Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Apple

Apple Working on Combined TV Box, Speaker to Revive Home Efforts (bloomberg.com) 28

Apple has been a laggard in the smart-home space, but a versatile new device in early development could change that. From a Bloomberg report: The company is working on a product that would combine an Apple TV set-top box with a HomePod speaker and include a camera for video conferencing through a connected TV and other smart-home functions, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing internal matters. The device's other capabilities would include standard Apple TV box functions like watching video and gaming plus smart speaker uses such as playing music and using Apple's Siri digital assistant.

If launched, it would represent Apple's most ambitious smart-home hardware offering to date. The Cupertino, California-based technology giant is also mulling the launch of a high-end speaker with a touch screen to better compete with market leaders Google and Amazon.com, the people said. Such a device would combine an iPad with a HomePod speaker and also include a camera for video chat. Apple has explored connecting the iPad to the speaker with a robotic arm that can move to follow a user around a room, similar to Amazon's latest Echo Show gadget. Development of both Apple products is still in the early stages, and the company could decide to launch neither or change key features. The company often works on new concepts and devices without ultimately shipping them.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Working on Combined TV Box, Speaker to Revive Home Efforts

Comments Filter:
  • sounds like Facebook Portal wannabe. apple has to do something with all the discontinued homepad crap.
  • Why it doesn't ACTUALLY want to be anything more than a niche electronics/computing purveyor.

  • by takochan ( 470955 ) on Monday April 12, 2021 @11:01PM (#61266928)

    They are called "microphones", not "speakers" as their primary purpose is to listen... to everything ;-)

    "Speaker-ing" is just a side function..

  • by lsllll ( 830002 ) on Monday April 12, 2021 @11:01PM (#61266930)
    Yeah, I know. We sit across from cameras all day long sometimes, but it's one thing to be sitting in front of a camera in a shirt and only your upper body showing and another thing to be lounging in front of the TV shirtless, scratching your balls. When I use a camera for teleconferencing, I actually disconnect it (USB) when I'm not using it, and I use Linux. Don't know what the appeal is for all these devices, from devices that listen to you all the time now to devices that can see everything inside your home. But I'm sure someone will come to their defense.
  • Whats this fascination with face to face meetings ? For fucks sake.
    • Face to face? Real or on the telescreen? Without or with deepfaking?

      The first one is obvious. The latter a meme/fad/FlappyBird.

      • All of them. Whats the big deal with meetings ?
        • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

          All of them. Whats the big deal with meetings ?

          People like face to face time. You might not, but in general, people do. We're social creatures who thrive in the presence of others.

          Even the biggest introvert still gains benefits by meeting people - they may withdraw, but that's because introverts find social interactions draining (which is fine). That is, after all, why they're introverts. Extroverts are the opposite - they gain energy from social interactions.

          Note I said "energy". I didn't say "introverts l

          • > People like face to face time. You might not, but in general, people do. We're social creatures who thrive in the presence of others.
            Having a meeting with your manager ever day is not a social interaction. Maybe its just me but i wouldnt call that fun or interesting, where half the people are talking bullshit about powerpoint and statistics.
            Most meetings are a waste of time, because most people are poor communicators. They are very broad and generalising the real details are often missing. Im in so
  • it will cost more than a streaming device, a speaker (I prefer 7.2 audio) and a webcam.

    With a "different" subscription price.

  • by Trailer Trash ( 60756 ) on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @12:20AM (#61267140) Homepage

    Iâ(TM)m honestly pretty excited about not buying one.

  • Combine two exiting things and call it an innovation.

    Bonus points, if somebody already did it before. Ideally some third rate Chinese knock-off manufacturer. ;)

  • Apple users are famously price-insensitive, be it in the app store or buying expensive HiFi gadgets to plug their phones into when they get home @2000$ a pop. So, why do they have to resell other people's stuff in their stores? Where's the Apple TV, (OK, they'd have to rebadge a Samsung to get the screen quality, I guess...), the Apple hi-end audio system (for home & car), the Apple home automation solution with all the latest IoT shit? They have an amazing opportunity to expand their 'walled garden'

  • The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment.
  • Seriously, Apple's current lineup of home automation gear just blows because it lacks features and integrations. Make the existing stuff useful and then get back to us on this new thing.

  • As long as Apple's smarthome stuff relies on their brain-dead AI that can't even answer basic questions most of the time let alone perform complex tasks, it is not going to be able to compete with Google or Amazon.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...