Apple Releases Security Update 2002-08-20 41
Prozy.G3 writes "Mac OS X Security Update 2002-08-20 includes updated components (OpenSSL & Security) which provide increased security to prevent unauthorized access to applications, servers, and the operating system. Mac OS X Security Update 2002-08-20 is available either through the Software Update application (System Preferences) or at the Apple Knowledge Base." According to the Knowledge Base, it is for Mac OS X 10.1.5; are these components already in Mac OS X 10.2, or is another update forthcoming?
Um (Score:3, Insightful)
Wouldn't it be better to find that out from Apple as opposed to asking the general Slashdot audience?
-Bill
Not for Jag (Score:1)
Someone compare this in 10.1.5 (type 'openssl' then 'version' to see, if you didnt already know)
$ Security
bash: Security: command not found
Re:Not for Jag (Score:4, Informative)
Post-update, 10.1.5 has OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002
So, it looks like 10.2 will generally be vulnerable until Apple rolls out the Jaguar version of the patch.
Re:Not for Jag (Score:2)
Re:Not for Jag (Score:1)
[medellia:~] dwc% openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.6c 21 dec 2001
I haven't installed this latest update:
[medellia:~] dwc% softwareupdate
Software Update Tool
Copyright 2002 Apple Computer, Inc.
Software Update found the following new or updated software:
- SecurityUpd2002-08-20
Security Update 2002-08-20 (1.0), 2680K - restart required
To install an update, run this tool with the item name as an argument.
e.g. 'softwareupdate
So, I'm guessing this is for 10.1.5, and that 10.2 will have a separate update for these items (since the CDs have most likely gone into production already).
Re:Not for Jag (Score:1)
Slashdot advertizing getting out of hand! (Score:1, Offtopic)
Screen shot [forked.net]
Re:Slashdot advertizing getting out of hand! (Score:2)
Re:Slashdot advertizing getting out of hand! (Score:1)
Gil
Re:Slashdot advertizing getting out of hand! (Score:2)
Re:Slashdot advertizing getting out of hand! (Score:2)
Re:Slashdot advertizing getting out of hand! (Score:2)
Re:I used to love OS9 (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I used to love OS9 (Score:2)
Your OS contains the openssl/modssl/apache packages. Software Update knows this. Just 'coz you're not using web sharing today doesn't mean you won't click that button tomorrow & I'm guessing you'd be one of the first people to complain that, when you did, Apple was running a version of openssl on your box that was three revs behind. Right???
Re:I used to love OS9 (Score:2)
Personal web sharing is disabled by default, BTW. This was not the case with IIS ...
Furthermore, you don't have to keep getting patches for them. Just stop clicking on that 'software update' button. I'm sure everything will be just fiiiine.
In short - quit bellyaching about patches. They're for your benefit. If you were running Linux, every time openssl rolls you'd have a whole lot of fun DLing the source/RPMs, building/updating a myriad of programs & crossing your fingers in the hope that everything still works. Apple does exactly this for you, packages it up all nice and all you can do is complain? WTF?
Re:I used to love OS9 (Score:2)
You can't have it every way. The problem with windows is that there *isn't* a 'god damned patch' every time it's necessary.
MacOS X is based on open source tools. Bugs get seen. Bugs get fixed. Lap 'em up and enjoy - it's a small price to pay for decent security.
Apple licensing clones again (Score:2)
Mac OS X compatible computer
Note they don't say "Mac OS X compatible Macintosh"
They're making clones again!
brought to you by the reading-too-much-into-things dept.
a grrl & her server [danamania.com]
I'm running Jaguar. (Score:2)
command line updater? (Score:3, Informative)
But at the moment, this new update only shows up in the GUI Software Update panel -- running from the CL tells me "Your software is up to date" and then exits. Anyone know why?
Re:command line updater? (Score:2, Informative)
Software Update Tool
Copyright 2002 Apple Computer, Inc.
Software Update found the following new or updated software:
- SecurityUpd2002-08-20
Security Update 2002-08-20 (1.0), 2680K - restart required
To install an update, run this tool with the item name as an argument.
e.g. 'softwareupdate
I thne installed the update via the command line and it worked just fine. Hope this helps!
-Jeff
Re:command line updater? (Score:1)
PS it works for me too.
Anyone know how I can get the SWU to stop telling me about the other languages (w/o installing them?)
10.2 Update (Score:2, Informative)
There have been reports that Apple will post an update for 10.2 a couple of weeks after it is released to address some security concerns, like the most recent one for 10.1.x and to fix some minor bugs that have shown up since 10.2 went GM.
0.9.6e (Score:2, Interesting)
This had me worried for a while, and mad at Apple, until someone pointed out that it looked like the update changed the significant libraries, so it probably was patched. Pretty irritating though.
So why the restart? (Score:2)
I was under the impression the Darwin framework system was sophisticated enough to deal with new versions replacing old on running systems.
Is this just a holdover in thinking from the OS 9 days?
Re:So why the restart? (Score:1)
The only time you really need to reboot is if the kernel is updated. You can force quit the updater app if you want to bypass it.
Re:So why the restart? (Score:2)
Re:So why the restart? (Score:2)
Apple could walk through the process list and restart any of the standard daemons that needed it. They could suggest that a reboot would be a Good Idea, but I don't think it should be mandatory.
Debian manages this sort of thing with apt-get just fine without a reboot.
It's a mindset thing. Someone is still stuck in the 'any change to the system = reboot!' frame.
two different 2002-08-20 updates? (Score:1)
However the next day, on the 21st, it appeared again with the same name; I reinstalled it and rebooted the machine again. Now it seems to be fine.
Anyone else experienced this?