Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Apple

Apple Hiring Engineers To Develop 6G Wireless (bloomberg.com) 58

Apple launched its first iPhones with 5G wireless speeds a few months ago. Now it's looking to start work on sixth-generation cellular connectivity, or 6G, indicating it wants to be a leader in the technology rather than relying on other companies. From a report: The Cupertino, California-based company this week posted job ads seeking wireless system research engineers for current and next-generation networks. The listings are for positions at Apple's offices in Silicon Valley and San Diego, where the company works on wireless technology development and chip design. "You will have the unique and rewarding opportunity to craft next generation wireless technology that will have deep impact on future Apple products," according to the job announcement. "In this role you will be at the center of a cutting-edge research group responsible for creating next generation disruptive radio access technologies over the next decade." People hired for the positions will "research and design next generation (6G) wireless communication systems for radio access networks" and "participate in industry/academic forums passionate about 6G technology." Industry watchers don't expect 6G to roll out until about 2030, but the job listings indicate Apple wants to be involved at the earliest stages in the development of the new technology.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Hiring Engineers To Develop 6G Wireless

Comments Filter:
  • I hear AT&T has already "evolved" to 9G. :-)

    My understanding is that they're going to switch to base26 for 10G so they can keep using a single character on the displays for, at least, the next few months -- I mean years -- so then it will be "AG" -- "ZG". Could be twice that if they decide to use UPPER *and* lower-case letters, but they're concerned that could be confusing... /satire

    • Or... base36 for those that don't have fat fingers and can proofread. :-)

    • Nah, BaseUnicode! I'll wait for {POOP_EMOJI}G!

    • I hear AT&T has already "evolved" to 9G. :-)

      9G is soooo 15 minutes ago. I hear Tesla has already gone to plaid. It's so fast they're waiting for smartphone engineers to be born so they can design the thing.

      • 9G is soooo 15 minutes ago. I hear Tesla has already gone to plaid. It's so fast they're waiting for smartphone engineers to be born so they can design the thing.

        That's just ludicrous...

    • "I have the most G's, believe me! In fact I have infinity G's, everyone knows it! When millions talk to me, cheering by the way, always cheering, they start out, "Gee..." as in, "Gee, you are so smart, you invented all those terrific G's by yourself! Next I'll tackle H's, and it will be fantastic! Can't wait to get to T's. Love those T's!"

  • by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 ) on Thursday February 18, 2021 @02:28PM (#61077192)

    Full 1 THz infrared, passes through NONE of the things, needs base stations in every room. Stations. Plural. Cause your body might be in the way. But somehow we will still manage to actually be slower.

    Because "progress"!

    (I am for progress. I'm saying if it isn't better, it by definition isn't progress. That is how I define progress.)

    • If you think your comment is funny, imagine Cave Johnson is reading it.
      It's not funny, it's freakin' hilarious.

    • ....just by increasing frequency to x-ray range. You get wider bandwidth as a nice side effect too. *ducks behind lead shield*

      • While we're at it: Just wondering:

        Given that no blockage seems perfect, how bright of a normal, say, green light would you need, for it to actually be detectable, or even visible, on the other side of a 4 inch thick brick wall?

        And would the wall melt first? ;)

        Or is there some quantum effect that makes that 100% impossible for that thickness and that frequency?

    • by Misagon ( 1135 )

      I already made a 7G mobile years ago. Its seven G's are hanging in my bedroom window.
      Each G is in a different style and different colour.
      Easy to upgrade to 8G or more.
      Has a bell for ringing.
      A small notepad for memory.
      A picture of the speaker of the house at the top. (He's loud)
      Not wireless though.

  • Apple launched its first iPhones with 5G wireless speeds a few months ago. Now it's looking to start work on sixth-generation cellular connectivity, or 6G, indicating it wants to be a leader in the technology rather than relying on other companies.

    ...and that might also afford them the ability to charge for the technology if they end up designing it, instead of being the one to pay to use it, thereby generating more of that sweet, sweet revenue for them.

    Unless of course they open it up for everyone to use freely, which I highly doubt would happen.

    • Apple bought out Intel's wireless modem business last year so they do have a foundation. Whether or not they can make it work remains to be seen.
    • by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 ) on Thursday February 18, 2021 @03:24PM (#61077470)

      And it willl result in more decisions beig made in favor of their insane mindset. Like taking power away from the users and becoming even more people's condescending nanny. Like it being more important that it looks good, than that it actually is good (, so more people fall into the nanny trap).

    • Each generation of cellular and wifi Builds on the work of previous generations. 5G is still using patents from 3G cellular.

      Regardless of what Apple is thinking they will accomplish here they aren't going to be able to generate enough innovations to hold even a double digit percentage of the relevant patents because of this. Maybe if they keep with it for 20 years they will hold enough patents to be relevant but for the next decade everyone is still going to be paying all the people they are paying now.

      I ho

    • I think for Apple it is not just about money but also about control. They really hated that Qualcomm had them over a barrel, and no matter what they did, they had to pay the same percentage to Qualcomm. (Add better screens and processors and memory and charge more? Qualcomm gets more money for the modem chip.) And the courts bizarrely said that it was all FRAND.

      So Apple basically wants to create their own integrated CPU and modem, and not have Qualcomm be able to dictate any terms, financial or technologica

  • 6Geeee (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Kisai ( 213879 ) on Thursday February 18, 2021 @02:38PM (#61077246)

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but 5G is probably where things end.

    Each technology (eg AMPS, TDMA, GSM, WCDMA, (HSDPA), LTE) before it were large jumps enabled by reducing the power required to transmit the same amount of data, with LTE we finally went all IP for the voice and data.
    With WCDMA and HSDPA we switched away from dedicated channels for data. With GSM and TDMA we introduced time-slice channels on the otherwise analog spectrum it previously used.

    There already was nothing to gain from 5G other than using multiple spectrums simultaneously. What's been happening every time a new tech has rolled out, is that it came at the expense of the two-technolgies-ago spectrum. So 4G came at the expense of previous 2G spectrum in the US. 5G comes at the expense of 3G spectrum. If you go look at the actual coverage maps for most of the western half of the US or Canada, you'll find that there is no 5G or 4G coverage between cities, when there used to be coverage back when there was AMPS and 2G. Devices simply are not capable of putting out the power needed to communicate, and the carriers are unwilling to put up twice as many towers to solve it when it only serves car or train traffic.

    If you use Amtrak, you've likely encountered large dead zones where no cellular internet works at all. These are areas that were likely only ever served by AMPS/2G, if at all.

    So by saying 5G is where it stops, is that we will likely never see the full roll out of 5G, because carriers won't let it. eg 5G NR (operating in unlicensed spectrum) will likely never be permitted by AT&T because it cuts them out of the picture.

    6G is unlikely to improve upon anything unless it supplants WiFi from the beginning, and I don't know how I feel about only being able to use wireless services provided by my ISP.

    • 6G and wifi will be literall the same thing. Mark my words.

      That means your wifi router will offer wifi. But the technology will be the same as 6G. Aka the 6G cell will be 6G, but technology will be the exacf same as the next wifi standard.

      • by PPH ( 736903 )

        That means your wifi router will offer wifi. But the technology will be the same as 6G.

        And that's fine with me. As long as I can configure my phone/laptop to connect to my router. Which might be LAN only (I have a WiFi router that only talks to a local server). Or if it connects to the Internet, it does so through a broadband/VPN connection so my end point appears local to my bank in Monaco.

    • Interesting post, but isn't it possible that 6g will break the pattern, since for the reasons you stated, it has to, whereas previous evolutions did not?

      Living in New Mexico where coverage is very spotty I would like it if we could get direct connections from a handset to LEO satellites or high-flying drones and call that 6G, but I guess that's a pipe dream.

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      6G might not offer speed, bit it might offer pervasiveness.

      As in, you take your device out of the box and it's connected instantly via 6G. No messing with WiFi settings or passwords or IP configuration. Out of the box, it just works.

      That's where I see cellular technology going - after all, the user experience to get connected is fairly low friction - you insert the SIM card, and you have connectivity and telephony without having to enter long strings of anything. Insert and go.

      No matter how you do it, WiFi

    • by Bengie ( 1121981 )
      5G is about 20x faster than 4G in real world worst-case situations when given the same time slices and bandwidth. 5G uses much more advanced mu-mimo beamforming couples with ofdma. It can even compensate and actually utilize multi-path signal reflections to enhance signal strength.

      And to say nothing beyond 5g.... I've been reading about real world usage of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access, where devices can communicate at the same time on the same frequency and sub-carrier by differentiating "power level".
    • The idea that 5G won't be fully rolled out by carriers is a fantasy. 99% of the functionality rolled into the 5G standards was specifically to benefit carriers and includes access to new markets and more customers with a largely decreased cost of infrastructure.

      I don't know where 6G will go, but I will bet you a kidney that 5G will get a full rollout. It's precisely the standards that carriers have been clamoring for. And if you think 5G is about faster speeds or phones like most people then you have a lot

  • That's a cancer creation, mind control waves, virus implantation delivery, slightly better internet speeds, AND an aloe strip. Hell, make it two aloe strips to be sure!

  • by zawarski ( 1381571 ) on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:03PM (#61077804)
    It won't give you covid.
  • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • How do they crack the problems of being right up close for the faster speeds....I love the AX reviews where you need to be within 10 feet of the router to get faster than AC..at that point you'd run a wire.
  • 6G, for when 5G doesn't turn Muricans gay and/or autistic fast enough
  • FFS this 5G stuff isn't even really working properly yet and they're already wanting to upgrade from that? Seriously? WHY?
  • They have a secret pact with Elon Musk and once 3000 satellites are up, you'll be able to send texts for free from any point of the planet, with a $1700 iPhone, no ISP needed.
    China and Russia will just love it.

  • Those damn recruiters are always pushing it.

  • ...so I can use my smartphone together with base stations for doing indoor X-ray tomography of my body.
  • SO Cook just launched dumbnet 6g. He bought Telco BS 5G was deployable for iPhone12.

    SteveJobs included WiFi call handoff with iPhone1 and iPhone3. Seamless cellular to WiFi calls were a thing in the beginning. He included WiFi, as a not too obvious, reminder that Telco carriers are not the only game. Metered calling rates were a real threat to iPhone. Apple wanted access based billing rather than metered bits.

    Why Apple dropped WiFi call handoff is beyond my pay grade. Now Apple could be far more effective l

"Life sucks, but it's better than the alternative." -- Peter da Silva

Working...