Apple Delays AirPods Beyond Original 'Late October' Window (arstechnica.com) 77
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Apple's new wireless, $180 AirPods have less than a week to meet their original shipping target of "late October," and now the company has confirmed that such a launch is officially off the table. A Wednesday statement, given to Ars Technica just one day ahead of the company's latest Mac-related press event, confirmed Apple's decision to delay the wireless headphones' launch. In the statement, Apple tells Ars that the company "needs a little more time before AirPods are ready for our customers." "The early response to AirPods has been incredible," the Apple statement reads. "We don't believe in shipping a product before it's ready." Apple declined to offer any estimate or release window information about when to expect the AirPods' official launch.
Courage (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, he should just shove things through whether they are ready or not, Samsung did do just that and they haven't had a problem yet right?
I am not really trying to defend Apple, I am just pointing out that unless something is ready the end user experience can be flammable at times.
Re: (Score:2)
You really think they would expect to finish a design, get it produced in China and into customers hands in America in six weeks?
There is now shoving though, it was done on September 1st. This delay is a 100% manufacturing and logistics f-up. And that was supposed to be Timmy's specialty as the former COO and chief bean counter. If the idiot can
Re: (Score:2)
You are guessing what the problem is, you actually have no idea.
I don't know either but I wont pretend to. For all you know it might be a battery issue that causes them to burst into flames, late production problems happen so who knows.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a fair point but this isn't Kickstarter we're talking about, it's Apple. Knowing the market as they do, you would have expected final production to be underway before the announcement.
I'm not being particularly critical - as long as Apple can supply in time for Christmas all will be well.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
What battery tech is in these devices you stick in your ear? Did they choose Lithium Ion?
Re: Courage (Score:5, Interesting)
I know first hand. The battery tech isn't completed. Right now, the prototype EarPods only last 15 minutes. The right EarPod with the controller and button lasts only 10 minutes. These also heat up quite a bit during discharge specifically with phone calls.
We were hoping the new battery tech would be ready lipo2 but the fast charge capabilities of the battery greatly reduce the endurance.
We are now trying a much slower charging lithium ion tech but requires a change in the weight and form factor.
Re: (Score:2)
It's got to be lithium, nothing else will get you the energy density and form factor. At least you have to remove them from your body before charging them. Lots of people charge their phones in their pockets from a second lithium battery.
Re:Courage (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
It's really unfortunate that the iPhone doesn't have an alternative to minijack for wired headphones. The fact that the Air Pods were going to be the first bluetooth headphones ever makes things even worse.
At least Apple should have included an adapter or something with the new iPhone.
Amazing (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yet AI and self-driving cars are right around the corner and we are going to colonize Mars soon. Right?
Still obsessed with Mars eh?
Who says AI is right around the corner? Depends what AI you mean. Nobody with intelligence is saying strong AI is around the corner. AI like Watson is already here. Self-driving cars are already here.
Apple can't get their wireless ear buds in time for launch with phone? I'll just file that one under D for DGAF. Doesn't really prove anything wider to be honest.
An idea for Apple (Score:5, Insightful)
Next time you feel like doing something brash, like removing a ubiquitous, standardized, and completely functional feature from your products, such as the headphone jack in order to promote wireless listening, why don't you go ahead and make the Bluetooth headphones available FIRST?
Or better yet, don't eliminate the jack at all. This isn't the 3.5" floppy in the age of CDs that we're talking about here. The headphone jack works well, it's standard, and it's on literally almost EVERYTHING that outputs sound.
And now Apple is set to announce tomorrow that its professional line of laptops will be moving completely to USB-C.
This company has lost its way and its mind.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Bluetooth headphones have literally been available for years. These are just the first Apple-branded bluetooth earphones. iPhone 7s come with Lightning Earpods in the box, and you have the option of using any of the thousand
Re:An idea for Apple (Score:4, Insightful)
And yet iPhones users have been buying/using 3.5mm corded headphones by the hundreds of millions, WHILE bluetooth has been available.
For something soooooo superior, you'd think no one would be using corded headphones.
Yet another device to plug in, and other synced devices to pull away the iPhone from your bluetooth headphones. That simply means it's not ready yet.
Re: (Score:1)
So the laptops will be getting lightening ports as well? Probably not, so you won't be able to use the corded headphones you got or bought for your phone with your laptop.
While I like cordless headphones, I think as user there is absolutely no benefit that they removed the 3.5mm headphone jack. It made life easier for their engineers, but that should have been their problem, not ours.
Re:An idea for Apple (Score:4, Interesting)
All the iphone owners I know (mostly my kids and their friends) get through many sets of earphones a year. They are always replaced with another set of wired headphones at minimal cost. I've not seen a bluetooth replacement being favoured.
As for the listening and charging issue - I didn't foresee that being a problem (I don't listen to music on my phone) but those users I have spoken to say that it's a deal breaker.
Not being able to listen with wired headphones whilst charging the phone is a real problem. I guess if you view the phone as your social and media hub, you need to be able to charge it whatever you happen to be doing. That's just not possible with the iphone 7 unless you are forced to use BT headphones. That's not the complete solution as your headphones are discharging whilst you are charging your phone which means you need a wired set for when the BT headphones die and your phone is charged.
Re:An idea for Apple (Score:5, Interesting)
Most iPhone users just use the ones that came in the box. And they'll do the same with the Lightning ones.
This right here is the rub. Apple made a huge deal about removing the headphone jack (COURAGE!) and suggesting the real replacement for their iBuds (or whatever) were to be these bluetooth headphones for $169. They manufactured an inconvenience to entice their customers to spend more money. It's really like getting that new shiny $2000 MacBook, then they say "Oh, you want to be able to charge it? well, we can sell you this $500 wireless charger because we did away with the charging port. We needed the space to put in this handy piece of plastic."
So now they are saying "Remember all that courage we showed when we removed the headphone jack and promised that these $170 headphones of the savior would be all you need? Yea... about that.... the headphones suck and we can't sell them to you yet".
Re: (Score:2)
Most iPhone users just use the ones that came in the box. And they'll do the same with the Lightning ones.
84,000,000 headphones were sold in the US in 2015, 64% earbuds. [statisticbrain.com] Do you really think they were all bought by Android users?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Bluetooth headphones have literally been available for years.
Bluetooth headphones are shit.
Re: (Score:1)
I've owned several bluetooth headphones over the past 10 years that sound just as good as wired. It's not the sound quality that the problem, it's the price.
Re: (Score:3)
You also have to be careful to use the correct drill bit - titanium nitrite is recommended as it improves the signal quality once the headphone jack has been exposed.
Any drill bit you use will leave trace material on the surface of the hole and this of course effects the quality of the signal (the residue acts as an unpredictable unbalanced shield -- obviously bad news).
Although titanium nitrite bits result in much higher sound quality than HSS bits, some experts suggest using Monster drill bits to be sure
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Don't forget, Apple will also be eliminating the Escape key from their Professional laptop line as well.
Re:An idea for Apple (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
This company has lost its way and its mind.
You can thank the SJWs; they're toxic.
Re: An idea for Apple (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
They could have included a special plug the fill the 3.5mm jack if you don't need it and want improved waterproofness. Although waterproof 3.5mm jacks exist and are barely more expensive than a non waterproof one, the contacts inside can still corrode due to salt in sweat for example.
What are you dong with your phone that you get sweat in the jack?
Re: (Score:2)
He's using it while making the arduous climb from his mother's basement, of course.
Re:An idea for Apple (Score:5, Insightful)
Right because fully waterproof to IP68 3.5mm jack sockets have not been available for years already?
Sony have been doing waterproof phones now since early 2013 at the latest with waterproof jack sockets that required no plug and/or cover. By the time they got to the Z5 they even had waterproof microUSB sockets that don't need a cover as well.
The claims about needing to do it for waterproofing is just utter rubbish that Apple fan boys lap up because they don't know any better.
Re: (Score:1)
Bluetooth headphones have been available for over a decade.
Or since you are complaining about a lack of tiny earbud headphones, you could use the wired headphones of the exact same form factor that are included free in the box.
Or you can take any superior headphones using the standard 3.5mm connector, which as a separate thing you are already carrying around, connect the included free in the box lightning adapter to them and still continue to have only one separate thing to carry around, and plug those in
Re: (Score:2)
Complaining about a lack of Bluetooth headphones on the market is just silly.
Anyone who cares about audio and has tried Bluetooth headphones knows that audio on BT is fucking shite.
It's fun to see all the mental gymnastics of people though. Keep going.
Re: (Score:2)
> audio on BT is fucking shite.
Yeah. And if you were even a pretend audiophile, you'd be making the same complaint about:
1) mp3/AAC audio files (lossy compression)
2) Spotify, Pandora, Apple Music, or any other streaming service (lossy compression plus buffering and internet streaming artifacts)
3) The cheap little D/A chipset that's compact and low-power enough to fit in any phone. (Not isolated enough from other electronics to prevent artifacts)
4) The cheap little amp circuit that's compact and low-pow
Re: (Score:2)
The headphone jack works well, it's standard, and it's on literally almost EVERYTHING that outputs sound.
And it's better quality. The limitations with Bluetooth mean it has to be compressed. So in true Apple fashion, it cost more, does less.
Oh, they aren't out yet. (Score:2)
That's why I didn't see reports of AirPods being lost.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't want to hurt iPhone 7 sales (Score:5, Interesting)
My theory is that the headphones are ready, but Apple is worried that when people realize Bluetooth headphones are fundamentally unreliable, it will hurt iPhone 7 sales. Better to wait until further into the holiday shopping season and prevent any bad press or YouTube videos from impacting phone sales, then drop the headphones closer to the holidays so bad reviews haven't had time to sink into the public consciousness to hurt the gift-giving headphone sales.
It's not that I think these are going to be bad headphones, as much as Bluetooth headphones just don't work a lot of places and a lot of people are going to be disappointed.
I guess they lost them! (Score:1)
$180 for earphones? (Score:2)
$180 for earphones that will (sooner or later) die because the battery degrades? Seriously?
Wow, the "sucker market" is way bigger than I realized. This makes my helium-filled anchor look downright silly.