Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Apple

User Says Apple Disabled His iCloud, App Store, and Apple ID Accounts After Payment To Apple Card Failed (dcurt.is) 172

Dustin Curtis, writing on his blog: About ten days ago, when I went to update a few apps in the App Store on my Mac, I was met with a curious error: "Your account has been disabled in the App Store and iTunes." The internet is filled with stories from people whose Google accounts were locked for unexplained reasons, causing them to lose all of their data, including years of email, so I was somewhat concerned. But I'd never heard of similar cases involving Apple's services, and I wouldn't expect such behavior from a customer-focused company like Apple, so I figured it was a glitch and made a mental note to try again later. The next day, Music.app stopped working: "You cannot login because your account has been locked."

Now I was genuinely worried. I checked my phone and neither the App Store nor Apple Music would work there, either. A few minutes later, Calendar popped up an error â" it had stopped syncing. I immediately tried to call Apple Support from my Mac, but Apple's Handoff feature had been disabled as well. The first person I spoke to at Apple spent a while researching the issue and then told me there was nothing she could do but escalate the issue, and that I should expect a call "hopefully" within the next day. I asked what the problem might be, and she seemed as confused as I was. Although some Apple services were still working, like iMessage (thank God) and Photos, I was terrified that more services would suddenly become inaccessible or that I would lose the considerable amount of data I have stored in iCloud.

A couple of days later, I became impatient and contacted Apple Support again. This time, the representative mumbled something about Apple Card before saying that he also had no power to help me. Apple ID was a different department, he said, and they could only be contacted by email. He emailed them. I continued to wait. The next time I tried to use my Apple Card, it was declined. Strange. I checked the Wallet app, and the balance was below the limit. I remembered the Apple support representative mumbling about Apple Card, so I did some digging through my email to see if I could find a connection. As it turns out, my bank account number changed in January, causing Apple Card autopay to fail. Then the Apple Store made a charge on the card. Less than fifteen days after that, my App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, and Apple ID accounts had all been disabled by Apple Card.
Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, which is fighting a legal battle with Apple, offered some commentary on this: "It's terrifying how much leverage Apple has over consumers and developers by integrating everything, locking us all in, and exerting total control. Normal companies respect the natural boundaries that exist between platforms and services. Apple does not! For Apple, every choke point they create is both a profit center and a lever to exert control. After blocking Fortnite updates from over a billion iOS users, Apple threatened to block Sign in With Apple -- which they forced us to adopt -- affecting Fortnite players on 7 platforms."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

User Says Apple Disabled His iCloud, App Store, and Apple ID Accounts After Payment To Apple Card Failed

Comments Filter:
  • by Dan East ( 318230 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:09AM (#61116062) Journal

    Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, ... It's terrifying how much leverage Apple has over consumers and developers by integrating everything

    He's just jealous. Typical CEO envy.

    • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:24AM (#61116132)

      While I agree that Epic’s complaints seem rather hypocritical, that does not render the point they’re making moot.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Membership in the Glorious Apple Master Race is only for people with money and gainful employment. Everyone else go use Android, you peasants.

  • Just Don't (Score:5, Interesting)

    by unixcorn ( 120825 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:11AM (#61116074)

    Don't use apple for all of your stuff. I liken this to don't keep all of your eggs in one basket. Apple is great for some things but not for keeping track of my money.

    • Re:Just Don't (Score:4, Insightful)

      by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:28AM (#61116154)

      Definitely. Going all-in on any single entity is a recipe for disaster - even if you’re a fan.

    • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:35AM (#61116186) Journal

      Yes, spread it all around so that vendors can take turns doing you in the caboose.

      • by nadass ( 3963991 )

        Yes, spread it all around so that vendors can take turns doing you in the caboose.

        I'd give you mod points if I had any... This is the exact truth of these competitive matters. Every company will take their turn, it's just a matter of *when.*

    • Re:Just Don't (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anubis IV ( 1279820 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @01:27PM (#61116790)

      Exactly this. Even as a longtime Apple user, I find the notion of tying myself to any one company like that to be madness. Accidents—both theirs and ours—can and do happen. Products can and do get "sunsetted". Companies can and do take turns for the worse.

      Inasmuch as I do use any of Apple's apps or services, I always make sure that I can either walk away without hesitation or have a way to get out immediately should the need ever arise. Apple Card? It's a nice-to-have, not my primary card. iCloud Drive? Never more than a drag-and-drop away from being replaced. Mail, contacts, and calendars? I stopped letting Apple sync those for me years ago, and instead pay a respected third-party to manage them. News feeds? Screw Apple's proprietary News app; I've stuck with RSS and only consider clients that allow me to export my subscriptions in the industry-standard format. Podcasts? A third-party app and a service that supports data export using industry-standard data formats. Photos? They may live in Apple's ecosystem, but they also get synced as a flat directory of pictures to a Windows machine I own, then backed up from there both locally and in the cloud. Passwords? A third-party app that supports exporting to various industry-standard formats. Movie rentals? The data is already ephemeral and I already use competing stores when it suits me. Movie and music purchases? I don't buy anything that I can't load into Plex, but I've also purchased copies of several disc ripping and DRM stripping apps, so that's rarely a concern in practice. Messages? It would seemingly be the hardest to replace, but SMS is still the global standard and I've kept Messages tied to my phone number (instead of an email address), so everything and everyone should simply fall back to SMS if I ever get cut off from my Apple account.

      All of which is to say, no matter which ecosystem you're in or companies you trust today, assume your relationship with those companies will eventually sour. Save yourself some significant headache later by planning out what you would do if you suddenly lost access to X or how you would deal with it if you needed to get your data out. And as you consider alternatives in the future, disregard any that are hostile to users exporting their data in standard formats. With technology and the culture around it moving as fast as it does, it isn't so much a matter of if you'll need to get out, but when.

  • ... I thought it was supposed to be a feature? - - - Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games ... offered some commentary on this: "It's terrifying how much leverage Apple has over consumers and developers by integrating everything, locking us all in, and exerting total control. ..."
  • by btroy ( 4122663 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:15AM (#61116084)
    This is kind of a result of the obvious don't you think?

    Rent your services, music, etc. and guess what, don't pay your rent, don't get to play.
    • by omnichad ( 1198475 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:19AM (#61116110) Homepage

      They disabled the free stuff too. And the charges went through - the payment was just past due.

      • by btroy ( 4122663 )
        Yes read the article after the fact.
      • by Alain Williams ( 2972 ) <addw@phcomp.co.uk> on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:43AM (#61116218) Homepage

        But Apple just stopped services - it did not tell him that payment had not worked - this was the real problem.

        • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

          But Apple just stopped services - it did not tell him that payment had not worked - this was the real problem.

          I realize it's a time honored tradition here to not RTFS, much less RTFA, but damn this is just lazy.

          From the summary:

          I did some digging through my email to see if I could find a connection. As it turns out, my bank account number changed in January, causing Apple Card autopay to fail.

        • Actually, that's just a presumption. He could have either missed it or simply not mentioned he ignored it a tad too long. There's a reason "The check is in the mail." is a mock statement.
        • by taustin ( 171655 )

          Well, the real problem was " As it turns out, my bank account number changed in January," which is certainly not Apple's fault. Was he unaware that his bank account number changed? If so, was it because the bank didn't tell him or because he ignore the message?

          Apple certainly could (and should) have had front line help desk people able to determine the account was locked for a declined payment, and willing to tell him that. But that's secondary to the actual problem at his end.

          If you're going to put all you

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      We're in an awkward transition period right now. People say, "that's my data! I took those photos! I wrote those spreadsheets!" to which the megacorp says "hippity hoppity, that's now my property." People just haven't gotten used to it yet and are still thinking the old way. We're purging the four olds: Old Ideas, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Customs. It's just going to take a while before people adjust to the new normal. You won't own anything and you'll love it.
      • And this is why I manage all that stuff from my own private cloud at home... If you're paying people for these various services your breakeven to host it yourself is easily under a year. Breakeven might be different if you're only doing the freebies - but I'd argue it's stupid to to that.
      • Don't put it on someone else's machine. Blindingly simple.
        • by sjames ( 1099 )

          The problem is all the "services" that make it increasingly difficult for the average consumer to not put it on someone else's machine. Go ahead and try to find something the average consumer has any hope of setting up that let's them set up a family sync server that they own. It could be made easy and consumer friendly to do that, but Apple et. al. don't wanna.

  • laws of sale? can best buy repo your TV if your CC fails at the store?

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by guruevi ( 827432 )

      If you haven't payed for it yet, sure they can. In this case he was still paying off his iPhone:

      This is the e-mail he got:
      We’ve been unable to collect full payment for your new iPhone . As a result, we will block the device on the order from further access to the Apple iTunes and Mac App stores, and disable all accounts associated with the device purchased on the order.

      He was unable to use his iPhone and the subscription to Apple Music (which I'm assuming gets paid from the same card and/or got 1 year

      • Worse than that. The email mislabeled an M1 Macbook Pro as an "iPhone." They fully shut down the Apple ID, including the free services - did not work on any device.

        As far as I can tell, there was never a point where a credit card charge was declined. They were just late on an Apple-branded credit card payment.

      • by sjames ( 1099 )

        You make him sound like a deadbeat. He was willing and able to pay, they just didn't bother to ask him about it after an automated process failed silently. Even when he called THEM, they couldn't say what the problem was. At the very least, on his first call, they should have told him the problem and accepted his new account number to fix everything. They also should have offered a tall apology for cutting everything off without calling him first.

    • by sjames ( 1099 )

      This is more like a single credit card charge for your TV fails, so they come repo your TV, couch, stove, cars, and the dog's water bowl even though those are paid up.

      They even repo the complementary wall calendar they gave you for browsing in the store.

      They COULD have called you and gotten the new CC number in under 5 minutes, but they didn't.

  • Bad summary (Score:3, Informative)

    by Presence Eternal ( 56763 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:18AM (#61116096)

    FTA, they didn't block access because he couldn't pay the card as such, but because the phone he was using was also going unpaid.

    In my opinion the summary is trying to make you think this is the same kind of thing as being hit by a Google Blackhole. It was not, and was fixed after talking to someone.

    I think his major comment was "It appears as though charges from Apple are special, and if your account is not 100% current, Apple will quickly take drastic action"

    • Re:Bad summary (Score:5, Informative)

      by omnichad ( 1198475 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:22AM (#61116120) Homepage

      No - their email mentioned an iPhone, but they actually meant M1 Macbook Pro. They canceled his trade-in credit and applied it to his card balance, and that actually did go through. It was just is credit card payment that failed, so he was past due. And Apple blocked the free services on the Apple ID - not just the paid ones.

      Yes, they fixed it after he talked to multiple someones at multiple companies. And it took multiple business days after the payment issue was rectified - and Apple's own instructions for reactivation didn't work.

    • Re:Bad summary (Score:5, Insightful)

      by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:53AM (#61116278)

      It was not, and was fixed after talking to someone.

      No it wasn't. It was fixed after talking to multiple people, chasing a company whose internal escalation process ignores customers and doesn't call them back and took several days to achieve.

      Don't make light of this. It's time we stopped accepting the bullshit "customer service" we get given. Though props for actually being able to get someone. The best you can do with Google is tweet at them angrily.

      • Yes. This was pointed out to me and I accepted it. Bad on me for not reading the article as carefully as I should have. Possibly bad on you for not reading the thread.

  • Serf'ing the Cloud (Score:5, Insightful)

    by SteveSgt ( 3465 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:30AM (#61116160)

    This is not (just) about Apple. It's about the new form of serfdom we have accepted by moving some of our most valuable possessions to "the cloud".

    That magical cloud is a "place" where you store your valuable data on some computer you couldn't find in physical space if your tried, in a tenant-landlord relationship from hell governed by a ridiculously one-sided agreement you haven't read. Your home is no longer your castle when it belongs to someone else, who can evict you and confiscate your possessions when you aren't expecting it.

    The question is, is there a better solution than building your own server you own, and running your own central storage? Or are we all doomed to digital serfdom?

    • by Oligonicella ( 659917 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @01:03PM (#61116640)

      we have accepted by moving some of our most valuable possessions to "the cloud".

      We? You, maybe, but not "we".

    • This is great, and no, I don't think there's much better solution. I've done the "host my own" thing and its got a bunch of its own downsides.

      The only hedge seems to be some hybrid solution of multiple clouds and/or self-hosting, of course with all the attendant costs and nuisance.

      There might be some point in the future (5 years? a decade? never?) where the political system forces some kind of bill of rights compromise, but mostly I expect it will boil down to cloud companies providing a more "concierge" a

    • by eth1 ( 94901 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @01:14PM (#61116704)

      The question is, is there a better solution than building your own server you own, and running your own central storage? Or are we all doomed to digital serfdom?

      That's actually a perfect analogy... It used to be if you couldn't afford to defend yourself, you pretty much had to find someone who could, and subjugate yourself to them.

      These days, if you have the knowledge and resources to run your own stuff, you can, otherwise, you become digitally subjugated to someone else who can.

      The crazy part is that a lot of big companies are doing this to themselves, even when they *can* run their own stuff, just because it's a bit cheaper.

    • > The question is, is there a better solution than building your own server you own, and running your own central storage?

      It's always, "build, buy, or rent". I personally own storage and rent Xen slices running on hydro power cheaper than I can run them; Debian installs are doing what I need on both. I'm trading some privacy for cheap hosting.

      But somebody could buy a Helm and a Synology and get something similar, giving up some more control on software but keeping more data locally.

      Or they could go ful

  • by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:30AM (#61116162)

    Apple's selling point is exactly that it thinks and decides for you, so you don't "have to". Which necessarily comes down to you not "having to" be an individual, but "enjoying the comfort" of keeping your brain off, and effectively be part of a bigger swarm individual.

    You knew that when joining them. They are the boss now. And you wanted that. If that is your choice of how you want to exist, and it makes you happy, we're not stopping you.

    So now don't act surprised that they have power over you and you're dependent on them, just because they made a mistake. It's not a mistake, but "your" choice... unless you chose to be a distinct individual again. In which case, staying with Apple is a bad idea, buddy.

    • by Dutch Gun ( 899105 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:49AM (#61116256)

      Yes, thank God I chose Google's Android, so I never have to worry about all my services being shut down due to them disabling a shared ID.

      • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

        Yes, thank God I chose Google's Android, so I never have to worry about all my services being shut down due to them disabling a shared ID.

        Minor difference being that your Android device doesn't turn into a brick if Google tells you to go away... there are alternates to the Play Store, and you can always side load applications. Apple is a captive market.

  • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @11:33AM (#61116174) Journal

    Everything in life is like this: payment hiccups result in the service being shut down. The nicer orgs give you warnings and grace periods, but typically one cannot depend on that.

    • The issue is Apple is both the store and the payment processor. Other stores would just charge the card, give you the goods, and have no knowledge or interest in your ability to pay your credit card. In this case, the tight relationship Apple has between store and payment means the store charged his card then failed to provide services because his credit card company said he was a risk. That doesn't happen with other stores or cards. This is a unique Apple problem.

      • by wagnerer ( 53943 )
        Card was disabled. Apple tried to charge it for his subscriptions. Charge rejected. Apple stopped the subscriptions. Didn't purge the account which they were probably legally entitled to do, just suspended it due to lack of payment.
    • Everything in life is like this: payment hiccups result in the service being shut down. The nicer orgs give you warnings and grace periods, but typically one cannot depend on that.

      Are you saying Apple isn't nice? How shocking!

      • by wagnerer ( 53943 )
        Sounds like this guy wasn't paying attention to his messages. He forgot to send the trade-in he promised too. He forgot to update his payment options. He forgot to pay his bill (The Apple Card gives plenty of notification on the phone). He admits he didn't check his e-mails until after the account was suspended. Is being nice mean to keep providing services after someone refuses to pay, breaks their commitments on other things, and ignores contact attempts? I don't think so. Nice was just suspending the acc
  • Companies should at least offer perpetual licenses, what if I'm a starving artist or startup and I can't afford an adobe subscription? I lose the ability to create work. With perpetual licenses at least you maintain your ability to run the current purchased release.

    • I agree but too many finance departments at companies that make up the biggest revenue source care about the short term financials/capital position. Investors in companies that have subscription based software or hardware should be given the complete picture and risk. Right now as far as I know, subscription makes your âoethis quarterâ expenses look good to investors.

    • by v1 ( 525388 )

      Perpetual licenses for ongoing services makes no sense.

      The best licensing I've seen recently was I purchased a 1 year license for some software. During that time I could download the software and updates. At the end of the license, my software continued to run, I just couldn't update it. The guy selling it (the sales line AT the vendor) actually said a lot of people save money by only renewing every OTHER year if they don't feel they will need phone support all the time. Every other year you just can't

    • Adobe tries to lock every user in forever, but what does that do?

      It encourages competition to come in and offer things like Pixelmator and others who offer great tools for less and which a lot of students (read future employed & startup creators) use and will use into the future. Some will work where Adobe is on all the machines, but Adobe will lose some business permanently.

      The government & companies know how Apple, Adobe and others work and so they often & so they often set up special deals o

      • Usually engineering programs can be bought with a perpetual license partially of the reasons above and partially for budgetary reasons.

      • It really makes my think Adobe is shooting themselves in the foot... just with a very slow-moving bullet.

        Every designer I personally know got their start... back in ye olden days of installing from a CD and entering a license code... with pirated copies of Photoshop, Illustrator, and on. Eventually, they grep up and quit designing rave flyers, concert posters, and T-shirt and sticker designs for their friends, and got real jobs or started real businesses where they paid for their Adobe suite and wrote it o

    • Companies should at least offer perpetual licenses, what if I'm a starving artist or startup and I can't afford an adobe subscription? I lose the ability to create work. With perpetual licenses at least you maintain your ability to run the current purchased release.

      Maybe you missed the 90's when that was a thing, then they realized the public was stupid with mmo's, everyone in silicon valley was paying attention to what garriot and Ralph got away with, they literally got the public to pay to steal role playing games from themselves and pay for the priviledge for not owning their own software. That's why the entire tech industry has been celebrating the stupidity of the game buying public.

      See here "the client to cloud revolution", better known as the return of mainfra

  • In over 20 years of working professional IT, employed and self-employed, I can safely say that Apple telephone (and written) customer service is the most abysmal that I've ever experienced, for any company, ever.

    To the point that - when they failed basic legal obligations to register a written complaint, after refusing to register a telephone complaint, after several days of being passed from pillar to post (I alone spoke to 10 different countries just from their one support line!) they couldn't even be bot

    • by nadass ( 3963991 )
      Hmm, I doubt you've dealt with enough companies to ascertain that Apple is indeed "the most abysmal" -- and to such an extent that Google is somehow the best customer service.

      As of last week, Comcast (and many national ISPs) rank as the worst experiences overall. They'll run your credit report before you even try to sign-up for service (yeah that's happened) and they'll bill you multiple times for the same month of service before your service is even setup (the Internet is littered with those stories and
  • People always forget this aspect when companies become monopolies: they can and will screw you along every link of their chain.
    I once had a Chase bank account. which they closed, literally, for no reason. As in they told me "our contract states you or we can cancel the relationship at any time, and we're exercising that right. we don't need to tell you why". No credit hit, no illegal action, just Chase deciding they didn't like me for some reason they wouldn't tell me about. I'm pretty sure it was because

  • by petes_PoV ( 912422 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @12:23PM (#61116402)

    my App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, and Apple ID accounts had all been disabled by Apple Card

    If only there was a non-Apple way of using the internet and getting services ....

  • "I remembered the Apple support representative mumbling about Apple Card, so I did some digging through my email to see if I could find a connection. As it turns out, my bank account number changed in January, causing Apple Card autopay to fail."

    Bank account numbers don't change on their own. He didn't check his email. He didn't check the payment status of the Apple Card in his wallet. Because of that, there was a cascading series of lockouts.

    Tell me again how this isn't the poster's negligence leading

    • Ya really as mush as apple deserves some hate this dude was at fault fully. I have never just have a bank account number/CC number/Debit change on its own lol. Now we can fault apple for having poor customer service for not having an answer and having a difficult time getting to the right department. But this dude isn't telling the full story IMO
  • The lesson here is to never have an umbrella account for multiple services because you are at the mercy of any issue banning the entire group of services. Not to mention outages that affect multiple services However the way people have been dumbed down by devices today they may not know how to become free of the 'bundling'
  • He had autopay set up. His account number changed (how often does this happen?!?), causing autopay to fail. 15 days later Apple started locking features. How did he go 15 days without noticing his payment failed? How often does he check his balance? What happened to other autopay services (most notably a mortgage or utilities)? When my debit card changes, I need to contact 5-8 companies with updated card number and expiration date.

    • You might have missed this, but his Apple card was still operational. He could have taken that and swiped it at any store that takes Mastercard and walked out with goods and services. This was just a late payment. Normally just a late fee and some interest, not everything being shut down - his charges still went through.

      • This was just a late payment.

        Don't hand wave that away, his failure to keep his account information up to date caused his whole mess. That he didn't know that his own bank account number changed tells me all I need to know about his blog.

        -Gotta pay to play.

        • Again, the card was still active and can be charged to.

          • But if his auto pay was set up through a bank account number, that card doesn't help at all. Hell he might even have the cash in hand, but if auto pay is set up to only use a *bank account* then that also does not help.

            Now maybe auto pay allows a fallback for payment, either he had not set that up or it simply does not work - but no one has mentioned that a fallback exists so I assume it does not (exist). Also, hoping the card will be used as a fallback is not a plan.
            • I still am not sure you're reading it right.

              The auto-pay was for their bank account to make payments on their credit card bill. At no point was the credit card deactivated. No payments charged to the card have yet been declined. Apple suspended everything on the mere suspicion that the user might remain delinquent on their credit card bill.

              • Ok I get it, so Apple Card was his credit card, which he used in turn to pay for his Apple account. He failed to update bank information for whatever reason on his Apple Card so it was declined when Apple tried to use it to pay for the Apple account.

                Why do we have to read about it? He lost track of his finances and became a dead-beat.
  • ...putting your data in "the cloud" is simply putting it on someone else's computer---one which you have no authority to manage. Do the owners of that computer have the same ideas about how valuable your data is to you? (How quaint that you answered "yes".) Are they backing it up? How would you ever know?

  • When the market is "free" you can expect this kind of thing. The companies are "free" to do as they please without fear of losing any real money.
  • by iamhassi ( 659463 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @12:58PM (#61116612) Journal
    Why are you asking the guy suing Apple for his opinion on Apple? He’s suing Apple because he didn’t want to pay Apple what he agreed to pay Apple, obviously he’s not impartial and won’t say anything positive or particularly helpful about this situation.
  • I'm sure if your automatic payment fails to Epic, they'll disable your access as well.

  • by Fly Swatter ( 30498 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @01:18PM (#61116726) Homepage
    Well, there's your problem. Don't blame Apple for your non-payment.

    Do they not teach basic home accounting anymore? Instead of whining all over social media about it, try to keep track of your financials. Expiration dates and bank account changes don't update themselves...

    -Good thing most people don't use cash, apparently they can't even keep track of their own bank account number.
  • I wouldn't expect such behavior from a customer-focused company like Apple

    Just stop... really... They don't and never have cared about you any more than Google does (other than going all the way back to Woz.. he loved you dearly)

  • ...by integrating everything, locking us all in, and exerting total control

    No, you locked YOURSELF in. There is absolutely no need to put everything on Apple's 'cloud' and use all their services 100% (and why even use an 'Apple Card'?).

  • by shubus ( 1382007 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @02:00PM (#61116940)
    I pre-empted problems like this by getting rid of my Apple Card. I will never EVER have one again. Additionally, I killed the autopay option to Apple for iCloud storage and will keep my storage within the "free" limit. Happily, I don't use Apple Music so now I have no autopay's at Apple. This leaves me free to buy the occasionally needed Apple products from Apple with my non-Apple credit cards. It is NOT hard to eliminate this "Apple leverage".
  • While the user's issue can be easily resolved because it's simply due to a 3rd party change that caused consequential damage. But Sweeney has no say in this matter. This is a consumer's issue with the service provider. They will have a way to resolve it with each other. Sweeney is so bitter being blocked because of his deliberate action, he finds every possible reason to attack Apple and that makes him pathetic.
  • Connecting everything up benefits the CONNECTOR, not the user. Otherwise they would not let you do it.

    Have a ipad? Do not get an apple card.

    Have a twitch account? Do not connect it to your amazon account. Use a different email.

    They can not force you to integrate, there is little benefit, and the potential problems are HUGE.

  • by uncqual ( 836337 ) on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @03:13PM (#61117186)

    "It's terrifying how much leverage Apple has over consumers and developers by integrating everything, locking us all in, and exerting total control. Normal companies respect the natural boundaries that exist between platforms and services. Apple does not! For Apple, every choke point they create is both a profit center and a lever to exert control. After blocking Fortnite updates from over a billion iOS users, Apple threatened to block Sign in With Apple -- which they forced us to adopt -- affecting Fortnite players on 7 platforms."

    If you're an Apple user, you chose to live in their garden with all of its "protections", limits, and constraints. This is no secret and hasn't been for a long time. You made a conscious decision to shell out money for this and therefore agreed to it.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (1) Gee, I wish we hadn't backed down on 'noalias'.

Working...