Beats Music To Shut Down November 30 (fortune.com) 61
UnknowingFool writes: After November 30, Beats Music subscriptions will be cancelled and no longer work, according to Apple. Subscribers can use Apple Music, which has many of the same features. This shutdown was not unexpected when Apple purchased Beats last year for $3 billion, as Apple has a history of buying companies for various reasons other the products. Many former companies have been absorbed into Apple in one form or another in this manner: the technology of Fingerworks peripherals was the start of multi-touch for iPhones; PA Semi and Intrinsity personnel were the core of Apple's internal chip design teams; and AuthenTec made biometric technology that became the backbone of Touch ID.
Re: (Score:2)
You are an idiot :D
Re: (Score:1)
I am so confused. I keep being told that I am not the customer, but rather that I am the product! So which is it: am I the customer, or am I the product?!
All your data are belong to us...
-- Google.
Re: (Score:2)
Beats Music is a streaming music service sort of like Spotify and Google Music. Like both those services, you could create playlists and I guess could "subscribe" to other people's playlists.
Those are going away with no way to recover them.
So, no, they don't get to keep what they bought. Like pretty much every cloud software, once the servers put down, whatever data you had stored in them is gone forever.
Errhm. https://www.apple.com/music/me... [apple.com]
What happens to my Beats Music service?
You can easily move your current Beats Music subscription over to Apple Music. Just open Beats Music on your iOS device and you’ll be prompted to join Apple Music. Once you’ve signed up, the playlists you’ve created or subscribed to and the albums you’ve saved in your Beats Music library will all be available to you in Apple Music.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, they do "get to keep what they bought". Some of these things are significantly less useful without the service they subscribed to, but it is hard to say what the actual damage of that is, especially since I'm sure it was in the fine print of the EULA that the service could be shut down at any time with no implied liability. iTunes will start supporting the devices eventually, at least for long and just well enough to stave off a class action suit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Everyone gets to keep what they bought? (Score:2)
Beats is taking up our market what can we do?
Why would anyone want to use anything but our service it's perfect.
Let's just buy them and force customers to change, our service is better anyways...
Great idea! let me get the checkbook
Re: (Score:2)
From my viewpoint, every Apple purchase has had a strategic value for Apple whether we know it or not. For example, when Apple bought PA Semi, people assumed Apple would go back to PowerPC chips as PA Semi specialized in the POWER architecture. Later Apple purchased Intrinsity and Jobs himself said that the purchases were for the expertise and personnel not the products; Apple was not going into the POWER chip market. Instead Apple was focusing on mobile CPU design for their devices.
With the Beats Music I
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Beats Appliance? (Score:5, Funny)
What about all the ppl. that shelled out US $599.00 for the beats appliance?
Beats me.
Re: (Score:3)
More accurately they got exactly what they paid for advertising and an ego trip. Ohh, look I'm a victim of marketing with a massive ego and I can believe I can pose about by strapping a 'Beats' logo to my head. What happens to them, people point their fingers at them and laugh, well, that might not really happen but a lot of people are thinking it.
Re: (Score:1)
What appliance? Why would you have an appliance that's specific to any particular music store? Especially at more than twice the cost of Amazon's Echo appliance.
Was it better than a Harman Kardon Aura?
If you bought a device for a single music store at $599.00, you're fucking stupid. And maybe the cost doesn't matter.
Re: (Score:1)
If you bought a device for a single music store at $599.00, you're fucking stupid. And maybe the cost doesn't matter.
I agree. Anybody who would buy an appliance that you can only load music into with something like iTunes is fucking stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
You can buy mp3s from anywhere and load them onto an iPod or iPhone.
Confusion ensues... (Score:2)
"...as Apple has a history of buying companies for various reasons other the products."
wat
Re: (Score:2)
it's true. usually Apple buys them to poach a user base, gain credibility, and/or acquire engineers and patents, rather than to just rebadge the product.
Re: (Score:2)
Eliminate a competitor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Apple didn't make chips before PA Semi;
Except for chips like this: http://www.applelogic.org/file... [applelogic.org]. Late Apple ][ models, Lisa, Newton, every Apple printer since the Imagewriter,, every Mac, every iPhone, and most if not all iPods have included one or more chips designed by Apple, carrying the Apple logo, unavailable to anyone else, and usually very poorly documented (if at all.) One could also argue that the 680x0 and PPC versions that Apple commissioned for exclusive use in Macs amounted to them acting like a fabless CPU maker (e.g. like PA
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I should have clarified that to be ARM chips. By the time Jobs came back, Apple had long moved out of making chips.
Still not really right, except for the narrow issue of Apple not visibly doing any custom ARM CPU work between the ARM610 and buying PA Semi. A lot depends on what you mean by "making chips" because they have never owned their own fabrication plants, but there has always been some Apple-labeled, Apple-only, and at least partially Apple-designed silicon shipping in Apple devices since 1983. In the sense of running a fab, PA Semi also never "made chips." However:
Every Mac (even every one of the 90's PPC Mac
Re: (Score:2)
Still not really right, except for the narrow issue of Apple not visibly doing any custom ARM CPU work between the ARM610 and buying PA Semi.
Since acquiring PA Semi (and later Intrinsity) Apple has done more and more design work for ARM CPUs for their devices. With each Ax generation of chip they are customizing it further. The A4 used a Cortex A8 core. The latest design A9 is a custom ARM core designed by Apple.
My point however was that Apple didn't buy PA Semi for the Power products. They really wanted the personnel and expertise for chip design specifically to be used in their mobile devices.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Above all on weekends when Timothy is at the helm.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple figured they'd rather have an Apple-branded music service to pre-load onto their phones as bloatware and all profits from said bloatware.
We know from Apple Maps that Apple is hit-and-miss with application software. Their greatness is hardware.
But yet they buy the company with with horrible--yet trendy--hardware, and a service with an ephemeral subscriber base. I don't understand this acquisition at all. I'd stab my eardrums out with a pencil if I was forced to listen to Beats for any length of time, and having a music service a la Pandora doesn't differentiate and sell their hardware--where Apple makes their money. Not sure where they're going with this one....
Re:Just a branding change (Score:5, Interesting)
Better than what FingerWorks customers got. (Score:5, Informative)
When Apple bought FingerWorks back in 2005, all we FingerWorks customers saw was a terse announcement that the company had ceased operations effective immediately, and that no further products would be released or shipped. It was quite some time before we could even be sure it was Apple that bought them, because the deal was wrapped in non-disclosure terms.
The FingerWorks user community was very, very small -- so small that the company probably couldn't have kept going as an independent entity. I suppose having Apple rescue some of their technology was better than losing it all. But the gestures that Apple has implemented are a tiny, tiny fraction of the rich, well-designed vocabulary present on the FingerWorks TouchStream keyboards. I still wish they'd release the rest of it, but that's never going to happen.
Re: (Score:2)
fingerworks sold keyboards, not subscriptions. your keyboard still worked.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Better than what FingerWorks customers got. (Score:5, Interesting)
For a while. Mine doesn't any more, and support services were shut down shortly after the acquisition.
You might think a keyboard with no moving parts would work basically forever, but there was apparently a problem with certain driver chips in the keyboard's circuitry. Some members of the FingerWorks Forum isolated the problem, and had posted a how-to for people to replace the chips (easy as pie if you're comfortable with surface-mount rework) -- but Apple eventually took down the forum, and with it, that information. I hope it's still available elsewhere on the Web; for various reasons, I haven't looked.
There was one other issue -- the software FingerWorks provided to configure and customize the keyboard turned out to be incompatible with newer versions of Windows and OS X. We found workarounds, but again, they were documented on the Forum, which went away.
Of course, none of this would have been any better if FingerWorks had simply gone bankrupt and shut down.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, none of this would have been any better if FingerWorks had simply gone bankrupt and shut down.
Apple wouldn't have taken down the forum
Google would never shut anything down.
Re: (Score:2)
Editorsneeded, apply within (Score:3)
"Apple has a history of buying companies for various reasons other the products"
1) No editing or proofreading needed here. God forbid we have coherent, readable sentences in the summary.
2) Sometimes Apple buys things simply to shut them down or eliminate them, similar to the way that Amazon recently stopped carrying competitors to its streaming video service. Can't compete? Worried about eroding market share? No problem- just buy your enemy and dismantle the business.
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes Apple buys things simply to shut them down or eliminate them, similar to the way that Amazon recently stopped carrying competitors to its streaming video service. Can't compete? Worried about eroding market share? No problem- just buy your enemy and dismantle the business. Flag as Inappropriate
While some companies have seemingly disappeared I don't know if there is any glaring examples of Apple's intention to do this. Sometimes it's just a bad acquisition. In this way it's not similar to Amazon no longer carrying competitor's products as they still exist.
Re: (Score:1)
for god's sake fuck off.
Re: (Score:2)
for god's sake fuck off.
Why would god need you to tell me to fuck off? Couldn't He tell me Himself, or failing that couldn't He just make me fuck off?
Are you God's official mouthpiece on Earth, or is the pope out sick today and you're just covering for him?
Good riddance (Score:2)
Gee, so glad I had to lose MOG [wikipedia.org] with its very nice interface to Beats with its horrid interface.
I knew Beats was going to be a disaster as soon as I tried it out (and dumped it).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)