Apple Hawks Madonna iPods 350
danamania writes "Apple's latest promotion is a gimmick with Madonna, Tony Hawk or Beck's signature, or a No Doubt logo, on an iPod. It seems Apple's really pushing the iPod as a too-cool fashion accessory as much as a too-cooler MP3 player... is Maddie's signature worth an extra USD49 over the standard iPod?" Instead of $50 for the engraved signature, you can spend $20 to print "Madonna's Signature" in beautiful Helvetica.
Increased value? (Score:5, Funny)
Other iPods... (Score:5, Funny)
The artist formerly known as the artist formerly known as Prince iPod.
Re:Other iPods... (Score:5, Funny)
As an added bonus, the Metallica iPod play mostly static interspersed with Lars Ulrich screaming "YOU FUCKING MUSIC PIRATES".
"Innovation" at Apple (Score:2)
iBond or iT2000 edition? (Score:2)
Yep, it might reduce the price to nothing... for example would playing "Die Another Day" incite hardware failure? Either by the iPod developing a taste for music (in which case it self destructs) or the listener throws the iPod into a wall? (when users friend has got a waaaay cooler "Q" department issue iPod/iBond with a laser light show or something).
So in the end it is rather worthless, being in little pieces and all, unless Apple develops a special Terminator edition called the iT2000 (for when the film comes out) that can morph back together?
Re:Increased value? (Score:3, Interesting)
Star Wars lunch boxes sell well to the to young to know any better, but I don't think many in this demographic have the spending power for consumer electonics.
The only positive side I see is that surely some or all of the people they pick will turn out really unpopular. There has to be an iPod equivalent of the Jar Jar Binks lunch box.
I picture the price list this way:
Madonna iPod $349
Regular iPod $299
Mariah Carey iPod $149 (with bonus laser/bubblejet printable sticker slightly larger than signature)
Coming soon .... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Coming soon .... Bill Gates iPods (Score:2)
It lets you download music to it, then presents you with an EULA informing you that you do not own the music, but merely have a limited licence to listen to it. Pressing the Play button constituted agreeing to the EULA, pressing any other button gives you a BSOD.
MT.
At first, the engraved iPOD seemed superfluous.... (Score:5, Funny)
Does this mean Steve Jobs is a Material Girl?
Re:At first, the engraved iPOD seemed superfluous. (Score:2)
I'm waiting for the Hulk Hogan model (Score:5, Funny)
How Much... (Score:3, Funny)
No. Seriously.
Re:How Much... (Score:4, Funny)
Sean Penn or Guy Ritchie?
why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:why? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:why? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:why? (Score:2)
Why do they sell "Eddie Bauer" Ford Explorers?
*shrug* I have no idea why, but they seem popular.
Devo (Score:5, Funny)
Whip it! Whip it good!
Including Music (Score:5, Interesting)
I bet the RIAA wold love that.
Wow. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Wow. (Score:2)
But (Score:2, Troll)
Two years from now, will it still be cool?
Two years from now, my Nomad Jukebox 5gb (c. 1956) will still nice-looking due to it's timeless design.
But, soon enough the "clean" look will be "out", and iPod sales will drop. Mark my words.
Re:But (Score:5, Funny)
Re:But (Score:3, Insightful)
No, your Nomad will look just as pleebian as ever and Apple will sell new iPods with more features and new avant guarde styling.
And people will buy them. That's the powerful combination of technology and fashion which Apple's more recent success is almost entirely due to.
Re:But (Score:3, Insightful)
Industrial design is a funny thing. I'm not sure I agree that the "brushed-metal-look-plastic and primary colour bezel" look is any more valid (in the long run) than any other choice out there. It may depend on how one defines "timeless", but I'm not sure the current Creative or Panasonic designs are necessarily timeless. Of course, only time will tell.
Both are relatively recent takes on a look that has been around for some time. My first personal cassette player was a tiny Toshiba that was rounded-rectangular, brushed silver with black trim. Very iPod like for the time. That was close to 20 years ago.
Not to mention the creative also offers the NOMAD Jukebox Zen, which is aimed directly at the value-oriented would-be iPod buyer.
Creative is doing what most companies do: creating brand-recognition through design and style, while offering enough of a departure (read: copying other successful styles) to pick up the margin customers.
Madonna iPod (Score:3, Funny)
Rumor has it... (Score:5, Funny)
I was hopping it came with the music she pirated! (Score:2, Funny)
If it did there'd be some Whilliam Orbit in there it bet!
I don't understand this (Score:4, Insightful)
http://english.planetarabia.com/content/art
Re:I don't understand this (Score:3, Insightful)
People like branded things - people like to think their "version" of an item is somehow better. The fact that Woz signed my IIgs doens't mean it ran any faster, but it was still cool to have. It's just a function of society to want something we view as "unique".
Re:I don't understand this (Score:2)
Re:I don't understand this (Score:2)
Hell, at least show up to Linux World and get him to sign your laptop or something, then it's real.
Re:I don't understand this (Score:2)
Mod the parent up as funny!
RIAA and such (Score:5, Insightful)
My Opinion (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:My Opinion (Score:2, Insightful)
Should have music pre-loaded (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone notice this? (Score:5, Funny)
Anybody else find that a bit strange, I'd prefer it to show all of my contacts and appointments.
Re:Anyone notice this? (Score:2)
it protects you!
you know, like a newspaper with only happy news.
If a tree... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If a tree... (Score:5, Funny)
MT.
sounds like a gimmick but it is interesting.... (Score:3, Interesting)
or perhaps musicians realize that like the VCR the iPod MAY encourage piracy but it has plenty of non-infringing uses. just like gnutella....
Mac Plus w/ Jobs' name (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Mac Plus w/ Jobs' name (Score:2)
Apple's long history of 'celebrity computers' (Score:2, Informative)
</apple geek nostalgia>
Just great... (Score:3, Funny)
Ok, so how long... (Score:4, Funny)
Nerd iPods (Score:4, Funny)
K&RPod - Trse UsrIntFace, very flexible though
GPLPod - If you sing along, you must record your singing and distribute the original song along with your singing.
M$Pod/SonyPod/RIAAPod - You hate it because you have to.
CaseModPod - iPod with glear plastic case, neon kit, chipped cpu w/water cooling
Re:Nerd iPods (Score:2)
OK, so you're trolling and all, but I actually think you might have a market niche here... I certainly want one of those!
Case-mod an i-Pod (Score:2)
Why? Why the hell not...
Re:Nerd iPods (Score:2)
Bah! I knew it all along! (Score:2, Funny)
Think Different, Godammit! (Score:4, Funny)
Kevin Mitnick edition iPod (plays music, DOSes your iMac).
Hillary Rosen edition iPod (plays nothing, shops you to the Feds for file-sharing)
Nick Cave edition iPod (plays music, but you hear only silence)
Satan edition iPod (plays music in reverse, you hear voices telling you to 'do it! do it!')
MT.
Re:Think Different, Godammit! (Score:2)
Re:Think Different, Godammit! (Score:2)
I think you meant John Cage [mindspring.com].
By the way, here's his signature [newalbion.com], for free no less.
Re:Think Different, Godammit! (Score:3, Funny)
I hear he was drunk at the time.
So was Steve Ballmer, that's why your music gets interspersed with whooping, hollering, and chants of "Developer! Developer! Developer!"
MT.
No surprise (Score:2)
Kathy Ireland
Martha Stweart
Tommy whatshisname
Ad infinitum
Celebrity connection sells. Real signature or just a logo.
Who will do this? (Score:3, Interesting)
How about ipods in *different colors*?? It worked for the iMac, and is a better choice than the signature of the 'flavor of the month'. Cmon, THINK DIFFERENT, indeed.
Better yet, a clear, removable face plate that can cover photos or art of your OWN MAKING.
That sounds more like Apple to me...
Re:Who will do this? (Score:2)
It all sounds like Apple to me -- much of their innovation has been centered around what are really superficial visual design changes.
Some wags may argue that some of the design changes made the machine easier to work on (some aspects of the B&W G3 case design) or easier to use (the new iMac's screen adjustability) or made them more productive because they made them feel better looking at a "good" design.
I think overall that the design changes were designed more around grabbing people's attention than material improvements in the basic function of the device.
I think Apple rather lays bare the superficiality of some of their design motivations and cheapens the actual design ground they laid by doing this with the iPod. But I bought a Tivo instead of an iPod with my mad money, so what do I know..
Re:Who will do this? (Score:2)
There are lots of colors and designs other than 'Booberry' and 'Flower Power'.
Color will always sell. 'You can have it in any color you like, as long as it's black' - Henry Ford
Ask Ford about that now.
Your fashion guess could be right. I like early 60's clothes, mid 60's cars, late 50's furniture, and present hardware. What it all means - who knows.
None of you understand this (Score:5, Informative)
For several years, we (Apple) have been working on ways of customizing computers and electronics. It all started back in the Power Mac Cube days, when we were looking into new injection molding processes. That worked okay, but we got a lot of flak from customers who thought the mold lines in the plastic looked like cracks.
Now we're looking at custom laser engraving, trying to figure out ways to get the cost down to less than a dollar per square inch. The idea is that you will be able to order your laptop with anything at all engraved on the surface: your name, a logo, a picture of your kids, whatever.
This little promo is just some of the runoff from that work.
Oh, and incidentally, Apple isn't doing this for the money. I don't want to say anything else too specific, but there's more going on between Apple and these artists than just this. Expect to see more interesting things in the coming months.
Re:None of you understand this (Score:2)
There has to be something more to this -- just selling Madonna or No Doubt-branded cases is schlocky, and Jobs would never agree to schlocky to sell a few more units.
Re:None of you understand this (Score:2)
Well, now that I do, I still think that this is a stoooooopid product idea specifically designed to troll for morons.
But I'm sure you're really a nice person in real life.
Re:None of you understand this (Score:5, Interesting)
See, the deal is that Apple's management-- Steve more than anybody else, really-- sees the record companies kinda dropping the ball. People are happy with MP3-quality music, and they want to be able to buy it over the Internet. Current systems for doing that just suck. Since Apple controls
In the future, you'll (assuming we can cut a deal with Apple Records on that nasty trademark matter) be able to plug you iPod into your Mac, browse a library of songs via iTunes, and download them directly to your iPod over broadband or AirPort. Micro-payment (well, semi-micro; on the order of a dollar per song) will be handled through the
When we go live with this-- which we're hoping to do by the end of next year at the latest-- we're going to need some big names. That's why we've been talking to Madonna, No Doubt, Beck, Dave Matthews Band, Moby, and some others.
Basically Apple is trying to do an end-run around the record companies and the RIAA. It's not done yet, and it may not work, but the foundation is there and all that's really left is to sort out the legal details.
If anybody finds out I've posted this, I'm out of a job, and I'll probably end up with my ass in court. Hope this "anonymous coward" thing works as advertised.
Re:None of you understand this (Score:2, Funny)
I'm not going to bother looking up who posted this, but if it comes to my attention I won't ignore it. For the world, please discount this rumor because will lead to false expectations.
Steve.
Re:None of you understand this (Score:3, Funny)
More to the point, will it refuse to play in proximity to a Christina Aguialera or Justin Timberlake edition player?
MT.
Only $20 (Score:4, Informative)
IANAT but... Why is this slashdotworthy? (Score:4, Insightful)
Ah well. I can see my karma dropping now. Mods, do your worst...
--j
Unique iPod-only, artist-specific content? (Score:4, Insightful)
Why? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm all for people who want to get an Ipod - i'm sure it's a cool toy - as well as i'm sure it like all other toys has its +'s and -'s
But WHY? would you be more incligned to buy a Palm Pilot or a Zaurus if it had any of these signatures on it?
How to make money (Score:2)
2. Buy all the old Madonna albums from the used section of your local music store.
3. Put ink on the tip of your plaster mold.
4. Stamp album covers.
5. Ebay some autographed Madonna albums.
(you knew it was coming)
6. PROFIT!
-B
Re:How to make money (Score:2)
3. Put ink on the tip of your plaster mold.
4. Stamp album covers.
Wouldn't the signature be in reverse ?
Re:How to make money (Score:2, Funny)
Goblin
"Maddie"?! (Score:2)
Ah... I mean more ridiculous than Madonna as a conceptual whole.
-B
Re:"Maddie"?! (Score:3, Funny)
and your real name is "Wee"?
Re:"Maddie"?! (Score:2)
No, but that's what everyone calls me. My dad gave me the nickname a long time ago and it stuck. In my signature (the real, on-paper kind), my first name appears as "Wm". Giving Madonna another, shorter name is like calling me "W". That was my point.
-B
Re:"Maddie"?! (Score:2)
What's next, we call her "M"?
Too late, already taken by a French singer [jedisaime.com]
Makes no sense (Score:2, Insightful)
What about the lawsuit against the contractor? (Score:2, Offtopic)
Moderators, punish me if you must, but I think this bears mentioning on
No no no! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:No no no! (Score:2)
Old technology (Score:3, Interesting)
A better, more profitable idea (Score:2)
I wanna know (Score:2)
Madonnas IPods? (Score:2)
And what when they are all sold - how is she going to listen to music?
And where did she get all those mp3s anyway - did she download them from the net? Eh? Eh? Eh?
Spielbergs IPod! (Score:2)
The obvious signature... (Score:2)
How about uploading art? (Score:4, Insightful)
One iPod to Rule Them All (Score:5, Funny)
Ash iPod durbatulúk, ash iPod gimbatul,
ash iPod thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
Apple said no; a pity. I would have liked to have seen The One iPod
Re:One iPod to Rule Them All (Score:4, Funny)
I'd pay extra for Hilary Rosen's signature iPod (Score:3, Funny)
What if I lost my iPod (Score:3, Funny)
iPods I'd like to see (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OK (Score:3, Insightful)
And thus there was crap on the shiny back of an iPod to be covered in the thumb prints of day to day use.
(I have a 20GB iPod - Back gets all printy fast)
Re:OK (Score:2)
Re:OK (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hawking? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Who wants an ipod (Score:2)
Re:What Really Bothers Me (Score:2)
Apple is trying to sell their product to Joe Sixpack. Joe doesn't know or care what a GB is. He does know, roughly how long a CD or a record takes to listen to.
The default import settings for iTunes is 160kbps MP3 (non-VBR). At those settings, 1000 songs (or roughly 2.6 days worth of music) consumes roughly 4.6GB which leaves enough space for the OS and your calendar, contacts, etc.
If you take a look at the Tech Specs [apple.com] page you'll find: At a 160Kbps compression rate (the default setting for encoding MP3s in iTunes), 20GB equals approximately 4,000 songs, or about 400 CDs. At 128Kbps -- the most popular compression rate people use for MP3s -- 20GB is equivalent to approximately 5,200 songs, or about 520 CDs.
Re:Setting: 2008, Anytown, USA..... (Score:2)