ChatGPT For macOS Now Works With Third-Party Apps, Including Apple's Xcode 6
An update to OpenAI's ChatGPT app for macOS adds integration with third-party apps, including developer tools such as VS Code, Terminal, iTerm2 and Apple's Xcode. 9to5Mac reports: In a demo seen by 9to5Mac, ChatGPT was able to understand code from an Xcode project and then provide code suggestions without the user having to manually copy and paste content into the ChatGPT app. It can even read content from more than one app at the same time, which is very useful for working with developer tools. According to OpenAI, the idea is to expand integration to more apps in the future. For now, integration with third-party apps is coming exclusively to the Mac version of ChatGPT, but there's another catch. The feature requires a paid ChatGPT subscription, at least for now.
ChatGPT Plus and Team subscribers will receive access to integration with third-party apps on macOS starting today, while access for Enterprise and Education users will be rolled out "in the next few weeks." OpenAI told 9to5Mac that it wants to make the feature available to everyone in the future, although there's no estimate of when this will happen. For privacy reasons, users can control at any time when and which apps ChatGPT can read. The app can be downloaded here.
ChatGPT Plus and Team subscribers will receive access to integration with third-party apps on macOS starting today, while access for Enterprise and Education users will be rolled out "in the next few weeks." OpenAI told 9to5Mac that it wants to make the feature available to everyone in the future, although there's no estimate of when this will happen. For privacy reasons, users can control at any time when and which apps ChatGPT can read. The app can be downloaded here.
Screenshots? (Score:3)
So how does it work, screenshots?
Local AI is not far behind the main services; I'll wait.
Small print? (Score:2, Insightful)
Does it also take our code for training?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Response to stimuli implies thought or life. It's responding to a query, like any good database management system does. Thinking of it as anything other than a new form of database is a step too far, and how the current generation of AI prophets start driving the wedge into people's brains, making them believe these things are intelligent, thinking, "entities" that are somehow comparable to humans.
JFC, no (Score:1)