read to realize this article was submitted by an idiot. "iTunes" the music application/media store portal is NOT the same thing as "iTunes LPs". All they are doing is getting rid of a special content-addition option for album sales on the music store that let publishers include digital version of the booklets that normally accompany physical CDs, containing linear notes, photos, and other printed content from the band.
Re: (Score:2)
The music category is a bit special in itunes, its the only place itunes lets you store audio video and pdf files (maybe epubs too) recent itunes behaviour has been to rip pdfs and epubs out of itunes and into ibooks. with the content hidden in a directory with a name like hghgdykkf73y7y. rather than Books/author/title thats just too easy to use. The only way to avoid this is rip ibooks out of the os. The only way to put ibooks back is to reinstall the os...
This really sucks since i store itunesmedia on
Re: (Score:2)
This really sucks since i store itunesmedia on a nas thats backed up every two hours with rsync. precisely to avoid having duplicate files everywhere. I do not care to have my files backed up via icloud and rented back to me.
Are the filenames being rotated around by iTunes on a regular basis or something? I'm having trouble seeing how this would cause "duplicate files". I have my iTunes library being synced to my NAS, too, and while the iTunes library files get replaced regularly, the only other file changes are actual music that has been added, removed, or changed location from me editing tags on the source machine (I let iTunes organize it by tag info). The linking of the actual LP content file to the music album should be in
Re: (Score:2)
I keep a central library on my nas so i don't need to duplicate it across machines ibooks will pull all the books out of the nas and put them onto my laptop, i use several machines and duplicating my library because i have no central resource any more is unacceptable.
Its a shame as ibooks is quite good as a reading app but i will not have it mess with my data.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right. They still make money selling music, but didn't with this LP thing. Whoopdee friggin' doo. Slow news day?
I pay for an Apple Music (Score:2)
Clickbait. (Score:5, Informative)
There is literally nothing in the article to suggest that because Apple will stop selling their proprietary special featured albums that they will stop selling music all together.
It's clickbait, nothing more.
Confirmed: iTunes is not going away (Score:2)
I just confirmed that iTunes is not going away. iTunes music revenue is still growing as of Q3 2017 at a clip of 20%. 99 cents for a track is pretty reasonable. So iTunes is profitable and growing. iTunes LP (whatever that is) is going away, I think this is the interactive content and cute liner notes that typically come with CDs. YouTube is currently the go to place for extra content and as a heavy iTunes user, I did't know iTunes LP existed, so it must be hidden well.
Quite a leap... (Score:4, Insightful)
That argument is quite a leap beyond logic and reason. It sounds a little bit to me like if someone had tried to suggest that Apple was abandoning removable media when they started shipping the iMac with no internal floppy drive. Removing one largely unused and/or obsolete feature does not suggest that the entire product is going to be killed.
Mind you, as buggy as iTunes is, it seems likely that this particular leap really boils down to wishful thinking from Apple's biggest fans and/or biggest critics -- which are often one-and-the-same people, by the way -- but I'm afraid there are far too many things which still require iTunes, for it to be discontinued entirely, this early in the game.
No. No it doesn't. (Score:2)
However, the fact that Apple plans to ditch iTunes LPs in 2018 potentially hints at the possibility that Apple may stop selling iTunes music downloads in the near future.
No. Just. No.
2 + 2 = 128 (Score:5, Funny)
iTunes LP format has failed... so Apple may pull iTunes?
Google Wave failed - Google to leave the advertising industry?
What? (Score:2)
Apple: iTunes LP doesn't make us money, never really did, so we'll ditch it
News hack: OMG Apple is exploding!
How does that even hint at Apple stopping sales of music?
C*nt of Mac (Score:2)
Its like you know, how Ford closed up shop when they stopped selling the Model-T
The US in unique it seems in that the total IQ of the country remains the same even as the population has grown. You have have more and more really stupid people. and these blogs cater for that crowd because they are the majority.
Exit iTunes, Enter Apple Music (Score:1)
Moronic article (Score:2)
What a moronic article. The actual news is simply that Apple will be deprecating their _album_ format. This is not surprising, because digital singles have always outsold digital albums, and it's far from clear that the added album content increased album sales. I'd give Apple credit for at least trying to make digital albums interesting, but the reality is that for the majority of albums there are only one or two songs that are really popular, so only dedicated fans buy entire albums, and they'd probably b
Re: (Score:1)
Wait, but I never bought any iTunes music! (Score:1)
other than those Irish songs they forced on me, I've never paid for a danged song.
Does this mean they're going to do away with webcasts too? What will I fill my Rio Clear MP3 player with?
Reading comprehension lacking (Score:1)
I like iTunes :0 Please enlighten me (Score:1)
I just had to weigh in here, because every time there's a story about iTunes, i read how much people hate it. Even at work, there has been one or two occasions where someone has talked about iTunes and someone else jumps in showing their disgust of the product.
Apparently there is something wrong with me. I've used iTunes since my first iPod in 2004, on PC. Yes, PC. In the early versions there was a bug that instead of ejecting the CD unmounted it. Makes perfect sense on *nix, but doesn't translate that we