Mac Mini Receives First Overhaul in Four Years; New iPad Pro With No Home Button Announced (venturebeat.com) 257
Apple is turning its attention to a range of devices it has not upgraded in recent years. Alongside the new MacBook Air that the company unveiled on Tuesday, it is also upgrading the Mac Mini for the first time in four years, and also has a new iPad Pro in the offering. Regarding the new Mac Mini: It has Intel's 8th generation processors -- in four- and six-core i7, i5, and i3 flavors -- and 60 percent faster graphics. The processor's paired with up to 64GB of RAM (8GB comes on standard) at 2666MHz and up to 2TB of SSD storage -- double the capacity of previous Mac Minis. Overall, it's up to 5 times faster than the previous-gen models, Apple claims, and can drive 4K and 5K Thunderbolt displays and output in three formats. In terms of ports, there's plenty to go around: two USB-A, HDMI 2.0 video, four Thunderbolt USB-C, an audio out port, and a Gigbabit Ethernet port (you can add up to 10 Gigabit Ethernet, if you so choose). Also onboard is Apple's T2 chip. It's a 64-bit ARMv8 chip -- a variant of Apple's A10 -- that runs Apple's custom BridgeOS 2.0 operating system (an Apple watch derivative). The new Mac Mini starts at $799. Regarding the new iPad Pro: After months of rumors, Apple has today announced a completely redesigned iPad Pro with slimmed-down bezels, Face ID, a USB-C port, and far more powerful specs than its predecessor. Just like prior years, the new iPad Pro comes in two screen sizes: 11-inch and 12.9-inch. The 11-inch model has essentially the same proportions as the prior 10.5-inch model. And the 12.9-inch model puts the same-sized display into a much smaller form factor. The new iPad Pro starts at $799 for the 11-inch and $999 for the 12.9-inch. Preorders begin today and it ships November 7th. The new Pro is the company's first iPad not to include a home button, which allowed Apple to extend the screen vertically for a much more immersive experience. The bezels have been downsized on all four sides. [...] But something else has been removed, too: the headphone jack. There's no 3.5mm port visible on any of the device's sides, meaning that buyers will need a USB-C-to-headphone dongle to listen to music through wired headphones. The 11-inch iPad Pro starts at $799. The 12.9-inch version starts at $999. It goes on sale today and ships on November 7.
"32GB Comes Standard" (Score:5, Informative)
What? No. 8GB is standard. 32GB is $600 more - almost the full price of the base model.
Re:"32GB Comes Standard" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, if I were buying it and wanted 32GB, I wouldn't be paying $600 for sure. Just complaining about the inaccurate article (or summary) that claims 32GB is "standard" on the product. If that were the case, then the $799 price point wouldn't actually be that bad.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Apple always makes the entry tier for their products crappy so push people into the next product wrung where they charge an extra $200+ for components that cost them maybe $20, so that it's pretty much pure profit. Then they've got the high-end model that's even more expensive, but isn't
Re:"32GB Comes Standard" (Score:5, Interesting)
> there's no point at all to pay the Apple tax.
The reason that you *consider* paying apple memory prices is that apple's specs for memory are something like a half a standard deviation higher than other good memory.
I don't find it worth it, but the reality is that meeting apple's specs is more expensive.
Then again, a few years ago when I brought my iMac in the third time for crashes, they returned it with my bank of aftermarket memory in a bag--with the offending stick labeled . . .
hawk
Re: (Score:2)
The reason that you *consider* paying apple memory prices is that apple's specs for memory are something like a half a standard deviation higher than other good memory.
Except you get basically zero performance benefit for it, so no.
Re: (Score:3)
It's not about performance, but failure rate.
Then I will double down on that it is horseshit. Go buy the cheapest shittiest RAM available. If it works out of the box the odds of failure are down the same as every other component in your PC.
If the machine crashing brings your entire business to a halt for hours
Then you likely wouldn't be using MacMinis and instead something with ECC memory and massive forms of redundancy rendering the entire discussion moot.
Sorry but I disagree that there's any value at all in "premium RAM" unless you're getting paid for the instruction and need the absolute tightest timings, or are payin
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hopefully that's an upgradable NVME drive in there as well.
Nope. That's not upgradeable. However, the Mac mini works fine with external storage. I usually keep a clean Mac OS install on the internal drive, clone it to an external drive, and boot off the external drive for day-to-day usuage.
iOS app devs, for one (Score:3)
I just can't see any reason why I would pay close to $1000 for the Apple device.
Let me guess the most probable reason: Someone is paying you to port an Android application to iOS to take advantage of the App Store's far greater revenue per user for paid applications and in-app purchases compared to Google Play. For this, you need to buy a Mac on which to run Xcode and an iOS device on which to test.
Re: (Score:3)
Since when can a non-Mac sign apps for testing on a physical device or for submission to the App Store? The free provisioning instructions [microsoft.com] require Xcode, which is Mac-only.
Re: (Score:2)
Many years ago, when I bought an Apple laptop, I ordered my extra RAM stick separately from Crucial. (way back when you could still do this)
Much to my surprise, the "much cheaper" RAM I got was the SAME brand and part number as what Apple was shipping the machine with!
Re:"32GB Comes Standard" (Score:5, Informative)
I worked Apple retail before going on to work at two different Apple Specialists (the highest level of AASP - Apple Authorized Service Provider). I now work for a another company and one of my tasks is the occasional job of taking Apple machines in for repair.
At this point, the number of Apple machines I have dealt with that were going through the AppleCare repair process number in the tens of thousands, I would guess. In all of that time, I have not once seen an AppleCare coverage denied because of third-party RAM installed by the end user. Not a single time.
Your statement is verifiably incorrect by the thousands of other people who have had the same experience as mine.
Re: (Score:2)
I worked Apple retail before going on to work at two different Apple Specialists (the highest level of AASP - Apple Authorized Service Provider). I now work for a another company and one of my tasks is the occasional job of taking Apple machines in for repair.
At this point, the number of Apple machines I have dealt with that were going through the AppleCare repair process number in the tens of thousands, I would guess. In all of that time, I have not once seen an AppleCare coverage denied because of third-party RAM installed by the end user. Not a single time.
Your statement is verifiably incorrect by the thousands of other people who have had the same experience as mine.
Exactly.
I hate LYING Apple-Haters. If you're gonna hate on Apple, at least don't LIE to do it.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Ask to speak to the manager. If the manager maintains that position, pick up the phone and call 1-800-SOS-APPL. Press zero repeatedly until you are connected to an operator. Ask to be transferred to Apple Customer Relations.
Refusing warranty coverage for third-party RAM, unless the RAM is faulty, is a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You needed to say, "I need to speak with your manager, because this is BS and you're violating the law here."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, doesn't quite work that way.
Back when my MBP was under AppleCare, they were fine doing motherboard/screen/battery repairs under the warranty, even though I had modified my laptop about as much as you can... Maxed the ram, gone dual storage (SSD + mechanical disk).
They never batted an eye, except when the hard drive crapped out. At that point they wouldn't replace it when it was in the CD->HDD carrier, so I moved it back to the HD bay and they were fine dealing with it.
Adding RAM does not void warranty (Score:5, Informative)
Because if you don't, then you forgo your extended warranty.
Yeah that's not true [apple.com]. If someone told you that then they were either lying or misinformed.
Re: (Score:3)
Consumer vs. producer (Score:4, Insightful)
Sorry Apple, I've already switched to a Samsung Tab A 10.1, and I'm not going back.
Great idea if you are just going to watch movies.
Not so great if you want to actually do anything serious with a tablet - like run Photoshop. Are you going to be editing a 3GB PSD on that Samsung? I think not.
I'm sorry (Score:2)
But only photogenic models in commercials actually try to do real work on tablets. Nobody else does.
It's not possible. They want you to think it's The New Thing, but it simply is impossible to do anything meaningful on a tablet. The ergonomics are all wrong. There will be of course one response to this post about someone who writes assembly code for his neural network on a tablet, but for 99.999% of humanity, the ergonomics of tablet-work are not possible.
Holding a tablet with one hand means you hav
Real work is what I do on an iPad Pro (Score:2)
But only photogenic models in commercials actually try to do real work on tablets. Nobody else does.
That is totally wrong. I was on a three week trip and brought only an iPad Pro and external HD. I edited and reviewed a ton of DSLR photos on the trip, saving me lots of time when I got home. You can already today do full featured editing with Affinity Photo, I can edit large 16 bit TIFF files directly...
I know more and more people that travel just with iPads. I know even some business people moving more
The iPad Pro can have a dock now - USB-C (Score:2)
how exactly are you supposed to do be a professional graphic artist on an iPad if it doesn't have a proper dock?
The iPad Pro has USB-C now so why not use any one of a number of USB-C docking solutions?
It can connect to an external monitor and lots of other devices now.
Yes its touch but capacitive touch screens aren't as precise as graphics tablets
The Apple Pencil is a lot more accurate than other graphics tablets (and has a higher refresh rate). I use to have a Wacom Cintiq which absolutely sucked compared
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a nickle kid, get a real computer. [dilbert.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Photoshop on Java? Now pull the other one.
To run Photoshop as God intended it be run, you're still going to want an iMac.
will changing the ram void the warranty? (Score:2)
will changing the ram void the warranty?
it does have so-dimms
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Legally, no. https://www.ftc.gov/news-event... [ftc.gov]
Will apple claim it will? Probably.
Re: (Score:2)
will they try to lock the ram to the T2 chip?
Re:will changing the ram void the warranty? (Score:5, Insightful)
If they were going to do that, they'd just solder the RAM to the board so they could shave an extra
Re: (Score:2)
> Why would they bother making it user upgradable if they were going to lock it down like that?
The cynic in me would suggest they'd do that to teach their customers an expensive lesson. Like their Genius Bar currently does with small repairs they no longer bother diagnosing and just lie about the cause and recommend a new unit instead.
Re: (Score:2)
For values of probably synonymous with "yes".
This would be a radical departure for the way that they've operated for the last 30 years. I have never once seen them deny warranty service like this, unless the part itself is the likely cause of the fault. I've brought in my MBP with all its mods and so forth, and never had an issue despite it being about as heavily modified as is possible (it's prior to the current crop of Retina machines).
Re: (Score:2)
If you have to replace a motherboard under warranty for the iMac Pro, IIRC, they consider that to be a complete unit with the CPU and RAM, and thus won't touch the board if you have replaced the memory or cpu.
Re: (Score:2)
Given that the RAM is user upgradeable, just as it was in many of the previous generations (though not the last gen or two), I'm going to go with a resounding "no".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Upgrading the RAM in my 2011 Mac mini was as simple as rotating the bottom plate to unlock it, swapping the RAM, then replacing the bottom plate. A novice user could do the whole operation in less than a minute. Likewise with the PowerBook G4 I had when I started college, which only required that I press two release switches at the top of the keyboard in order to gain access to the RAM. Likewise with the iMac my mother had on her desk for years, which hid the RAM behind a small plate that could be removed u
Re: (Score:2)
will changing the ram void the warranty?
it does have so-dimms
No. Never has. Never will.
And for all the Haters that have posted hand-wringing bullshit about Apple "not listening": Well, witness the result of Apple listening!
(MUCH!) Better CPU (up to a SIX core i7)? Check!
Upgradeable RAM? Check!
Up to 64 GB RAM? Check!
Upgradeable SSD? Possibly (PCI-e Based)
Up to 2 TB SSD? Check!
10gigE Option? Check!
USB-A AND HDMI (plus FOUR USB-C/TB3 Ports)? Check!
And it STILL has a 3.5mm Headphone Jack...
This is one FANTASTIC Upgrade!
But I'm sure the Haters will STILL find SOMETHING t
An i3 with 8 gigs and 128 gig SSD for $800 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's probably this one: https://ark.intel.com/products... [intel.com] it's the only 8th generation i3 that runs at 3.6GHz stock.
Re: An i3 with 8 gigs and 128 gig SSD for $800 (Score:2)
Why is it an i3 if it really has four cores? Did intel outsource marketing to Sirius Cybernetics?
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like their 8th generation Core series are 4-cores for i3, 6 for i5 and i7's. At least for their non-mobile/laptop offerings.
Re: (Score:2)
As for why desktop i3's have quad-cores now, I guess it's just a situation where last-year's bleeding edge becomes this year's standard.
Re: (Score:2)
seems a bit high even for Apple. And it's probably a laptop chip version of the i3 based on the form factor...
Nope. They spefically said the CPUs are NOT Mobile versions!
Re: An i3 with 8 gigs and 128 gig SSD for $800 (Score:3)
Your analysis makes $800 for a system with a nice case and non FOSS OS seem like a reasonable deal.
Not great, but reasonable. Add $100 for the OS and you have a 33% margin for assembly.
Re: (Score:2)
We need less vulnerable SMC, not more (Score:2)
and storage locked to the MB is bad ! (Score:2)
and storage locked to the MB is bad !
Define "consumer" (Score:2)
It's not clear that the Mac Mini is aimed at the consumer
How I'm supposed to feel about that depends on what you meant by "consumer", which isn't quite clear. Which of these did you mean?
be nice to have 10-gig swtichs come down in price (Score:2)
be nice to have 10-gig switches come down in price. Small hope for a big roll out of US ISP's to have 1G/1G much less higher any time soon.
Re: (Score:2)
If history of Apple including things has been any indication, they will.
USB hubs and devices used to be rare and expensive, until Jobs rolled out the iMac and told Apple users to deal with it.
The computer I took to college in 2001 had a gigabit port and switches finally came down in price to use the full gig.
"Airport" was pretty revolutionary at the time, now there's 802.11 everywhere. Prices for PC components started coming down, most using the same Atheros(?) chipsets as the first airport devices.
Re: (Score:2)
You can get a managed 24 port 10G switch sub-$8000. Unmanaged 4 ports are ~$500. If you want to go cheaper, Huawei has some decent gear for less than Netgear.
Re: (Score:3)
At those prices you're almost better off just building your own router/switch.
You can pick up off lease 10GB 2 port cards for $20.
Re: be nice to have 10-gig swtichs come down in pr (Score:3)
Wait, what?
You think a gp-cpu will switch as fast as an switches ASIC? Do you know how many interrupts you need to switch at 10g?
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
What I'm most interested in is the SoC in the new iPad. It's probably more powerful than what they put in the new Air, so I'm wondering how much
Re: (Score:2)
What I'm most interested in is the SoC in the new iPad. It's probably more powerful than what they put in the new Air, so I'm wondering how much longer until Apple ditches Intel entirely. You have to think that they've been planning for it for some time now.
They might just be waiting for better capacity and higher yields, the A12 and A12X are still relatively small and max out at four high performance cores. It's impressive for a tablet but to replace the whole non-pro Mac line they'd probably want at least an 8-core and more GPU to drive big external monitors. They have the building blocks but when you look at the iPhone/iPad prices it might not be the time for an even more expensive SoC. Once AMD/nVidia are able to make big GPUs though the door is open for a
Re: (Score:3)
That is the real problem with Apples Macintosh lineup. Where we use to have a yearly upgrade they seem to fall every 4 years. And their price doesn't seem to go down the next year. There really isn't a good time to buy one. The Air and the Mini, are already under-powered new (About a year old tech). Which isn't bad, but if you are going to keep it for 4 years or 8 years then these will be miserably out of date during your next upgrade. And you can't wait a year or two to get it on the cheap.
Re: (Score:2)
And some of that comes from "design over all else." You make a beautiful machine and then, next year, CPUs change and the thermal system can't handle it without a redesign. Redesigns are expensive, so Apple doesn't do it and keeps cranking out the same stuff as last year.
I'm waiting to see what happens when Intel comes out with the next generation of Xeons and how long it takes for Apple to update the iMac Pro. As I've said before, if I'm spending $5000 for a computer, I expect it to have the latest and
Re: (Score:2)
get the new mac mini, just a touch over 4000$ after you load it up
Yes, but you can save on the RAM by buying aftermarket.
And that gives you :
3.2GHz 6core 8thgeneration Intel Core i7 (Turbo Boost up to 4.6GHz)
64GB 2666MHz DDR4
2TB SSD storage
10 Gigabit Ethernet (Nbase-T Ethernet with support for 1Gb, 2.5Gb, 5Gb, and 10Gb Ethernet using RJ45 connector)
Not bad for a computer the size of a ham sandwich.
Mini vs. Hackintosh (Score:2)
I wanted to buy a Mini a few years back, but for the same money, I could buy a much higher spec Intel NUC box as a Hackintosh, so that's where we went. The Hackintosh has worked well, though it has a few glitches, and I'm afraid to install upgrades in case it breaks something.
It looks like with this upgrade, the equation stays the same. If you're willing to do a Hackintosh, you can get something much better at a lower cost.
I thought the same thing (Score:2)
Mac Mini just releasing hardware with Intel NUC [amazon.com] specs that's been out for some time now.
Maybe I'll just buy this NUC8 beast instead for half the price and dualboot both.
-dk
Much better only in performance (maybe) (Score:2)
If you're willing to do a Hackintosh, you can get something much better at a lower cost.
I kind of question much better.
Are you going to have much better storage speed for a lower cost? I'm not sure about that. Also much better connectivity? I don't think so. Much better fan noise? Also not too sure on that front.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're doing a Hackintosh then you can ditch the whole low profile thing entirely and have a MUCH better range of available options.
Even with a NUC, you probably still have a much better range of available options.
The limiting factor is the small subset of the available PC options that MacOS will actually support.
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe a lower monetary cost, but you've already pointed out the other factor: you're time and stress. How much is that worth to you?
For me, if I wanted to be afraid that my whole computer would be bricked because of an update, I may as well just use Windows 10. Then I'd at least be able to play the latest games on it too.
Non-Removable SSD = Disposable Product (Score:2, Insightful)
I create content, and 10% of my Samsung 850 SSD life is used up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
SMART is definitely a thing for SSDs. The only quirk is NVMe drives, they don't access the drive controllers in the same way so some SMART software doesn't work with them.
SSDs report metrics such as total read, total written, unexpected power loss, power loss protection failure (if an SSD has it), or the one of interest to the GP: 231 - Life Left, 231 - Endurance Remaining, or 233 - Media Wearout.
My NVMe drive reports two temperatures, the controller (which should stay cool) and the NAND (which should stay
They are repairable (Score:4, Insightful)
SSDs do go bad. Now, with Moore's law gone, those machines could have lasted longer than they will now. If Apple cared about the environment more than their money, they would make them repairable.
What makes you think they are not repairable?
At least by Apple they will be. But on the iMac Pro the SSD chips are removable [macobserver.com] so I don't see why that would change on the Mac mini.
Also the systems are fully recycled by Apple, no it's meaningless to complain about caring for the environment because the system might die.
I create content, and 10% of my Samsung 850 SSD life is used up.
That's kind of an older SSD drive (I have one as well). At this point I would say lots of other system components are going to go before the SSD chips do.
Re: (Score:2)
More efficient than mining (Score:2)
Swappable SSD and RAM help this immensely
Which the Mac mini has (for sure the RAM, maybe the SSD). But they do not "help immensely" if they are never done during the life of the device. As I said, I think with newer chips the SSD will probably outlast most other components in the system.
Recycling takes energy and has environmental concerns of its own.
I think you are confusing what Apple is doing with the way others "recycle". Apple is reclaiming all minerals from recycled devices so they can use them in
Re: (Score:2)
More efficient than mining (Score:2)
And melting things down or leaching minerals from ground up ICs doesn't take energy or produce toxic waste?
See: Subject line.
You seriously think getting minerals out the earth is way easier or involves LESS toxins than anything in a computer?? Come on.
You've obviously never seen the outside of an old mine... with bright orange streams of water nearby.
Re: (Score:2)
And? (Score:2)
And as I already pointed out, long term usage is not affected on the new Mac mini either, so why you would carry on down that irrelevant point is beyond me.
However you are also incorrect in one regard - even just ruddying yourself of an old device can provide supplies used to build a new one for someone else instead of mining.
I'll let you have the last response since you seem stuck on a track.
As long as Apple keeps making Xcode for it (Score:2)
as I already pointed out, long term usage is not affected on the new Mac mini either
That depends on how long Apple will continue to make new versions of Xcode compatible with this Mac mini model. Someone who doesn't need an Xcode license could probably just buy an Intel NUC and install GNU/Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
> If Apple cared about the environment more than their money, they would make them repairable.
thatsthejoke.jpg
iPad Pro update is what I hoping for (Score:4, Interesting)
I really liked the Mac mini refresh, but what I really loved was the iPad Pro update.
I had the first larger 12.9" iPad Pro before, which I liked quite a lot for photo editing.
Now though, the newer one has FaceID - was nicer with a device you can hold in any direction than trying to find the home button. And the power seems really impressive, the demo they gave showing editing a 3GB PSD was the most impressive thing I saw at the Apple event.
The USB-C connection also is great for connection to external monitors and other things I already have accessories for... and the redesign of the pencil to simultaneously clamp onto an edge (I think any edge?) and charge at the same time is a great touch.
Also if you look at it from a pure travel standpoint, the new MacBook Air is 2.75 lbs - but the largest iPad Pro is just 1.25lbs or so!! That is a huge difference in what you have to lug around, as long as what you need to do can be done on the iPad Pro. For photo editing when traveling this device is pretty much perfect now.
Perhaps finally Apple will bring Xcode to the iPad Pro...
Re: iPad Pro update is what I hoping for (Score:2)
ipad pro processor looks impressive (Score:2)
Hopefully the beginning of the end of Lightning (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know why you say that. IMO the lightning connector was a brilliant design. Fully reversible and very hard to ruin. It was, in every aspect, vastly superior to the existing USB connectors.
The only problem is that Apple kept it to themselves. If they had offered it to the USB standards group it could have become the next USB connector.
Re: (Score:2)
Mac Mini At 799 quid, not so competitive in the UK (Score:2)
Apple craps on education and music again... (Score:3)
They're forgetting that education made the company originally and music saved it later. Dropping headphone jacks will be a huge pain and expense for education. I teach a high school comp sci class twice a week, and it's already a huge pain to keep the iPads charged. There's no way the school will be able to afford BT headphones and deal with the hassle of keeping them charged. Also, the best headphones are all wired.
Apple did not drop wired headphones ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Still shitty accessory design (Score:2)
While the Apple Pencil appears to be a better design, it still is flawed. Apple has a real problem with treating accessories as total after thoughts. Magnetic attachment to the side? That's fine I guess until I want to put it away or carry it or do anything besides gently put on on a desktop and not touch it. Knocking it off the edge will be stupid easy. Even worse if you want to carry it somewhere without worrying about it falling off. How about a design that won't fall off/out with the slightest pro
Re: (Score:2)
on the Mac Mini 2014 catastrophe (Score:2)
Someone mentioned the Mini on the MacBook Air thread, and I responded there forgetting which thread I was on, even though I only discussed the 2014 Mac Mini catastrophe.
Because a small number of people read these threads months later, here's a link:
https://apple.slashdot.org/com... [slashdot.org]
Idared (Score:2)
Funny story.
My wife named her 2008 iMac Idared [wikipedia.org].
But it can also be read as iDared.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I love 4:3 and hope there'll always be a 4:3 version available, for me it's perfect. But then I never watch videos (apart from the occasional youtube) on my iPad. I understand your viewpoint though, it's just not mine.
Re: (Score:3)
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S2, S3, and S4 are all 4x3 as well. It really is the best aspect for reading web pages and doing work. 16x9 was only good for video and nothing else.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
4:3 is just plain better for most uses.
Re: (Score:2)
Even that Mac Mini is headed straight for the bin, but I'm sure I can con a few hundred out of some Apple fanatic for something that is basically outclassed by a Raspberry Pi nowadays
If it's one of the more recent ones with 4GB of soldered RAM, it's not really good for much of anything serious. I ended up with one (some moron had erased the internal drive and I had to set up an optical drive to re-install an OS) that I use as a MythTV client. My other mac minis with socketed RAM are doing actual useful things. And if I wanted a laptop, I wouldn't get a mini. I still don't know yet if the new MacBook Pro will have socketed RAM.