AOL and .mac IM Not Entirely Integrated 61
gsfprez writes "While chatting with some Apple employee friends (with .mac accounts and iChat), we were stumped why we couldn't see each other on AIM. It seems that AOL has decided to take the opportunity -- while integrating the .mac users 'into the fold' -- to modify their AIM protocols so that Open Source clients (like Fire and Trillian) can't see those with '@mac.com' IM accounts, and vise versa. Bottom line: you can't be seen by .mac IM users, and they can't see you, unless you get the crufty, single service AOL IM client. The only positive affirmation of this is from the Fire mailing list. 'Into the fold ... sorta' is more like it." Well, it's still early, this may merely be about bugs that need fixing, rather than intent to block .mac users. We'll see.
for the record.... (Score:2)
Re:for the record.... (Score:2)
Re:for the record.... (Score:2)
Yes. It's the super-secret Developer Program. The one that includes super-secret developer seeds. The last one I got was 6C106, which I've been running full-time ever since I got it. The golden master was 6C115, so this build is pretty close to finished. There's some debugging code in iChat itself that probably got ifdef'd out in the release, but other than that, it's totally release quality.
In fact, I'm using iChat right this second to converse with some co-workers in Australia. I love it.
Re:for the record.... (Score:1)
And if I want to show friends some pictures, I just drag 'em to ~/Sites/ and give out the domain name pointing at my IP. Gotta love OS X. =)
dalamcd
Re:They can be turned off. (Score:2)
Under the "View" menu, you can choose "Show as Text" or "Show as Balloons." Methinks you didn't look around quite as much as you say you did.
Re:They can be turned off. (Score:1)
Silly me for looking in the preferences. =P
Still, I'd rather use Adium. The bubbles were just one example. (The window modes of Adium are another, if someone actually cares.)
dalamcd
Re:for the record.... (Score:2)
Re:for the record.... (Score:2)
For anyone running OS X, I would suggest giving it a try.
Older AIM didn't work either. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Older AIM didn't work either. (Score:1)
The correct URL for Fire (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The correct URL for Fire (Score:2)
Re:The correct URL for Fire (Score:1)
(Of course, in this case Epicware will just get an abnormal amount of 404 errors in their logs...)
Re:The correct URL for Fire (Score:2)
Re:The correct URL for Fire (Score:2)
Fire v. iChat (Score:2, Interesting)
Undoubtedly, anyone who depends on running on two or more messenger systems will stick with Fire. Those who use only AIM will probably switch to Apple's offering. But if this is true, then within any circle of friends it has to be one or the other -- Fire (or your fave) or iChat.
It would be a shame to see Fire die, but with the trend for Macheads to adopt Apple programs, that might very well be what happens.
[Sigh] Back to running two messenging apps again. :(
Re:Fire v. iChat (Score:5, Informative)
And yes, I am certain iChat allows you to use your AIM screen name.
Re:Fire v. iChat (Score:3, Insightful)
Not that it's necessary, but I'll second that. I've been using my old-as-the-hills AIM screen name with iChat for some time now to chat both with other iChat users (even over Rendezvous over AirPort, which is really cool) or AIM users on both platforms. Since I had an AIM screen name all along, it seemed unnecessary to use my
Re:Fire v. iChat (Score:1)
Re:Fire v. iChat (Score:1)
Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager... (Score:1, Funny)
MSN Messenger is the best IM client anywhere, ever. Quit screwing around with that
Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. (Score:1, Redundant)
He/she/they/whatever* is creative, I'll give 'em that.
* "On the Internet, no one can tell you're a dog."
Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. (Score:2, Interesting)
DeanT
The only real IM (Score:1)
Re:The only real IM (Score:1)
However think of it as a phone number, not as a primary key. Your phone number is after all a primary key too. Besides, most people don't know their ICQ#. Well I for sure don't and I only have a 7-digit ICQ number.
Why you can't see .macs (Score:4, Informative)
Anyone have any concrete information on this?
Re:Why you can't see .macs (Score:5, Informative)
Certainly the old client I had (4.3) wouldn't even let you type in a
Wouldn't surprise me if it's just a bug/version problem.
Re:Why you can't see .macs (Score:1)
Because oscar is a closed protocol, gaim, trillian, and any other unofficial AIM clients that use it have only information from reverse engineering to work with. The diffrences between TOC and oscar are covered well enough in gaim protocol page [sourceforge.net].
One of two things probaly happened:
1) AOL extended the oscar protocol to handle the new charachters
2) The other clients can't handle the @ and . in screen names
It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing (Score:1)
Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing (Score:2, Funny)
You mean from stealing AOL's resources, right? If AOL wants to only let their clients, or licensed clients connect, then they should be able to do so. It's their resources after all. If Trillian wants to be compatible, they should step up to the plate and talk to AOL, just like Apple did. If AOL declines, well, this is a free country and you can do business with whoever you want.
-BrentRe:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing (Score:1)
Furthermore, what was AOL's goal here? My personal info or being gracious and giving me that POS sotware? My info...they got it, either way.
Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing (Score:2)
Nah, when they asked for your personal information, you probably lied and said, "Bill Gates, 1 Redmond Way".
-BrentRe:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing (Score:2)
i mean it is a sucky reason, but a reason nonetheless.
Proteus (Score:2, Interesting)
Just to add more to the discussion, I remember that even AIM had to be upgraded to work with or see Mac.com buddies, so it's just that the others haven't caught up yet.
Distributed IM service (Score:3, Insightful)
-Brent
Jabber IM? (Score:1)
http://www.jabber.org/ [jabber.org]
- Benad
What about Adium?? (Score:1)
Anyways.. enough of the rant on Adium vs... I wish that AOL would just open its doors. It's not like it's going to loose business here. All the AOL users still use AOL for their messaging, and I imagine that's where they get a whole lot of their money from. The banner ads on AIM can't provide that much for them. Am I wrong?
Re:What about Adium?? (Score:2)
Re:What about Adium?? A Technical Answer (Score:1)
Wait, wait.... (Score:2)
I think I'll stick with ignoring my email instead of moving to ignoring my instant messages.
Re:Wait, wait.... (Score:2)
iChat vs. AIM Direct IM issue (Score:1)
I know this is mostly unrelated, but it is still weird iChat/AIM interaction.
Storm, meet teacup. (Score:2)
This isn't the death of Fire, or Trillian any more than all the other changes to Oscar were. The third-party clients will reverse-engineer the changed protocol within a week, Trillian users will download (yet another copy of) aim.dll, and we'll all be happy again. Meanwhile, the idea that AOL would force-upgrade all of its legitimate users just to annoy Trillian users for a week is pretty ludicrous.