Propose Class Action Alleges Apple's Cloud Storage is an 'Illegal Monopoly' (thehill.com) 169
"Apple faces a proposed class action lawsuit alleging the company holds an illegal monopoly over digital storage for its customers," reports the Hill:
The suit, filed Friday, claims "surgical" restraints prevent customers from effectively using any service except its iCloud storage system. iCloud is the only service that can host certain data from the company's phones, tablets and computers, including application data and device settings. Plaintiffs allege the practice has "unlawfully 'tied'" the devices and iCloud together... "As a result of this restraint, would-be cloud competitors are unable to offer Apple's device holders a full-service cloud-storage solution, or even a pale comparison."
The suit argues that there are "no technological or security justifications for this limitation on consumer choice," according to PC Magazine.
The class action's web site is arguing that "Consumers may have paid higher prices than they allegedly would have in a competitive market."
The suit argues that there are "no technological or security justifications for this limitation on consumer choice," according to PC Magazine.
The class action's web site is arguing that "Consumers may have paid higher prices than they allegedly would have in a competitive market."
Interesting question in 2024: (Score:3)
Re:Interesting question in 2024: (Score:4, Insightful)
The same place it did in 2004. I use nextcloud, no reason why my iStorage cannot use a webdav endpoint.
Re: Interesting question in 2024: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I tried that before, but WebDAV really isn't a great solution for backing up a large number of files. It would always choke when there were more than ~200 things to sync.
I am "old school" now-- WireGuard to my NAS over SMB. Some stupid limitations by Apple mean it won't use it as a default location, but it works well enough for my needs.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: Interesting question in 2024: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Where does the operating system end and where does the cloud service begin?
What, you don’t know? It’s right there, on page 2 of the EUL..oh, that’s right. I almost forgot how they did that so easily.
expensive (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
It is a monopoly in that all services on their platform are controlled by Apple, who also takes a cut. If you buy into a glass house for the glass but dont realize the costs behind heating and cooling the glass, you are the sucker.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You know what? I got android originally so I could develop on it, then wanted to leave due to malware. After going with iPhone I suddenly was able to join a family chat I had never been able to be on. It's nice to be able to do that, and it seems to integrate with my Mac (although stupidly) but yeah, it is bullshit that the platforms' core messaging apps are walled off from each other. Of course the chat was a good reason to join. Ads? well no malware I can detect yet but there sure are ads, just not as out
Re: (Score:2)
After going with iPhone I suddenly was able to join a family chat I had never been able to be on.
MMS works on Android too. Group texting is an MMS feature. There may be other features enabled within the walled garden but including more than one person in a group is not it.
Re: (Score:2)
Those of us with families often can't force our loved ones to not buy an iPhone. I wouldn't mind so much, except that Apple has made it impossible to effectively use other cloud services. iCloud gets a free pass to access all data and run in the background to do long uploads. Everything else is just a normal app, with limited access to data and killed off if you don't keep it open with the screen on while uploading.
I already pay for cloud storage and have a load of it free from Google, but it can't be used
Re:expensive (Score:4, Informative)
Tell your spouse to install Dropbox. It works fine on a Mac.
Use Dropbox for most stuff she wants to auto-backup to the cloud, and iCloud only for Mac specific stuff like messages. The free iCloud tier will be good enough.
Another advantage is that Dropbox makes it easy to share files with Windows and Linux users, while iCloud does not.
Re: (Score:2)
it DOES NOT work fine on an iPhone at all, a heap of the automatic services and backups will not go to Dropbox.
Cuz Apple cannot guarantee the "security" of it's ecosystem when the user insists on using non-Apple 3rd party services?
Re: (Score:3)
no contacts, calendar, keychain etc
You can still use iCloud for those when using Dropbox for files, and there's no charge for using iCloud for syncing contacts Only fo r storing data above the free limits.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure about illegal monopoly, but fuck me it is expensive. My wife uses iphone, the eyewatering price of her device was bad enough, the monthly iCloud bills are just insane.
How much storage?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:expensive (Score:5, Informative)
No, she doesn't [apple.com]. iCloud backs up nowhere near the full 512GB. It backs up all of your settings and any data that's not already synced to iCloud. But it skips the apps, music, movies, mail, and a few others. Those are re-downloaded from their original sources after the backup restoration is "complete." It even re-populates the app grid and your folders. But they're all greyed-out until they redownload; but not from your iCloud backup, but from the App Store. My (256GB, 212 used) iPhone's most recent backup is 3.9GB.
So you might want to look at the actual sizes of those backups. They'll be smaller then you expect and you should be able to scale down your iCloud Drive.
Re: expensive (Score:2)
iCloud Photos is the biggest user of my storage. This uses space without being part of the backup. Thatâ(TM)s quite inconvenient to move to another storage system.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I know, you'd rather have no monopoly and pay the same or more to someone else who will be of no help to you whatsoever, but as much as it may surprise you, they actually have people in the stores who are paid to help customers and who know how to do it.
For example, years ago O2 messed up my email account. They had no idea h
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Then teach her how to properly back up or more precisely: store, her images.
Having all her important stuff in iCloud means: no access if there is no internet.
Seriously. How fucked up can people be that they do not grasp the difference between convenient and important?
It is convenient to a have a gazzilion old photos you are to sentimental to delete in a cloud. It is in no way practical if those photos are important for work.
Now tell me: she does not know how to make a folder on her computer file system and store everything relevant of a project in that folder and put the folder under automatic back up and a version control system?
Not to mention that the "Files" App that is already on her iPhone is more than happy to connect to SMB or even WebDAV Shares on a computer or NAS, and also to third party Cloud Storage such as DropBox, etc. She can Select multiple Photos from the Photos App and transfer them directly through the Files App.
Or she can do the same through any number of (often freeware) ftp clients for iOS.
Or, if she has a Mac (which she should), she can one-click back up her ENTIRE phone to that through USB, and from there, b
Re: (Score:3)
iCloud backs up nowhere near the full 512GB. It backs up all of your settings and any data that's not already synced to iCloud.
And that's the trick they use. An iCloud backup tends to be under 5GB (barely), which is enough to fill the free tier. But it means you can't use iCloud for literally anything else, and it also doesn't include things like photos that are what people really want to back up.
Anything that's "stored on iCloud" is not in the phone backup. That includes photos, documents, game saves, and all sorts of information that people really want to keep backed up. It's also what prevents you from using any other cloud serv
Re: expensive (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
she has to get the 2TB plan as it is the smallest plan that can cover her 512GB iPhone. basically extra $180AUD a year for backups without having to go through the hoops of manually moving stuff for backups.
$10/month for 2TB of cloud storage is hardly insane, plus she can family-share it with like 6 family members.
Besides, it's the same monthly price for dropbox and google one
Re: (Score:2)
I've upgraded to the 50GB plan which is about $20 CAD/year, and that's plenty for my iPhone and iPad. And I take a lot of photos. I still have 31GB free.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: expensive (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
What..... is she doing that requires that?
I've never paid for icloud in my life? An I use an iphone and mac and have done so for 15 years.
Re: (Score:2)
What..... is she doing that requires that?
I've never paid for icloud in my life? An I use an iphone and mac and have done so for 15 years.
Where it's really good is backing up all your photos and videos. It's basically a big virtual drive so you never run out of space. It pages out stuff to create space as needed, and automatically brings them back when you click on them
Re: (Score:2)
It pages out stuff to create space as needed, and automatically brings them back when you click on them
That part is great. But on both Android and iPhone, I don't believe you can tell either cloud storage service to transfer any photos to your next new phone except individually. So your next phone only has photos taken after the purchase date of the new phone. When offline or if something happens to the cloud service, you don't even have a second copy safely on your device.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure about illegal monopoly, but fuck me it is expensive. My wife uses iphone, the eyewatering price of her device was bad enough, the monthly iCloud bills are just insane.
How much is "insane" exactly?
Re: (Score:3)
At first, I thought it was something frivolous, but there's something there.
I mean, you can use Amazon Photos to back up your photos and such (which probably take up the most space on the device), and Apps don't need backing up, so it's really just app data that gets backed up. But even that can consume a lot of data, and it's only 5GB in total, not per device.
So there's probably something there in that you really don't have any option other than to use iCloud to back up y our phone to the cloud.
I mean, you
Re: (Score:2)
3$ a month is "expensive"?
Re: (Score:2)
3$ a month is "expensive"?
First, there's a huge difference between US$, Can$ and Aus$. Second, you get 5GB free, 50GB for 0.99, 200GB for 2.99, and 2TB for 7.99 which you can share with all the devices in your family (iPhones, iPads and Macs) for six family members. Without ever having to enter a password (that's your Apple ID). Now maybe another tier for 500Gb and 5TB would be nice...
And this lady somehow got convinced that she needed 2TB because 200GB is not enough for a 500GB iPhone. Most likely it is. And 7.99 for 2TB is not e
Re: (Score:2)
I avoid the clouds.
Re: expensive (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure about illegal monopoly, but fuck me it is expensive. My wife uses iphone, the eyewatering price of her device was bad enough, the monthly iCloud bills are just insane.
It's not the absolute cost that annoys me, it's the abusive pricing strategy. They make the cheaper tiers pathetically small and then you have to pay a crazy amount for way more storage than you actually need. It's the same with the pricing of the macs now - they make the cheapest tier have some stupidly small hard drive (my 2013 entry level MacBook pro has the same size SSD as today's one), but if you want to upgrade it they absolutely fleece you. It's put me off buying another mac, but I'm sure it works f
Re: (Score:2)
I have enough money to buy a good MacBook (especially with the help of HMRC which paid 800 of the 2000 pound my MacBook cost, thank you very much, guys), but I don't like wasting it. If I use my MacBook away from the desk, the one drive that I need continuously ways 45 grams. I don't care what it looks like, but a MacBook with 3TB on the road was cheap. I'll buy another drive when some reputable co
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's $1 a month.
Re: (Score:2)
My wife uses iphone, the eyewatering price of her 0device was bad enough, the monthly iCloud bills are just insane.
From Apple's support page
United States (USD)
50GB: $0.99
200GB: $2.99
2TB: $9.99
6TB: $29.99
12TB: $59.99
Dunno man, seems reasonable to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Each tier is reasonable but that chasm between 200GB and 2TB is pretty steep if you need 300GB.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a whole SEVEN DOLLARS!
Re: (Score:2)
I think the way to read that is "more than tripled"
Re: (Score:2)
But so what?
I mean, when something costs a penny, who cares if the price went up 1000% ?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure about illegal monopoly, but fuck me it is expensive. My wife uses iphone, the eyewatering price of her device was bad enough, the monthly iCloud bills are just insane.
Well, let us know how your efforts to reduce the size of the bill goes. I think you are already sure but you are not ready to admit it.
Re: expensive (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that the prices are posted publicly, right? Perhaps before flying off the handle and rage-hating on people you should try checking the facts first. Because if you had bothered to do so, you'd know he was telling the truth. [apple.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that the prices are posted publicly, right? Perhaps before flying off the handle and rage-hating on people you should try checking the facts first. Because if you had bothered to do so, you'd know he was telling the truth. [apple.com]
Not quite. He complained about the ridiculously high cost - and that was not the truth. 7.99 a month for 2 TB is not ridiculously high. And he complained that it was needed. Outside of professional photographers and videographers, you don't _need_ 2 TB. She said she needed more than 200GB because she has a 500GB phone - and that's not related.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Bullying? Lmao, omg, how old are you?
I provided the price and the fact that you don't need to pay anything at all for config storage if you want to use non Apple storage and you got triggered by that and modded me troll with your sock puppet account.
Wow! How did you become so weak minded and ignorant yet still manage to use a computer?
Re: (Score:3)
You don't have to do any such thing.
The free tier comes with your Apple ID. I doubt most people even realize they're using the free tier for their meta data.
If you'd ever actually used an iPhone instead of going into frothing rant mode anytime you see the Apple logo you'd know how it works.
No one has been harmed by getting a small chunk of free tier utility storage for meta data. No one is forced to use Apple if they want more storage. No one is prevented from using third party storage. I used iPhone fo
Re: (Score:2)
The ignorance is astounding.
Seems pretty plausible. (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Macs are able to backup to time machine, which already has a defined interface. No real reason phones couldn't do the same.
Re: (Score:3)
but it seems like a pretty straightforward argument that iCloud is tied to iDevices in a number of ways that typically aren't wholly without justification(eg. having iCloud be the only thing you can restore from reduces the complexity of the first-run restore option because it can just assume iCloud; rather than Apple having to define an interface that 3rd party restore providers would offer or add a pre-restore app install section so that the relevant 3rd party app could be installed to provide the restore interface(the way 3rd party apps can snap into the "Files" app); but which are...awfully convenient...given Apple's margins on both cloud storage and higher storage phone models.
For a long time, users can backup iOS devices to a local computer whether it is a Mac or PC so I am not sure what you are talking about.
It probably doesn't help(if Apple seeks to make some sort of "we do it for the security of the people!" argument) that iOS historically(and still does, though it is much de-emphasized) supported either unencrypted or encrypted backups
Well that is a lie. [cnbc.com] It took me seconds to google that is not true. And that was for iCloud. I cannot find when local backups offered encryption but this user post from 2011 tells tells other users not to encrypt their backups [apple.com] because if they lose their password, they lose their backup.
Re: (Score:2)
I cannot find when local backups offered encryption but this user post from 2011 tells tells other users not to encrypt their backups [apple.com] because if they lose their password, they lose their backup.
If you're talking about backing up a Mac to Time Machine, it's just a matter of checking a box and picking an encryption password.
If you're talking about backing up iDevices locally, last time I did it you (again) just checked a box and picked a password.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Seems pretty plausible. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because Time Machine stores old versions of your backups as long as it has enough storage, you may set a limit for storage used for each device, so that your video editing machine doesn't gobble up all the space. And mak
Re: (Score:2)
But that's not consolidated solution if you want to set up one backup system for every computer in your home.
What are you talking about? Time Machine works across different Macs and can work with network drives. Set up or buy a NAS and hook it up to the local network. Dropbox works for Mac. GoogleDrive works for Mac
Most Open source backup systems have to just refuse to do apple.
Describe "most". Open source backup systems that work on Macs: BorgBackup, UrBackup, Syncthing, Duplicati, Bacula, BackupPC, zAmanda, rsync, Timeshift. So are you lying or did you not bother researching?
. Then you need a specifically tailored system to do your MacBook because its "special".
You mean like how you need "special" versions for Windows or BSD if the code was originally written f
Re: (Score:3)
Backing up to a computer isn't a replacement for iCloud. Sync to cloud backup is automatic and continual.
Re: (Score:2)
Backing up to a computer isn't a replacement for iCloud. Sync to cloud backup is automatic and continual.
When did cloud offerings like GoogleDrive, Microsoft OneDrive, and Dropbox stop working for Apple devices?
Re: (Score:2)
They work but are second class. Can't back up everything, and can't do background data transfer indefinitely.
Re: (Score:2)
They work but are second class. Can't back up everything, and can't do background data transfer indefinitely.
At this point it seems you are merely adding conditions to artificially ensure that iCloud. This is a No True Scotsman fallacy.
Re: (Score:2)
Background data transfer is essential, otherwise your stuff doesn't back up automatically.
Yet free local backups still exist... (Score:2)
I'm able to connect my modern iPhone to my modern Mac, select "Back up all of your data on your iPhone to this Mac" and... back everything up, as often as I want, for absolutely no cost whatsoever. As much as I think it'd be great that we all got free wireless cloud backups of our phones, the fact that local backups remain available at functionally no cost really seems to impede the argument that there's some sort of illegal monopoly.
Re: (Score:2)
As much as I think it'd be great that we all got free wireless cloud backups of our phones, the fact that local backups remain available at functionally no cost really seems to impede the argument that there's some sort of illegal monopoly.
I think you can use the first 15GB free on Google Drive and you can use Google Drive to backup certain iOS files like photos, calendar, and contacts. Not free if you exceed 15GB but it starts at $1.99 per for 100GB a month.
Re: Yet free local backups still exist... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, duh. You solved the problem by buying another Apple device.
does this even make sense? (Score:2)
If I want to sell my product, and Walmart refuses to carry it, can I sue them for being a monopoly on what they sell at their own store?
Because that sounds completely silly to me, and yet it's what I think of when these developers try to pull it with a digital store.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, you can. Especially if Walmart is the only store that can legally sell your product, and if Walmart demands a royalty on any subscriptions required to use your product.
Have you been bullied into buying overpriced tech? (Score:2)
The lawsuit is about 3rd party and very confusing (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah I don't understand either. Synology devices can behave as remote Time Machine storage devices without the end user having to do anything special. And I've personally used the third-party app Arq to back up (encrypted) my Mac's disk to a Backblaze storage endpoint.
Re: The lawsuit is about 3rd party and very confus (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But why does it always have to be something that costs a lot of money that works with apple?
2 TB on Amazon for 66 pound is the cheapest 2TB hard drive that I can find (and that is likely not a scam). 40 pound for 1 TB. Is that a lot of money to you?
TFS is fraught with ... (Score:2)
... softball speculation using words like perhaps, maybe, probably ...
Buying a phone and services is a package deal. Consumers know what they are getting and, for competition, have many other choices.
For me, it's like, "Your BBQ sauce is better than ours and yet you keep the recipe for yourself. We're filing a class action lawsuit."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But whatever that solution is, you can't get your windows/Linux systems to work with the same thing. People are looking to not have to treat the mac special
What are you talking about? Services like Dropbox work the same.
I use google on iphone... (Score:2)
Not tied to iCloud (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except Apple doesn't really compete on price.
Re: (Score:2)
What these companies want it is for Apple to let people back up their phones to their companies servers directly from their phones so they can more easily profit.
iMazing has existed since 2008 [wikipedia.org]. Seriously, a simple Google search for me showed Cloud backups for iPhone. [cloudwards.net] Other companies are already doing that so I do not understand is what exactly is the complaint.
While true it probably would force Apple to lower iCloud storage price to better compete
iCloud is $0.99 for 50GB and $2.99 for 200GB. GoogleDrive is $1.99 for 100GB. iDrive is $2.95 for 100GB. Acronis is way more expensive at the low end but cheaper at the high end. BigMind is more expensive overall but their pricing is based on minimum of 10 users. Per user it is about the same as the others. J
You motherfuckers! Leave us alone!!!!!! (Score:2)
Nobody requires you to buy an Apple product! If you don't like its ecosystem, go buy something else!!!
Stop trying to fuck it up for the rest of us!!!!!!!
God damned fucking assholes!!!!!
Thanks.
The people writing this crap are morons (Score:2)
uh oh (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can already backup your iphone to a laptop, and then store that backup however you wish. Encryption is optional too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can already backup your iphone to a laptop, and then store that backup however you wish. Encryption is optional too.
The latest iPhone you can plug directly into an SSD drive. Or the SSD drive directly into the iPhone. Just make sure you buy a USB 3 instead of a USB 2 cable to get the full speed.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Nothing new here , apple just copying again (Score:5, Insightful)
Not sure if you meant it ironically but you can buy Office by itself. Not sure what the bundling is, I mean sure if you subscribe (starting for free?) to the online version (if you need for example the web version) there would be some space for you, like there is for Google Docs, but a web based document editing thing doesn't really make sense without some cloud storage. I guess one could always want to use Microsoft's online Word or Google's Docs to edit directly documents from Dropbox or Mega, but I doubt this can be much enforced by anything except the market.
Speaking of Microsoft what was apparent after the last bricking bug https://arstechnica.com/gadget... [arstechnica.com] for Android was how bad we have it with these "walled gardens", and in this case it was with the "open" Android. Specifically:
- you can't backup your device because you are denied access to mostly everything, from OS data to app data (note that it isn't even "to sell cloud storage" because the online backup is equally bad, as in not storing app data)
- you can't boot something else, all the discussions we ever had about Secure Boot and Windows starting since at least Windows 8 are nothing, you can still boot anything on any PC, and you can even do it in a "Secure Boot" fashion if you prepare well
- even if you could boot something else you can't get the keys to your own encrypted storage
We're talking about access, Secure Boot authentication and data encryption available to you, as the owner, authenticated in any way possible, before anything bad happens, of course, not that a thief can't get the encryption keys or the evil maid can't boot something, that of course is by design. All points were particularly relevant as the mentioned bug was probably something simple, like a permission or symlink, which could be easily fixed by just booting from something else and running something trivial.
And the point I'm trying to make is that basically all are available for all PCs. You can make backups as you like both for files and images of whole drives, you can manage your Secure Boot and boot anything (including wildly different OSes) and you can have your Bitlocker recovery keys. When you manage to have your "open" OS worse than Windows things are dire.
Microsoft got fined for bundling a media player and/or a browser with the OS. Samsung (we are talking about the top Android manufacturer?) gives you (depending on the phone and region) a Facebook app you can't install (because of course, the admin and owner of the device doesn't have permissions to uninstall apps!) and it's all fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is not copying.
Apple behaved like a smug monopolist even back when it had 1% of the market.
Re: (Score:2)
True, apple was formed from lies and deceit, the very same values they hold dear today
Seriously, you need your head examined. I wonder what caused it? Blean? Horse dewormer? Generous use of recreational drugs, possibly by your parents?