Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Crime Iphone Apple

Apple Now Working With the NYPD To Curb iPhone Thefts 123

Posted by Soulskill from the hip-to-be-robbed dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Back in late 2012, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg attributed the increase in statistical city-wide crime to Apple, noting that thieves had a propensity to target folks using iPhones and iPads. As an illustration of the problem, there were 3,890 more Apple product thefts than in 2012 than there were in 2011. At the time, Mayor Bloomberg's press secretary Marc La Vorgna explained that 'if you just took away the jump in Apple', crime in New York City would have been down year over year. Indeed, the number of major crimes reported in 2011 in NYC came in at 104,948 compared to 108.432 in 2012. If you exclude Apple related thefts from the figures, then the crime rate in 2012 is essentially the same as it was in 2011. In light of that, a new report from the New York Post details that Apple is now working with the NYPD in an effort to curb iPhone and other Apple related thefts."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Now Working With the NYPD To Curb iPhone Thefts More

Apple Now Working With the NYPD To Curb iPhone Thefts

Comments Filter:

  • How about bricking them? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by MarchHare ( 82901 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:07PM (#42985751)

    Why not simply brick any device reported stolen? I understand it's done in other countries (or for other devices).

    • Re:How about bricking them? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jackb_guppy ( 204733 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:15PM (#42985827)

      Why brick them? Just making using them useless. Every connection to network: WiFi or Cell, just opens a FaceTime connection, so the police can direct comunate with the current holder. So clean records.

    • Re: (Score:2, Troll)

      by alen ( 225700 )

      Someone files a false police report and someone's phone is bricked

      Who's fault is it? I've known people who filed false rape reports and nothing happened

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Correct. Why is this such a difficult concept in the US? I use an unlocked iPhone in Australia. If it is stolen I promptly contact my telco, identify myself and they permanently deny that phone access to any network in my country. I buy a newer model phone and the dick who took my phone has a paperweight. I claim the loss on my home insurance and pay the insurance excess of a few hundred dollars and no market is created for stolen iPhones.

      • Why is this such a difficult concept in the US?

        Because companies that make cell phones spend more on lobbying than the people who own cell phones.

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by Anonymous Coward

        You think changing the IMEI / identifiers on any stole phone is hard?

        • It is very hard and highly illegal. Hard enough that web forums are full of criminals who want to swap their stolen smartphone with somebody else's stolen smartphone from another country (since the IMEI blocks usually only happen for a single country).

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Xyde ( 415798 )

        s/paperweight/glorified iPod touch/

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion

    • the problem is remote bricking is software based. software can be defeated via jailbreak/rooting

      even something like this has limited effect because phones are still usable (just not for voice communication)
      http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/us-stolen-phone-database-goes-live/ [digitaltrends.com]

      besides, it takes time for the buyer to figure out the phone won't work as a phone, but the thief still got their money (therefore will keep stealing)

      tracking and going after the perp is the best way to curb thefts. If I was a thief, a

      • Here in Australia at least I believe a phone can be blocked from accessing a network via its IMEI. You can't change and IMEI through jailbreaking.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by slick7 ( 1703596 )

      Why not simply brick any device reported stolen? I understand it's done in other countries (or for other devices).

      Why not use Lowjack? Find the bastards, what they're doing besides stealing iPhones, iPads or any other electronic device, and take them down. Is it really a stigma if you steal something, you should be punished?

  • PR is the death of rationality (Score:5, Funny)

    by kruach aum ( 1934852 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:13PM (#42985813)
    If you only took away the amount of weight I gained from eating deep fried pizzas every meal, I actually lost weight last year!

    • Re:PR is the death of rationality (Score:5, Insightful)

      by icebike ( 68054 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:19PM (#42985869)

      Chuckle.

      I thought the same thing when I read the summary. In one breath they are talking about Major crimes, and in the next sentence they lump in iphone theft in that group. Yet if you report an iPhone theft the police won't do a damn thing about it other than give you some paper to fill out. How is that considered a Major Crime?

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Altus ( 1034 )

        Its a high value theft. I assume they have some threshold for value of stolen goods that makes it major or minor.

      • If you report a $3000 bicycle stolen, they won't do anything besides give you a piece of paper.

        Same probably applies to a $3000 motorcycle (and honestly, to many cars costing far more). Those crimes are pretty hard to investigate and they probably figure that if you cared that much, you would have insurance.

      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • We're talking about New York City. According to Wikipedia the New York City Sheriff is appointed by the mayor, not elected. I also doubt that everyone with a lost phone is going to be able to talk to this sheriff, there are just too many people.

          • Re: (Score:3)

            by icebike ( 68054 )

            Yeah, it seems the Sheriff of New York City amounts to a revenue collection role only. (Which is exactly what Sheriffs in Ye Olde England were, the Kings revenue officers first and foremost).

            County government in New York City is largely a puppet of the city.

    • there were 3,890 more Apple product thefts in 2012 than there were in 2011

      Wait... and there were 20 thousand more Apple product thefts in 2012 than there were in 1990 !

    • As fr as I can tell they don't say how iPhone thefts there were in 2011. Apple sold a lot more phones in 2012 than in 2011, and before 2011 it's a tiny percentage overall. So it may be that "per capita" (per iPhoneita) thefts were well down.

  • Nothing will work (Score:3, Insightful)

    by boristdog ( 133725 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:14PM (#42985817)

    Apple's consumers tend to want to show off the fact that they are Apple consumers. Even their phone & tablet covers have a hole to show off the logo.

    My mother taught me not to flash around my valuables, but I doubt you can convince most folks to do this.

    • When I step on the subway there is often an announcement requesting we do just that. It doesn't stop people from using their phones (apple or otherwise), which is enough to let a thief know you have it (no "flashing" required).

    • Yes! Blame the victims! (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Apple's consumers tend to want to show off the fact that they are Apple consumers. Even their phone & tablet covers have a hole to show off the logo.

      Yeah, and BMW owners like to show off because they don't cover the logos either.

      I fail to see how the presence or absence of a hole showing the logo provides evidence in support of your claim. My case has no hole and yet you can still tell by a casual glance that I have an iphone.

      I don't care who sees my phone. The iphone isn't a status symbol. Was it ever? Maybe very, very briefly among a tiny crowd (who pretty much all had iphones.) I can't imagine wanting anything to do with someone who thought "Oooh, he

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by Anonymous Coward

        I've seen a picture of 3-4 people all with i Phones, "showing each other their gear" (yes, they're showing each other the same fucking phone).

        I've had someone show me their phone just to show me that PicSay wasn't in their app store. It's like I thought they were lying? Why would I need or even want to see "no app found"?

        Why do I pass by mall stores with a ton of people in there -- and they're not even buying anything! If they're not in there for "cool factor", I'm not sure why they're in there.

        Why do I

      • It's really tough to fight those trolls. The only way some people can rationalize that someone else thinks an iPhone better suits their needs is to accuse them of wanting it only for a status symbol. They actually believe that is why people buy them. The very idea is laughable, but their raging hate for Apple blinds them from the fact that some people find iDevices best. I am one of them. Oh, and my iPad cover DOES NOT have a hole for the icon. My phone is a regular dumb-phone, because that is my choice.
    • Clearly it is the victim's fault for getting their iPhone stolen.

  • I know, they can use square corners for a disguise!

  • Pass the blame (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Sepultura ( 150245 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:16PM (#42985841)

    This is a ridiculous supposition. Are we suppose to believe that the criminals responsible for these thefts were lured into stealing by the flashy Apple gizmos? Or that these criminals would reject crime and find honest work if only New York could rid itself of Apple products?

    This is just another example of politicians passing the blame to something else. In this case it's Apple, as blaming Apple for life's ills is in vogue at the moment.

    • Or that these criminals would reject crime and find honest work if only New York could rid itself of Apple products?

      The claim (verified by the numbers in the summary!) is that crime wouldn't have risen if not for apple thefts. The bigger question is, would those thieves have stolen other items if apple products weren't so common, valuable, and portable? Or do apple products present a uniquely common, accessible, and valuable target for would be thieves? Such that without an increase in the number or thieves

      • Thieves are thieves.

        iGadgets are merely the path of least resistance.

      • When I grew up in NYC, I wouldn't have been flashing an expensive camera around my neck; today people walk around with $500 to $800 iPhones and iPads plainly visible and accessible. In fact half the time they're holding the iPads up in the air in one hand taking pictures. So easy to grab!

      • The claim (verified by the numbers in the summary!) is that crime wouldn't have risen if not for apple thefts.

        The claim is actually that if we took the number of all crimes, and subtracted the number of iPhone thefts, the result would be less than the number of the previous years. And that claim is true, but meaningless.

        There were many more iPhones around in 2012 than 2011. The percentage of iPhones among all phones is higher, so it would have to be expected that the number stolen would be higher. If Apple hadnl't sold any phones, almost everyone buying an iPhone would have bought some other phone, and all those

    • This is a ridiculous supposition. Are we suppose to believe that the criminals responsible for these thefts were lured into stealing by the flashy Apple gizmos? Or that these criminals would reject crime and find honest work if only New York could rid itself of Apple products?

      This is just another example of politicians passing the blame to something else. In this case it's Apple, as blaming Apple for life's ills is in vogue at the moment.

      Thieves steal valuable things that are easy to fence. If you want to know what people covet most, take a look at what is being stolen. End of story.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by fermion ( 181285 )
      No, the thief's are motivated by the high resale value of Apple products. At a pawn shop an old iPod Touch with max ram get get well over $100. And old iPhone almost $100. Steal one device a day and you are doing better than minimum wage, tax free. Hell, $100 a day, even three days a week, is almost 1600 a year. Unless you are into expensive drugs that is a living.

      For the iPhone, it might be a simple deal. A police report is filed, the serial number is reported to Apple, and Apple reports the fact to

    • We are told to believe that guns incite people to violence.

      People selectively buy into anything they want to believe in

      • If your achievements are always short of your goals, doesn't that make you a loser?

        • If your achievements are always short of your goals, doesn't that make you a loser?

          Of course not. If A has the goal to make a million, and makes only $900,000, and B has the goal to make $10,000 and makes $12,000, who is the loser?

          The _proper_ use of goals is to use them as motivational tools. The best way to set a goal is to set it so high, that it looks just barely achievable. Such a goal will usually _not_ be achieved, but leads to the highest _actual_ achievement. Setting goals that are easily achieved leads to less actual achievement (while meeting the goal), while goals that are

          • This doesn't seem to generalize beyond tawdry goals of the form "receive X tokens of appreciation from others."

            What happens if I have a goal like "understand quantum mechanics"?

  • Bullshit analysis (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:20PM (#42985883)

    The vast majority of car thefts now involve fuel injection cars. If you don't count those, the crime rate would be down!

    Make no mistake, we, the police department, are doing a GREAT job. It's your damn newfangled fuel injection systems that are the problem!

  • Password to power off (Score:4, Interesting)

    by NoKaOi ( 1415755 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:26PM (#42985935)

    How about just making it require a password to power off, put it in airplane mode, or disable Find My iPhone so you can use find my phone? As it is you can still turn the phone off even if the lock screen is passworded. I don't want to have to enter a PIN every time I unlock my phone, but I also don't want a thief to be able to disable Find My iPhone (such as by turning it off), and I wouldn't mind entering a password on the rare occasions I turn the phone off or put it in airplane mode. Do any Android phones have a feature like that?

    I think most thieves know to turn off an iPhone that they've stolen.

  • The NYPD has too much fucking money (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    From last linked TFA:
    One stolen iPad was tracked to the Dominican Republic and recovered with the help of an NYPD intelligence cop assigned to Santo Domingo.

    Their own "intelligence" cop in a foreign country? Bloomberg and Kelly are power crazy.

    • Re:The NYPD has too much fucking money (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Elbereth ( 58257 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:58PM (#42986191) Journal

      I don't think you understand how politics and police in a big city work.

      There's the police force that the poor get, the police force that the middle class get, and the police force that the rich get. Generally, when cops come into poor neighborhoods, it's to bash heads. In middle class neighborhoods, you get sympathetic cops who politely explain that they're too busy to investigate your report. In the rich neighborhoods, they drop everything in order to find your missing poodle.

    • Once we had two detectives come to out datacenter because someone sent an email with a return address hosted by a customer. No idea whether it was a real drop box or a faked envelope From, but the complaint was made by this annoying guy that took all that nonsense seriously. So yeah, they do have resources to waste. At least they recovered stolen property here and didn't just chase ghosts.

  • I guess we should have seen that coming, they already own the Apple Records label too. (Never would have drempt of that happening when they were still making the computers out of wood in the 1970s.)

    In exchange, they will want the 'Big Apple' to now be known as the 'iApple', but after mass protests in the city they are forced to compromise to 'Bigipple'...

  • It's a little like saying if you just ignore all the Toyota thefts the number of cars stolen would go down. They are going for what's popular and easy to move. What's new?

  • Ban! (Score:3, Funny)

    by RearNakedChoke ( 1102093 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:41PM (#42986045)
    Apple products result in increased crime, you say? Well, the solution is simple - just ban iPhones and iPads.
    • Nah, just mandate the sale of a handgun with every iDevice. Because, as we all know, guns prevent crime, right?

      Then again, now I am envisioning the i45 with a slide-to-unlock safety... *shudders*

  • Things I learned from this advertisement (Score:3, Insightful)

    by tuppe666 ( 904118 ) on Friday February 22, 2013 @07:06PM (#42986235)

    From the Article "The California-based company then informs the NYPD of the device’s current location — and it can track it even if it was reregistered with a different wireless provider."...they then boast how they have tracked a phone to brazil!?

    Nobody, no-one concerned that a Apple is tracking their customers, and can do so without their knowledge.

    Seriously "Do no evil?"

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by PRMan ( 959735 )

      Seriously "Do no evil?"

      You're mistaking Apple for Google. Apple has always been evil. People like evil, as long as it looks cool.

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Seriously "Do no evil?"

        You're mistaking Apple for Google. Apple has always been evil. People like evil, as long as it looks cool.

        Google can track your location, they know your browsing history, your shopping habits, what hobbies you have what kind of clothes you like to wear, who your friends are, what you look like, they can rifle through your email if you use their G-mail service, they know what kind of porn you like... the list goes on, and on, and on...... and you two are worried that Apple can find out where your phones are?

      • Seriously "Do no evil?"

        You're mistaking Apple for Google. Apple has always been evil. People like evil, as long as it looks cool.

        The meme of "looks cool" being the only reason people buy Apple is stupid and needs to die. You need to drop your blind hate and see that people buy Apple because the devices fit their needs better. That's why I bought an iPad. I really couldn't care less what I look like using it. In fact, I rarely use it in public.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by bidule ( 173941 )

      Nobody, no-one concerned that a Apple is tracking their customers, and can do so without their knowledge.

      I thought that was true of any cell phone. Or is it only the SIM that can be tracked?

    • Re: (Score:3)

      by Rewind ( 138843 )

      From the Article "The California-based company then informs the NYPD of the device’s current location — and it can track it even if it was reregistered with a different wireless provider."...they then boast how they have tracked a phone to brazil!?

      Nobody, no-one concerned that a Apple is tracking their customers, and can do so without their knowledge.

      Seriously "Do no evil?"

      You have to opt in and setup Find My iPhone, so I don't see how that is without their knowledge. Unless you are talking about something different?

  • As an illustration of the problem, there were 3,890 more Apple product thefts than in 2012 than there were in 2011

    That sentence is suffering horribly. Please put it out of misery.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by bidule ( 173941 )

      Hey, to the overrated troll: you're such an ass. If your brain so scrambled up that that sentence made sense to you?

  • He came for the 16 oz soda, I did not say anything... yada yada yada, ..he came for the guns ... blah blah .. now he is coming after my iPhone but there is no one ...
  • Are they saying there were no Apple related crimes in 2011?

    Cause if there was Apple related crime in 2011, you have to remove that to see exactly what the crime rate did without Apple.

    Also, a one year change does not a trend make.

  • NYC, you asked for this. (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    The city with the absolute highest crime rate of one of the most sought after pieces of electronics...also happens to have the most oppressive and restrictive gun laws in the entire country.

    I would say I'm sorry, but I'm feeling more like a "tough shit" instead. Maybe next time you won't be so quick to give up your rights.

    Have fun in your gun-free zone. Good to hear that's working out so well. I can practically smell the peace and love from here.

  • Who the hell voted this guy in? All it proves is that on average NYers have an IQ of 50? If thew crooks didn't steal iPhones they would find something else. Like necklaces and pendants.
  • Of course, the bump in crime is Apple's fault for selling them in NYC. The mayor should outlaw iPhone ownership, especially the more expensive and capable versions. It would dovetail nicely with outlawing gun ownership, outlawing the sale of large sodas, and outlawing the use of trans fats.

  • Is selling these above average smartphones at premium prices. You may get it "free" with your contract but you pay extra on your contract.

    You might even get a contract for the same price for a Galaxy3 or an iPhone5. The iPhone buyer is being ripped off in that exampleif the Galaxy user gets a fair price.

  • It the correct SIM card is not inside the phone, the phone can't turn on without a password.

Slashdot Top Deals

In practice, failures in system development, like unemployment in Russia, happens a lot despite official propaganda to the contrary. -- Paul Licker

Close