Mac OS X Software Roundup 55
zpok writes "The Register runs an interview with the two only Mac OS X coders on the OpenOffice Project. In short: no, OO.org for Mac OS X won't be delayed until 2005, but they could really really use some help."
jeblucas writes "There are new versions of Macromedia's media suite: Macromedia Studio MX 2004 with new versions of Dreamweaver, Flash and Fireworks. There's also a professional version of Flash (for PDA, phone, and video authoring with direct links to Final Cut Pro, Adobe Premier, and Avid Express) to be had for $700."
A user writes, "Cricket Media has released a Mac OS X application for hardcore Netflix users who want to manage their accounts without using the website. The app is an interesting example of what can be done with WebKit."
lordDallan writes "Opera had recently released Opera 6.03 for Mac OS X. Purchase of this version includes a free upgrade to 7.0 when it becomes available."
In other Apple news... (Score:2, Informative)
Also, new Powerbooks are nowhere to be seen, which is leading many, myself included, to believe that we will not seen them until the Paris expo, which is sometime in mid-Sept.
Re:In other Apple news... (Score:1, Informative)
Negative. Panther has had labels since before A202, the WWDC preview release.
Re:In other Apple news... (Score:2)
Re:In other Apple news... (Score:2)
I guess it could be done (Score:1)
P.S. It's not because the parent message was offtopic that my reply is. Anyway, do as you please.
Re:I guess it could be done (Score:2)
Re:I guess it could be done (Score:1)
rant
And moral issues are always relevent to moral people. For example, even if I think RMS pushes the enveloppe too far sometimes ( like his views on Debian in this interview [ofb.biz] ), I agre
Re:I guess it could be done (Score:1, Insightful)
Define "many." "Many" is a weasel-word; it carries no meaning by itself, and so can be used to prove just about any point. In this context, "many" is probably measured in dozens. In other words, "it's a practical and moral matter for dozens of programmers."
In other, other words, who gives a rat's ass about the FSF? Certainly the vast majority of programmers do not.
And moral issues are always relevent to moral people.
Ye
Well... (Score:1)
You're right when you say that nobody would give a fuck about the FSF if only dozens of people would agree with the ideas it maintains. Now, browse a little on SourceForge and look at the projects going on under the GPL ; y
Re:Well... (Score:1, Interesting)
That is absolutely the wrong way to judge how many people drink the FSF's kool-aid, for two reasons. First, the GPL has disproportionate mindshare. How many people tack the GPL on their software just because they're buzzword compliant, with little consideration given to what the GPL actually means, much less what the FSF wishes it could mean?
But far more importantly, the GPL (as has been widely discussed elsewhere) is a vi
Re:I guess it could be done (Score:5, Insightful)
But not all morals are the same. I, for instance, think that the GPL is a terrible license. I have no problem with BSD or propietary licenses though. Why?
I see the GPL as being very hypocritical. Preaching some twisted form of freedom while imposing restrictions on software. At least proprietary licenses are very clear in that sense.
Don't let the FSF delude you. We are talking about software here. There are much much much more important issues in the world than software licenses. Your energies would be far better spent on those problems (think world poverty, environmental concerns, the increasing aggressiveness of the USA, etc).
Right (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I guess it could be done (Score:2)
If you're so worried about computer ethics, why do you have a Hotmail account and use Macromedia products running on Windows to create your web pages [er.uqam.ca]? Do you believe that ASPL is morally worse than MS-EULA, or are you being hypocritical?
You're funny (Score:2, Funny)
As for the Flash stuff on my site, it's just getting pretty old
In related news (Score:2, Funny)
Re:In related news (Score:1, Insightful)
Webkit and other open Apple developer developments (Score:5, Insightful)
With everyone crying about Apple ripping off Watson, pushing out Adobe Premeire, and basicaly running over a number of smaller developers, its easy to forget what they have been giving back in recent months. Lost in hardware rumors Apple is innovating in the developer scene as much as anywhere.
Developing and then giving away Webkit instantly gets a thousand projects off the ground which were previously only musings and ideas (read: netflix manager). The best of open source is when it facilitates truly independent innovative ideas that would be shot down by 'the corporate machine' and never see the light of day (read: SubEthaEdit). Dont forget Apple saw this long ago with Hypercard and have been listening to users wail about its death. Not just of the product but of the idea and philosophy of "I own an Apple, therefore I innovate."
Xcode, Applescript Studio, WebKit, Services, Java, Cocoa..... It looks like taking 5 years to plan a new OS from scratch is _finally_ paying off.
spinning beachball (Score:5, Interesting)
of course there was that period where steve jobs was sent off to wander in the wilderness of NeXT. being a NeXT owner it was of course shocking how NeXT like mac OSX is. all the way down to the spinning multi-colored beach ball.
of course its not really a beach ball. its really a spinning magneto optical disk. a what??? yep the very first next shipped with a magento optical disk as its main drive. It truly sucked (speed wise) and vanished from later editions. (applications launched so slowly you often ended up double and triple launching multiple instances as you clicked on the icon over and over--that probably also one reason why the apple icons hop and can only be launched once). I've always enjoyed the subtle irony of the spinning beachball.
in any case in the next day, NeXT created one of the best RAD gui tool kit ever invented, and a new language to go along with it (objective-C). and gave them away. lots of little groovy app, not major ones, showed up as a result. anyone could make a calculator or an interface to gnuplot. Oh yeah, there was one or two major ones: Mosaic and Zilla (Zilla was not related to 'mozilla', today the modern term for Zilla is 'Grid Computing'. So this strategy of making awesome developmer tools is not new
Its also clear that given how much the mac of today echos its NeXT look and feel (the file browser, the dock, netInfo, three button mice, DisplayPostscript/pdf, cube shaped computers, and of course BSD unix) that not a whole lot of development has happend since its first incarnation. In other words Steve jobs vision got slowed down and only now its taking root and flourishing
playing "what if", would we be further along if he had not cast out? one might speculate that he had to wait for technology to come along. but remember tim bernardslee invented the World wide web to justify buying a NeXT Station, we had postscript, mime e-mail, good sound cards, ethernet,giant screens, and cube shaped computers back in the hey days of NeXT. so maybe we'd be further along indeed if so much time had not been lost.
indeed I think the reason Jobs performance now seems so amazing now is not because is doing anything different but rather because MS and the beigebox makers did not seize the opportunity to innovate during his absence from the scene. the world did not eclipse Jobs it just waited for him to return and lead the way again, showing how to be an early adopter, how to integrate ideas cleverly, and how to tame Unix on the desktop. He didn't have to leap frog his way to the front. he was amazingly enough still there with his NeXT technology. Nothing in principle Sun or MS or IBM could not have done while he was out. BeOS might have been the only one who actually tried, but it was too little too late.
I wonder why apple and jobs seem to be the source of all computer creativity?
Re:spinning beachball (Score:3, Informative)
Hang on there. I've been using Macs since the mid 1980s (how I remember the excitement of getting a 20Mb external hard drive to supplement the single 800K floppy...it took me years to fill it. But i digress), and there's always been a spinning beach ball. Of course it started out in B&W since that's how Macs started too (and NeXT was originally launched as a grayscale machine).
NeXT too
Re:spinning beachball (Score:2)
Re:spinning beachball (Score:2)
Re:spinning beachball (Score:2)
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
sure, but one reason the NeXT version was full grayscale & fancy while the Mac version was B&W and simple was that Macs originally shipped with B&W screens (no grayscale) and a resolution of 72dpi. I think icons were 12 by 12 pixels (maybe 16 by 16) - you try representing a fancy diffraction pattern on a system like that.
Re:Webkit and other open Apple developer developme (Score:5, Insightful)
KHTML is LGPL [temple.edu].
Could you restate your point?
Lussarn is rude and illiterate, but correct (Score:4, Insightful)
However, the big question is -- and this is much bigger than Lussarn gives it credit for! -- why did Apple choose to use khtml at all? They could have written their own rendering engine and kept it completely proprietary. They also could have used Gecko and kept it completely proprietary, since the Mozilla license is, IIRC, a BSD-style non-recursive license. (Anybody know for sure on that one?) Apple had plenty of choices resulting in a completely proprietary Webkit, and they didn't take them.
So saying that "Apple is as much about open source as Microsoft" is just plain wrong. When was the last time Microsoft open sourced anything? Sure, they used open source code in their products -- but they've actively avoided any and all recursive open source licenses.
Apple may not be an angel -- they're a corporation, for heaven's sake, and they're beholden to their shareholders and not to the moral compasses of Slashdot readers -- but they've consciously decided to participate some in the take & give back process of open source when they could very well have just stayed out completely.
And don't try to tell me that hasn't done anything useful for anyone. Or has BSD never pulled a patch from Darwin? Has khtml not examined the optimizations Apple made?
Re:Lussarn is rude and illiterate, but correct (Score:1)
Obviously I was confusing this with the case of the Darwin kernel/OS and other projects, where (I believe!) they are indeed releasing more code than they really have to.
I also agree with your other comments.
Re:Lussarn is rude and illiterate, but correct (Score:2)
Re:Webkit and other open Apple developer developme (Score:3, Informative)
Surely the Open Source Darwin Streaming Server is of no interest to anyone but Mac users. Also Open Directory, Rendezvous and the Apple CDSA framework for encrypting etc. is completely useless.
Thanks for telling me I wouldn't have noticed that.
SubEthaEdit (was Hydra) (Score:5, Informative)
Lee Joramo [joramo.com]
Re:SubEthaEdit (was Hydra) (Score:2)
The only problem I had with Hydra was that it had no vi mode. (Or other programming enhancements.)
Re:SubEthaEdit (was Hydra) (Score:2)
Talk about killing brand recognition...
Re:SubEthaEdit (was Hydra) (Score:2)
Okay.. (Score:4, Funny)
I would've just named it "Tafkah"...
Also, just because I"m feeling rude: those guys are really dorky-looking. Except the guy on the left he looks pretty cool. Looks to me like he's trying to get away from the others.....
Say, isn't the guy in the OSX shirt a member of Kraftwerk...? Hmm...
In smaller-time news (Score:4, Informative)
Re:In smaller-time news (Score:1)
I'm thoroughly addicted at this point
Re:In smaller-time news (Score:2)
Hey look! (Score:1, Redundant)
*ducks*
The Netflix app might actually get my fiancee to use my mac a little more often. It's always the little things...
Help Contribute to OO? (Score:1)
SubEthaEdit is a great name (Score:3, Interesting)
What about Director? (Score:2)
Plus with xtras, you can write your own C++ to extend Director's functionality. We just got another SQL database xtra today.
Sorry to not see it mentioned in the software roundup.
Other interesting / cool software (and some not) (Score:2)
- Fugu - spiffy front-end to some sort of secure file transfer protocol
- Free Ruler (but I wish Mac OS X had user-definable logical screen dpi and that so many apps weren't hardwired to 72dpi)
- rBrowserLite - spiffy free FTP client / alternative file browser
- TextLightning.app (shareware) - way cool fileservice which allows apps to open arbitrary
Macromedia is lazy, update Mac Flash Player! (Score:1)