Report Claims Microsoft Beat Apple in Online Tablet Sales for October (winbeta.org) 239
Eloking writes: Apple's iPad tablet ushered in the modern tablet era when it was introduced in 2010, and it's dominated tablet sales ever since. iPad sales have stagnated recently, but nevertheless Apple has maintained its lead in overall tablet market share. WinBeta received an early version of an upcoming report, '1010data Facts for Ecom Insights, January 2014 – October 2015' by the 101data Ecom Insights Panel, however, that indicates all of that might be changing as Microsoft assumes the mantle of best-selling tablet maker in terms of online sales in October.
They can't lead in market numbers forever (Score:5, Insightful)
At one point, everyone who wanted an iPad and is able to afford one will already have done so. After that, these people will only buy a new one to upgrade once in a while.
Re: (Score:3)
True... and the main iPad didn't get an update this year... frankly it didn't really need one just yet...
A year ago we replaced an iPad 3 and a iPad 4 with a pair of iPad Air 2s. That was a decent upgrade. My plan/hope is that these new units last us 5 years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Op said main iPad. The iPad Pro is a different line.
BS Dummy iDiot! iPad Mini / iPad Air / iPad Pro
MacBook / MacBook Air / MacBook Pro
Dell Inspiron / Dell XPS / Dell Alienware
Re: (Score:2)
Dude "Built-in 27.3-watt-hour rechargeable lithium-polymer battery" http://www.apple.com/au/ipad-a... [apple.com], the only way they will last five years is if you do not use them, the more you use them the quicker they will die. "Apple warrants the included hardware product and accessories against defects in materials and workmanship for one year from the date of original retail purchase. Apple does not warrant against normal wear and tear, nor damage caused by accident or abuse", this from their warranty page. So ye
Re: (Score:2)
You'll have to define "fail". I have iPad 2's from four years ago which still have many hours of battery life and have seen relatively heavy use. Perhaps not the 10 it had originally, but then neither does a Microsoft tablet. I think Apple considers a battery eligible for replacement if its capacity falls below 80% during warrantee or Apple Care period. Otherwise you have to pay $99 to have it swapped out.
Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever (Score:5, Informative)
$99 to replace the battery in a 128GB iPad Air 2 in 3 years strikes me as a pretty reasonable price. It is about 12% of the cost of the device and it would restore it to like new condition.
If the other option is spending $700 on a new one, $99 for a battery seems quite reasonable.
Re: (Score:2)
This from Apple "Your battery is designed to retain up to 80 per cent of its original capacity at 1,000 complete charge cycles. The one-year warranty includes service coverage for a defective battery". So 1000 full discharges and recharges, one year only covers defective and not designed failure. The more you use it, the quicker you lose it (mind you somehow you think it is evil to allow a user replaceable battery in the design). You must also pay for shipping if necessary, during which all your data will
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't play semantics I just go with reasonable rules https://www.accc.gov.au/busine... [accc.gov.au]. Failure would be no longer fit for the purpose for which is was intended ie supplying a reasonable charge to allow reasonable use of the device. I know some countries are tougher on this, than those that blatantly favour corporate profits but I think they need to be even tougher and not be sucked down by corrupted foreign government influence.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The reality distortion field generator is on the fritz. The yearly upgrade cycle business model is failing.
Re: They can't lead in market numbers forever (Score:5, Funny)
Is it even a fair comparison? Apple defined the market with their iPad, a pioneering product running their mobile OS. Microsoft enters, running a full non-crippled OS. It just doesn't seem right. A court should require Microsoft to run Windows CE so the products can compete on more equal terms.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The reality distortion field generator is on the fritz. The yearly upgrade cycle business model is failing.
The Reality Distortion field has been on the fritz since his holiness, The Steve, croaked.
Steve was insistent on the 10" iPad, and 3.5" iPhone for maximum usability for their form factors.
Now you have the iPad mini and iPhone 6 Plus competing to be the same size.
Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever (Score:5, Interesting)
Now you have the iPad mini and iPhone 6 Plus competing to be the same size.
I actually really like the iPhone 6 Plus and it was long overdue, yes it is naturally more awkward than it's predecessors but that's ok, the tradeoff is screensize which makes it MUCH more useful. Apple has a habit of lambasting things that its competitors are doing that it isn't yet doing, when they do that history has shown it is a sign it is something they are worried about and hurriedly working on themselves.
I still remember the Intel switch (Score:5, Interesting)
Yeah, about lambasting things that its competitors are doing, there was a pretty crazy instance.
It was during the switch to Intel CPUs. They were selling for a while both their older Power PC based line and their new Intel inside line, so they had, at the same time on their website for several months, both pages dedicated to proving how much faster the Power PCs were compared to the Pentium, and another set of pages at a different part of the site showing how much FASTER the Pentium was compared to the Power PC. They were even using the same benchmarks sometimes (with some fudging about of course, like enabling/disabling AltiVec to suit the desired result etc).
It was so ridiculous, but it was even more ridiculous that nobody was really calling them on it. They claimed both sides of the coin with a straight face and it seems that most were drinking the kool-aid.
To top it off, at that time (before the Intel Core 2), it is most likely that AMD had the fastest CPU, so both campaigns were BS...
Re: (Score:2)
I had a completely different experience.
No doubt, not everybody has the same size hands and same preferences. It's funny to look at the posts defending [daringfireball.net] whatever screen size Apple is currently producing and even predicting [dcurt.is] that no other will ever exist. There's certainly no shortage of people out there defending the company's decisions based on their own made-up justifications - that actually turn out to be wrong.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Apple is desperate to continue that yearly upgrade cycle, which is why they're now offering plans to encourage that behavior. I'm predicting that you're only going to see it continue for most people while smartphones are in an early growth market. Sure, there will always be the hardcore technologists for fanboys, but that will be a much smaller piece of the market.
Remember how often we had to upgrade our PC hardware until the tech settled down after a few decades? Every couple of years, right? Now how o
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The reality distortion field generator is on the fritz. The yearly upgrade cycle business model is failing.
It's been about four years since Steve Jobs died. I'm still not exactly sure how, but that man was very, very good at reading what the public wanted even before the public knew what it wanted, and to then act as a filter within the company to provide products that fit those wants. Apple without Steve Jobs struggled before when he was released from the company when they attempted to go low-cost and mass-market, and Apple without Steve Jobs now appears to be making design missteps that no longer lead what t
Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think Apple really gives a shit if they sell more tablets than android makers do. Considering the outrageous mark up on iPads they make a ton of money. If Samsung is making 10 dollars off every tablet and Apple is clearing this kind of money....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci... [dailymail.co.uk]
then apple doesn't need to sell more tablets.
Re:They can't lead in market numbers forever (Score:4, Interesting)
You can't compare profit margins at the top and bottom of the market. Samsung have premium models that make huge profits and sell millions too, but they also have affordable models that cater to a different group of consumers.
The fact that they make small profits on some products does not mean they aren't competing, it just means that they operate in a market that Apple ignores on top of their premium tablet business.
In fact Apple has been expanding into Samsung's other markets, e.g. the large tablet market and the pen input market.
Re: (Score:2)
Who cares if they care? Them caring about other things doesn't make it true that they have the most market share. That's the distortion field causing cognitive dissonance when you hear something that sounds vaguely anti-apple, even if it turns out to be a neutral fact.
Re: (Score:2)
What good is the most market share? It's how much money you make. Commodore Business Machines sold more computers their last year in business than ever before. Then went straight into bankruptcy. Tell me who's making all the profit?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How can Apple increase market share? If they had a removable battery, expandable memory, and allowed direct filesystem access, this geek may consider it.
None of these things will add even 1% market share. Not one person in my family could tell you how much RAM is in any device we own besides me (and on some of the tablets I couldn't tell you). We have five laptops, two desktops, four tablets, and four phones. Geeks are not the way to increase market share. They represent a microscopic fraction of a percent of all users.
My wife uses an iPad 3. I got her an iPad Pro for Christmas. The things I am concerned about are printing, durability, battery life
Re: (Score:2)
Surface is great (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course on slashdot it is a failure and no one is buying them. But in the real world they ate the number 2 generator of revenue for Microsoft and can run office and be managed via active directory for IT departments making them popular. The screen is Apple quality hardware
Re: Surface is great (Score:5, Insightful)
The Surface and Windows Phones will sell very well to corporates with heavy investment in Microsoft tech because it integrates very well and the Surface can run all their proprietary software. Apple and Linux fanboys are completely incapable of understanding that the corporate world is never going to fully embrace something that doesn't allow them to take advantage of their huge investment in Windows.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I really don't care. Why would I care if you or anyone else pisses their money away? I own a galaxy tab 2 that I picked up used and it works okay so I'm not buying into Apple's high priced tablet world but I have looked at them and they are better than anything Samsung makes and Samsung makes nicer hardware than the Surface tablets. I can see that if you are slaved to the windows world then sure, Surface is your thing. I own an Apple Mac Mini that I use for video work but I'm using Linux for general com
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Linux runs good on lower grade hardware. On my T420 it hauls ass. I built a dual AMD 64 bit system back years ago when that was the hot thing. I put Mepis Linux on it and it was amazing. I had a friend come over and he was absolutely blown away. I've installed it on a lot of friends computers over the years and I only had 2 that went back to windows.
Re: (Score:2)
The Surface and Windows Phones will sell very well to corporates with heavy investment in Microsoft tech because it integrates very well and the Surface can run all their proprietary software. Apple and Linux fanboys are completely incapable of understanding that the corporate world is never going to fully embrace something that doesn't allow them to take advantage of their huge investment in Windows.
With Windows Phone, there is the added advantage that if given to employees, it's likely to be used just for work purposes, since it misses much of the cool stuff that iPhones and Androids have that could tempt employees to repurpose them.
That, and the fact that they would integrate so much better w/ Windows 10
Re: (Score:2)
I'm hoping to get one at one point. It can be a tablet, and also masquerade as a laptop when needed. And I can install legacy Wintel apps
But it's tough to justify it given that w/ the same budgets, I could get a far superior spec'ed laptop from any of the other vendors - Dell, HP, Asus, Lenovo et al
Re:Surface is great (Score:4, Interesting)
Whoops: forgot to say, obviously my main interest is sketching. The surface running windows ten shows what touch on a laptop should br. Very nice. Without a pen the ipad pro was just a really big ipad - bit pointless.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Explain to me what is up with the lag. Completely unpredictable shifts in latency from zero to over a second. This was horrific - it completely ruins the interface.
What is with the little diamond near the nib of the pen? It seems to track the pen reasonably well, but the actual ink from the tool misses that diamond by a few centimetres. If the tracking is there (diamond only seems to lag behind the nib by about a centimetre or so in fast strokes) , why is the actual drawing from the tool so far from that di
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
PA are known MS shills.
They have been ever since the launch of the 360.
Re:Surface is great (Score:5, Informative)
The pen is shit. Horrific lag, unpredictable latency.
Couldn't disagree more. It's the best pen input device I've used that didn't need to be physically tethered to a computer, and the lag is quite predictable (really bad in hover, almost non existent when touching)
Tried the builtin software ("fresh paint"?), what a pile of crap.
This I agree with, wholeheartedly. Great little kids toy but even then only if they want to play with swishing colours together. It's garbage.
Re: (Score:2)
Go somewhere you can compare the Apple pen to Samsung's pen. The Samsung one is far, far ahead in terms of latency and accuracy. I'm actually quite shocked that Apple would release it in that state, but I think like Apple Maps it was rushed.
Are you sure you meant the Apple Pencil? (Score:3)
Go somewhere you can compare the Apple pen to Samsung's pen. The Samsung one is far, far ahead in terms of latency and accuracy.
Did you mean the Microsoft stylus? Because everywhere I've read a review comparing the Apple Pencil to other current styluses, the Pencil was said to be far better... even over the Samsung [neurogadget.com].
I'll get the Pencil in a few days so I'll be able to see for myself, but everyone I've talked to who has used one said zero lag (latency) and pretty much perfect accuracy.
Re: (Score:2)
The pen was decent on the Surface Pro 2. I agree, it worked better when touching the tablet. Hovering it felt a little off and if I came in at a low angle from the bottom it'd be totally off.
That being said, it's probably the best you're gonna get without getting a hard core Watcom drawing tablet. (I think they made some of the Surface Pros pens/digitizers didn't they?)
But I don't draw, so I was just using it to struggle with Illustrator.
Re: (Score:2)
*online* sales? who cares? (Score:5, Insightful)
I recall reading about when Pepsi overtook Coke. Everyone rejoiced. However, in actual fact, Coke still outsold Pepsi by a wide margin; the overtaking was in grocery store sales which they had managed to do by making the six-pack into an 8-pack for the same price and then measuring by total volume.
And here we have a report that says MS outsold Apple in *online sales*. Hmmm. I suspect that Apple sells the majority, if not the vast majority, of their sales through retail chains. So when I read:
"The report did not take in account customers who purchased their tablets in brick-and-mortar stores, such as Apple’s retail stores or Best Buy."
Then basically I think this is even less of a mini-victory than Fortune posits. Pepsi anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:*online* sales? who cares? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yup. This report is simply cherry picking one particular and declaring Microsoft the winner. Mind you, Apple does the same thing with its overpriced "boutique" smart devices.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The funny part. (Score:3, Interesting)
I have a Surface pro... and I can not get myself to buy another. The huge problems with the Surface pro and how microsoft has told me "sucks to be you, reinstall the OS" means I have zero interest in walking down their road again. Not as long as they use low grade dog food chips like Marvell for their wireless networking.
Re: (Score:3)
I had a problem with the wireless once. Turns out it was a windows problem and the refresh fixed it just fine. Otherwise zero hardware issues on my end. My partner had a problem with the pen on her Surface and after talking to tech support for a few minutes they sent her a new pen. (There was a facepalmingly funny moment where the tech support person asked her to hold a button combination on the surface which does a hard reset not realising she was running the chat session on it. Kudos that after booting up
Re: (Score:2)
And that $1000 price tag is why the surface pro is not really a tablet from a sales point of view. It'll sell to corporate execs who want a light laptop - and for whom it matters that they have an obviously pricey toy to show off. Plus, these things will primarily be used as laptops to run desktop software. But that's the Mac Air market, not the iPad market - much less the Kindle Fire / $99 Android market.
Microsoft can only hope that once they sell enough of these, devs will start writing tablet software
Re: (Score:3)
The surface is just 699 and now has a quad core atom. It can run office and act as a tablet and no crappy scaled down mac office suit with a crappy ios. It is a real OS that can be used for both work and play. No laptop under 1000 is going to be good anyway in a sea of cheap plastic and garbage quality 1k screens.
Re: (Score:2)
Extra, extra! (Score:5, Interesting)
Rerun of the movie first shown in 1977 can be seen at 11.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is the new BSD, forever dying. Netcraft confirms it.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is the new BSD, forever dying. Netcraft confirms it.
Don't you mean "Never before heard of competitor of Netcraft, forgotten next month, confirms it?"
tablets are useful for SOME things (Score:2)
Pretty much all devices can do everything. The question is really how good can one device be at one thing. Tablets are good for reading and that's pretty much it. I mostly use mine to read scientific article and annotate them. This is my killer usage of tablet. And I got the one with the most usable "pencil" in the market at the time. Samsung's note tablets were are the best at the time.
I haven't tried Apple's version. But MS shot at it with the surface pro was a pretty good shot at it I found.
I'd say that
Re: (Score:2)
The question is really how good can one device be at one thing.
No the question is what can it do for me and is there something better that fits the scenario. The Surface Pro series is not the best tablet on the market, it's not the best laptop either. It is however the damn best device for a note taking hybrid tablet that can act as a fully function laptop when you need to device.
Brand awareness (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
This isn't brand awareness as much as mouth drooling fucking stupidity. I've seen all sorts of things call iPads, and yes that includes things that say "Surface" on them in clear text. That shouldn't be a praise for apple, that should be an out right failing grade for our species. Mind you it is 2015 and people still call the computer chassis the "hard drive" so I don't see us breaking out of this trend anytime soon.
One month.... (Score:4, Interesting)
One month does not make a trend. If Microsoft can string multiple sequential months together, than this will be news. Until then, it only means that in this particular month, more Microsoft tablets were sold. Interesting, but nothing more than that.
Cannibalized sales? (Score:2)
Once bitten twice shy. Now a days most IT shops want to use only the set of Microsoft products that inter-operate with other systems, even if the wal
Apple stabbed with its own Pencil (Score:3, Interesting)
And Microsoft will continue to dominate through the Christmas holiday. How do I know? I went into the Apple Store to buy an iPad Pro. ::Pulls out wallet:: "Please add a Pencil to the order." ::Puts wallet away:: ::Leaves store:: ::Typing this on my Surface Pro 4 and loving it!::
Sales person: "Yes sir! We have them in stock!"
Me:
Genius: "We'll ship a Pencil to you in 5-6 weeks"
Me:
(Sometime later)
Me:
I guess I know the tiny flaw in the survey (Score:5, Interesting)
Next year: Amazon confirms - Nobody buys Apple TVs or Google Chromecasts!
All Things Must Pass... (Score:3)
With it's atrocious interface and sky high price, the iPad is akin to the early days of paying for a bottle of water...
Let the real tablets take their place at the table: Google, Samsung and Microsoft
Re:Just So I'm Clear (Score:5, Informative)
The summary says "online sales" which means that we are probably NOT talking about "shipped" rather than "sold" numbers. However, these are numbers for October, which is all before the new iPads shipped (including the iPad Pro) so we are probably seeing some depression of iPad sales that will catch up in the November numbers (or not: if MS can maintain these sales numbers in November and December, then this would be quite interesting).
Re: (Score:2)
Online sales are direct to consumer. There's no warehouse middleman artificially inflating the numbers.
Re: (Score:2)
I also notice at the airport security check, more and more other people are pulling out Surface Pros, so I believe they are making ground.
I recall when the Macbook went Intel and everyone wanted one. We did evaluations at the time fro our next fleet replacement but Apple ju
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I tend to lean towards the sales actually being good. Microsoft has finally managed to design a compelling product and get people interested in it. Beyond
Re: (Score:2)
MS surface is a hot seller. Slashdotter remember 2012 with the 1st genration tablets with an ARM chip.
Today the low end uses an ATOM and people are used to metro now. Yes Windows 8.1 is a joy to use on a touch screen. Not trolling but I speak as a user who loves the light portability and uses it for wiresharkING network connections at work.
All my coworkers have bought them after 1st mocking them. Seriously the screen and corporate integration are tops. I won't buy a regular laptop again as a result of the b
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question. Yes, larger phones are intruding on the form factor, but more importantly the general tablet hype has faded away and people have realized that a tablet is not a replacement for a laptop. Vendors love tablets because they're essentially a reset button for software ecosystems: where they couldn't have a walled garden before, now they can.
Touch is a regression in human interface desig
Re:Tablets will die off (Score:5, Insightful)
Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.
Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.
Re: (Score:3)
Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that. Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.
Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.
It's 1995 all over again. Apple target home users, who have a taste for new shiney and lead the sales curve, but don't have the appetite to continually upgrade or replace. Microsft target business users who are slower off the mark, but throw a lot more money around and do it on a regular cycle, for a lot longer periods.
Re: (Score:2)
Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.
Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.
Agreed. Much like PC's / Laptops, Tablets (and smartphones) are starting to reach a mature, saturation point. A 3 year old model is still plenty useful. For some reason the tech industry feels that double digit growth is sustainable, and the only indication of success. That means if you sold 1 million units last year, you are a failure for selling 1.05 million this year, you need at least 1.1 million.
For real, genuine work, it's hard to beat a PC (any OS) with dual screens, and a keyboard and mouse. However
Re: (Score:2)
For real, genuine work, it's hard to beat a PC (any OS) with dual screens, and a keyboard and mouse. However a tablet is hard to beat to leave on the coffee table and open up for a quick web search, or to watch downloaded movies on a flight (though I usually download the movies on a PC). More and more when I travel I leave my laptop at home, and rely on my tablet.
I bought a used TF201 and a new old stock keyboard dock on deep deep discount, it didn't want to charge for about half a day but since then it's played ball. Aside from the low low resolution, it's the best of both worlds. I can open a SPICE, VNC, or RDP session to someplace relevant and use it very much like a real computer. But it also has great battery life, weighs nothing, takes up no space worth mentioning, and has totally passive cooling.
Re: (Score:2)
I can open a SPICE, VNC, or RDP session to someplace relevant and use it very much like a real computer.
Eg: The real computers at the other end of the line are still important.
Re: (Score:2)
Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that.
Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.
Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.
Agreed. Much like PC's / Laptops.
But it seems like manufacturers didn't repeat the same "mistakes".
Desktop PCs are fully upgradable and repairable. A bit less for laptops but that's still better than most tablets. Additionally, the software and hardware are independent provided you have the right drivers. As a result, you only need to change your PC when your hardware really is outdated. Something that doesn't happen much nowadays. With tablets they do everything in their power to make you change it every two years : sealed batteries, disc
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely - and, since this belief is never true because it would also require a double digit growth in personal disposable income, the tech industry is constantly under pressure to create new product categories of things people don't want, so that this new category can have a temporary growth spurt. 3D TV and smartwatches are two recent examples.
At one time there were "home computers". T
Re: (Score:2)
Tablets are already dying off, the iPad sales plateau is proof of that. Why tablets are dying is a more interesting question.
Tablets aren't dying. Tablet sales are falling off because the people willing to buy one now have one. Tablets will stick around for the foreseeable future.
Not just that, people sometimes get free or subsidized tablets from their cellular carrier - Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile et al
Re: who has a tablet? (Score:2)
You have to leave your basement for that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
http://www.apple.com/shop/prod... [apple.com]
Re: Are they even in the same market? (Score:2)
Mamas don't let your iPads grow up to be laptops...
Re: (Score:2)
They're also counting laptops with detachable screens as being tablets.
While I agree with the Surface Pro 4 being considered a tablet, I also agree calling the Surface Book a tablet is ridiculous. Not because it is basically a laptop with a detachable screen, but because that detachable screen cannot function like a tablet by itself. Its battery life as a tablet is only about three hours.
I recently bought a Surface Pro 4, and was very tempted to go with the Surface Book because of the nicer screen. But three hours of detached battery life was just too little. If they could hav
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have a Winbook as well as an iPad.
One major advantage the Winbook has is that I can download the official videos of music from YouTube using apps like YouTube Downloader, Hyper, et al. W/ the iPad, I have to buy it from the Store. Yeah, Groove too is a store, but at least on Windows, I have apps that allow me to download stuff that I can transfer b/w memory cards. Something that I can't do on the iPad.
I do use the iPad for listening to Sirius radio when I'm not in the car, and also for doing FaceTi
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry but if it works without the keyboard? Its a tablet.
So all smart phones are tablets? The 60" smart monitor at work is a tablet? I'm not saying you are necessarily wrong by considering it a tablet, but your narrow definition of what makes something a tablet seems a bit silly.
Around 3 hours was what they wanted out of their laptops, anything above that was gravy. This makes sense as when was the last time you were away from an outlet for more than 3 hours?
Like them, I am fine with a "mobile desktop"-type laptop only having a few hours of battery life. But this isn't since I am worried about how long I will be away from an outlet, its because I am virtually never away from an outlet. Or a docking station for that matter. A computing device
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is first-world "news".
We live in a first world country so what did you expect?
Re: (Score:2)
Why, are IT departments suddenly slush w/ cash? The Surfaces are several times more expensive than equivalent lesser brand laptops, including the likes of Dell and HP. And for most office uses, touch is irrelevant. Avoiding iPhones makes sense - there ain't much the iPhones bring to work environments - both Androids and Windows Phones make more sense.
But I agree that Surfaces ain't stealing any marketshare from Apple. Just like in the 90s, when PowerMac sales didn't make any dent on Wintel - all it di
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)