Fedora 25 Now Available -- Makes It Easier To Switch From Windows 10 Or Mac (betanews.com) 154
Reader BrianFagioli writes: After the release of both alpha and beta versions, Fedora 25 is officially here and ready for production machines. If you aren't familiar with the popular Linux-based operating system, please know that it is the distribution of choice for the founder of the Linux kernel, Linus Torvalds. One of the most endearing qualities of Fedora is its focus on only offering truly free open source software. Also, you can always count on a very modern version of the Linux kernel being available. Despite having very up-to-date packages, it is always very stable too. My favorite aspect, however, is the commitment to the GNOME desktop environment; other DEs are available, though. The team says, "Fedora 25 Workstation now makes it easier to for Windows and OS X users to get started, with Fedora Media Writer serving as the default download for those operating systems. This tool helps users find and download the current Fedora release and write it to removable media, like a USB stick, allowing potential Fedora users to 'test drive' the operating system from that media environment. Fedora can then be installed to their systems with the same process".
It's a hell of a lot easier to switch now! (Score:5, Funny)
It's a hell of a lot easier to switch now!
Good job, guys!
I was having a hell of a time switching to your software before you released it. Now that it's released, the experience is 1000X better!
(still sucks, though..)
Re: (Score:3)
This will finally be the year of Linux on the Desktop.
(About time, too! It's been in the pipeline for ages...)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
I feel like the time for the Linux Desktop has come and gone, and it is such a shame too.
I agree that it has come and gone, but I think that's great. I do not want for the illiterate masses to use Linux. I want for them to stay with Windows, so that criminals will target mostly Windows. I do not want for my desktop environment to be dumbed down so that everybody can use it - if Linux were ever to become relevant in the desktop, it would be in the way of the asinine desktop environments that Red Hat and Canonical are pushing. In that situation, it would soon be the status quo that applications w
Ruminating the good ol' FUD (Score:1)
> I agree that it has come and gone, but I think that's great. I do not want for the illiterate masses to use Linux. I want for them to stay with Windows, so that criminals will target mostly Windows.
That's the FUD only the "illiterate masses" swallow: Windows is more insecure because... it's more targeted.
So perhaps Windows is for you?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
With somewhere between 40 and 80 million desktop Linux users already, the year of Linux on the desktop arrived some time ago. You may be confusing that with the year of Linux world domination of the desktop. Not sure when that is, but judging by the strength of the products recently released by Microsoft and Apple, it may not be far away.
Re: (Score:2)
The "Year of the Linux desktop" has ALWAYS been considered as the year when Linux desktop users become the majority.
By who? You? According to me, and most probably, according to the vast majority of Linux desktop users, it is the year that Linux became usable as a full function desktop. Not sure which year that was, but it was long ago. Other definitions, such as yours, we typically hear from trolls with some vested interest such as being a Microsoft employee.
Re: (Score:2)
> (still sucks, though..)
I think it's pretty awesome.
Which computer company is letting you do some things on your computer?
Re: (Score:2)
Here's the link:
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/25/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso
BTW, it's right there on the right side of the page, under "Other downloads".
Just clicking on that would have been a lot quicker and easier than typing up a rant, but who am I to judge someone that just needs a little hand-holding to download an ISO?
Re: (Score:1)
I've seen games doing things similar to this, relying on some special algorithm to helpfully set up the gaming experience, and often it's not the experience
Re: (Score:2)
I highly doubt that Mr Torvalds would accept such a steaming pile of a distro, let alone recommend it.
Apparently, you have never used 'git'...
An unsecure OS has been detected. Fix now? (Score:5, Funny)
You know, kind of like the upgrade process from Windows 7 to Windows 10, to keep in line with what Windows users are used to.
Re: (Score:1)
An unsecure OS has been detected. Fix now?
Protip: If you don't want people to think you're some Indian scam tech support outfit, you might try using correct grammar.
Re: (Score:2)
Protip: If you don't want people to think you're some Indian scam tech support outfit, you might try using correct grammar.
Oh, you mean an outfit that provides tech support to Indian scammers?
Re: (Score:1)
Uhh, no. A 14 year old wouldn't use the term "ProTip" as they wouldn't be old enough to remember it from GamePro.
How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:3)
Can anyone who know both Fedora and Ubuntu say how they compare to each other?
Unity aside, is there a solid reason to use Fedora over Ubuntu?
What do you like about Fedora - if you are a Fedora user?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I still install RPMfusion right after installing Fedora, but starting with F25, MP3 decoding is enabled out of the box. I'm assuming their legal counsel has reviewed the MP3 patents and decided they've expired or are no longer enforceable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anybody who is able to use ogg instead of mp3 and doesn't is just an idiot. I can see keeping a bunch of mp3s around instead of transcoding, because what's the point of losing even a bit more quality? Unless you need to save space of course. But taking mp3 over ogg any time you have the choice, that's just "kick me in the cluepants" zone.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't see ogg support listed on the car stereo, MP3 is.
Where did you get that crap stereo?
Re:How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:5, Informative)
All the patents regarding mp3 decoding expired, but there's still one covering encoding, and that's why only playback is enabled for now.
Re:How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:4, Informative)
Just uninstalled Ubuntu 16.04 here after about three weeks & installed Win 10. The file manager in Ubuntu would constantly cease to function. If you clicked on the icon the background would pulse with changing color as if it were launching then, after about 20 seconds, the pulsing would stop. That's it - no response, error message, crash report - nothing. And it's not just a file manager, it also handles auto mounting of flash drives, external hard drives, etc..
There were also crashes of something in the background with the crash report icon appearing in the dock. But the freezing file manager was finally intolerable. I might have had more patience or tried to diagnose if this hadn't been a long term support release. I had to reboot Ubuntu 16.04 more than my time with Win 8, 8.1, & 10 combined.
If this is the best LTS release Ubuntu can come up with I'd advise using anything else.
Re: (Score:3)
I haven't used any desktop Linux in a while but when I played around with them I found Ubuntu's were easier to initially set up, but Fedora was more stable. There were still bizarre integration problems with applications though, like different apps using different file manager plugins so that one application works across the whole file system no problem, but another can't browse into mount points, which means you need to move files out of that mount to use them, then put them back, etc. A small mountain o
Re: (Score:3)
There were still bizarre integration problems with applications though, like different apps using different file manager plugins so that one application works across the whole file system no problem, but another can't browse into mount points, which means you need to move files out of that mount to use them, then put them back, etc.
Whaaaa? I've never heard of such a thing, and certainly never experienced it, ever. Maybe you've got a real story to tell, maybe you just made it up, or maybe your mind played tricks on you, trying to remember something annoying that happened in the distant past, I don't know. But file managers on Linux don't do that. And apps don't use "file manager plugins", they use whatever the widget toolkit (usually GTK or QT) provides. Often with customization, and therefore the possibility of bugs exists, but not br
Re: (Score:2)
> And apps don't use "file manager plugins", they use whatever the widget toolkit (usually GTK or QT) provides
Whatever, I'm a sysadmin not a programmer, and that's what I was looking to call it.
And it sure as hell did happen. In Evolution:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution
I remember it clear as day because we were corresponding with a client endlessly going back and forth on a project and all of the project docs were on a mount on the office CentOS machine and I was absolutely pissed that I could get
Re: (Score:2)
Evolution is a Gnome thing, the same guys who brought you Bonobo and a bunch of other steaming piles. Try Dolphin, you'll like it. Personally, I try to stay as far away from GTK things as I can. But when forced to use them because of no other choice, they usually do function as designed, in their stilted, award way. I can't imagine how you ended up with an Evolution build that trips over mount points, Evolution certainly never did that the few times I used it. But who knows. There's no reason to use Evoluti
Re:How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:5, Informative)
Just uninstalled Ubuntu 16.04 here after about three weeks & installed Win 10. The file manager in Ubuntu would constantly cease to function.
I'm not a big fan of 16.04 either. On two machines I work with the ethernet port randomly stops functioning every so often and until I unplug/replug the cable, similar deal with pulseaudio, systemd refused to boot the machine because one of the network shares in fstab had a syntax error, and there was a clusterfuck the one time I tried to install an ATI graphics card. However the file manager... You could just install a different desktop environment (I'm guessing you were using Unity?) and that problem would go away. I might try uninstalling systemd, TBH. I reckon half of my problems come from there.
Re: (Score:2)
Agree about Systemd. I'm not a systemd hater by nature, but I did see a bunch of strange issues over the last year or so that I never saw before systemd landed, and that just don't show up as KDE or Gnome open issues. Those feel like Systemd/dbus things. For example, I might suddenly lose all keyboard input, but the mouse is still working fine. Cure is to restart X, which is to say, low level input handling isn't the problem. Thankfully, those seemed to go away with later 16.04 updates, and 16.10. The latte
Re: (Score:2)
Your goddam hardware is obviously bad or just plain shitty. Big whoop.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Your goddam hardware is obviously bad or just plain shitty. Big whoop.
Annnd this is why no one wants to run Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Of course. I'm not saying shitty hardware isn't to blame for issues arising from shitty hardware.
However, I've had issues, stupid ones like the OP's, pop up occasionally on various Linux distros, and the answer you get time and time again is "must be shitty hardware". Even when the hardware is fine and can run BSD, Windows, sometimes even OS X just fine.
It's that sense of superiority that Linux is perfect and if there are any issues it just must be shitty hardware that turns people off. It's just as smug as
Re: (Score:1)
Your goddam hardware is obviously bad or just plain shitty. Big whoop.
Annnd this is why no one wants to run Linux.
Oh my, a word from a sensitive little snowflake. No, it's not why noone wants to run Linux (which isn't true anyway) it's why people get triggered and have little hissy fits, then get over it and eventually end up doing whatever makes sense to them. For what it's worth, I think the "goddam hardware" guy is an idiot too. But get real. If you want serious abuse, try some phone support from Microsoft.
Re: (Score:2)
If you want serious abuse, try some phone support from Microsoft.
This was maybe true in the 90s but things have changed, a lot. Microsoft support, especially on cloud products, is excellent. I have a client who uses Office365 and every time a problem occurred in the last year or two, within minutes after the ticket was open Microsoft called to provide assistance, and they stayed on the line until the problem was resolved.
There are companies out there with even better customer service, especially retailers (like Zappos), but for a tech company Microsoft is top tier in tha
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No I'm talking about the free tier support from Office365.
As an admin for Office 365 for business, you get free access to our knowledgeable support agents for help resolving technical issues, as well as for pre-sales, account, and billing support. You can also contact us on behalf of Office 365 users in your organization.
https://support.office.com/en-... [office.com]
Re: (Score:3)
My hardware is a Dell Optiplex 9010 - 3rd gen core I7, 16 gig of ram, CoolerMaster 500 watt PSU, GTX750Ti, Mushkin Reactor 1tb SSD. And this motherboard might as well be an engineering prototype from Intel. Every chip is Intel and even the "Dell drivers" downloaded from Dell support are just generic Intel driver packages.
But maybe you're right and this setup is just shitty hardware. But it's shitty hardware where Ubuntu 16.04 stumbles & Win 10 runs a treat. Maybe someday I'll buy some "good hardware" so
Re: (Score:2)
Oh and, yes, it runs Crysis.
Re: (Score:2)
My hardware is a Dell Optiplex 9010 - 3rd gen core I7, 16 gig of ram, CoolerMaster 500 watt PSU, GTX750Ti, Mushkin Reactor 1tb SSD. And this motherboard might as well be an engineering prototype from Intel. Every chip is Intel and even the "Dell drivers" downloaded from Dell support are just generic Intel driver packages.
But maybe you're right and this setup is just shitty hardware. But it's shitty hardware where Ubuntu 16.04 stumbles & Win 10 runs a treat. Maybe someday I'll buy some "good hardware" so I can run Ubuntu.
In my experience, here's how distros rank for hardware support:
OpenSuSE > Fedora > Ubuntu.
The fact that kernels on Fedora are usually bleeding edge helps a lot.
This being said, very often there's some weird conflict going on that causes problems. For instance, I have a low-end HP laptop that has a wifi adapter that keeps going off in Ubuntu; I had to blacklist a bluetooth controller to get wifi working properly; meanwhile the thing runs flawlessly on Fedora 24 and Windows 10.
Re: (Score:2)
Just uninstalled Ubuntu 16.04 here after about three weeks & installed Win 10. The file manager in Ubuntu would constantly cease to function.
16.04 was annoying unstable when first released. It's ok now, but 16.10 is the new shininess. But that was unstable too, when first released. I put it on a throwaway laptop and kept updating until it got stable, I think maybe 10 weeks or so, then put it on the rest of my machines without incident. Very nice. I run Kubuntu on it, and highly recommend it. KDE has really matured lately, it's actually very pleasant to use these days. No comparison whatsoever to the Windows experience, it's beyond me how anybody
Re: (Score:2)
Don't order a laptop with Ubuntu preinstalled. Get a regular laptop, and install Xubuntu 16.04 instead. The crapware gets removed along with Windows 10; it probably counts as a Windows 10 PC for sales purposes.
Right, and the crapware makers end up subsidizing your Linux laptop, it's actually a sweet deal.
Re:How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:5, Informative)
Fedora is usually one or two releases ahead of Ubuntu. Fedora is usually quick to fix issues with their shipped software and doesn't necessarily wait for the next distro release to release a new version of a specific package or to add new packages. Fedora ships with (usually, depending on release schedules) the latest versions of GNOME and GNOME software.
Ubuntu supports some things that Fedora can't/won't because of patents/copyright. Ubuntu is Debian-based, so if you're more familiar with that family of distros, you'll be more comfortable in Ubuntu.
Re:How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:5, Informative)
Both will give you KDE (again, Fedora's version may be newer), MATE, LXDE, Gnome, etc... You can set either up however you'd like, and the default repos largely contain the same stuff.
Personally, I run Fedora since my work uses RHEL and that keeps me in the same mindset. I tend to bounce between Linux Mint and Fedora, and have found the only real difference for me comes down to some obscure libraries on (very rare) occasions. Folks complain that Fedora is unstable, and that's generally true for the first few weeks after release. I've had the same problem with Ubuntu, though... so YMMV
Re: (Score:2)
Fedora is "bleeding edge" while Ubuntu favors stability - Fedora typically has newer versions of libraries sooner than Ubuntu does.
It's not really fair to say that without mentioning Debian Sid, on which every version of Ubuntu is based. By running Sid you will typically get even fresher packages than Fedora. If Sid is a bit too adventurous for you (packages do break from time to time but many people use it for their primary workstation because it's fun) then try Debian Testing... solid as a rock. Never mind Stable, which actually goes overboard on the stability.
It's kind of odd how Debian doesn't get mentioned much in these kinds of t
Re: (Score:2)
Fedora is a workcamp for Redhat, they experiment in Fedora new changes and updates with Gnome and now Wayland. This is the same work that Can
Re: (Score:2)
Fedora is a lot like CentOS/RHEL, so if you're developing for one of those, it's a good desktop environment to use. It also gives you a preview of what might go into future releases of CentOS/RHEL and gives you a chance to adapt to it or complain about it. (CentOS/RHEL are relatively well-supported by software and hardware vendors and hence popular in environments where stuff has to "just work".)
Re: (Score:2)
Almost everything is better refined under Fedora. Most recent example: I support a lab that teaches embedded development. The ARM devices present themselves to a host as a USB network device with DHCP. If we attach those devices via USB to an Ubuntu host, it switches the default route to the embedded device, which means the host loses access to the NFS server and the whole desktop session hangs. On Fedora and CentOS, the hosts correctly get an address and a subnet route, but the default route is unmodif
Re: (Score:2)
God there are some stupid pointless flamewars on this site, and when I saw this article I hoped this thread might be an exception, but the first bunch of posts are all "Year of Linux on the desktop" crap and grammer Nazi nonsense.
Then you two come along and start a real thread.
Re: How does Fedora compare to Ubuntu? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Something like CentOS ?
Re: (Score:1)
Can anyone who know both Fedora and Ubuntu say how they compare to each other?
Just imho naturally. Fedora/Redhat.... everywhere it departs from the teachings of Debian, it seriously blows. Example: RPM. It's just eye-gougingly bad, particularly rpmbuild. Ask anyone who has had the misfortune of having to deal with it as a maintainer. For users, it's not as bad, but its still bad. Example: still uses mainly file-based dependencies. That's package manager brain-damage more than an RPM deficiency per se, but still it's symptomatic of the mindset that Fedora/Redhat maintainers have. Another example: executable scripts to initialize network interfaces. Come on, that's something you'd expect from Microsoft, not a self respecting Unix guru. Oh wait, there weren't any Unix gurus involved when that garbage was invented. There are just countless more flaws, big and little, along similar lines. Not to say that Fedora/Redhat is a complete steaming pile, after all, it shares a lot of DNA with Debian/Ubuntu. But basically, everywhere it departs from Debian/Ubuntu, there you will find big steaming piles of turd.
Oh, whoops, redhat employee with mod points detected.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, I'll bite:
> RPM [...] Example: still uses mainly file-based dependencies
That's not true. It _can_ but primarily does not use file-based dependencies. I think, realistically, from a packaging perspective, you'll find places where both RPM and deb suck, and where they both have strengths — it's kind of half-a-dozen-of-one, six-of-the-other. From a user perspective, it barely ever matters even a little bit.
> Another example: executable scripts to initialize network interfaces.
I assume you me
Re: (Score:2)
Supporting a release for an extended period of time is very expensive, both in terms of actual money but also in demands on volunteer time — and despite Red Hat sponsorship, Fedora is largely a volunteer project. We could choose to focus on a longer lifetime, but that would come at the expense of other areas (like bringing new tech to users quickly while still doing a decent amount of QA). So, instead, we've worked on making upgrades as painless a
Wayland is also now the default (Score:5, Informative)
Hell, there's not even token a mention of it in this summary.
Re: (Score:1)
Sounds like the story got Waylaid...
Re: (Score:3)
Seriously? Isn't Wayland kind of a big deal?
I mean, I can't remember anymore. It's been in development for so long that in my mind it's reached Duke Nukem status. Now I'm going to have to go google it cause I can no longer remember what was supposed to be so good about it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
True, but this is the first time (that I am aware of) that it has been considered good enough to be a first class citizen in a major distro. That's a significant milestone.
Re: (Score:1)
Not sure what you mean. Wayland has been continually improved, but it was actually already released 4 years ago. It arrived reasonably soon after the talk about it began whereas DNF took more than a decade.
What we've been waiting for was for applications and operating systems to rely on Wayland instead of X, which has been taking so long because X is very entrenched. Nvidia, with its X-only drivers, certainly isn't helping.
Re: (Score:2)
Because, as I understand it, X11 is a ginormous mess at a level that rivals Internet Explorer. Maintainability and performance is getting worse as a result.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If I wanted Linux... (Score:2)
...why would I pick Fedora? It's one thing if we're talking servers and I needed RHEL or Oracle Unbreakable, but for personal usage? When SteamOS is based on Ubuntu, why not pick a Ubuntu or even a Debian based distro? .deb is a lot easier to handle than .rpm
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you work with RHEL/CentOS servers, running a Fedora desktop will show you what the current/next version of those server distros will look like and give you more insight into their inner workings. Their underpinnings are the same, their os-level services are the same (Though versions may be different). And DEBs and RPMs are basically the same effort-wise anymore for end-users, Fedora COPRs are equivalent to Debian PPAs. And in my opinion, RPMs are easier to build.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
For whatever it's worth, Steam runs just fine on Fedora.
Re: (Score:1)
...why would I pick Fedora? It's one thing if we're talking servers and I needed RHEL or Oracle Unbreakable, but for personal usage? When SteamOS is based on Ubuntu, why not pick a Ubuntu or even a Debian based distro? .deb is a lot easier to handle than .rpm
I prefer Fedora KDE spin but other people prefer different spins (ie. GUI or CLI) such as Gnome and Xfce but there are others [fedoraproject.org] to choose as well. The best way to pick one is to download a Live spin and run it from DVD or USB key before making a decision if you wish to install. You can actually do something similar with the Debian (eg. Ubuntu and Mint) based distributions.
It is important to realize that Fedora is only supported for about a year with a major release approximately every six months and you d
Re: (Score:2)
If you like systemd, it's the reference platform. If you hate systemd, it is the worst distro out there. It's their fault.
Re: (Score:2)
...why would I pick Fedora? It's one thing if we're talking servers and I needed RHEL or Oracle Unbreakable, but for personal usage? When SteamOS is based on Ubuntu, why not pick a Ubuntu or even a Debian based distro? .deb is a lot easier to handle than .rpm
Well, most of the "under the hood" changes are pushed by Red Hat so you'll probably see them in Fedora first if that rocks your boat. Ubuntu is trying their own thing "over the hood" with Mir, Unity etc. which may or may not be to your liking. I kinda like KDE but it seems to always be on the sidelines for everyone but SuSE. Right now I'd probably go to Mint Linux's Cinnamon edition but realistically I hope to keep Win7 working a little longer. SteamOS and their Steam Machines kinda went nowhere, so it's s
Re: (Score:1)
This is a good question and I find myself going back-and-forth on this issue myself. I typically prefer Debian Stable and Fedora. Mainly because I like Gnome 3 (if you don't like Gnome 3, you probably feel differently and that's okay). Ubuntu seems a lot buggier than it once was (I started using it around 7.10). Also, Ubuntu wants to have its own version of everything (Mir, Unity, Snappy, etc.) and they never seem to put enough resources behind any of them to turn out a good product. Fedora on the othe
Re: (Score:2)
An interesting claim... (Score:2)
systemd no thanks (Score:1)
If they are still using systemd I'm not interested.
Re: (Score:2)
Linus' distro of choice? (Score:2)
How do we know that? In the past Linus has always been very careful not to say what distro he uses out of caution that any mention by him would be considered an endorsement, as has apparently been done here. I've read him talking about desktop environments but never distros.
Re: (Score:3)
He actually mentioned many times he uses Fedora as desktop/workstation distro, and in his children's laptops too.
Join the torrent now! (Score:2)
oh boy! (Score:1)
Hardware support in Linux (Score:2)
Linus Torvalds advanced things a little [wired.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, desktop of the future. Sure. How long have people been saying that? How much has the hardware driver issue been advanced in that time?
Light years. Linux now gets day 0 support for new 3D cards from AMD and NVidia, for one thing. For another, Linux now supports a far bigger range of hardware than any version of Windows. True. Because Linux doesn't drop old hardware like Microsoft does. Once some piece of hardware is supported in Linux, it stays supported forever. And for most hardware you won't need any vendor driver, the hardware support is built into the kernel (typically as a module).
For hardware you really care about, like your network
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't get my AMD Radeon 7870 XT/LE card to work with graphics acceleration since the proprietary driver is no longer supported.
Ubuntu 16.04? You and a bunch of others... it fell between the cracks where fglrx was dropped and AMDGPU support didn't cover some cards. The recommendation at the time for owners of those cards was, don't upgrade. If you inadvertently did, you could consider reinstalling 15.10. Now, on 16.10, "man radeon" tells me that Tahiti is supported.
Re: (Score:2)
If you inadvertently did, you could consider reinstalling 15.10. Now, on 16.10, "man radeon" tells me that Tahiti is supported.
Great, now about Fedora...
Good luck with that :)
I suggest switching to a Debian-derived distro.
WTF! easier to switch? LOL (Score:2)
How goddam hard has it ever been to change to linux? You just put the goddam CD in the CD-ROM reader or plug in the goddam USB stick and reboot. Sheesh. The way it has ALWAYS been.
Re: (Score:2)
27 floppy disks is all I have to say to that.
The real question... (Score:1)
Never mind being easy to switch from windows or mac os, can you actually do an upgrade from previous version of fedora? The instructions used to suggest it was best to nuke previous versions before installing.
Does Fedora have aptitude or similar? (Score:2)
Does Fedora have an ncurses app for exploring packages, such as aptitude? Last time I looked at it, as far as I could tell you had pure command-line tools (rpg and yum) and full GUI tools but nothing like aptitude.
https://wiki.debian.org/Aptitude [debian.org]
I particularly like the way vi keys work as expected inside aptitude. For me it is a fantastic way to browse through packages, see what I have installed, etc. I would have tried out Fedora by now if I knew I could use aptitude on it.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're currently on Debian/Ubuntu then Fedora would feel like slumming.
Wonderful! (Score:2)
So now Linux handles Active Directory and DFS shares? I can run Cisco Jabber and connect with my cow-orkers? There is a decent Visio like application I can run? Checkpoint VPN support?
Organics (Score:1)
How does this make it easier to switch? (Score:3)
When I think of an OS that makes it easy to switch from one I have used before the UI is just one of many things I consider. The article mentions some scripting languages that are supported out of the box, a few applications that are included, and how it's got a great kernel and package manager but those are really important only to software developers and the like.
What I'd think people that are switching operating systems would be concerned about are things like being able to read their existing media and files, has drivers/utilities for their peripherals (like a printer/scanner/fax MFD), can connect to their network (wired, wireless, whatever DSL/cable/satellite/dial-up modem they might have), and probably most importantly can run the programs they are used to and/or invested a lot of money into. There was a brief mention of supporting graphical hardware, and being able to play MP3 files but not much else.
For long time users of computers they will have a stockpile of older files and potentially software they'd like to access even on a new system. This computing inertia has been a big reason why Microsoft has been so successful, people can move from one version to the next and not worry too much about losing the ability to do things as they did before. This is especially true for technologies like VirtualPC and Boot Camp that allow people to run their old OS on their new computer alongside the new OS. (I realize the two technologies I mention don't do exactly the same thing but it does allow one to run an older Windows OS relatively painlessly and run some other OS with little difficulty for people that wish to do so.)
Fedora is much like any other Linux based OS I assume, so I assume it can run VirtualBox. WINE is probably available too. I assume it can at least read NTFS and HFS volumes, even if writing is not available the ability to read is huge. I assume it runs a few nice web browsers, office productivity suites, and e-mail programs too. I'd like to hear about those. I'm sure access to games is important to a lot of people so adding that would be a good idea but it won't be much of a selling point to people like me or for corporations.
I know some of this stuff because I'm a regular user of Linux, Mac, and Windows but honestly I don't know a whole lot about what a recent version of Linux might do to help me ditch one of my non-Linux OSes. I use my Mac for e-mail and web browsing, Linux for writing code, and Windows to run Office. I don't really try to do away with any one OS because I literally have a dozen computers in my basement, I have options.
If someone wants to sell me an OS as an alternative to MacOS or Windows then they will have to try harder. I believe I am not alone in this.
sketchup, photoshop, visio ? (Score:2)
Yes there are alternatives, but why don't publishers publish their software on linux?
Re: (Score:2)
Just a beautiful. Don't you noun?