Playstation emulation on Macs 76
Bob_Dobbs wrote in to tell us that there are major rumors that
the next Macs should actually do Playstation Emulation. Requires
a G3, but it's not like many people are buying Mac Classics
any more.
H: Sounds like Jobs will be announcing this officially
tomorrow. Very cool.
Update: 01/05 12:23 by S : Here's some more info thanks to
Narbo:
Connectix'
press release confirms the story, and
lists the games you can play on it.
Complaint. (Score:1)
TV Reality (=oxymoron) (Score:1)
The ability to go higher would be kind of cool, but the fact is the bulk of games are designed for 512x480 mode and a few for 640x480 (playstation high resolution mode). Taking these games to higher resolutions would reveal just how low-resolution the textures, bitmaps, objects, etc. really are. They are fit only for TV (or a really, really bad shadow-mask monitor).
Take for example the PC port of the ever-excellent WipeoutXL. 640x480 looks okay.. Playing at anything over 640x480 is not a pretty sight. Playing Gex2 for PC is the same.. it doesn't even look that good on any monitor.
The rest of your arguments could quite easily be applied against you.. Why listen to games on crummy PC speakers, and watch on a sharply flaw-revealing monitor, when the Playstation hooks up to a home theater system with 3 RCA plugs?
I don't know about anyone else, but I'd much rather listen to it on a Dolby surround system, use regular analog dual-shock controllers, and not tie up my computer.
Get real (Score:1)
Firstly, the number 40% is so rediculously high it cant be true.
And even if it were true
Secondly, most major graphics software excists for both mac and windows so if you lose 40% of your productivity, you must be really stupid.
"Only" run ROMs? (Score:1)
i.e. I have a PC. I have lots of old Nintendo games. I don't have room in my dorm to hook up a classic NES or SNES.
I download the ROMs to games I have. Nothing illegal there, I believe there are laws saying you can make a backup copy of software you own for personal use - That's what the ROM is, a backup of a cart you already own.
Uhhhh why would you even get excited about this??? (Score:1)
I'm far more interested in the handheld Playstation that I've seen tidbits about.
The great thing about the Playstation is that it's never crashed, boots quickly, plays Playstation games flawlessly, and my 4-year-old son can work it with no problems. (He can also use the Mac, but can't do everything on the Mac, like he can on the Playstation.)
However, if the emulator works, and works well, it could be a boon to Mac sales ("runs all of your office software and it runs Playstation games, too!").
That's not the point (Score:1)
well... (Score:1)
BTW - No Piracy (Score:1)
This is from Connectix - and that's the diff. (Score:1)
If you'd ever watched Windows 95 boot on your PowerMac, you'd have more respect for this company.
-Hollis
Umm... they had it for windows first..... (Score:1)
1) Its compatibility, while admirable for a project of its kind (emulating a recent system within only a year or two of development time) isn't exactly stellar.
2) It's illegal anyway. This might not be (then again, it depends on how Sony's feeling).
No, it's not licensed. (Score:1)
To those comparing this to open-source projects trying to do the same thing: like most things, it's a tradeoff. Connectix' product isn't going to be free in any sense of the word "free", and it's only going to run on G3 Macs. On the other hand, a commercial company has the ability to throw programmers at a project full-time, something very few open source projects have the luxury of. CVGS is almost certainly going to be substantially better than PSEmu is now. PSEmu may eventually catch up (all open source projects do if people keep plugging at them), but that has no bearing on Mac owners.
PSEMU (Score:1)
Playstation Reality (Score:1)
Regarding monitors, I just got a 21" Hitachi with like
Multimedia monitors are expensive, but I'm willing to bet you get PS comparable imaging using a TV out card, which I think the new ATI's do anyways. The big 56" monitors are just for tradeshows and Microsoft employees..
Framerates might drop on an iMac revB, but I don't see it happening on the new entry-level 300MHz desktops.
All emulators, and MP3 players as well, coincide but do not directly cause an increase in piracy. Sales and rentals will go up though, especially if this is as good as the real thing on at least some of the new Yosemite boxes. Oh well..
PSX? (Score:1)
Differing strengths. (Score:1)
On the other hand, I wouldn't want to invite friends over to gather around the 13" LCD screen and play Tekken 2 with two people sharing the keyboard.
As for CVGS vs. PSEMU, you can't legally use PSEMU without owning a real PlayStation. No comparison, regardless of the other relative merits of the products. So it appears that the Mac *does* have the first full PSX emulation.
Not that it matters to me, my laptop being a PC... But CVGS for Linux would rock.
The N64 is a 3D object show, no more... (Score:1)
Web Page (Score:1)
PSX? (Score:1)
Web Page (Score:1)
http://www.connectix.com/cvgs/index.html
According to the press release the compatibility list should be at:
http://www.virtualgamestation.com
though that site doesent seem to be up yet.
However based on the fact that Connectix rules,
(one of the few software companies I have real faith in
games then the 50% or so that psemu supports.
From the link off the press release you can
see that both Final Fantasy VII and Final Fantasy
Tactics both work which already puts it ahead
of psemu.
That and though I have not yet seen the full specs the only required hardware is a G3 mac with 32MB of RAM, which would seem to include the powerbook series, whereas psemu requires as much hardware as you can throw at it including a voodoo board.
Tekken on the bus anyone?
Chris
Upgrade THIS (Score:1)
The fact that you cannot name a single Mac game
implies you lack the clue you would have others
seek.
To answer your question (short list the top few):
Myth 2, Starcraft, Quake[1-2], Unreal, etc...
And what is this upgrade you speak of? Its a piece of software little man. Not some plugin board.
That and the price is $49.99USD, and it will likely be shipped for free with new iMac systems.
Chris
Sony should be THANKFUL for this..... (Score:1)
Most that will buy this will buy it so they can use it on a laptop, possible internet play. Probably a load of other options most emulators have, such as real-time saving and loading, and outputing of music to a sound file will be included as well.
So Sony should just sit back, and be thankful they have a new market. Only thing they are probably steamed about is that they didn't do it first.
This is from Connectix - and that's the diff. (Score:1)
Without starting a regligious crusade here, could someone tell me where the particular meme above came from, and what the justification for it is?
Before you start taking pot shots, I use Mac, Windows, Linux and find then all useful. I've used open source and proprietary code and have found good and bad in both groups.
So I find statements like the one above to be more based on faith then on facts. I think open source is a good idea. I don't think it's the only good idea.
SteveM
Complaint. (Score:1)
And yes, I am aware of the fact that slashdot is free, that's no excuse for not doing the job right.
Childish (Score:1)
The time has come for the mac lovers, the amiga freaks and PC fanatics to set their different layouts aside, join keyboards and say "no" to propriatary software and set the power of knowledge free.
EMULATION != GAMES!!! (Score:1)
Its hand coded PowerPC 750 Assembly! You probably don't even know anything about Macs, much less PowerPC assembly....what good would Open Source do....by the time your guys could understand it, port it, and optimize it, Moore's law will have made that all irrelevant, for by raw speed alone, you'll be able to play it.
And then the PlayStaion II will come out....
: )
The difference is.... (Score:1)
$50? $50?! (Score:1)
$50? For an emulator where the actual Sony Playstation is only about $99 USD depending on where you buy it?
This is a whole new degree of lameness.
Playstation Reality (Score:1)
What I see happening is a lot of illegal downloads of the playstation BIOS rom, coupled with illegal downloads of the Emulator itself. Possibly a lawsuit against the company for making the emulator isn't far behind... although since I am not a lawyer I don't fully understand copyright law, and how it would apply.
PSEmu, unlike this project, was run by a guy in his spare time, more or less just to see if he could do it. No one makes any money off of it and it never once has claimed to be anything other than a pet project by some college student.
As far as your comments about using VPC emulation I'm very happy you've found something you can use.
Though if you're using a SCSI CD-Rom you're using hardware technology that's much older than a decade. I guess it never hurts to have old standards huh?
Oh, and none of the games I've ever played take 5 minutes to load up. Gran Turismo (a game that the emulator claims to run) only takes about 20 seconds on my playstation to load. I would like to find out how long it would actually take to load on this emulator, and how well it plays. Is it really going to be worth the loss in framerate due to the emulation? Or the fact that most monitors aren't nearly the size of a TV? (You can spend $1300 on a 21" monitor or the same on a 56" TV, and yes resolution is better on a montior, but we're talking a GAME console here)
Macintosh Unreality (Score:1)
TV's resolution is a bit higher than 320x240, as a point you should remember that the playstation games are designed to be used with a TV and not a computer monitor. The games are fine tuned to look good on a TV, and sometimes they blur images just so they look good on a TV.
It's like using any emulator on your PC, the games seem to look better if they are on a TV simply because thats what they were designed to work with. Heck, Look at zSnes, a popular Super Nintendo Emulator, it has a mode where it blurs the pixels for you, otherwise the games look too crisp. I doubt the Virtual Game Thingy has a blurred mode since it would take precious CPU time...
But hey, if emulating playstation games on your Macintosh makes you happy, by all means, go right ahead, nobody's gonna stop you. But it is not, by any measure, a Macintosh "First", and given the games list on that website, niether is it a Macintosh "Best".
I'd be interested in comparing the performance/price for emulator on PC vs. Macintosh, my current PC costs about $900 to build and with it's 3dfx voodoo2 card emulates the Playstation pretty nicely, though I only loaded one game, just to see if I could. I much prefer playing Gran Turismo on my real playstation using the Dual Shock controller....
EMULATION != GAMES!!! (Score:1)
last time I checked, Intel DOES own all rights to the 80x86 chips, and it is NOT an "open spec". It may be well known, and repeatedly duplicated, but it is not open. Companies have to be very careful of how they go about copying others work to ensure that they do not violate copyrights.
Specifically, "Black Box" development techniques must be employed.
Summary of the flames... (Score:1)
Flame: "Windows had it first -- go see psemu.com! Nyah nyah..."
Response: "Ah, but this is being released by a large, well known, and well respected company. It will be faster, more compatible, better supported, and actually legal (once Sony gets its obligatory posturing out of the way)..."
Flame: "Well if the code is so great, then it should be open sourced! It's the code that matters, not the games!"
Response: "Uh, guys, this is something target at consumers, not developers. It most certainly is the games that matter, and your average PC-using family is not necessarily willing or able to track down something that was just hacked together by the still relatively unknown geek community."
Flame: "Well if we wanted to be at the mercy of big companies, we'd all go back to Microborg!"
Response: "Um, the whole world is not run by Microsoft. Believe it or not, there are still some decent, respectable companies out there, and companies can still do a lot of things that the geek community cannot..."
Am I missing anything?
misinformation abound (Score:1)
due to what ever reason ( I think ignorance has something to with it) several of you have done a great injustice to people who work many hours on these emu's
there are several play station emus out there that
work relatively well and can play, play
station CD's very well thank you. not ROM's
as some
people have mentioned (CD images is another
story)...
psemupro has come along ways since its humble
beginnings and is now one of the leading psx
emu's out there it has its very own software
GUI for systems without a decent 3d card and
it also has the optional d3d and glide GUI as
well as a opengl GUI (although it is slightly
Lacking)...
another great psx emu was
psyke although it needed glide to function
properly it was the hottest psx emu at its
time it has now been merged into psemupro.
Although these emulators are great they do
require you to have a psx BIOS image of some
sort.
This is where all the fun and games ends, if you
do not have a play station you are not entitled
to
a BIOS image. If you do you have a play station you can have a image of that system's BIOS
made and be a
legal owner of it. otherwise if you just download
one off the net somewhere it is still illegal.
the only emulator that I know of that does not
require a play station BIOS(besides virtual game station ??) is bleem which has
undertaking the task of reverse engineering the
system and developed a working play station
emulator out of it which works very well and upon
its release will have full d3d support and
should play 85 - 90 % percent of
play station games out there...
psemupro http://www.psemu.com/index.html
sope
http://technopole.le-village.com/rejeb/sope.htm
bleem http://www.bleem.com/
also there is a linux psx emu in the works called sope so check it out..
chaos4u
Umm... they had it for windows first..... (Score:1)
EMULATION != GAMES!!! (Score:1)
The N64 is a 3D object show, no more... (Score:1)