Judge Orders Tim Cook and Craig Federighi To Testify in Epic Case (appleinsider.com) 33
A judge has ordered Apple to produce Tim Cook and Craig Federighi to testify for the Apple versus Epic lawsuit, and they must produce required documents before the next hearing. From a report: The Apple versus Epic lawsuit continues as publicly filed court documents tell us a bit more about the upcoming trial. Epic wants Apple to produce extensive documentation surrounding the App Store and its operations, but there has been some deliberation as to how extensive this data needs to be, and who will present it. The document filed states that Apple will have a large burden placed on them to gather much of what Epic is asking for. The court sides with Apple here stating that Epic need not ask for more amplifying data unless absolutely necessary. The most important part of the court filing is who's going to be made available to represent Apple. Epic has requested that Tim Cook and Craig Federighi be made available for the hearing. Apple says that Tim Cook will be available, but requests his deposition be limited to four hours. Apple also requested that Eric Neuenshwander, who runs the App Store and reports to Craig Federighi, be present instead.
Re: (Score:2)
The argument for is that Apple is paying the
Re: (Score:2)
The argument for is that Apple is paying the hosting costs, the review costs, the transaction costs, and the distribution costs of all the services the App Store provides (for paid and for free apps). They surely make money as well.
Some people think otherwise. [slashdot.org]
Not quite right... (Score:2, Insightful)
Apple charges developers 30% for purchases of apps, digital sales from apps, and subscriptions as well.
15% for companies earning under $1 million/year, or for subscriptions lasting longer than a year.
preventing developers from using their own payment gateways.
Anyone can use any payment gateway they like. Just not within the app itself.
I can buy Epic VBucks on the web just fine, and could when Fortnite was in the App Store.
I don't want the walled garden to lose its walls and become a dangerous jungle, but
and not ban political content ,adult content, etc (Score:2)
and not ban political content ,adult content, etc.
But stuff like wordpress buy an website pay apple 30% for an site they don't host?
Facebook sent money (the same thing you can do on the facebook website) apple takes 30% and they can't even say apple takes 30%
Must use apple web engine?? MS got smacked down for doing less with IE
Re: (Score:2)
Also, Webkit (the engine behind Safari) is open source, and used in so may other browsers. IE's rendering engine was not open source. It was copyright, and that my friend, is the difference.
This is going to be (Score:2)
I Like Epic Cases (Score:2)
But who is their opponent?
Re: I Like Epic Cases (Score:1)
Key strategy in nuisance lawsuits (Score:1)
Epic makes money. They can publish elsewhere. This is about them wanted to get around Apple restrictions that keep them from having kids rob their parents credit cards.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple makes more money than Apple. Epic doesn't need Apple, but Apple doesn't need Epic either.
I think in terms of money to waste in court Apple has the advantage. Fortnite is a Fad game, like all games that will be popular for a few years than when the next generation of kids come in they don't want to play that game because something else will be more interesting for them.
Re: (Score:3)
Apple makes more money than Apple.
That sounds like some kind of financial-wormhole/blackhole or something
Surely you meant "Epic makes more money than Apple"?
Re: (Score:3)
Apple makes more money than Apple.
That sounds like some kind of financial-wormhole/blackhole or something
Surely you meant "Epic makes more money than Apple"?
And both of those would be wrong. Apple makes more money than Epic. Epic is 10% sized Apple's assets. Epic is a rat trying to be a fatter, greedier rat.
Re: (Score:2)
Epic is 10% sized Apple's assets.
That is huge.
Re: (Score:2)
That's all you need to do to tie up an executive in the courts? File a lawsuit? I'm kind of suspicious that judges will commonly order anyone other than a person (Apple corporation)'s legal counsel to be in court, considering Epic isn't suing Tim Cook himself. Making a CEO take time off from golfing or yelling at people [cnbc.com] or firing them in the elevator [allenpike.com] seems to be a privilege mostly restricted to Congress.
Re: Key strategy in nuisance lawsuits (Score:2)
Is it worth it? (Score:2)
Epic is closing the door on being able to run on future Apple hardware.
We know MacOS is not a big market vs. PC gaming, but mobile is another story.
Is the money Epic gains for pocketing %100 of list price more than they lose
in the next 5 years if they are shut out from Apple?
A runaway PR and financial loss for Epic, but hubris won't let them back down.
Re: (Score:2)
Epic is closing the door on being able to run on future Apple hardware.
In what way? Like, you think Apple will be vindictive and never let Epic use their hardware again if they win?
Re: (Score:2)
Apple, vindictive? Ask nVidia.
Re: (Score:2)
What do you mean if they win? Have you tried to play Fortnite on the App store? Apple already played the vindictive card. That is now the status quo.
And good on em, fuck Epic.
Re: (Score:2)
Is that because you didn't like Epic before? Or is it because they sued Apple, and that was enough reason for you to not like them?
Re: (Score:2)
Are you talking about my point? Because the point of my post remains unchanged whatever my motivations for making it was.
As to my last comment that says fuck Epic, I've been a lovely member of r/FuckEpic long before I even know they made games for iPhones. Epic games is a shitstain in the gaming industry introducing the worst features of consoles (3rd party exclusives) to the PC world in an effort to force consumers to accept a completely subpar product simply because they want a piece of the 30% pie withou
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, mainly just wondering why you didn't like Epic.
A big mistake (Score:2)
Epic needs to present a better argument, not waste peoples time with depositions. It does not take a lot to show how this (enforcing a single method of providing in-app purchases) benefits customers, especi
Re: (Score:3)
The new M1-equipped Macs (and all future "Apple Silicon" Macs) can run iOS (mobile) games.
So if "mobile is another story", what about "Mobile + all M1 Macs users"?
Epic are being stupid. They should have targeted Apple, Google Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo all at the same time. They could at least have sued them all for price collusion or something.
Re: (Score:2)
Epic are being stupid. They should have targeted Apple, Google Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo all at the same time. They could at least have sued them all for price collusion or something.
If they had done that, Microsoft would probably just make an alternative to Unreal Engine and give it away for free.
The difference between Apple and the console makers is that Epic actually makes a lot of money from the console makers. I doubt Fortnite for iOS sells many copies, and no one buys a Mac if gaming is a priority. However, if they force Apple to open up the iPhone, they could potentially make a lot of money if their competing app store took off. From their moves so far, it appears they believe th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What about the multi-touch MacBook trackpads and the external Magic Trackpad that they sell separately?
Re: (Score:2)
Even worse, some (racing) games use the accelerometer so they are a complete no-go.
Re: (Score:2)
What about streaming the video of the iOS application running on the Mac to the iOS device and using the iOS device itself for... oh wait.