Yellow Dog Linux Released 54
bondo writes "Yellow Dog Linux, the new G3 Linux distribution is now accepting orders at www.yellowdoglinux.com. " Head over to check it out.
A physicist is an atom's way of knowing about atoms. -- George Wald
how does this compare to PC linux? (Score:1)
However, that's just processing power. The video seems to suffer somewhat, presumedly due to the lack of any kind of acceleration. I really don't know (most of my Linux experience is on the PPC).
Still, it has come a long way in the last year or so - kudos to the LinuxPPC people who are doing the lions share of the work (mklinux and yellow dog are cool too for simply existing, though!).
- Darchmare
- Axis Mutatis, http://www.axismutatis.net
how does this compare to PC linux? (Score:1)
GNU/mk? (Score:1)
Cool to see yet another non Intel port (Score:1)
What's wrong with free software? It runs on Macs, and they already _have_ what you list, for the most part. Isn't it _good_ to start using Linux and embrace the whole free software movement? What's so useful about using linux to run proprietary x86 binaries? Can't you use Windows for that?
ROTFL (Score:1)
Good (Score:2)
Perhaps Yellow Dog will become the Redhat of the G3 PowerMAC's. (now there's a contentious statement--is that a good or bad thing?) I'd have to say that even their packaging appears to appeal to the artistic side in typical Mac customers.
Now it remains to be seen what this "Yellow Dog Desktop" looks like. Couldn't they have used KDE or Gnome or something? Perhaps it's a MAC-ish desktop?
LinuxPPC doesn't have support? I don't think so! (Score:1)
It's with EVERY CD we sell.
Plus, people can buy support from LinuxCare.
Nice FUD, YDL.
Cool to see yet another non Intel port (Score:1)
would NOT be java, which is a stack based virtual chip.
Obfuscating the source does pretty much the same thing. Either way it sucks.
Loki Games WILL be releasing a patch for running Civ3 on LinuxPPC... it's rather trivial I am told. They could do the same with Quake at Id if they want... it's the "media" or WAD files that you're buying... and iD realized this long ago when they first supported Linux. Same thing with linuxPPC homefully..
down under mate ??? (Score:1)
Think Lab. This distro comes from the fresh mountain springs of Colorado.
dichotomy (trichotomy?) (Score:1)
Download available "soon" it says (Score:1)
Web page (Score:1)
1000x2000 pixel background picture? Clearly, these are Macintosh people.
---
Isn't it great?
Seriously though, I thought the page was okay but not terribly attractive. They may be Mac people, but most Mac people can design better sites than that.
(I know, I know, promoting computing stereotypes, blah blah blah).
- Darchmare
- Axis Mutatis, http://www.axismutatis.net
Cool to see yet another non Intel port (Score:1)
After setting up my first PC running Linux, I am all the more thankful about the IRQ crap I didn't have to go through on Apple hardware. Could the coming-of-age of Linux spark a move toward better hardware? Damn straight it could. Big software publishers(even Microsoft) haven't been this malleable and open to change in a long time, let's not drop the ball. Kick butt!
Couple things. (Score:1)
>home user. But then I think about it some more, and I like the fact
>that your standard Linux distro does whatever you want it to.
Well, yes -- but the point is that the standard Linux user can't do whatever they want to. And doesn't want to have the choice.
As long as there is a commoditization of Linux from a kernel standpoint, the individual distributions must achieve some kind of unique quality to survive. And if Linux is to continue growing at an appreciable rate, it has to move beyond the sysadmin/engineer/geek market.
Don't force every distribution to be identical.
Oh man... (Score:1)
Oh yeah, I forgot to add (insert Homer Simpson drooling sound here).
d/l (Score:1)
d
"I'll whip your pretty little dog with my GNUattorney!"
iMac installer broken (Score:1)
Check out their list of supported hardware [yellowdoglinux.com] for more details.
Oh man... (Score:1)
...I REALLY want one of those 400mhz G3 towers. Running Linux on my desktop...
-W.W.
Cool, (Score:1)
I want that too! (Score:1)
boy i just can't wait til i have macos, macosxserver and linux all on my box. (which is blindingly fast btw - for instance the mp3 encode time to play time ratio is 0.5 : 1)
Woo Hoo!
GNU/mk? (Score:1)
F.O.Dobbs
That's a straw man (Score:1)
Where does YDL say that LinuxPPC Inc. doesn't supply support with their distro? I don't see it. They specify six differences between the two companies/distros, and their assertions all seem right and proper. Am I missing something?
But one thing that does bother me about this page is their confusion of LinuxPPC the distro and LinuxPPC Inc. the company. ("Yellow Dog Linux, like LinuxPPC, Inc., uses the LinuxPPC kernel...").
--Tom Geller
Y' can't support what you won't release... (Score:1)
FUD or not, LinuxPPC doesn't have anything to support, except outdated product. So, logically, YDL is correct.
Don't get me wrong. I waited, erm, a dog's age for LinuxPPC to release R5. I got bored.
It appears that the profit motive has its place.
These names suck! (Score:1)
I pray that no one comes up with a Blue Daemon BSD! :-)
Web page (Score:1)
what OTHER hardware will it run on? (Score:1)
Couple things. (Score:3)
2) I noticed their "Gone Home" distribution - designed "specifically for home use." I think I like this idea, making a distro specifically for the home user. But then I think about it some more, and I like the fact that your standard Linux distro does whatever you want it to. ("It's a server!" *smack* "It's a client" *smack* "It's a server!" - sorry, Chinatown flashbacks...)
I guess I'd rather see an install that gracefully handles a home user or a commercial/power user. I'd be disappointed to see anything start a win95/winNT-client/winNT-server type dichotomy (trichotomy?) in the Linux distros. Of course, you can add whatever capabilities you want after the install, so I suppose it's no biggie.
How will it affect OS X server sales? (Score:1)
How will it affect OS X server sales? (Score:1)
I've got one :) (Score:1)
Doesn't look like it supports the iMac (Score:1)
How will it affect OS X server sales? (Score:1)
-Sol
RE: Nifty (Score:1)
http://www.yellowdoglinux.com/s upport/faq_diff.html [yellowdoglinux.com]
the only thing i'd like to add is that the current version of linuxppc, R4, is glibc1 based whereas YDL is glibc2. hopefully, linuxppc will get their act together now and put out R5 which will have glibc2 stuff.
-l
how does this compare to PC linux? (Score:1)
Ben: Yes, indeed. If it's a fast chip.
Han: Fast chip? You've never heard of the PowerPC G3?
Ben: Should I have?
Han: It's the chip that made the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs!
Ben: d00d!!!! That'd make a rad Be0wu1f cluster!!!!!
Not in the same market (Score:1)
KDE (Score:1)
Nifty (Score:1)
I guess it's a good alternative to Mac OS X Server in some ways (price!
WHAT? You don't browse in 1600x1400? (oh, any FTP? (Score:1)
Lest I be OT... I *am* looking forward to this distro. I would like to try it out, but there doesn't look like there's any FTP site to download it. Hmm... I'll have to wait for the next MacWorld and just try the LinuxPPC version.
Is YDL just not redistributable?? Or they have no bandwidth. Ideally I'd need an