VMware Fusion goes Beta 153
Rahul writes "Fusion is a new VMware product that enables Intel-based Macs to run Windows and Linux in virtual machines on Mac OS X. The Mac virtualization market is presently dominated by Parallels and it will be worth watching if VMware can gain the mindshare despite its late entry. Ars Technica reports: 'The nice thing about VMWare Fusion is that it already supports some of the stuff that the Parallels Beta2 released yesterday just added, such as USB 2.0 and most USB devices, CD/DVD drive support, and drag-and-drop between environments (unless the guest environment is Linux, that is). You can also run multiple Fusion environments at once or assign multiple processors to your virtual machine(s), if you're into that sort of thing.'"
Competition is a GREAT thing (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Competition is a GREAT thing (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
What would be *REALLY* cool, is if Apple would release a version of OSX Server that will run under VMWare, and for VMWare to have an enterprise version for OSX Server. Buying and running OSX Server on non-apple hardware would be way coo
Re: (Score:2)
I don't really see Apple letting OSX run on non-Apple hardware while Jobs is at the helm. We would conceivably see VMWare Server for OSX letting people run multiple OSX images simultaneously. Of course, then you'd need some really fat XServe machines to host a bunch of virtual machines, which would be nice. I'm still expecting some sort of hypervisor to come with Leopard, which would allow you to partition a box into a number of simultaneous OSes a la AIX on Power5. We've consolidated a bunch machines
Multi-CPU support? (Score:5, Interesting)
I've downloaded it and have a VMWare image downloading...
The Parallels tools have things like image import that VMWare is missing though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Multi-CPU support? (Score:5, Informative)
It's a tool for importing a VMWare image, or an image from a real Windows box.
VMWare is coming late to the game, but this is a feature they'll have to match.
Re:Multi-CPU support? (Score:5, Informative)
To create a VMware image from a real Windows box, use the VMware Converter [vmware.com] (a free download).
There is also a free importer that converts images from other formats (not sure if it supports parallels).
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely correct. I was thinking late to the game on the Intel Mac platform. Sorry... I should've been more specific. They are quite late on Intel Macs, but as another poster noted, competition is a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
However, that being said, they've made me very happy with what they've put out. It respects Mac interface conventions, puts files where they belong, and even loads and unloads its kernel extensions on the fly.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Hello all!
Now you can migrate your Windows PC, VMware or Virtual PC Virtual Machines to Parallels Virtual Machines.
You will need Parallels Transporter Beta for this. The Mac version is bundled into Parallels Desktop for Mac Beta Build 3036. The Windows version containing both Parallels Transporter and Parallels Transporter Agent can be downloaded from here.
1. Usage models.
* Migrate remote Windows PC over network directly to VM on your Mac/PC
1) Install Parallels Transpor
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, from a quick search...
This link says it doesn't http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_virtua l _machines/ [wikipedia.org]
This link says This may be, at least in part, because the Parallels software doesn't support SMP for the virtualized instance of Wind
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Mod parent down for simply being wrong.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, ok. Just idle curiosity. Speaking of which, if I was modded offtopic, shouldn't you be as well? :)
Re: (Score:2)
The Mac version includes the Compressor, which otherwise sells separately for $50.
The real reason: Because they can. Until now, there has been no free virtualization alternatives on Mac - a market where there is also a large incentive for virtualization in order to run some apps on Windows.
If vmware eventually ends up with a free product on Mac (as they have on Windows and Linux), I'm confident the price of Parallells would go down to the level of their Windows version.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That doesn't mean that someone can't need AutoCAD and declare that the mac is insufficient because its not available, but my money says that AutoCAD will run better in emulation than the other packages simply because it doesn't have the 3D capabilities the others do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There's a bunch of parametric tools out there fighting over that space, but for what it does there's nothing in the leagure of AutoCAD.
Note how AutoCAD is not lumped with the large number of parametric tools, but in its own niche. If you're going to be doing mechanical design, by all means, get a parametric tool. There are great tools available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. But for simple, low-end 2D stuff, AutoCAD might better suit your needs.
Re:Prize goes to the 3D graphics provider (Score:5, Informative)
Inside Mac Games had an interview [insidemacgames.com] recently with a PR guy from Parallels where he says "The goal is to have OpenGL and DirectX support in our next version, which should be in beta around the turn of the year."
You know, I'd really be curious to see how some of the CAD programs behave on a PowerMac with Parallels. Those are really fast machines. It would be an expensive experiment, but you're not the first CAD user I've heard mention this. A friend of mine works at an architecture firm, and he also mentioned the lack of CAD software available on the Mac as being the main reason he couldn't get one.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
PowerBook was a term apple was using for their laptops, which did not start with powerpc chips.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
To pick nits, Powermacs are not named because of PowerPC. Just like Powerbooks are not named because of PPC (there were Powerbooks long before the PPC chip). They are so named because they are "power user" machines. iMacs also had PowerPC chips in them, but were not called "iPowerMacs." Xserves had PPC chips in them, but were not name Xpowerservers.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to nitpick the nitpick, but the Power Mac was originally names as such because of the PowerPC chip.
I don't think so. After all, there were Performas made soon after the Powermac, that used the PPC chip. Not that anybody actually bought PPC Performas, but they existed. I think the name was a rather nice coincidence, but was mostly intended to maintain the lineage that started with the Powerbook. When the original Powerbook was released, mobile computing was considered to be a very advanced thing - for "power" users. I believe the intention was to refer to a powerful computer - not the architecture of th
Re: (Score:2)
But the first PowerPC Macs were called "Power Macintosh". I think that name directly reflects PowerPC. There were no non-PowerPC Power Macs.
The Mac "Quadra" got its name from the "4" in "68040", its processor. (First Macs had the 68000, and the Mac II had the 68020).
Performas were Macs for the home, bundled with home software. Apple kept using the Performa name on newer PowerPC machines. In most cases, Performas were just other models with a different
Re: (Score:1)
I've run Pro/E on a Mac Pro (Score:5, Informative)
Let me tell you how it behaves: Not great.
I'd imagine for small changes and assemblies its probably usable, but I pulled up my largest project to really put it through its paces. This is an assembly with hundreds of parts in it, mostly sheetmetal. Parallels seriously needs 3D acceleration. It is also worth noting that the only graphics card on any mac that is listed as supported by Pro/E (see PTC's website) is the Quadro FX 4500, which is a $1700 BTO option.
I was able to select and redefine features, but screen regens were horribly slow. Pan/Zoom/Rotate was totally unavailable despite the multi-button mouse and Parallels wouldn't recognize my spaceball at all (yes, I installed the driver software).
I wasn't able to get boot camp running because the X1900 + 23" display does not work with boot camp presently (apparently this is a widespread issue discussed on the Apple forums).
I'll be testing it on my macbook pro (core 2 duo 2.33 ghz) next week in both boot camp and parallels, though I don't expect much performance. Our Pro/E guru at work tells me that the graphics card is going to be the biggest problem for performance if its not an officially-supported card (and the X1600 on my macbook isn't on that list either).
Despite all the performance lags, I was so excited just to be running Pro/E on a mac that I imagine it can only get better from here. And if not...I don't really want to do work at home anyway!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
why does linux lag windows in features? (Score:3, Interesting)
For example, I cannot:
-Install Parallels tools for linux, so everytime I suspend my VM, the clock freezes and ends up several days behind schedule when I resume
-Use the nifty new feature that eliminates the Windows desktop and instead just shows the application window on the OS X desktop
-Copy and paste directly between machines (I have to rsync between hosts, though because the VM IP is changing, is only convenient in one direction)
-Easily change resolutions of the Linux VM.
The list goes on.
Now, is this because Windows is just what everyone is running in a VM, so all of the resources are going toward it, or is there some inherent difficulty in replicating these features in Linux. As an aside, couldn't someone in the OSS community (I am not talented enough, sorry) program Linux-based additions to faciliate some of those features, above (like the clock sync)?
Re:why does linux lag windows in features? (Score:5, Informative)
You can copy and paste and drag and drop to and from Linux, Solaris, and Windows, and easily change the resolution of the Linux VM.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm a linux guy myself, and I love the choices I get (just switched window managers recently, in fact), but that's why you won't get those kind of features when you're running it in a VM session.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It is a very slick thing that they're doing with Windows apps. Quite a bit of overhead, but newer Macs ar
Re: (Score:2)
IME changing resolutions on Linux is likely to crash or be unavailable even if you're NOT in a VM. It requires the RandR extention which is relatively recent and not widely well supported. Still I'm disappointed if the VMWare X driver doesn't do it.
Copy and paste between a Linux host and a Windows guest works for me. This of course with all the usual caveats for copy a
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
> -Use the nifty new feature that eliminates the Windows desktop and instead just shows the application window on the OS X desktop
This is really a nasty hack-on-a-hack for Windows. With Linux + OS X, just fire up Apple's X server and tell your Linux image that the X server is at "yourmac:0", and then start up your X session.
Re: (Score:2)
You serious? I've been running it for at least six months. Linux runs great... I turned a dual Opteron desktop into a server and moved my work to Parallels on my MBP because it was close enough to the performance. And a lot more portable. :)
I know half a dozen people using Linux as well... don't get me wrong... I'm glad to see VMWare finally making it to Intel Macs, but I doubt they'd be here now if Parallels wasn't drivin
Re: (Score:2)
Still, support for each OS under parallels seems to be a unique case in terms of features. You can drag stuff under XP, but not 98, where you have to use an odd network configuration to share files instead. The clock skews across some linux restarts, but not XP, etc. Parallels tools available, or not. It's kind of annoying when you're trying to develop and test things across multiple environments; I'd value uniformity more t
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have the same issues running Fedora Core 5 under Parallels (couldn't get FC6 to work, despite how-to notes on the net). No copy & paste, no sharing of folders (except via network), no resizing of the VM window, etc. (Note: I just installed the latest Parallels beta and haven't run Linux yet...)
answer: Parallels' marketshare grab (Score:2)
Now, is this because Windows is just what everyone is running in a VM, so all of the resources are going toward it, or is there some inherent difficulty in replicating these features in Linux.
This is a more than fair question, because Parallels users have been complaining [parallels.com], as a google search shows. Linux is open source down to its skivvies, and it should follow that it should be easier to understand/tie into/work with the kernel, develop kernel modules if necessary, etc.
Yet a closed OS like Windows ha
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.mathworks.com/support/faq/macintel.htm
A bit buggy, but matlab code executes fine on my MBP. I sent in a bug report and corresponded directly with a developer about the problem (print preview has problems), which was an interesting experience for me as a student.
Re: (Score:2)
You can set the "iburst" option on the server line in the config file so that it synchronizes quicker at startup.
It's compatible with the other VMWare products! (Score:5, Interesting)
Interoperability is HUGE when it comes to virtualization. There's a lot of value to being able to 'build' a server in my bedroom and upload it to bigger metal when I get to work. Parallels didn't have that, VMWare does. I'm going with VMWare.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Strangly enough, I did just this with a Parallels VM two nights ago, and it worked like a champ.
You may not know it, but Parallels has options for OS-X, Windows and Linux. The Parallels VMs are interoperable between all the platforms, although the VM settings do need a bit of tweaking when switching between Windows and O
XEN (Score:2)
Any news on licensing changes? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Windows Schmindows (Score:1)
CrossOver is Intel Only (Score:1)
first comparisions (Score:4, Informative)
- Fusion seems a bit slower/sluggish from a user perspective, but that might be due to driver issues.
- Fusion does not handle dual headed machines in full screen mode as well as Parallels, as the fusion full screen mode is designed for single headed situations (main menu handling)
- Fusion handles Networking much better than Parallels. E.g. my cisco VPN works out of the box in shared mode. I never got it to work with Parallels, athough they claim to support it.
- General Driver support is better with Parallels, except networking
- Additional tool support like drive compression is better with Parallels
- Parallels support Boot Camp partitions.
I probably will go with Fusion unless Parallels gets their networking situation straight, but tiime will tell
vmware vs parallels (Score:1)
parallels and vmware (Score:3, Interesting)
I want a gaming designed VM (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You Are Running VMware Fusion with DEBUG option. (Score:5, Funny)
Awesome. I think more companies should pop up windows that tell the user their software will run slower and there is nothing they can do about it. Maybe throw in a clip of Nelson haw-hawing?
I know, I know, public beta. It's a joke, son.
Re:You Are Running VMware Fusion with DEBUG option (Score:2)
"You *WILL* run this software in the manner which *I* determine, you got me boy?!?"
Same thing they did with Server when it was beta (Score:2)
I suggest checking the VMWare forums about it.
Snapshots? (Score:2)
Re:Snapshots? (Score:4, Interesting)
It seems to pretty much be VMware Workstation on OS X so I would expect it to have pretty much the same features eventually.
Re: (Score:2)
OS X in VMWare. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
http://thepiratebay.org/details.php?id=3368775 [thepiratebay.org] looks like it has a link you can download it from.
Stupid for Apple - I'd buy it from them if they'd suppor
Blogs by the VMware engineers (Score:5, Informative)
Why can't OS X based VMWare of Parallels run OS X? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't really know how it works internally, but it seems insane you can't virtualize the host OS yet you can virtualize almost any other.
Fusion flawed without OS X VMs, Bootcamp partition (Score:2)
Now that it's here, the reality is less than exciting. Bootcamp works really well, and for the most part either I can get by in OS X or I *need* XP, so having both simultaneous doesn't really matter that much. Disk space on a Macb
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if you've looked into it, but Parallels does this already.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Besides, 3d acceleration is not included in Fusion, though that might change, and is only experimental in their more mature Workstation product.
Re: (Score:2)
How can you dilute yourself by pretending there is some difference between the OS in Home versus Ultimate
Re: (Score:2)
Luckily, no one needs Vista at all. How many apps are Vista-only today? How many would be if people stick with XP? Of course, the windows community will all shoot themselves in the foot and upgrade in a knee jerk, developers will follow, and then you'll be stuck.
I am so grateful I was able to move to OSX and linux I can hardly describe the feeling.
Re:Vista eula (Score:5, Informative)
No. What you mention only applies to the Vista Home edition license. The Vista Ultimate version specifically gives permission to use it in a virtual machine. Both of these are "Vista".
I don't like Microsoft either, but at least I try to badmouth them accurately.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I didn't need "permission" to run XP Home in a VM, but because of that license change, now I do with Vista.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Vista eula (Score:5, Insightful)
Ironically, one great use for virtual machines (in the software development world) is to test with different configurations, which you'll be able to do with all versions except HOME. You'll have to run that on a separate PC.
In general, MS is full of crap with their licensing approach here. I need neither the features or functionality of Business or Ultimate, other than I want to run it on a VM on my Mac (vs. a Bootcamp approach). It won't cause me to pay more for a product I don't need or want, instead, I'll stick with XP until they get their head out of their ass or I can kiss that crappy Window OS off once and for all (given MS recent missteps, that could been sooner than expected).
Re: (Score:2)
If everyone told Dell, HP etc forget Vista just preload XP then we might be able to weaken the MS monopoly.
Once the API stays static for long enough, WINE etc can start getting more and more compatible, then MS could end up like a BIOS manufacturer, or like Intel when they tried to sell the Itanic vs AMD's 64 bit x86.
If the API gets hijacked from the hands of MS, stuff like games might run on OSX, Linux and Windows without modification.
It is in the interest of MS