Apple is Finally Adding Some of Gmail's Best Features To Its Own Email Apps (theverge.com) 53
Apple announced some major new features for Mail that finally bring the email app closer to parity with Gmail and other popular email clients. From a report: Perhaps the most useful will be an undo send feature, which will let you call back an email within 10 seconds of hitting the send button. A "remind me" feature will let you set a time for an email to come back to the top of your inbox. A new scheduled send feature that allows you to specify exactly when an email should go out. And Mail will even tell you when it thinks you've forgotten to include an attachment.
Giving Apple Users Features (Score:2)
There still are email clients on phones that do not match 20 year old linux and unix apps when dealing with messaging.
Just Said no (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
unless your job requires it on a corporate device for the work day...
Re: Just Said no (Score:1)
And yet here you areâ¦
Re:Giving Apple Users Features (Score:4, Interesting)
"These are NOT the new services that you are looking for!" With the usual apologies to Obi-Wan Kenobi, but these are acknowledged to be old services in old email systems. Rather sad that Apple cannot do better.
So here's a short list of NEW features I want:
(1) A PROPER notion of email time rather than an asinine 10-second or 30-second undo. Or a half-arsed "Schedule send" option. In particular, relative time is important, and as it applies to undo, I want to set my default sending time as one to three relative hours in the future. If it's urgent, then there can be a "Send now" option, but almost none of my email needs such an urgent response and I'm quite likely to have a better idea if I think about it. (And I am NOT apologizing just because I'm slow witted!)
(2) A feature to bounce "confidential mode" email unread. If you don't trust me, I don't need your email. 'Nuff said.
(3) Death to spammers! "Live and let spam" is the standard business email monkey-business model these days, but what I want is an email system that spammers hate so much that they won't send ANY spam to that email domain.
So here's my idea of how to do it (but I'd love to hear your better idea). How about a "Fight spammer" button beyond the "Report spam" button? The simple goal is to take away the money, which is what causes most of the spam. (PoC: The pump-and-dump stock-scam spam you no longer receive because they removed the money.) I imagine an iterative analysis where I would click on "Fight spammer" and it would send me a webform with the expanded analysis of the spam I am reporting. I could click on the various options to confirm or correct the analysis leading to the anti-spammer countermeasures that remove the money. Trivial example: An email dropbox the spammer uses to reach suckers. Let's nuke that one. More complicated example: A phishing scam that involves hacked personal information. It will probably take several rounds of analysis and confirmation, but the scope of the problem can be identified and the spammers can be found and destroyed. (At least I want to believe it's possible.)
Re: (Score:2)
And if Slashdot had a delayed submit option I might have caught that typo in the attempted joke. *sigh*
"These are not the new features you are looking for."
Oh well. All of my attempted jokes need to be filed under "That trick never works!"
Re: (Score:2)
(2) A feature to bounce "confidential mode" email unread. If you don't trust me, I don't need your email. 'Nuff said.
Amen to that. I use Fastmail which provides Sieve scripts for incoming mail. I wrote this rule:
if exists "X-Gm-Locker" {reject "Google confidential mode emails are automatically rejected at this email address"; }
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for this information. Does it send the bounce message back to the rude person who sent it?
And does Fastmail have any strong anti-spammer features?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
MUAs are Hard (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Looking at my Postfix/Dovecot mail server I wonder how this "recall" feature will work.
Most likely it works so that the client don't send it to the server, so that the send actually means that send it 10 sec later.
Is that kind of feature needed at all? How it can be the most useful feature??
Re: (Score:2)
Looking at my Postfix/Dovecot mail server I wonder how this "recall" feature will work.
Most likely it works so that the client don't send it to the server, so that the send actually means that send it 10 sec later.
Is that kind of feature needed at all? How it can be the most useful feature??
My work uses Google Apps.
"Unsend" has come in handy several times, especially when accidentally pressing Ctrl+Enter (the KB shortcut for "Send") at an inopportune time. "Most useful" is an exaggeration, but it's a good one.
Re: (Score:1)
GMail "best" feature (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can't we let e-mail die the fiery train wreck that it already is?.
In South Korea, emaili is for old people.
Re:E-mail (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
" How is that worse?"
I don't want an SMS message everytime i get my utility bill.
I want my utility bills to be quietly filed away into folders automatically.
And I'm just trying to imagine searching for an SMS message from 20 years ago on mydesktop; something that is trivial with email; mail servers, multi-device syncing, archiving, indexing...it's all in place.
SMS also requires a phone number... organizations have literally thousands of email boxes that aren't attached to individuals who carry a phone, or a
Re: (Score:2)
too many words
appropriate response would have been,
get a job
Re: E-mail (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is a different kind of undo than the "recall" mails we've all seen... Given the description, it looks as if this just stalling the email 10 seconds in the pipeline, which would work - at least for those scenarios where you know it wasn't finished yet.
What would you replace it with? (Score:5, Informative)
Can't we let e-mail die the fiery train wreck that it already is?
E-mail has its issues, but so does...literally everything else, generally worse so.
First off, it's neigh impossible to imagine anyone conjuring up an open communication standard in 2022. Most of the newer things seem to be proprietary implementations of formerly-open standards. Slack and its clones come to mind.
What makes E-mail continue to exist is the fact that it's federated. We could all use Facebook Messenger if everyone agreed to do everything through Facebook, but...obligatory XKCD [xkcd.com] pretty much reflects the problem, leaving us with SMTP and its evolution.
Un-send e-mail? Everyone who wasn't an AOL user learned that pre-1995. Giving the impression of an 'undo' button is creating a base of people who don't read and don't expect to be burned. (yeah, none of us read the warning, but when you click OK, you get what you get)
I'll agree with you that this functionality is questionable in its utility, though I've seen it implemented in Mailspring already. At the very least, Apple isn't implementing "Mic Drop".
It sucks for security.
And what is a better solution for better security that isn't proprietary, centralized, or already an extension on SMTP?
It sucks for interoperability.
And what is more interoperable than SMTP? I can spin up a Postfix/Dovecot server *today* and successfully send a message to an e-mail server from 1990 if I wanted to for some reason. Is there a more interoperable protocol you had in mind?
And over the years 'mail servers' have deviated from protocols so far, that 'roll your own' is better than what we're calling e-mail.
So go for it! Personally, I'm a fan of Mailcow as it's done most of the heavy lifting for me while still providing a good cross-section of functionality, but by all means, roll your own mail server...for something that "sucks for interoperability", I'm sure I can send an e-mail to your e-mail server one hell of a lot more successfully than I can WhatsApp your XMPP server.
Microsoft, I'm looking at you with your 'no timeouts' soft policy.
Oh, f'k Office365 and G-Suite Appy Workspaces Messaging Duo Wave...but just because they're annoying to talk to doesn't mean that they don't ultimately accept SMTP traffic.
Re: What would you replace it with? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Email is not interoperable at all.
How do you figure? You can run MS Exchange or have your mail hosted by Google or use one of the niche e-mail servers like Icewarp or MDaemon or run Mailcow on a Raspberry Pi...and all of them can send and receive messages between each other in an understood manner, each of which having a web frontend like Rainloop or Roundcube or using a desktop client like eM Client or Mailspring or The Bat or Pan or Pegasus or 10,001 iOS or android apps...and that's not "interoperable" in your book? Could I trouble you fo
Re: (Score:2)
Standardizing certificates and basic encryption, at least from an account to the server, and from server to server would be better than "shooting ones and zeroes at each other".
Something that had just enough logging that the receiver could file a complaint about abuse and there could be basi
Apple copies News at 11 (Score:2)
Who is surprised? Apple has been copying for a while. They copied Xerox Alto and called the Mac the first GUI-based computer. They copied the Diamond Rio and called the iPod the first mp3 player. They copied the features from Nokia, LG KE850, and myOrigo and called the iPhone the first smartphone.
Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I bet you get unreasonably bothered when you see any car that was created on a production line
No, only bothered when a smug fanboi tries to pump the "new features" as the greatest thing since sliced bread, while claiming their preferred company created the bread slicing machine too. And then proceed to tell you how "brave" that company was for removing widely used features. Shit's irritating. I'm not accusing you of being a fanboi, nor saying all Apple users are like that. But the ones that do act like that are insufferable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Recycled Debunked News at 11 (Score:2)
>They copied Xerox Alto and called the Mac the first GUI-based computer.
that has been so categorically debunked that it isn't even funny anymore.
Apple had mockups of a proposed bit-mapped GUI *before* the PARC visit.
Yes, seeing the working Xerox system influenced the direction of the final product.
But to be equally fair, the Xerox machine relied *heavily* on the Master's Thesis of one Jeff Raskins . . . one of the apple engineers on the product.
And the next claim from apple I see to be "he first GUI-base
God Apple sucks (Score:2)
Can we somehow unsubscribe from the deluge of Applesauce posts the last couple days, I can't give less of a shit.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't give less of a shit.
Yet here you are in the comments.
Re: (Score:2)
Not because I wanted to read this, but because I wanted to bitch that there's been nothing but Apple posts the last couple days. Is their marketing department all here or what the hell is going on?
Apple while technically "open source" is so antithetical to the spirit of open source that none of their shit should be allowed here.
Re: (Score:2)
Can we somehow unsubscribe from the deluge of Applesauce posts the last couple days, I can't give less of a shit.
It's almost like there was a developer conference or something on which generate a lot of stories. WWDC doesn't end until coming Friday. Can I suggest you go hide in a cave with no internet if things other people find interesting triggers you so much?
Oh and just so you know this happens every year so I suggest at the start of next year you look up when WWDC 2023 is on and then go prep your cave in advance.
Re: (Score:2)
Bunch of goddamn lemmings
Re: (Score:2)
All you pussy apple users suck dick!
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't like news for nerds (which this is) may I recommend for you a good knitting forum?
Or maybe you just actually like bitching and moaning. Is your local pub closed? Is that why you decided to jump on a site go into a comments section of a story you're not (apparently) interested in and post about it?
Get some therapy man. Your social network addiction is getting out of hand.
Re: (Score:2)
I already explained... I read thru the headlines and saw almost nothing that wasn't fruit-related. So I picked the top applesauce story to bitch.
This is too much rotten fruit. Find something else. Go masturbate to pictures of Jobs' bald spot.
Re: (Score:2)
How about doing the reverse, Google? (Score:2)
Please add a proper "bounce message" (or "resend", if you prefer) to Gmail. Most desktop email apps (including Apple's) have offered this since day one.
Gmail has best features? (Score:2)
But I had to install Thunderbird and configure it to download my Gmail mail because the Gmail interface sucked so many balls I couldn't find enough guys that wanted their balls sucked.