Apple Tops Holiday Sales With 44 Percent of All New Device Activations (macrumors.com) 188
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Mac Rumors: Apple's iPhone and iPad were the most popular mobile devices gifted during the holidays this year, according to new data shared by Yahoo-owned mobile analytics firm Flurry. Flurry examined device activations by manufacturer between 12/19 and 12/25, finding Apple devices to be twice as popular as Samsung devices. 44 percent of all new phone activations were Apple iPhones, while Samsung smartphones accounted for 21 percent of activations. Huawei, LG, Amazon, Oppo, Xiaomi, and Motorola trailed behind with between two and three percent of activations each. Google's Pixel smartphone, which came out in October, did not make Flurry's list. Last year, Flurry released a similar report, and Apple devices made up 49.1 percent of all device activations, while Samsung devices came in at 19.8 percent. Phablets, or smartphones and tablets ranging in size from 5 inches to 6.9 inches, continued to grow in popularity. In 2016, the phablets category, which includes the 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus, 6s Plus, and 7 Plus, was responsible for 37 percent of total device activations. Medium-sized phones, like the 4.7-inch iPhone 6, iPhone 6s, and iPhone 7, were responsible for 45 percent of all activations. Activations of full-sized tablets, like the iPad, have continued to wane. From Flurry's report: "While Samsung is slowly growing in popularity throughout the holiday season, up 1% from last year, Apple devices continue to be the gift to give. Holding the third and fourth positions for activations are Huawei and LG; which is remarkable, as both manufacturers do not have an individual device within the top 35 devices activated. Their high rank is likely due to the fact that they have wide variety of devices and affordable options (hundreds of phablet and medium phones) for consumers to choose from."
In other words (Score:5, Insightful)
The majority of new device activations (roughly 56%) was Android phones.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple takes home the lion's share of all mobile profits by a huge margin.
And you consider this a good thing? Bragging material? When everyone knows that they stopped innovating years ago, that they're exploiting Chinese workers and that they're piling up billions upon billions of dollars in offshore bank accounts, severely hurting the American economy in the process?
Meanwhile Apple customers are probably the first to get their panties in a bunch over Walmart business practices and their impact on the American factories. Such a bunch of hypocrites.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't go to Walmart, but I'm also not in the US, so its impact on American factories means little to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Businesses only stay in business when they make profit.
Businesses stay in business when their business model is sustainable. That's why Apple took a nosedive in the 90s and had to be saved by Microsoft, and that's why they're again heading straight for the wall. They don't learn.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So when Apple's business model is sustainable (profitable), it's bad?
Profitable and sustainable are two different things. For instance, one can operate a very profitable business as a bank robber or Ponzi scheme instigator but this is not sustainable.
Fucking your customers over consistently by forcing them to upgrade power cables or headphones on top of selling them antiquated hardware at a premium compared to the vastly superior hardware sold by the competition is not a sustainable business model.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So to you Apple was in a better shape when they were still losing money. Well thanks for that insight.
Look pal, you can twist words all day long, it won't stop Apple from continuing their freefall into irrelevance.
Re: (Score:2)
If Apple were in the dire position of _ever_ actually losing money again, say at a rate of a Billion a year.... they have cash on hand to limp on for... over two centuries.
Wrong. Most of their cash (about 230 billions) is abroad and they can't touch it without giving a huge chunk of it to the tax man. They also have huge debts, to the tune of 75 billions.
If they were to bring back their money, pay their taxes and pay their debts, Apple would have less money than McDonalds. Apple is a market bubble all by itself.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah... it's been four decades now of Apple pissing people like you off, and any minute now that bubble will burst... but guess what... you just aren't a sharp enough prick.
Dude. Apple almost went bankrupt in the 90s. The "bubble" started in 2010-2011, that's hardly four decades.
Re: In other words (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, this I always find hilarious too - people being *happy* that 2/3 of the cost of their phone is pure profit for the badge mannufacturer.
Re: (Score:2)
Cheap Android phones don't make much money for anyone.
Rubbish. Well over a billion Android handsets per year drives a huge industrial supply chain, making billions for everyone from suppliers of raw materials to foundries to manufacturers to retailers. Oracle says the Android industry generates $32 billion annually [bloomberg.com]. I say that's an underestimate, and I say enough wishful thinking from bitter Apple groupies.
Re: (Score:2)
Cheap Android phones don't make much money for anyone.
Rubbish. Well over a billion Android handsets per year drives a huge industrial supply chain, making billions for everyone from suppliers of raw materials to foundries to manufacturers to retailers. Oracle says the Android industry generates $32 billion annually [bloomberg.com]. I say that's an underestimate, and I say enough wishful thinking from bitter Apple groupies.
That's Google's total revenue on Android until Jan. 2016. What's that number supposed to prove exactly in relation to the question asked? Again, this is neither profit (as in "making money") nor "the industry".
Just to make sure you understand: Apple had more revenue on iOS last quarter.
Re: (Score:2)
Oracle says the Android industry generates $32 billion annually [bloomberg.com]. I say that's an underestimate, and I say enough wishful thinking from bitter Apple groupies.
That's Google's total revenue on Android until Jan. 2016. What's that number supposed to prove exactly in relation to the question asked?
You are right, that number is a small fraction of the total Android industry, what was I thinking?
Again, this is neither profit (as in "making money") nor "the industry". Just to make sure you understand: Apple had more revenue on iOS last quarter.
You don't mean "on iOS", you mean from all its operations. Six times as many Android phones are sold as Apple phones, and for more than 1/6th the price. Inescapable conclusion: worldwide Android revenue is considerably more than Apple's revenue. Sure, it's divided up between many companies, and we care about that exactly why? Then there's the trend: Apple volume down ~7%/year while the world phone market increa
Re: (Score:2)
Oracle says the Android industry generates $32 billion annually [bloomberg.com]. I say that's an underestimate, and I say enough wishful thinking from bitter Apple groupies.
That's Google's total revenue on Android until Jan. 2016. What's that number supposed to prove exactly in relation to the question asked?
You are right, that number is a small fraction of the total Android industry, what was I thinking?
Not much, you just grabbed the first number that you "thought" supported your point and posted it without checking the facts. Which is your MO.
Again, this is neither profit (as in "making money") nor "the industry". Just to make sure you understand: Apple had more revenue on iOS last quarter.
You don't mean "on iOS", you mean from all its operations.
Nope, I meant from iOS. Check it out, you imbecile. Problem is you can't, because you are too stupid. Tough Love, indeed. Certainly not Loves Thought.
Re: (Score:2)
I felt more stupid after reading your post.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple's war chest builds up for the long term
More like a horde chest. Tim Cook is too squeamish to use it in any effective way. Meanwhile, Apple's race to the bottom of the market share pile is gathering steam.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
a lot of the apps that work on phones are disabled on tablets - particularly on the Android side of things
Examples? I'm not saying that's not true, but I haven't encountered it; just a bit curious.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, Apple keeps the profit (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure the Chinese slaves who work in Apple sweatshops for $3/hour will rejoice. It will ensure them many more months of working 64h/week before they earn more than they spend on basic living conditions.
It would cost $12 per device to Apple if they were to ensure a decent wage to those workers but that would slow down the insane piling of money in Apple offshore accounts so it will never happen.
Thank you Apple and Apple customers! You all contribute to making the world a better place.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting factoid! Please tell my which brand of cellphone I should buy that is so generous to its laborers, making the most commoditized electronic product in the world?
Re:Yes, Apple keeps the profit (Score:4, Interesting)
Interesting factoid! Please tell my which brand of cellphone I should buy that is so generous to its laborers, making the most commoditized electronic product in the world?
According to China Labor Watch, pretty much any brand except for Apple.
Also if your argument is that smartphones are commoditized, can you explain why you and other fanbois applause and cheer a company that makes $400 per device they sell, while a simple $12 chunk of this profit could make the Chinese workers who do all the work live well?
Anyone who buys an iPhone is complicit of this outrageous exploitation of human beings.
Re:Yes, Apple keeps the profit (Score:5, Informative)
Companies that use Foxonn.
Acer Inc. (Taiwan)
Amazon.com (United States)
Apple Inc. (United States)
BlackBerry Ltd. (Canada)
Cisco (United States)
Dell (United States)
Google (United States)
Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Huawei (China)
InFocus (United States)
Intel (United States)
Microsoft (United States)
Motorola Mobility (United States)
Nintendo (Japan)
Nokia (Finland)
Sony (Japan)
Toshiba (Japan)
Vizio (United States)
Xiaomi (China)
Re: (Score:3)
Ok I will have to assume that you don't know how this works.
It's not a one-size-fits-all situation. First, Foxconn is not the only supplier, there's also Pegatron (who pays the workers on Apple production line even less than Foxconn, an impressive $1.85/hour). Second, the conditions for each production line is not the same. Apple has dedicated plants and they are by far the worst: extreme pressure, poor working conditions, etc. It's well-documented to the point that even poor Chinese workers no longer want
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Apple isn't Pegatron's only customer either. And if you are so cock sure that the conditions aren't the same - why don't you post actual numbers? Should be easy to do.
The prevailing wisdom is that Apple is worse, backed up by what we know so far. If you want to disagree with the prevailing wisdom, it's your job to provide a citation if you want to be taken seriously. The ball is in your court, sir.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Apple isn't Pegatron's only customer either. And if you are so cock sure that the conditions aren't the same - why don't you post actual numbers? Should be easy to do.
The prevailing wisdom is that Apple is worse, backed up by what we know so far. If you want to disagree with the prevailing wisdom, it's your job to provide a citation if you want to be taken seriously. The ball is in your court, sir.
Prevailing wisdom is that the reports are biased, because they only ever looked at Apple. Prove that they aren't biased before sending me to China. Heck, there are reports of other companies being worse ehich constantly get disregarded. Samsung poisoned it's workers for years for example. Never gets mentioned here, because they didn't make parts for Apple in that factory
Heck, you guys pointed to Mike Daisey's work as evidence until it was proven he made it all up.
Re: (Score:2)
Then the prevailing wisdom isn't backed up with verifiable facts. Give us that if you want reasonable people to believe your version.
Re: (Score:2)
The prevailing wisdom is groupthink spurred on by activist media.
Wait, are you saying that the media are biased against Apple and that people who disagree with Apple shady business practices are the ones doing "groupthink"?
Re: (Score:2)
Companies that use Foxonn.
Not all Foxconn contracts are equal. Do a bit more Googling.
Re: (Score:2)
I expected this list to be way longer.
Re: (Score:3)
When you say "according to" you need to supply a citation, not just "google is that way." As far as I can tell, Chinal Labor Watch has stories (they are stories) about lots of different retailers and manufacturers, including both Apple and Samsung. There aren't any real numbers and there are no comparisons. So calling bullshit on your post.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting factoid! Please tell my which brand of cellphone I should buy that is so generous to its laborers, making the most commoditized electronic product in the world?
According to China Labor Watch, pretty much any brand except for Apple.
Yup. Could be related to the fact that China Labor Watch didn't even look at any other company but Apple (or rather their suppliers). Hard to find any flaws with them that way.
Re: (Score:2)
Citation or gtfo
<-- wikipedia is that way, and 4chan is that way -->
Slashdot is for people with at least a working knowledge of search engines.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple owns sweatshops? Interesting. When did they diversify into manufacturing?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I'm sure the Vietnamese slaves who work in Samsung sweatshops for $1/hour will send you some of their money because you speak out on Samsung's behalf.
Discussing the crooked business practices of Apple is not the same as "speaking out on behalf of Samsung". It can be hard to fathom for a fanboi but not everyone is blinded by A Brand.
Re: (Score:2)
They prefer their factory jobs?
That must explain all those suicides. Overabundance of happiness and hope.
That also must explain why Apple prefer installing safety nets to prevent workers from jumping from the factory roofs rather than sacrificing $12 of their $400 profit per device. Otherwise, what's next? They're gonna ask for picnic tables or some kind of free water supply in those hot factories? Must draw the line somewhere. Besides, working for Apple should be a reward by itself.
Re: (Score:2)
The suicide rate for Foxconn workers is actually lower than China as a whole. This could indicate that the workers at Foxconn are indeed happier than the norm.
Re: Yes, Apple keeps the profit (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
the majority of all profits (roughly 95%) goes to Apple
[Citation needed]
Samsung is the winner here (Score:5, Interesting)
The interesting figure is that Samsung *increased* their new activations, going from 19% to 21%, in the same year that they had to recall every single one of their new phones because they exploded. Meanwhile, Apple activations went down again. I mean, it takes a real optimist to spin that as a win for Apple.
And it's a long-running trend.
2014: Apple 51%, Samsung 17%
2015: Apple 49%, Samsung 19%
2016: Apple 44%, Samsung 21%
Now all Samsung has to do is ship a phone that doesn't explode or doesn't catch fire and they'll probably get a tie with Apple within a year or two. All of this after Apple had a complete monopoly in this market just 5 years ago. They'll probably end up in business textbooks as a case study of how companies can go from winners to total obsolescence within a same decade.
Re: (Score:3)
Possibly. More likely they'll go into a textbook about how shipping few units with a large profit margin is a viable alternative to shipping many units with razor thin margins. Actually, they already have.
Re: (Score:2)
The interesting figure is that Samsung *increased* their new activations, going from 19% to 21%, in the same year that they had to recall every single one of their new phones because they exploded.
Uh, "every single one"? Last I checked Samsung makes more phones than the Galaxy Note 7.
Where were the recalls for the Galaxy S7, Galaxy A3/A5/A7, Galaxy J, etc.? I never heard about them.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah don't get me wrong here, I'm not a fan of Samsung. I had a Samsung phone a while ago and it was the worst of the androids I ever had. Bloatware, terrible keyboard, awful battery life. But the fact remains that they're taking over the market from Apple and that's Apple's fault.
Re: (Score:2)
On top of that, I would barely consider the bastardized OS that Samsung offers Android at all.
An OS in the Android world is really a runtime. The Android runtime runs all the Android apps it needs to, so who cares how much lipstick they put on that pig?
Re: (Score:2)
They've put so much lipstick on it that the pig can't see where it's going. I've been using Android for a while now and it's getting more and more bloated. With every update my two year old phone gets slower. It's a shame that my next phone will have a cpu with twice the cores and almost double the clock speed of the current one but thanks to the pile of bloatware they ship on them it'll probably run slower, not faster.
Re: In other words (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the Ubuntu bloat mentality I'm sure. It's a distro thing. Android is just another distribution.
Re: In other words (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've used some lighter distros and they run fine on Pentium 4 laptops. Puppy in particular and PeppermintOS are blistering fast even on older stuff. The new Raspberry Pi 3 runs on a pretty anemic arm system and yet it's serviceable as a linux desktop. I have an atom dual core 1.6ghz netbook that struggled with win7 starter and yet is pretty snappy with PeppermintOS. I briefly tried Ubuntu on it but it was as bad as win7.
Re: (Score:2)
cyanogenmod is dead I've heard. What options are there going forward?
Re: In other words (Score:2)
Worked for Gateway 2000
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Sure, and that 56% accounts for 30% of device revenue, 20% of app sales, and only 10% of devices with the newest OS installed.
You're looking at this ass backwards. The huge profit margin and the planned obsolescence that is at the core of Apple business model is the exact reason why they are losing their grip on the market. They could dominate this industry for a long time if they focused on building good phones at a good price, but instead they're on a money-grab strategy (minimum investment, maximum profit) and they're sinking.
You can't keep selling average phones at a huge premium for a long time, people wise up and ditch you.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, and that 56% accounts for 30% of device revenue, 20% of app sales, and only 10% of devices with the newest OS installed.
You're looking at this ass backwards. The huge profit margin and the planned obsolescence that is at the core of Apple business model is the exact reason why they are losing their grip on the market. They could dominate this industry for a long time if they focused on building good phones at a good price, but instead they're on a money-grab strategy (minimum investment, maximum profit) and they're sinking.
Or the fact that the others are on a throwing-money-away strategy (maximum investment, negative profit) in their battle over marketshare is the reason why that share rises, but also the reason why many of them will not be showing up in the list next year because they went belly up. Just look at the number of companies with more than 1% share: 2 years ago there were 5, just as last year, with Xiaomi replacing Sony, but this year we have 8, with Nokia/Microsoft dropping out, but with all the smaller ones but
Re: (Score:2)
Yes Samsung only grew a little, but thats still infinitely more than Apple going backwards :)
Gee, could this have something to do with most Apple users buying their own phone when they come out in fall instead of waiting until they get one for Christmas?
Re: (Score:2)
Gee, could this have something to do with most Apple users buying their own phone when they come out in fall instead of waiting until they get one for Christmas?
No.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, and that 56% accounts for 30% of device revenue, 20% of app sales, and only 10% of devices with the newest OS installed.
You're looking at this ass backwards. The huge profit margin and the planned obsolescence that is at the core of Apple business model is the exact reason why they are losing their grip on the market.
Sounds like somebody needs a reality check. Planned obsolescence? I can only dream Android manufacturers were as good as Apple at this planned obsolescence thing, considering no Android vendor comes even close to supporting their hardware for so long.
Re: In other words (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Every single app in the app store still works on my 5
Only because they haven't opened up the NFC APIs; once they do that, there'll be an entire class of app that won't work for you.
Oh, I'm sure there are games, and possibly other apps, which absolutely rely on force touch. You can't really use those, either.
In the future, maybe be careful with absolutes; there's no quicker way to be wrong than to only require one counterexample.
Re: (Score:3)
All of those things apply to Android phones as well. Improving your hardware isn't planned obsolescence.
Re: (Score:2)
Being an irrational bigot means not having to care about logic.
Apple is routinely acknowledged to be the best manufacturer when it comes to long-term support. It would be nice if they would encourage App developers to support older versions of iOS, but I don't really expect them to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is routinely acknowledged to be the best manufacturer when it comes to long-term support.
But for no particular reason, since they are actually as likely to do something evil as something sane and only overwhelming pressure from customers will lead them to do anything about it. Holding it wrong? B&W G3 data corruption "buy another IDE card with a mac tax sucker"? G4 cube cracking, "suck it up fanboys"? G5s leaking and Apple first tried to bury the story, then tried to deny repair claims as the warranty had expired, and then only when it became broadly known did they repair or replace machine
Re: (Score:2)
My point, since you (and the other poster) plainly missed it, is that not every single app in the app store works on your iPhone 5 and it is fallacious to even claim such as only one counterpoint is required to
Re: (Score:2)
So... What was your point?
Re: (Score:2)
44% Apple, 55.9% Android, and don't forget 0.1% the late great Microsoft.
The Microsoft smartphone strategy will always remain a mystery to me. It's like they did all they could to scare developers away and to only allow low-end models to be sold via telecom providers.
I used a high-end Lumia for a while and it was very nice. I installed Gmail because Outlook is just brain-damaged but besides that, all the built-in apps were pretty good, I was surprised. Good battery life, good gps and maps, terrific camera. Of course the app store is a joke - and that by itself is a shame because
Re: (Score:2)
Wasted hours trying to get a friend's iPad to unlock with their PC-base iTunes. Neither end worked, etc, etc. It reminded me of why Apple products are banned in my household.
Should have sent your friend to the nearest Apple Store
Compatibility (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple Holiday Sales Share Shrinks (Score:5, Informative)
Fixed the headline.
Re: (Score:2)
Except they were up today.
Funny (Score:4, Informative)
I don't recall activating my new Android tablet, whatever that means.
Where do I sign up?
Activated tablets (Score:2)
They're probably talking about tablets w/ cellular capabilities that can be added to the carrier's network. You could buy a cellular iPad or Galaxy tab at a Best Buys, Costco or any such store, and get it activated while you're there
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't recall activating my new Android tablet, whatever that means.
Where do I sign up?
You install an app that uses Flurry Analytics. Done.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't recall activating my new Android tablet, whatever that means.
Where do I sign up?
You install an app that uses Flurry Analytics. Done.
Flurry isn't an ideal sampler though - it's much more used in iOS than Android apps, and seems to be persistently under-counting Android because of that.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't recall activating my new Android tablet, whatever that means.
Where do I sign up?
You install an app that uses Flurry Analytics. Done.
Flurry isn't an ideal sampler though - it's much more used in iOS than Android apps, and seems to be persistently under-counting Android because of that.
Claim all the Fandroids, because Flurry proves that Android users use less apps. Which is easily shown by comparing cross platform apps that of course show usage patterns on both platforms fairly.
*Sigh*. Android users use less apps, yes we all know this. That also means doesn't it that the thing that's being claimed here can't be accurately measured from what Flurry can tell you. If Flurry only knows about a device when a suitable app is installed, then Flurry being less used for Android apps, and Android users installing less apps, is going to undercount Android *devices*. This article is trying to measure *device* numbers, which it's unsuitable for doing so. Give me comparison figures from Faceboo
Big phones are the norm. (Score:2)
Phablets, or smartphones and tablets ranging in size from 5 inches to 6.9 inches, continued to grow in popularity.
Need to adjust that definition. 90% of Android phones now have screen of 5" or larger. It seems it's only once you hit 5.7" or above people really start throwing around the term "phablet" now.
Re: (Score:2)
Phablets, or smartphones and tablets ranging in size from 5 inches to 6.9 inches, continued to grow in popularity.
Need to adjust that definition. 90% of Android phones now have screen of 5" or larger. It seems it's only once you hit 5.7" or above people really start throwing around the term "phablet" now.
Where did you get that idea? According to Google's own statistics, 90% of all screens are "small" or "normal" with "normal" ending somewhere below 5" on their vague "definition" chart. https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html [android.com] . https://developer.android.com/guide/practices/screens_support.html#range [android.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Where did you get that idea? According to Google's own statistics, 90% of all screens are "small" or "normal" with "normal" ending somewhere below 5" on their vague "definition" chart. https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html [android.com] . https://developer.android.com/guide/practices/screens_support.html#range [android.com]
The documents you are citing appear to date back to Android 3.2 and are obviously out of date in regards to current handset specs. Average screen densities and diagonal measurements have grown quite a bit the last few years as manufactures try to one-up each other on numbers for marketing purposes.
Go on PhoneArena.com or GSMArena.com and do a search of Android handsets and sizes. As someone who has just recently bought I new phone, I can tell you from first-hand experience that the vast majority of Android
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, because I didn't have a fucking choice. (Score:5, Informative)
We had three iPhone 4S units in the family. All of them started to exhibit battery issues about a month ago. One had a dangerously swollen battery (which, according to Apple, is apparently "normal"). The other two refused to hold a charge. All three devices were happily running iOS 7.1.2.
We took them into the service centre, and had the batteries replaced for ~$100/pop. They were good solid phones, and in stellar condition for their age, so why should we upgrade?
Apparently Apple thought otherwise. I wasn't told this beforehand, but apparently "standard procedure" is to upgrade the software on the device prior to installing a new battery. Something about diagnostics- the tech basically said it was bullshit, the diagnostics from the older iOS software was identical to the new diagnostics, except for the version number- which Apple refuses to accept, and therefore will not ship the service centre a replacement battery.
So we got all three devices back with new batteries... running iOS 9.
Now they're virtually fucking useless.
It takes a good 10-20 seconds to open the phone app. I can have exactly one tab open in Safari, switching to any other tab causes that page to reload (which is great for my 3G data plan). Switching to another application causes the new application to re-launch itself (presumably because it got terminated in the background). Switching back to Safari will cause Safari to reload the active page. Before, I used to be able to have 3-4 apps open at the same time (without having them get terminated by the OS) and 4-5 tabs in Safari no problem.
Likewise, the new OS seems glitchy as fuck. Mail used to work fine with all my business IMAP accounts, now it's a crap shoot if half my inbox even loads (and it's a coin toss as to which half shows up). Even iCloud is a mess, some things are getting synced, others aren't. Almost nothing is working 100%. I've tried doing factory resets and setting up the phone from scratch, but it never makes any difference.
We've purchased exactly one replacement phone (an iPhone 7). The shit show that came with that (had to upgrade iTunes, except the new version of iTunes required us to upgrade the OS as well, which broke a whole bunch of other stuff)... I don't know.
We've still got a week to return that phone, and I honestly think we're going to do that and just switch to Android.
I'm tired of Apple's shit. It's pretty clear that a large part of their business comes from planned obsolescence and forcing people to upgrade, rather then producing products that people actually want to go out and buy. And I've had enough. They can ram their activation and adoption numbers up their ass for all I care.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never used an iPhone for business, and neither do I use it for the bulk of my work. My main use of it is doing video calls using either FaceTime or WhatsApp. For my work, since my employer uses Google to host their email, I simply use my Android phone - a Moto X. From there, I use Hangouts, Mail and the other applications, as well as 8x8's VOIP package
That's for this scenario. Had my employer used an MS Exchange server, I'd have gone w/ a Lumia. In fact, if a business licenses Office 365, they'd
Re: (Score:2)
You're on Slashdot, so assuming you can use a screwdriver, you can replace the battery in an Apple phone in about ten minutes, for about $20. Batteries on Amazon, or lots of other online retailers. They even come with screwdrivers for the annoying security screws.
It's impressive that your batteries lasted 5+ years.
Re: (Score:3)
This 4S, with iOS v9.3.5, still works even though and unsupported. Its battery hasn't blown up, but its life has shrunk. Pokemon Go + Cellular can drain it in 30 minutes. :( I doubt I will replace its battery since it is old and slow since I got it for free from my king ant who didn't want it anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah - this is exactly my worry about the enforced OS upgrades. It's all well-and-good having your device upgraded to the latest version, but if that version is next to unusable then what have you really gained?
I'm hardly saying that the Android situation is great, but one side-effect is that old devices don't get upgraded into obsolescence, and Android app developers don't assume that everyone's running on the latest OS like iOS developers do so you can usually still use the apps you want.
Re: (Score:2)
AirPods (Score:2)
AirPods: The gift that requires you to keep on giving.
Flurry? (Score:2)
Isn't that a frozen dessert sold at McDonalds?
How do they know they were gifts? (Score:2)
They could have been purchased for the end-of-year tax write off.
So what, a better comparison (Score:2)
Apple saved me money this year (Score:2)
Loyal Apple fan for years but this year I just finally gave up. I was due for a laptop upgrade but was holding out for > 16G. That didn't happen and there is no way I'll be going to the new MBP. Saved > 2k there.
Then I was going to get the Apple TV but it doesn't play nicely with my Harmony hub so I decided to do an Amazon Fire TV. It's impressive, 4k, runs Plex and everything I need, I can still AirPlay (granted I needed to buy an app for that but I can live with that) and it's 1/2 the pri
Re: (Score:2)
Apple had 49.1% of new activations last year. They can't even keep their numbers in their strongest quarter.
Re: (Score:2)
Steve Jobs died and it's been downhill since. Considering how far up the mountain they were it looks as if it'll take another 5 years or so for them to fall to where Samsung is.
Re: (Score:2)
I was pretty happy until Lion was released. That was the first time my computer actually slowed down after an upgrade. I now have a 2012 Macbook Pro 15" model and it may be the last Mac I buy. I don't really like the choices they've made since then.