Apple Unveils Smaller iPhone SE, Starting At $399 (techcrunch.com) 158
An anonymous reader writes: Apple has officially unveiled a smaller, cheaper iPhone designed to make a splash in the budget-friendly smartphone market. The new device, called the iPhone SE, looks nearly identical to the iPhone 5S but with a new rose gold color configuration. It's the internal specifications that differ significantly. The new iPhone SE will feature a NFC chip for Apple Pay, A9 processor and M9 motion co-processor, 12-megapixel camera sensor with the ability to capture 4K video, and a Touch ID fingerprint sensor. Unfortunately, it does not feature Apple's new 3D touch functionality. The iPhone SE will come in two models, 16GB and 64GB, priced at $399 and $499 respectively. You can buy the new iPhone starting March 31, and it will make its way to 100 countries by May.
ARE YOU IMPRESSED? (Score:1)
Replace "Are you sure?" with "Are you impressed?" in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
The answer stays: NO.
Re: ARE YOU IMPRESSED? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.
Re: (Score:2)
16GB storage (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:16GB storage (Score:5, Insightful)
I know, right? It's not like Apple is using flash storage ICs made from special magical dust or anything.
In fact, their options should be 64GB, 128GB and 256GB. We're in 2016 after all.
Re: (Score:2)
I can see a 32GB option as realistic. Memory does start adding cost, though not nearly as much as the markup.
16GB though...fills up ridiculously fast if you take more than a very few pictures. Even keeping SMS/iMessage/whatsapp/kik/etc. conversations turns multi-GB very quickly. 16GB iphone = ~10Gb available storage = warning messages before you know it
$100 for 48GB of memory is ridiculous though.
Re:16GB storage (Score:5, Insightful)
At the volumes they do, we're probably talking about at least a $2 billion yearly revenue loss for them if they made the base model more appealing and fewer people upgrade to the next tier.
They know exactly what they're doing.
Re: 16GB storage (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, Apple tends to view their hardware as superior so with 64GB on their low-end devices, that would make another selling point against low-end Android devices. Price differences aside, of course...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, they've always targeted the premium market ... and that's why they're starting to lose. The pricing they have was only reasonable when they were the only worthwhile smartphone on the market. This is no longer the case. They wouldn't be releasing a cheaper iphone if they weren't trying to tap the budget market, but it's far too late for that now.
Apple's consumer rape is not sustainable. Even they've finally figured that out.
Re:16GB storage (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, they've always targeted the premium market ... and that's why they're starting to lose.
Mostly because they dominate the hell out of the premium market - probably to the point of saturation. If you've saturated the high end with your product, and want to see more growth, guess where you gotta go?
The pricing they have was only reasonable when they were the only worthwhile smartphone on the market. This is no longer the case.
Depends. I have and use an unlocked LG phone that I bought last year... now the thing is starting to bork-up on the home key, and screen misalignment is starting to become an issue. Sure, I got the $200 I spent back out of it, but meanwhile my wife's ancient iPhone 4 is *still* chugging along just fine, years after it first showed up. My next phone? *shrug* Not sure yet, but damn I'm leaning towards something that would hold up better over time...
Therein lies the whole reason why most folks buy Apple stuff in the first place: It costs more up-front, but you make up the savings over time.
Re: (Score:2)
Your TCO will probably skyrocket once you find out you need to do something Apple in their infinite wisdom protect you from doing. :)
That's what happened to most Apple loyalists I know of, anyhow.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting claim. What have your Apple loyalists not been able to do? I haven't found a serious problem yet, and neither have my friends.
Re: (Score:2)
Well...
Install a webbrowser that actually supports modern webapp technologies for instance? That got one friend to finally abandon iOS.
http://nolanlawson.com/2015/06... [nolanlawson.com]
And that's just one example of many:
http://www.greenbot.com/articl... [greenbot.com]
iOS is great as long as you stay within what Apple anticipated you wanted it for. However, if you need to go outside the boundaries of Apple, then you are shit out of luck. Then your options are: stay in the fence, or switch to the slightly more open Android.
This lockdown wi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: 16GB storage (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bear in mind, that $17.25 is in New Zealand dollars, so about $11.68 in your fancy US Dollars. It's always just worked, I'd call that pretty reliable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The reason the 16GB configuration is so popular is because there's a lot of people who feel they have to have the iPhone even if they can't really afford the model they want. Paying the extra $100 for the next level up is simply too much for their budget.
It's not the apps that generally take up a lot of space, but rather things like pictures, videos, music, and other content. According to this page, the iPhone only has 11.8 GB free [apple.com] out of the box. By the time you subtract the space that the OS takes up, y
Re: (Score:2)
The reason the 16GB configuration is so popular is because there's a lot of people who feel they have to have the iPhone even if they can't really afford the model they want.
Or maybe they want an iPhone but don't care about the tech specs?
Re: (Score:2)
Storage space is hardly a technical spec at this point. It's not like more RAM or a faster CPU or GPU where having less just means the phone is less snappy but you can still do pretty much everything you want. Lack of storage can really limit what kind of things you can do with the device. Most games or apps will run on some pretty simple phones. You don't need a lot of horsepower to run most of the stuff being released. But having such a small amount of storage means you can't do simple things like keep
Re: (Score:2)
The additional storage is what iCloud is for, and in most cases that works just fine for most people's purposes. It also provides backup.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You obviously don't take 100 selfies every day, like the majority of iPhone owners do!
Uh, no. The only time I get a selfie on the Internet is when the Google Map Car drives by the bus stop (see pic link below).
https://twitter.com/cdreimer/status/705604128198635520/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw [twitter.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you understand what a "selfie" is
Another AC without a sense of humor. I miss the trolls and goatse of yesteryear.
Re: (Score:2)
Here y'go, big boy ;)
http://goatse.cx/ [goatse.cx]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is why my MP3 player has a 128GB micro SD in it. I hate having to shuffle music around and I like being able to listen to anything I happen to think of at the spur of the moment.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know, but maybe they're working their way through a monster order of 16 GB flash chips that they placed years ago. Apple may have over-estimated back in 2013 or so how many iPhones and iPads they would sell.
Re: (Score:2)
...If you're locked into Apple's ecosystem and are truly budget-conscious...well, tough luck.
Anyone attempting to claim they're on a budget while locking themselves into the Apple "ecosystem" is going to be in for a shock when people physically cannot restrain themselves from yelling BULLSHIT! at the top of their lungs repeatedly.
Re: (Score:2)
You can pick up a modern iPhone for under £20 per month in the UK. That's the price of two packets of cigarettes, or a meal for two at one of these burger restaurants that are all the rage at the moment.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And that's exactly why they don't do a 32GB iPhone. They want to sell the $499 model.
The 16GB model is a low anchor, that's a basic marketing technique.
And comparing an iPhone with an Android phone on specs is pointless. We all know that you can get more for cheaper with Android, but you won't get an iPhone.
Re: (Score:2)
And comparing an iPhone with an Android phone on specs is pointless. We all know that you can get more for cheaper with Android, but you won't get an iPhone.
Well I'd say Apple gave itself a pretty damn huge bump here. It's hard to find benchmarks with the 5s, 6s and Sony Xperia Z5 compact (the only other mini-flagship, really) on one page but here [anandtech.com] and here [phonearena.com] and here [ubergizmo.com] combined gives some:
Basemark OS II:
iPhone 5s: 1180
Z5 compact: 1350
iPhone 6s: 2619
T-rex HD (offscreen):
iPhone 5s: 28.7
Z5 compact: ~55 (approximated from graph)
iPhone 6s: 80.3
Manhattan (offscreen):
iPhone 5s: 13.1
Z5 compact: ~25 (approximated from graph)
iPhone 6s: 40.1
Considering the 5se will have the s
Re: (Score:2)
The Z5 compact is waterproof, has a better camera (more pixels, a way faster focus at 0.03s and a dedicated button to take the pictures), has a higher resolution display (full 720p), oh and 32GB of storage with the option of a microSD up to 200GB.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah - I wonder if Apple has even done any research on how much space their users' devices have free.
Re: (Score:1)
32GB is the sweet spot for phones right now, and because they can, Apple refuses to produce a 32GB model to force you to pay an extra $100 to get a reasonable amount of internal storage.
Let me translate that for you:
"iPhone isn't like Android. Wah! Wah! Wah!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. I love iPhones, but... fuck. Flatline for 6 years and counting.
http://pixelcity.com/index.php... [pixelcity.com]
Flamebait/Overrated is not a disagree mod (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How is this flamebait?
This is /. Where a reasonable discussion is easily avoided by a simple flame bait moderation. Why introduce facts when you can simply dismiss another's POV?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I have a BLU Studio Engery 2, I LOVE it.
$160 including the SIM adapter and 64GB SD card.
It really lasts all day, and is smaller than almost every Android device with acceptable speed and display.
It lacks things my previous phone had (now broken motox 2014), but over-all I'm happier with it, getting an honest 20 hours of heavy use.
Re: (Score:2)
From a financial point of view
How about from a user/consumer point of view?
Re: (Score:2)
From a financial point of view
How about from a user/consumer point of view?
This is /., where the 1% view the 99% as the great unwashed who are too stupid to really understand how the world really works.
Redefining budget friendly. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you get it just fine, but like me you really just don't care. It's the same thing with social networks. I understand why people like them, but personally I'd rather sit down a
Re:Redefining budget friendly. (Score:5, Insightful)
$40 out the door sounds like you had a subsidized phone - this $399 price is the unsubsidized price.
That said, "budget friendly" is a Moto G, $179 for 8GB or $219 for 16GB but with the ability to stick in a 32GB MicroSD for $20 more. Those are the unsubsidized prices.
oh wait... only $11 more now - http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-... [amazon.com]
Re: (Score:2)
$40 out the door sounds like you had a subsidized phone - this $399 price is the unsubsidized price.
My mom picked up a TracPhone Android smartphone on sale at our local grocery store for $10. That wasn't a super-special sale price, either. It's still on sale at that price months later. It's an LG with only a 3.5" screen. But it's running Android 4.4 and didn't seem really slouchy on UI reaction time. Plus it's a model that gives you 3x bonus on minutes purchased (when running on a new-customer activation).
Re: (Score:2)
Tracfone's devices ARE subsidized. Tracfone are stupid and rely on technological measures (bootloader/SIM-locking) to enforce their subsidies instead of legal measures. This gives the illusion of their phones being unsubsidized to the end customer even though they are, but also creates a significant market for bootloader/SIM-unlock exploits - A friend of mine makes QUITE a bit of money finding exploits in Tracfone's bootloaders and selling those exploits to Asian carriers, who buy the phone, unlock it, an
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My phone was $40, unlocked and unsubsidized.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I know what you mean.
I bought a Windows Phone a few years ago for $40 brand new on Amazon and put it on an AT&T pre-paid plan. It continues to work like a champ.
I can think of about a million things that I would rather spend money on than a phone.
Of course, you and I are not Apple's target market.
The funny thing is, I don't really know who Apple is targeting with this... perhaps the kids of current customers?
Re: (Score:2)
They're targeting me, for example. I want an iPhone that fits into my shirt pockets. I'm not in the market yet, but at some point this 5S is going to get old.
Re: (Score:2)
There's nothing wrong with how you use a phone, but there are advantages to considering alternatives.
Many of us now perform the majority of our communication through text or email. It's convenient, non-intrusive, and good for situations where immediate situational knowledge is not required. A smartphone is well suited to this, a flip phone makes even basic messaging a chore unless it has a keyboard. Unlike a phone call, I don't worry if I'm disturbing someone by messaging them at strange hours or if they
Missed it by that much (Score:2)
Why does small have to be budget? if only it had 3D touch - it'd be a modern phone - just smaller.
Maybe I need to spend more money on my clothes - do more expensive clothes come with bigger pockets?
I want it all. But as others are saying - our old iPhone5's are just fine. I'd like to upgrade just because the phone is getting slower and hangs more often.
For now the SE isn't compelling enough to upgrade. If I was looking for a new phone I'd consider it. I'll wait until October to see what the brand new p
Re: (Score:2)
It's great that your needs are met cheaply, but that doesn't make you morally superior, or qualify you to comment on what other people want and need.
Re: (Score:2)
At this point $400 isn't even budget-friendly for a 3D printer.
Oh, oh. (Score:2, Insightful)
Apple, one free word of advice, worth exactly the cost. The bottom half of the market you don't want to have. When the rabble, the unwashed peasants, starts flaunting the bitten apple logo everywhere, the beautiful people will flee to other phones with a clearer status seal. And then, the all encompassing middle unbrained layer will lose the daze caused by all that glitter, and start comparing phones like they do cars. Then some day you will announce the iPhone 15, and nobody will come to the party, because
Re: (Score:2)
Mass-market phones that have sold into the tens of millions are not 'status symbols'.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A status symbol is about causing envy, hard to do when you acquire what everyone else already has. Getting the popular product, however, means you're getting the support of that product. For example, if you're purchasing a game console, you want the popular one so that you have the best selection of games. A purchase of a PS4 right now would hardly be the move of an elitist.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes.
Not a status symbol (Score:1, Troll)
When you sell tens of millions of something it cannot be a status symbol, or if it is it is a very poor one. Nobody gives a shit if you have an iPhone or thinks you are special for it. Nobody I've ever met has bought one with the expectation of gaining meaningful social status. It's just not that special. I have people working for me that make barely over minimum wage who have iPhones and they don't regard it as a status symbol. The meme that Apple users are self absorbed social climbers out of proportion to the general population is ridiculous nonsense.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They should sell well in revolutionary countries, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Look, I haven't been hanging around in India or Namibia recently, so I don't care what looks like a status symbol there. If I were to care about status symbols, it would be about something that looks exclusive in the US, and the iPhone doesn't qualify.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
iPhones haven't been status symbols in a long time, and they still seem to sell in large numbers. It's not what Apple trades in. An iPhone is an excellent piece of equipment that works smoothly and is backed by superb customer support and an infrastructure, and that's what Apple trades in. If you don't find that attractive, fine, but if you don't see how other people might find that attractive, you're not going to understand and are likely to make up bad reasons and make inaccurate predictions from them
That phrase doesn't mean... (Score:2, Redundant)
Apple has officially unveiled a smaller, cheaper iPhone designed to make a splash in the budget-friendly smartphone market.
I keep seeing this. The iPhone SE being referred to as a "budget market" device. It's not budget-market at all, in price or features.
Besides the lack of Touch 3D support, it is pretty much the same as the current get "premium market" 6S.
Have people really been deluded by marketers to the point they measure the value of a device simply based on screen size?
Indication smartphones are under pricing pressure (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I have owned an iPhone 5 for three years. I love it as much as one can love an electronic device. It replaced a 3Gs. The 5 does all I want it to do and I am in no hurry to replace it. Until apps won't update or run at level that I am happy with. I was willing to not buy an iPhone next time because I don't want a big phone or pay $1000 for a phone. This might make me consider an iPhone in a year or two when this one has reached end of useful life.
Re: (Score:2)
You can have a top tier Android phone for much less than that if you aren't snobbish about Chinese manufacturers.
Re: (Score:2)
CDMA and still resisting the metric system? What a strange country y'all live in. :)
Thanks Apple (Score:2)
Just saved me some money. I said I wasn't going to buy the new phone to replace the 5s if it didn't have all of the features of the 6s. They didn't need to leave out the 3D touch to differentiate it from the 6s models. The screen size was the differentiating feature. I don't want the larger phones because I can't easily work them one-handed but I'm not going to buy a smaller phone that's deliberately lacking in features.
When Apple brings out a proper 4" phone again then I'll buy it.
Re: (Score:3)
Or maybe it wasn't possible? Force Touch works because it measures the capacitance betwe
Yet Another Australia Tax Rip Off (Score:2)
The 16GB model cost AUD 679 (incl GST) which give a pre-tax price of USD 468 at today's exchange rate. That's a 17% markup because we are in Australia.
Re: Small = 4" Screen?! (Score:1)
You do realize that when people see you they think: guy with a flip phone = loser, right?
Re: (Score:2)
You do realize that when people see you they think: guy with a flip phone = loser, right?
To paraphrase Obi Kenobi: "Who's the more loserish... the loser or the loser who judges him?"
Correction (Score:2)
"You do realize that when people see you they think: guy with a flip phone" = Drug Dealer/Pimp
Fixed it for you.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
No but there's "carbon-fiber" and gold plating options if you have more money than sense.
None of that fake, cheap, low-end "not real gold" from Apple. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry I was thinking about the iPhone only. The Apple watch does come in gold too.
Re: (Score:2)
I did, but everybody seems to prefer talking about slightly updated iToys instead.
Re:Sucker's Edition (Score:5, Informative)
iPhone Sucker's Edition: why get a 5S when you can get the same for twice the price?
Because it will do additional things the 5S won't, like WiFi calling and ApplePay.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Wireless charging is pointless [howtogeek.com]
Waterproof would be cool.
Re: (Score:2)
Terrible article. Completely misunderstands what wireless charging is about.
Good chargers self align. No need to muck about with cables, being careful not to damage your shiny. Waterproofing is easier too because the port can be plugged up.
Slow charging is good too. Fast charging wears the battery out faster. I keep a 500mA charger around for overnight charging when time isn't an issue.
IKEA started building wireless chargers into furniture. Chargers everywhere. No worries about having the right connector. P
Re: (Score:2)
Networking was wired. Wires are annoying. Now you can get networking to work really well without using wires.
Charging is wired. Wires are annoying. It's exactly the same thing. That networking is data and charging is power is irrelevant from the point of view of someone who wants to get rid of wires.
Which is everyone. No-one wants wires. My desk is covered with them. I can't stand the damn things. But at this point wireless charging isn't good enough for someone like Apple to burden their products with. The
Re: (Score:2)
Still no wireless charging support, and still not waterproof? WTF, Apple?!?
Less space than a nomad, too. Lame.
Re: (Score:2)
Wi-Fi calling works on the iPhone 5s [apple.com].
Not according to AT&T.
Re: (Score:2)
That's nothing new, Apple has always been behind Android, maybe the difference is they now see a need to do something about it? (not that I'm seeing any evidence of them trying to actually catch up)