Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Portables (Apple) Privacy Security Apple

Apple Advises Against MacBook Camera Covers Due To Display Cracking (appleinsider.com) 126

Apple, in a new support document, is warning users against closing their MacBook lids with a cover over the camera. From a report: Placing a cover, sticker or tape over a laptop camera is a practice adopted by some privacy- and security-conscious individuals to protect against webcam hijacking. Now, however, Apple is explicitly advising against the tactic. In a support document published earlier in July, Apple urges users not to close their MacBook Pro or MacBook Air lids if there's a camera cover installed on it. "If you close your Mac notebook with a camera cover installed, you might damage your display because the clearance between the display and keyboard is designed to very tight tolerances," Apple notes. The support document also outlines some of the privacy and security functions of the camera, including the green indicator light that lets users know when the camera is active and the camera permission settings introduced in macOS Mojave.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Advises Against MacBook Camera Covers Due To Display Cracking

Comments Filter:
  • Ok so (Score:5, Informative)

    by Austerity Empowers ( 669817 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:11PM (#60284352)

    Apple this is a feature you should build in. Yes, yes you stand behind your software protection. I still want a hardware cover.

    • Re:Ok so (Score:5, Funny)

      by LenKagetsu ( 6196102 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:12PM (#60284354)

      Introducing the iClose, $89.99.

      • Re:Ok so (Score:5, Informative)

        by Solandri ( 704621 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:38PM (#60284716)
        Most people I know just trim down a Post-it note small enough to cover the camera. Easy to remove, doesn't leave gunk on the lens, and is thin enough it doesn't interfere with closing the lid.
        • Re:Ok so (Score:4, Funny)

          by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Saturday July 11, 2020 @04:59AM (#60285970)

          Most people I know just trim down a Post-it note small enough to cover the camera

          Commandment 8 from the book of Jobs: "Thou shall not desecrate religious symbols of the one true faith by applying a sticky substance to its surface. "

          Those people are going to hell where they will be forced to reboot bluescreened Windows PCs for all eternity.

        • Most people I know just trim down a Post-it note small enough to cover the camera. Easy to remove, doesn't leave gunk on the lens, and is thin enough it doesn't interfere with closing the lid.

          Apple is specifically saying that it does interfere with closing. Perhaps not in a way that's obvious to the user, but in a way that may cause the display to crack over time.

    • Re:Ok so (Score:5, Informative)

      by slazzy ( 864185 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:13PM (#60284358) Homepage Journal
      Yes please, every webcam should have cover, and hardwire switch disconnect for the Mic.
      • I agree, And arguably a sort of easily accesable modular design to be able to remove the controllers for applications where that hardware is not nesseccary.

        For example I havr zero need for a mic in my laptop. I use headsets anyways.

      • Re: Ok so (Score:5, Interesting)

        by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:03PM (#60284542)

        Unless I can inpect the hardware switch, I don't trust it.

        Seen too many physical "hardware" switches, that turned out to just control a signal to the firmware, which did the actual turning off, and could be overriden from software.

        • Re: Ok so (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:44PM (#60284744)

          this makes sense, but it's inapplicable for Macs - if you're going to use a Mac, it's a single source anyway, so your decision is either you trust it or you don't, and if you trust it, you may as well trust that their engineering does not allow the camera to activate without the light also coming on. And if you don't trust it, then why use the Mac?

          • by Jeremi ( 14640 )

            this makes sense, but it's inapplicable for Macs - if you're going to use a Mac, it's a single source anyway, so your decision is either you trust it or you don't, and if you trust it, you may as well trust that their engineering does not allow the camera to activate without the light also coming on. And if you don't trust it, then why use the Mac?

            As St. Reagan would say, "trust but verify". And it's trivial to verify that you're not being observed when you've just slid an opaque plastic cover across the lease. Verifying that a green LED's on/off state always correctly indicates the on/off state of the camera would be much more difficult, and probably isn't possible without voiding the warranty of the laptop.

            And of course there is the whole separate issue of: just because the green LED (and camera) are off at this moment, doesn't mean that they co

            • by otuz ( 85014 )

              There are plenty of people dissecting and verifying everything in Apple devices. If there was some foul play or weaknesses, you'd have heard about it since the tech press loves going on and on and on about the smallest mistakes Apple makes.

          • And if you don't trust it, then why use the Mac?
            Because of macOS / OS X.

          • Single source?

            You mean Foxconn? ;)

            And no, they do not make every single controller in there.

        • Re: Ok so (Score:5, Informative)

          by doragasu ( 2717547 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:54PM (#60284784)

          Modern Thinkpads have a built-in sliding cover for the camera. You directly see the hardware switch. Simple and effective.

      • On a Mac only software that gets explicit permission can access Mix and Cam ... so it is pretty pointless to have hardware switches.

    • Re:Ok so (Score:4, Funny)

      by jenningsthecat ( 1525947 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:52PM (#60284482)

      Apple this is a feature you should build in.

      But... but... but... thickness! Do you know how many tenths of a millimetre that would add? You monster!

      • Less than the protective pouch you need so that tinfoil-thick laptop doesn't crumple when you put it away.

        • Re: Ok so (Score:2, Funny)

          by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 )

          They will only stop with the 80s retro retro trend of the 2030s, when people start to carry their huge phabtops on their shoulders with a boom box themed app, and the first Apple iMacBook lops someone's arm clean off.

          After "You're holding it wrong." works at first, they need to stop ZombieJobs in the middle of his keynote speech, while in an attempt to show its saftety, having lost both arms, and shouting "It's only a flesh wound!".

    • Where did you read they stand behind the software and what exactly do they mean by "standing behind the software"? Do they have some guarantee, is anyone manages to hijack your camera, they give you back 10x the price of the Mac? Or does standing by software must means "our engineers think it's good" but if it gets hacked there will be some excuse like "oops, we had a bug, we fixed it now" where now may mean in the upcoming Mac, not your device.

    • A built-in cover might be good.

      They aren't wrong about add-on covers cracking the screen when you close it, though. The distance between the screen and the touchpad area isn't a lot.

      At the end of my first day on a new job, I learned that closing an Apple laptop can crack the heck out of the screen if things aren't right.

    • by otuz ( 85014 )

      Apple this is a feature you should build in

      That's what they had on the original iSight FireWire camera. They had a mechanical shutter that you operated by turning. When you opened it, it'd trigger an event to open iChat AV; FaceTime's predecessor. When you closed it, it'd turn off the camera and microphone circuit along with closing the shutter in front of the lens. It was a quite expensive camera though, so the built in ones resembling what we have now came next and were the first popular ones, since there was no opt out choice either.

  • Bad summary (Score:3, Informative)

    by dknj ( 441802 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:30PM (#60284420) Journal

    They are not saying donâ(TM)t cover your camera, they are saying donâ(TM)t use little plastic pieces with or without a slide to cover the camera.

    Anyone with a brain would know that putting on of those on doesnâ(TM)t allow the laptop lid to close entirely. I ripped mine off because of that very problem. You know what does work and wonâ(TM)t crack the screen? Tape.

    The article doesnâ(TM)t say donâ(TM)t use tape (or maybe it did Iâ(TM)m old school I donâ(TM)t read articles). But tape wonâ(TM)t cause your screen to crack. And if you use electrical tape you get plenty of reuse out of it

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Hipsters aren't going to spoil the look of their MacBook with tape!

    • Yes yes we get the damn point. You trademarked an a with a circumflex.
    • Electrical tape leaves residue. And the older it gets, the more residue it leaves.

      They make sliding plastic covers that are literally no thicker than a couple of pieces of electrical tape. If one of those breaks your iToy then it really is designed like shit.

  • Placing a cover, sticker or tape over a laptop camera ... your Mac notebook with a camera cover installed, you might damage your display because the clearance between the display and keyboard is designed to very tight tolerances,

    If a sticker or tape causes problems, the clearance is way too small, tolerance way too tight. At that point, I'd start worrying about molecular bonding effects sealing the lid closed. :-)

  • translation (Score:3, Insightful)

    by sjames ( 1099 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:33PM (#60284428) Homepage Journal

    Apple designers were all absent on the days their professors discussed interference and tolerance (as related to engineering). The products are fragile (but expensive) junk, and they really want you to be completely dependent on their "good word" for any shred of privacy.

    • by ludux ( 6308946 )
      What on earth are you talking about? The same applies to Windows laptops - if you put a bit on top of your laptop that sticks out, then close your laptop over it, the pressure on that bit can cause damage. That's not Apple's fault, that's just... physics.
      • by sjames ( 1099 )

        Examining my laptop now....NOPE!

        Adding 1mm (10x Apple's recommendation) at the top of the lid applies no significant stress to the display when I close the lid.

        This is more of Apple's obsession with thinness at the expense of durability or even usability.

        • We are talking about high end laptops, even Dell has tight tolerances on their Latitudes and some 2in1 snap close with magnets that gives a huge shock. Iâ(TM)ve see a screen cracked on a Surface Pro ($3k) because the magnets snapped the keyboard shut and the user didnâ(TM)t see a small metal screw that had gotten onto the magnetic piece.

          • by sjames ( 1099 )

            Apple may not be the only over-priced and under designed laptop out there these days, but it certainly is one of them.

            • Claims like this usually get completely debunked by ppl who know more about the topic.

              • by sjames ( 1099 )

                Based on your lack of debunking, you are apparently not one of those knowledgeable people. One wonders why you feel qualified to comment on the subject then.

                So far, the best attempt was (more or less) Microsoft has a similar problem. Paragon of quality that it is.

                • Based on your lack of debunking, you are apparently not one of those knowledgeable people.
                  No, I'm not.
                  Not very interesting topic for me.
                  But even on /. you find posts that clearly show that similar specced Dells/HPs/IBMs cost the same or more.
                  That MacBooks are overpriced is simply a myth.

                  • by sjames ( 1099 )

                    The difference is the Dells, HPs, et. al. don't have their displays break so easily (or have as many keyboard failures, etc, etc).

                    It's one thing to pay top dollar for something that is reasonably durable, quite another to pay that much for "you're holding it wrong".

                    • My laptops are partly over 10 years old ... one is 9. They all work perfectly fine.

                      I think the holding wrong thing was an iPhone 4 issue, no idea. I don't follow such bollocks memes.

                    • by sjames ( 1099 )

                      My laptops are partly over 10 years old

                      Things have changed in the interim. Some brands have gotten better since then, some are much much worse.

          • So, what size screw is just ~120 microns thick? Because that's the thickness of the tape and paper we're talking about. I don't know of any screw that is just 120 microns in diameter.
      • Been using a piece of electrical tape on the Lenovos here at my office, for the last 5 years or so. Not a single broken screen! And yes, it is physics - if you designed your laptop with zero tolerance surface-to-surface geometry with zero flex and give, then it will break. That says a LOT more about the designer and mechanical engineers, though, than it does about a person using a piece of tape.

        I can't imagine the system devastation if you left a Post-It note on the screen and closed things up!

      • My thinkpad has a built in sliding cover that physically blocks the lens. Even if malware manages to activate the camera, it still won't be able to see anything.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Would be nice if they included a decent webcam. Few laptops have good ones but we are starting to see 1080p and half decent exposure/contrast.

  • by toddz ( 697874 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:39PM (#60284450)
    In 2014 someone figured out how to disable the green light and still activate the camera. Who's to say it can't be done again?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by superwiz ( 655733 )
      According to this slashdot article [slashdot.org] the latest law being proposed says that not only will this ability be possible in the future, but that it *must* be possible in the future.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Can the camera be enabled somehow while the green light is off (is it an operating system function), or is it a hardware functionality built into the camera that cannot be turned off? That is, if it's hardware, then it should be impossible to grab a frame from it without the light turning on .. speaking of which can a frame be grabbed periodically in an instant so you don't notice the green light .. or does the green light have a minimum time that it stay lit?

    Anyone know?

    • by sjames ( 1099 )

      At least at one time, the camera could be activated without the light. That may or may not have been corrected. In any event, even with a minimum time on, there's probably any number of circumstances where the user wouldn't notice a quick look through the camera.

  • I don't see how they can recommend against STICKERS due to the display cracking. Covers I can understand but if your display is cracking due to a sticker being over the camera then the tolerances are too tight.

    FWIW I don't bother on my laptops but on my desktop (which is where I do most of the Zoom/Teams meetings anyways) I have a little 3d-printed cover that I drop over the camera when not in use. Particularly when working from home I don't want to accidentally answer a video call sitting there in my und

    • The adhesive from a sticker could cause problems - not the thickness of the sticker. The sticker adhesive could leave residue (people would blame Apple for a poor quality camera) or the physical stress of removing the sticker could cause mechanical issues. Either way, the safest thing for Apple to do is to indicate that stickers should not be used. This does not imply you can not use a sticker - you just have to be careful with regards to the adhesive. The post-it note suggestion others have made is a g
      • What kind of residual adhesive is left - AFTER YOU REMOVE THE TAPE - that could crack the screen? It's got a metal back, and sheets of glass, and if the residual adhesive left (after the user has obviously broken the surface tension of the adhesive by removing the tape) results in cracking the screen - you have WAY compromised the design. It would probably crack from opening it in a stiff wind...
  • TL/DR: (Score:5, Funny)

    by ClickOnThis ( 137803 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:57PM (#60284512) Journal

    You're closing it wrong.

  • by kryliss ( 72493 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @03:59PM (#60284524)

    Use painter's tape. It doesn't leave a residue on the camera or the lid.

    • You mean masking tape? Even the really good stuff gets hard to remove after a couple of weeks.

      • no, he meant blue painter's tape. which is what a lot of 3d printer guys have sitting around, for some odd reason..

        low sticky content, does not damage most surfaces, is meant to be temporary but hold long enough and not fly away with wind.

        just what you want. and in pretty blue, too.

        • no, he meant blue painter's tape. which is what a lot of 3d printer guys have sitting around, for some odd reason..

          Yes, we painters (I went to school for auto body and paint) call that masking tape. There's also green and purple tape, which last even longer and leave less residue than the blue tape.

  • Riiiggt... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 )

    If a layer of mylar is too much, your product is defective by design. Unless you finally admit that it's not meant to be used, but tech poser jewelry. :)

    • Re:Riiiggt... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Aristos Mazer ( 181252 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:26PM (#60284648)
      The article (and summary) is wrong. Apple's advisory [apple.com] does not say tape will break your screen -- a thicker plastic cover will. Apple says: "If you close your Mac notebook with a camera cover installed, you might damage your display because the clearance between the display and keyboard is designed to very tight tolerances."

      The advisory does point out that using tape will interfere with the ability of the screen to autoadjust for lighting conditions. But it won't break the screen.
    • Re:Riiiggt... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Dixie_Flatline ( 5077 ) <[moc.liamg] [ta] [hog.naj.tnecniv]> on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:32PM (#60284678) Homepage

      As a reply has already pointed out, that's wrong. But your assertion is also wrong—I very often expect tight tolerances out of my equipment and electronics. I want a paper-thin gap when it's feasible for one to exist without compromising the functionality of the product. Go look at the panel gaps on a Japanese car—they're all as small as they can be with very little deviation. Now look at cars made by virtually anyone else—the tolerances are sloppy and ugly.

      Tight tolerances are often a sign of quality engineering. Being able to fit 2mm of plastic between the lid and the case would be a sign of shit build quality.

  • Black paint Cut the wires too
  • If you designed the tolerances to be so tight that tape would pose an issue, then you screwed up, not the customer.

    It's also worth pointing out that if Apple cares so deeply about users security and privacy, they would of build a slider into the frame to allow the user to cover the camera. It's not enough that it has a light and that you ask permission, the only way to handle webcams (apart from not having one), is to cover it. Apple is basically using the pull out method, for cameras, to prevent knockin
    • by Aristos Mazer ( 181252 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:27PM (#60284656)
      The article (and summary) is wrong. Apple's advisory [apple.com] does not say tape will break your screen -- a thicker plastic cover will. Apple says: "If you close your Mac notebook with a camera cover installed, you might damage your display because the clearance between the display and keyboard is designed to very tight tolerances."

      The advisory does point out that using tape will interfere with the ability of the screen to autoadjust for lighting conditions. But it won't break the screen.
  • What is allowed thickness of the tape that is approved?
  • by Solandri ( 704621 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:34PM (#60284686)

    The support document also outlines some of the privacy and security functions of the camera, including the green indicator light that lets users know when the camera is active

    That's backwards. If the light burns out or somehow fails, the camera can be on and you'll assume it's off because you've been trained by the indicator to think that light off = camera off. You won't realize the indicator has failed until you deliberately turn the camera on and notice the light doesn't turn on.

    The most important indicator is one that tells you that the camera is off, not on. Lenovo did this right. The built-in cover on my Thinkpad's camera [youtu.be] shows red when it's closed. So whenever I see it's red, I know the camera is covered and I'm protected. If it fails (say the cover breaks off and falls inside the bezel), I know the camera is uncovered because it's no longer red. It fails safe, rather than fails dangerous.

    If you want, you can add another indicator to tell you the camera is on. But to protect against failures, the most important indicator is one that tells you the camera is off, so you can assume the camera is active if you don't see that indicator.

    • The other big problem with the light is that it comes on with the camera when it starts recording. So that means that if you happen to see that it's illuminated, it may already be too late.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    the light is not a substitute. first because it's a software-controlled feature and can be overridden. second because the point of the cover is to make sure the camera isn't turned on. for example if you are taking a conference call on the toilet. you want to be absolutely sure the software doesn't decide to turn the camera on.
  • What's wrong with that? It will match the display.
  • hm, but there is a warning list to tell you when the camera is active. and arguably, surreptitiously listening in to my mike would be a larger problem — but there's no warning light, adn (afaik) no-one blocks the mike...odd....
  • if the concern is about about creating an extra torque that can result on cracking of the display, wouldn't it be solved by putting a similar piece of tape on the right and left side of the display?
  • how much apple really cares about security and quality in their crappy products
  • I will never understand people who cover their camera (what would anybody see, anyway?), and yet have one of those devices listening to everything said in your house.
  • I have a 2011 13" Unibody MacBook Pro (the last MacBook Pro whose internals can be upgraded). I've been using a small square of electrical tape to cover my camera for 9 years. The only problem I have with my MacBook is that Apple considers it obsolete.
  • If a PIECE OF TAPE will break your laptop screen, then you designed your tolerances much too tight and you used materials way too stiff.
  • Funnily enough, most users started using the covers because they were afraid of cracking.

  • My laptop isn't an Apple. It does close tight to the keyboard though, which sucks, because fingerprint grease gets transferred from the keys to the screen when the lid is closed. It's terrible.

    I taped a piece of paper over the camera.

  • If the tolerance is really that tight then it's improperly designed.

    I also have a hard time believing that inserting something as thin as a piece of tape between the covers is really the problem.

  • So weak a PIECE OF FUCKING TAPE can trash your display.

    And you pay exorbitant prices for it.

  • When you make things hideously thin, the structural integrity of everything is compromised.

    Thanks Apple, you made a laptop so fragile, you can't fucking paste a sticker on top of the screen,

  • Doesn’t it have a light sensor just opposite to the camera at the same distance as the indicator light? It might just be my very old Mac.

Don't tell me how hard you work. Tell me how much you get done. -- James J. Ling

Working...