Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.2.3 160
justzisguy writes "Apple has released Mac OS X 10.2.3 for Jaguar via the Software Update utility. The update 'delivers enhanced functionality and improved reliability for the following applications, utilities, and technologies: AppleScript, Classic compatibility, Disk Copy, Disk Utility, Image Capture, Mail, OpenGL, Print Center, and Rendezvous. It provides audio, disc recording, graphics, printing improvements, as well as AFP and WebDAV networking improvements. The update also provides updated security services and includes the latest Security Updates.'"
WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:2, Informative)
- Benad
Re:WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:2)
My only chance is to take my iPod into work tomorrow (my last day for over a week) and download it to that - assuming it has been posted as a seperate download by then. In fact I'm not certain if there is enough space on my iPod to hold it - must start deleting tracks.
Re:WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:1)
Re:WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:2)
Re:WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:1)
Re:WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:2)
Re:WARNING: 51MB download... (Score:2)
I surely expected the connex to drop at some point, but I awoke to a little present on my desktop this AM in the form of a full "MacOSXUpdate10.2.3.pkg"
P.S. Software Update 1.5.1 allows resumable downloads
(for the other branch in this thread)
Knowledge Base Document (Score:5, Informative)
- Benad
Re:Knowledge Base Document (Score:2)
I need to get it mirrored on telstra's GameArena so downloading this doesn't affect my 3gb cap.
I hate the state of broadband in Australia, sigh.
D.
Re:Knowledge Base Document (Score:5, Informative)
Just select the update(s) you want, then choose the "Download selected updates" menu item instead of clicking "Install"
Note that if you do this, your Software Update log file won't be updated with the time and date of installation because Installer.app will actually be installing the update.
So there's no need to wait for Apple to post a link to the file on their website anymore! (Unless you forget and accidently click "install"
Most Important Enhancement (Score:2)
Adds a Canadian English language spell checking dictionary.
They couldn't spell before?
Re:Most Important Enhancement (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Knowledge Base Document (Score:1)
Oh, now that sounds good. I bet there's a great story behind that bug.
10.2.2 Kernel Panic (Score:1)
Re:10.2.2 Kernel Panic (Score:5, Informative)
Just updated. Happy as a clam, so far.
Re:10.2.2 Kernel Panic (Score:1)
Then again, I use a real unix file system, not that hack job called HFS+.
Re:10.2.2 Kernel Panic (Score:5, Informative)
Then that's your decision, and IMO, your mistake. But don't slam HFS+ unless you know all the info. UFS has some advantages yes, but Apple does not recommend its use for OS X except for Development and compatibility...HFS+ is preferred for several reasons.
Perhaps you should read the paper [mit.edu] by Wilfredo Sanchez, who was at the time a lead developer on Darwin/OS X. The first section is called "File systems" and discusses HFS+ vs UFS. A good read..and you might find that you could have incompatibilities with some files and programs that base themselves on the old Mac Toolbox (and Carbon to some degree). Just a thought.
Re:10.2.2 Kernel Panic (Score:1, Informative)
Does it fix the Mail attachments issue? (Score:1)
Re:Does it fix the Mail attachments issue? (Score:4, Informative)
This problem doesn't lie with Mail.app or with Apple at all. It lies with the makers of mail readers who don't support documented, open standards for encoding attachments.
Re:Does it fix the Mail attachments issue? (Score:1)
Re:Does it fix the Mail attachments issue? (Score:2)
Re:Does it fix the Mail attachments issue? (Score:2)
No work-around is necessary. If you send an attachment with a resource fork on it to a person who uses a mail client that is not RFC 1740 compliant, that person will see two attachments: one large one representing the data fork and one very small one representing the resource fork. That person need only ignore the very small attachment, which is useless to them anyway, and use the larger one.
Re:Does it fix the Mail attachments issue? (Score:1)
New Widgets (Score:4, Interesting)
I can't say whether or not I like 'em yet though...
Re:New Widgets (Score:4, Informative)
Re:New Widgets (Score:2)
Re:New Widgets (Score:2)
itunes has the older widgets still
I'm pretty sure iTunes is a Carbon application, whereas those others are written with Cocoa APIs. Those widgets must be a part of AppKit framework.
Re:New Widgets (Score:2)
This may well be true. If I recall correctly, iTunes predates the "brushed metal" appearance, and Mac OS X in general. It probably still draws its UI itself, the same way QuickTime 4 did.
Re:New Widgets (Score:2)
Re:New Widgets (Score:1)
Result: all apps seem to have the new recessed widgets apart from iTunes. Perhaps it's the only one which doesn't use the system widgets.
I'm not convinced by the new ones yet. I'm not sure I like the idea of recessed widgets anyway, and this particular design just looks awkward and hacked-on.
Re:New Widgets (Score:1)
Re:New Widgets (Score:2)
Yet another reason why shoehorning themes are a gianormous waste of time and effort.
Re:New Widgets (Score:3, Interesting)
Personally, I prefer the new sunken-look ones, but it's fair if you like the previous...
Talking to a few other mac people I know, they're acting like Apple is on crack for ruining a GUI by changing those few little buttons. The response seemed more volatile than when flowerpower imacs appeared
We scare me sometimes.
a grrl & her server [danamania.com]
Mac OS X 10.2.3 for Jaguar? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't mean this a flamebait, I'm actually curious if Jaguar is something distinct from anything else 10.2
Re:Mac OS X 10.2.3 for Jaguar? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mac OS X 10.2.3 for Jaguar? (Score:1)
A Classic-killer? (Score:1)
Re:A Classic-killer? (Score:2, Informative)
Big difference (Score:1)
Re:Big difference (Score:5, Funny)
Finally, the 10.2.3 update is installed, and the above measurements are repeated.
Data: (10.2)
Trial 1:
Boot time: 28.452 seconds
ICBM: 1.989 bounces
Trial 2:
Boot time: 26.985 seconds
ICBM: 1.687 bounces
Trial 3:
Boot time: 27.189 seconds
ICBM: 2.176 bounces
Trial 4:
Boot time: 25.923 seconds
ICBM: 1.878 bounces
Data: (10.2.3)
Trial 1:
Boot time: 22.785 seconds
ICBM: 1.373 bounces
Trial 2:
Boot time: 24.873 seconds
ICBM: 1.284 bounces
Trial 3:
Boot time: 22.291 seconds
ICBM: 1.262 bounces
Trial 4:
Boot time: 25.843 seconds
ICBM: 1.348 bounces
It is observed that the average boot time for 10.2 is 27.137 seconds, with an average ICBM of 1.932 bounces. On the other hand, 10.2.3 yields an average boot time of 23.948 seconds, with an average of 1.317 bounces. Clearly, 10.2.3 is faster in all cases.
This intensive analysis has led me to the only conclusion that may be derived from these results: there are no plastics that require waxing for the optimal frisbee density. Further analysis may be required in order to determine the optimal frisbee color, however.
Manual Download (Score:2, Funny)
I'm curious as to why their patches are soooooo large.
Re:Manual Download (Score:1)
Re:Manual Download (Score:2)
Oh, man. You really need to set up a proper router/firewall to share your DSL between the iBook and the XP box.
I know lots of folks who have got one of those dedicated DSL routers from Linksys, and they are all happy. Myself, I use an old P-133 running OpenBSD to share my cable connection among a stable of Macs (some are served via 802.11b) and the occasional Linux box.
Relying on XP to provided services will lead only to madness. Roll me in flame bait and hand me to the trolls, but I wouldn't trust any recent Windows OS as a server.
Re:Manual Download (Score:2)
Shouldn't be too hard to scare up resources. OpenBSD is free, and you have to know _someone_ who can loan/give you an old box.
I just thew away a P-90 and a DX4-something (sans hard drive) because I couldn't give them away. Otherwise I'd have said pay the shipping and they are yours. I have a 486 running OpenBSD that still boots (installed the day 2.7 came out), but it is acting as an endtable right now. I had the idea that it can be dropped into my network if the current router blows up.
Of course, if you do assemble your own router, you end up paying in time instead of money. It took me about 3 hours to get it up and running, and maybe a week to tweak it into shape. The maintenance since has been negligible. Just time for upgrades about once a year (OBSD upgrades are a dream), and a few critical patches between.
The Linksys (and others) NATting cable/DSL routers are sweet and require a lot less work to setup (unless they get cranky, and then you spend hours chasing down stupid things). They are also quieter and consume less energy, which is nothing to sneeze at.
But if cost is the breaking point, I can't recommend OpenBSD enough. It will run on seriously marginal hardware -- hardware that the major Linux distros just don't want to support any longer.
Anyway, you'll figure it out.
Re:Manual Download (Score:2)
VPC 6 (Score:3, Informative)
does anyone know (Score:2)
got it.... (Score:3, Informative)
Software Update found the following new or updated software:
- 3560 Mac OS X Update (10.2.3), 52200K - restart required
Simply issue this command:
softwareupdate 3560
Re:does anyone know (Score:2, Informative)
Canadian Dictionary (Score:5, Funny)
> Adds a Canadian English language spell checking dictionary.
Woot! Er, I mean Wout!
MN. (Score:1)
Includes CUPS fixes... (Score:5, Informative)
There was a big public disclosure today about CUPS exploits, and there's sample code and methodology available now, for white and black hats alike.
At any rate, it has been confirmed that the 10.2.3 update patches the security holes in the CUPS code in addition to lots of other security and performance-related stuff.
I'm repeating this in this thread because some Mac-types may gloss over the security/unix sections, because they don't think it applies to them.
Bottom line: it does, and it's big stuff, so get your swupdate a-running.
--dr00gy
Re:Includes CUPS fixes... (Score:1)
At any rate, it has been confirmed that the 10.2.3 update patches the security holes in the CUPS code in addition to lots of other security and performance-related stuff.
Ok, fixes for CUPS updates are good. But for most home users, wouldn't they be safe behind the OS's default firewall configuration anyway? Nobody on the net has any business opening connections to anything but my ssh port, and even that wasn't accessible externally until I found the right checkbox.
Re:Includes CUPS fixes... (Score:4, Insightful)
However, most all web services (SSH, FTP, etc.) are also off by default (including CUPS).
The problem lies in the fact that most home users, when they click the box that says "Share This Printer" they don't realize that they're SHARING the printer -- the hooks are in place for remote printing, even though it requires an admin password -- and even fewer of 'em realize that it opens an HTTP port for configuration options (837? I forget, and I'm too lazy to look it up right now).
Nobody on the Net has any business opening connections to any port on your machine, but you'll get sniffed nonetheless.
5 minutes and a reboot. Get in the habit.
Re:Includes CUPS fixes... (Score:2)
I'm repeating this in this thread because some Mac-types may gloss over the security/unix sections, because they don't think it applies to them.
Sure those types exist, but I doubt they're reading Slashdot.
Re:Includes CUPS fixes... (Score:2)
where is my cookie?
Standalone Installers (Score:4, Informative)
Most important change (Score:5, Informative)
All of my games now run MUCH faster, WarCraft3, Alice, Quake3, AvP even the Sims.
Re:Most important change (Score:1)
Re:Most important change (Score:1)
Re:Most important change (Score:3, Informative)
1.4 plus all the other changes would easily add up to 50+ megs
Re:Most important change (Score:2)
The downloads you mention are all in one, with both the developer suite and run-time libraries, so quite a bit of that 30MB is API docs, examples, and so forth. Apple splits it up, and puts just the framework in the system update, with the rest in the developer tools.
Re:Most important change (Score:2)
Re:Most important change (Score:2)
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Apple's compiled binary distribution weighs in at just over 4.5MB, with GLUT adding another 670KB or so - and that's uncompressed. Don't take my word for it, just look and see:
A compressed tarball of these weighs in at just over 1.5MB: The 25-30MB distributions you mentioned earlier are distributed as source. A binary-only distribution like Apple's is tiny in comparison. In Mesa's case, it's easy to see how much of the download is demos, as they're packaged separately as a 10MB tarball. I'm on dialup, so I'm not going to download the main 21MB file to compare the space used by source vs. that used by docs.
At any rate, the original point stands. OpenGL 1.4, while really nice to have and very important for those who want it, makes up a very small percentage of the 30MB taken up by this update.
Re:Most important change (Score:2)
Before the patch the game would slow a bit when large battles happened in 4vs4. All of the caster effects would slow the system a tad, now there is n o slow down at all, even in 4vs4.
Even the menu system seems snappier with no delay in the opening drop down menu. Moss scroll around the map is snappier with no delays.
If I had to label a percentage on it I would say 15%, but you will likely see more improvement on lower end systems. Mine was great to begin with but now it's awesome.
Re:Most important change (Score:2)
Re:Most important change (Score:2)
I havent tried it on that system with 10.2.3 tho
Thing I have noticed (Score:5, Informative)
- Canadian English Dictionary, about fekkin' time.
- my G4's FireWire Port, which had a tiff with my iBook about 6 months ago (via Target disk mode) and weren't speaking, have reconciled and are now working things through
- there's strange flattened aqua widgets in metal-skinned cocoa apps.. minor tweak
- G4's insomnia was cured (and identified - File Sharing. Always the File Sharing.)
- OpenGL 1.4 Noticeable difference in speed. This applies to QuartzExtreme as well.. I'd say a good 15-25%
- basic FTP support in the Finder works well now
- fixed the stupid Keychain bug
command-tab functional (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:command-tab functional (Score:1)
Re:command-tab functional (Score:2)
Are you using LiteSwitch or something?
Re:command-tab functional (Score:2)
Not sure which way is better...on windows, if it's anything more than 3 tabs away, I've probably forgoten when I used it. Maybe they should change it to 3 or something, but then again, that brings up consistancey issues. Gotta love GUI design.
Apple System Profiler Crashes... (Score:2)
Anyone know what's up?
Re:Apple System Profiler Crashes... (Score:1)
I was actually trying to use System Profiler to see which kernel extensions belonged to Norton so I could remove them. I'd rather have journaling than Norton, as they're mutually exclusive at the moment.
Re:Apple System Profiler Crashes... (Score:2)
Don't suffer "Go Fever" with any Apple update (Score:4, Informative)
Trust me: Don't blindly install everything that Apple provides via Software Update.
Specifically, you need to read the instructions for all updates before you begin any update.
I've been reading lots of readers caught in gotchas caused by the Power Mac G4 Mirrored Drive Doors Firmware Update, the Mac OS X 10.2.2. update, and other installations. For many of these users, the problem comes down to neglecting to think about what you're doing. Hell, even I've been guilty of doing this a few weeks ago when I updated my MDD Power Mac to 10.2.2, knowing that it would hose my computer due to a bug with the HP printing software that causes its drivers to hog processing time until your Mac slows to a crawl or kernel panics.
And why did I do it? Because I wasn't thinking. I was caught in that Macintosh mode of thinking where we expect the moon and the stars from anything that Apple provides to us, especially if it's a freebie. It's a different psychology than what some PC users may understand, where caution is much stronger than in the Macintosh world. When most Mac users buy software, we rip the CD from the case, install the software, and damn any manuals or instructions that come with the program. In the earlier years of the Macintosh, this wasn't as much of a problem because of the simpler design. However, this ain't your dad's Mac. It's your Mac, and it's running not only a different Mac OS, but likely has a dramatically different hardware design that requires a little more care.
Professionals and home users need to use some common sense steps for any software update or install:
1) READ the instructions about any software installation or update.
2) UNDERSTAND what the update or install is supposed to do. If you don't understand the purpose of a particular update, don't install it until you find someone that knows and can explain it to you.
3) WAIT several days after an update is introduced before you even THINK about installing an update. If there are real problems with the software itself, this problem will show itself from the many trouble reports you'l see on the Internet. In other words, let other more careless people "beta-test" the updates for you in advance.
Two good places to visit for trouble reports are MacFixit [macfixit.com] or Apple's Discussion Boards on their Support Page.
4) READ the instructions for the update again.
5) PRINT a copy of the instructions BEFORE you begin.
6) DETERMINE A PLAN to revert the change (if the update allows it)
7) DECIDE if the update is really worth installing.
Remember that users who have tweaked their Mac OS X installation dramatically (read: against Apple's recommended configuration) may experience a bad time. If you have hacked an old Mac (read: not an original G3 or G4) to run Mac OS X, you should already know that you're running the bleeding edge of compatibility.
It's a good thing that we have BSD underneath our Mac OS GUI. It leaves many more possibilities for repairs or changes, unlike in the old Mac OS 9 days where we'd have to wait for Apple to get with the problem and provide a fix. A good example: after the HP printer software problem appeared with the 10.2.2 update, several enterprising people developed several workarounds and temporary fixes while Apple and HP slowly find an official solution.
[Update: The fix is part of the 10.2.3 update.]
Your mileage may vary with any update. Don't experience "Go Fever" [space.com] with your Macintosh, or things could blow up real good.
Re:Don't suffer "Go Fever" with any Apple update (Score:2)
Not.
And by the way - people who don't read the "readme" aren't going to read your post either.
Re:Don't suffer "Go Fever" with any Apple update (Score:2)
Re:Don't suffer "Go Fever" with any Apple update (Score:2)
Okay, I'm curious
Re:Don't suffer "Go Fever" with any Apple update (Score:2)
Yes, for once the people who have the "first post" mentality can actually do some good as a beta tester for software patches.
Yes... (Score:2)
iSub (Score:2)
I'm also tickled pink about openGL 1.4 - does this fix the problem with games like DiabloII (or Baldur's gate II) that refuse to run acceptably with 3D-acceleration turned on? Please say yes.
Triv
Re:iSub - Me too! (Score:2)
If 10.2.3 DOESN'T fix this, I urge iSub owners to send feedback to Apple.
Re:iSub - Me too! (Score:3, Interesting)
Triv
Apple Developer releases too (Score:4, Informative)
The Whole "Security Announce" blurb for X.II.III (Score:2, Informative)
---
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/secur
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
security-announce-request@lists.apple.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
security-announce-admin@lists.apple.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of security-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. APPLE-SA-2002-12-19 Mac OS X 10.2.3 (Apple Product Security)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:25:54 -0800
Subject: APPLE-SA-2002-12-19 Mac OS X 10.2.3
From: Apple Product Security
To: security-announce@lists.apple.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
APPLE-SA-2002-12-19 Mac OS X 10.2.3
Mac OS X 10.2.3 Software Update is now available. It contains fixes for
the
following potential security issues:
* fetchmail: Fixes CAN-2002-1174 and CAN-2002-1175 which could lead
to a potential denial of service when using the fetchmail command-line
tool.
fetchmail is updated to version 6.1.2+IMAP-GSS+SSL+INET6
* CUPS: Provides fixes for the following potential issues that could be
exploited remotely when Printer Sharing is enabled. Printer Sharing is
not enabled by default on Mac OS X or Mac OS X Server.
CAN-2002-1383: Multiple Integer Overflows
CAN-2002-1366:
CAN-2002-1367: Adding Printers with UDP Packets
CAN-2002-1368: Negative Length Memcpy() Calls
CAN-2002-1384: Integer Overflows in pdftops Filter and Xpdf
CAN-2002-1369: Unsafe Strncat Function Call in jobs.c
CAN-2002-1370: Root Certificate Design Flaw
CAN-2002-1371: Zero Width Images in filters/image-gif.c
CAN-2002-1372: File Descriptor Resource Leaks
In addition, Mac OS X 10.2.3 provides the following enhanced security
features:
* Random initialization of TCP Timestamp: This enhancement was submitted
by
Aaron Linville through the Darwin open source program. It prevents a
remote entity
from discovering how long a machine has been up based on the ID in the TCP
packets.
* Disk Utility now provides the option to zero data on the disk,
providing an
additional method for securing information.
Mac OS X 10.2.3 Software Update may be obtained from:
* Software Update pane in System Preferences
- OR -
* Apple's Software Downloads web site:
Updating from Mac OS X 10.2:
http://www.info.apple.com/kbnum/n120164
The download file is named: "MacOSXUpdateCombo10.2.3.dmg"
Its SHA-1 digest is: 46df611279b9981425be2cff23c3b3ed868d1809
Updating from Mac OS X 10.2.2:
http://www.info.apple.com/kbnum/n120165
The download file is named: "MacOSXUpdate10.2.3.dmg"
Its SHA-1 digest is: a51ed65311ad59879db7e728779e9cd4084057b5
Information will also be posted to the Apple Support web site:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?ar
This message is signed with Apple's Product Security PGP key, and
details are available at:
http://www.apple.com/support/security/securi
Re:The Whole "Security Announce" blurb for X.II.II (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah! Apple used the trivial patch I made for the kernel and even plugged me in the announcement! :-D
Where is CVS??? (Score:2)
Questions:
1. WTF???
2. Anyone know where I can find an OS X CVS installer package?
Re:Where is CVS??? (Score:2)
AFP now works with atalkd (Score:2)
This update fixes something I've been wanting since 10.0. Finally I can connect to my Linux box with AppleTalk over TCP/IP via the "Connect to server...". Before it was only possible via the Classic Chooser, which required the Classic Environment to be launched.
10.2.3 breaks WindowManger's VBL sync on my TiBook (Score:2, Interesting)
It looks to me like they turned off the WindowManager's sync-to-VBL for all window flushes. This is different than every previous version of OS X.
Now, this isn't a critical bug, nobody is losing any data from it. But it LOOKS HORRIBLE. I know I am going to get a headache from this in the next few days. And forget about developing anything with smooth animation (in a window. Full screen contexts still appear to work.) I wish I could downgrade to 10.2.2.
I'd run over to the Apple Store to see if it's just my machine or what, but being located inside the mall I'm hesitant to go anywhere near it until after New Year's.
Update Fixes USB Audio Distortion in 10.2 (Score:2)
This patch has fixed my issue completely, and will probably fix it with Cubase as well. Merry Christmas, Mac audio people!
Re:OMFG!! (Score:1)
Nope, I did it. ;-)
Oh... and there's even OpenGL 1.4! No word about Java 1.4 though...
- Benad
Re:OMFG!! (Score:1)
Re:OMFG!! (Score:3, Interesting)
Not totally. If Guinea Pigs, i.e. me, have major problems with it, this is a very good place to tell others to not update to 10.2.3 until the problem is fixed.
And at 50MB, it's a pretty big update anyways.
Otherwise you're right. This story should be rolled back into "weekly updates" or something...
- Benad
Re:OMFG!! (Score:1, Informative)
major os upgrades like this tend to break things, and I like to hear about them before I download the patches.
Re:Does it remove the carbon and coco libraries? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Does it remove the carbon and coco libraries? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:None of my programs run now (Score:2, Informative)