Apple/Palm deal postponed 39
J. Pierpont writes "According to an ABCNews article, the rumored Apple plan to create an Apple-ified Palm device has been delayed.
The article indicates that the project has been delayed in order to focus efforts on the new consumer portable, which will be unveiled at the upcoming MacWorld Expo. "
Keyboards!! (Score:1)
It's an image thing. (Score:1)
I came up against this problem in college. If I had my way, I'd wear blue jeans every day: they're comfortable, long-lasting, and never go out of style. But I found out that when you walked into the offices of the uncaring drudges that run Penn State in a T-shirt and jeans, they looked at you like just another sheep in the cattle chute. However, if you walked into their office in a suit and a tie, the little voice in the back of their brains said "Shit! It's the Boss!" and you got MUCH better service. It was a cheap trick, but it worked.
Yes, it's kind of stupid when you think about it. It has hardly anything to do with competance at your job (unless you network for a living with other people wearing suits). But it's an edge you'd be stupid to give up.
The bright orange PDA is a bad accessory for a business meeting because it clashes with your business suit and spoils the image you're trying to give off. It makes you look like you're sucking on a lollipop.
If you only ever wear jeans and t-shirts, it wouldn't matter. All IMHO, of course.
Jon
Re:iPalm (Score:1)
Re:Maybe if they cut the price. (Score:1)
How is this any different than when I take out my neon orange Nokia cell phone to take a call? People have some pretty crazy cell phones now days, I don't see why a PDA can't be the same.
Re:Turmoil at Palm Computing (Score:1)
$139 Palm III (Score:1)
Free shipping. I'm happy.
get a IIIx for your price of a III (Score:1)
http://www.shopper.com/cgi-bin/nph-sort2?a0=307
I bought mine months ago for under $300 and you can even find sites that sell with free shipping and no tax (that won't last). They are an awesome organizer and I wouldn't want to be without it. It goes everywhere I go....
Palm _is_ a Mac Classic :-) (Score:1)
The original Palm Pilot was a Motorola 68000 with a screen, more memory, ROMs, and a touchscreen instead of a keyboard+mouse.
It might need a slightly better screen, and you'd have to add some extra programming for the Graffiti drivers, and a compact flash instead of floppies, but if you can make a Pilot run Linux, you should be able to make it run MacOS
Re:iPalm (Score:1)
Re:What About the eMate (Score:1)
iPalm (Score:1)
Although I'd love to see it some time soon... (Score:2)
As much as I really wish they'd come out with a Newton replacement soon...
Don't I recall the Newton? (Score:1)
anyone remember (Score:1)
and that year at comdex, everyone was expecting this amazing "new" operating system to win the award for Best New Operating System?
and NewtonOS 2.0 won.
that was hilarious.
/offtopic
Palm Products (Score:1)
The Palm website says that III's are $250 and IIIx's are $370. Does twice the storage and a better screen warrent $120 dollars?
Another question -- Does it come with the cable to hook it up to my PC?
Maybe if they cut the price. (Score:1)
Fruity colors alone aren't going to put them over the top in the handheld market. In fact, in the business world, making your info device look like a Game Boy would be a hindrance (imagine taking a neon orange PalmPilot out of your suit coat pocket on an interview).
But, a low-cost Palm with Fruit Loop colors and a graphing calculator app would probably go over well with the high school crowd.
Still, whatever happened to basic black?
Jon
Turmoil at Palm Computing (Score:3)
Now, Abrams has resigned to join a start-up venture in Silicon Valley. Palm quickly named Alan Kessler as her successor. Palm is the fastest growing division of 3Com, and for good reason. With the introduction of the IIIx, the V, and the VII in the past few months, they are on fire!
But, there are rumors that Apple is not just looking to build a new handheld device. It sounds like they are considering buying Palm Computing. This would be an expensive purchase, but definately worthwhile. Just imagine: a hybrid of the Palm V and the Newton.
I guesss we'll just have to wait and see. You can get more information about Abrams stepping down here. [excite.com]
Re:Don't I recall the Newton? (Score:1)
Besides, who the hell needs a webserver in a goddamned PDA? Neat idea, and there are a few uses that a few people might take advantage of, but for the most part, it was a stupid idea.
Re:Palm Products (Score:1)
Is is worth an extra $100 for the IIIx? Maybe. I find 2MB of RAM to be just fine. I have a program which syncs with Quicken, a Star Chart, tons of addresses and appointments, a handfull of games, and a bunch of the Palm VII query apps.
But, 2MB is not huge. The IIIx with 4MB is better, but it may not be worth the price. You can always tryout the emulator (from Palm's web site) and see how much you fill up before you buy.
Re:Don't I recall the Newton? (Score:2)
But, shortly after the MP 2100 came out, the Newton project was killed. Most of Apple's Newton staff seem to have gone to 3COM's Palm division.
No one really knows why Apple killed Newton just as it was taking off (and just as the handheld market was taking off). There is still nothing in the handheld market that equals the capabilities of the Newton. Apple's official reason for killing Newton was to focus on one platform (MacOS). The rumor mill has Steve Jobs not liking and/or groking Newton. (He is rumored to have said once, "Apple makes computers, and computers have keyboards.")
What makes it worse is that Apple had spun Newton off into its own company, called Newton, Inc. Promise was high, since Newton was finally getting the attention it needed from its developers. Then Steve Jobs "un-spun" Newton, Inc. That's when we started to get suspicious. A few months later, he killed the project.
Newton users were and are very bitter about the whole thing.
When Newton was killed, Apple promised a return to the handheld market in 1999. I'm not holding my breath.
Re:Palm Products (Score:1)
The memory probably won't be an issue, unless you download every piece of freeware on the net and some books besides.
Jon Acheson
Re:Why did they kill the thing ? (Score:1)
Cost too much for a PDA
Took several versions until the handwriting worked accaptably.
Was incompetently marketed
Cost the company a fortune in R and D
Plenty of cool technology in it tho
Re:Maybe if they cut the price. (Score:1)
Re:What About the eMate (Score:1)
The real "Newton on steroids" was the 2000/2100, which had a nearly 200Mhz processor. What a loss to have it cancelled.
Re:Palm Products (Score:1)
Rumor Reporting (Score:2)
I'm not saying that this Apple/Palm thing isn't possible - in an interview a while ago, Steve Jobs did say that he had wanted to buy Palm but they wouldn't sell. But this pure rumor has no place on Slashdot and especially not on ABCnews.
Re:Maybe if they cut the price. (Score:2)
Why should owning a neon-orange PDA make you any less businesslike, exactly?
Suits are such terribly boring individuals aren't they?
The Newton (Score:1)
2) Why was the Newton killed? Simple: Jobs Ego. Scully had said at one time how the Newton was 'his' product at Apple. And given how he took the knife Jobs was going to plant in his back, passed it about the board, and each board member got to stab Jobs....killing the Newton was Jobs petty revenge.
So now Apple has to BUY back what Jobs threw out.
Good move Eh Jobs?
Re:Palm Products (Score:1)
The site is reports the following prices (not including s/h) for 1 July 1999:
Consumer Portable? Me want... (Score:1)
Palm computers are pretty neat, but I've just got too many "horsepower issues" for a shirt pocket computer. It's not just the power users that would have a problem, either, since many of the most common computing tasks just need too much graphics resolution to fit into a handheld package.
If Apple manages to get the true "P1" down to the $1000-$1300 range, with a 300 MHz PPC 740, there's not much reason to buy a Palm computer for half that price.
Side note: if the P1 specs are right, then it should be a trivial thing to shoehorn LinuxPPC into it...
Of course I do. (Score:1)
I read that Jobs killed because he thought that Apple had to focus on the Mac revival...rather than so much development.
I wonder if they are bringing this new palm computer from scratch...or they're reviving the old Newt... It took them lots of work to produce it a couple of years ago.