Mac OS X 10.1.5 Update Available 210
krugdm writes "The Mac OS X 10.1.5 update which was hinted at in the MS Office update changelog is now available through Software Update. From the updater: 'Update 10.1.5 delivers enhancements which improve the reliability of Mac OS X applications, delivers improved networking, security, support for PC Card serial communication devices, and expanded peripheral device support.'"
Rage Pro (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Rage Pro (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Rage Pro (Score:3, Informative)
That's amazing. I tried QT 6 this morning, under 10.1.4, and found it pretty damn lacking. Even the 300 kbps streaming sample movie couldn't play more than 1 or 2 frames per second, even though my network was wide open.
Just now I tried it under 10.1.5. What a difference a point release makes!
Re:Rage Pro (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Rage Pro (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Rage Pro (Score:1)
Re:Rage Pro (Score:2)
OS X 10.2 (Score:1, Funny)
From earlier stories, it looks like some really nice speed enhancments adn goodies are planned!
D.
--
http://www.MarsFirst.org/ -- Martian News. And other stuff.
Re:OS X 10.2 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:OS X 10.2 (Score:1)
Oh, wait. You meen in the US. I forget you people have different seasons to us Aussies
D.
Re:OS X 10.2 (Score:2)
DiSKiLLeR, I have to ask. Does your toilet water drain counter-clockwise? I now the seasons are reversed, I'm wondering about the coriolis effect of the earths spin.
Re:OS X 10.2 (Score:1)
Of course, if you want to do fancy stuff like partitioning your drive for the option-boot trick and OS X swap, you'll need to erase everything. But if you just want to set up and go, it's perfectly safe to just install, to the best of my knowledge.
Re:OS X 10.2 (Score:2)
Nothing about finder! (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm beginning to get annoyed, I've had my Tibook for a long time now (8 months?) and this issue still hasn't been addressed.
And yes, I run the maintenance files. That does nada. We'll see if there's any improvements tomorrow, but no mention either.
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:1)
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:1)
That doesn't bother me any - I have the fast version. Apple keeps the slow-ass Finder in reserve, so they can sell it to idiots.
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:1)
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2)
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:3, Insightful)
Aside from a few vocal, attention-starved whiners who have nothing better to do than move files around and scroll Finder windows back and forth all day, most of the people who have made an honest attempt at using it, have found OS/X's performance to be acceptable for getting Real Work done. It's not perfect, of course - nothing is. But the amount of whining that some people do over trivial issues is pathetic and annoying - thus, flamebait.
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:1)
howerver i would say the finder isn't that slow if you don't have 100's of files in one folder.
In other words, it's fast - until you try to use it?
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2, Funny)
Um... no. In other words, it's fast - unless you're organizationally challenged, and keep every file you've ever worked on in a single folder. If you're going to be dumb, you have to be patient.
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2)
Ding! Fortune file.
bsartist is my hero
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:1, Insightful)
Whatever, man.
I love how Mac users will defend the platform to the death, even when they're wrong.
Mom - "Uh, why is this iMac so slow?"
MacDude - "You're doing it wrong. It's only slow because you put so much stuff in a single folder".
Mom - "but I like to put all my jazz MP3s together, all my Rock MP3s together... shouldn't I be allowed to?"
MacDude - "No, Steve says it's the user's fault, not a problem with the OS".
Mom - "Okay..." (Switches to PC, where you can put as many files as you want in a folder without it slowing down).
Look, clearly there is a problem with the Finder! Instead of blaming it on the user, why don't you lobby Apple to fix it?
It's ridiculous that a user should have to organize their folders in a certain way just to keep the system moving at a decent speed, and the fact that ANYONE would defend Apple with regards to this issue just shows how far Mac people will go to prop up the platform, even when it's clear that the problem is being caused by Apple!
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2)
I love how Windows and Linux users will do the exact same thing. It's certainly just as amusing to watch all the holier-than-thous fly this way and that. All these people who don't realize they're just as stupid as the next guy.
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2, Insightful)
Honestly? I haven't seen the problem. I've heard other people complain about it, but I simply haven't seen it. This is not Steve's, my neighbor's, or my cat's opinion, it's my own, based on my own personal experience, using my Mac daily to make a living.
For one thing, I organize my files, instead of dumping them all into a single folder. Having inherited the maintenance task on web sites where there were literally tens of thousands of files dumped into a single folder, I recognize the value of organization. If your MP3 player requires you to keep all your Jazz files in a folder in order to display them that way, I'd suggest getting a better MP3 player.
For another thing, very, very little of the time I spend using my Mac is spent in the Finder. Like most people who use a computer, I spend my time getting work done, not shuffling files around. If all you do all day is dump a few thousand files into a folder, scroll the window back and forth and move the files around, what are you complaining about? Are you angry because you can't waste your time more efficiently?
If you want to complain, please, complain about real issues that really matter. Ask Apple why the eMac can't be ordered with a DVD-ROM. Ask them why the Finder no longer has labels. Ask them why DVD-RAM disks are read-only in OS/X. Ask them why their RAM is so damned expensive. Ask them why the the iMac only supports mirroring, when the video card it uses is capable of driving two monitors. Ask them why, even though FireWire works great to transfer video from my camcorder in iMovie, I can't use it to download photos from the same device in iPhoto.
I'm no fan boy - far from it. I'll be the first to admit that there are serious issues that need to be addressed. But by constantly whining about trivial non-issues that are easily avoided with the barest minimum of thought and rarely cause problems in the real world, you're helping to divert people's attention from the problems that actually matter.
Re:Nothing about finder! (Score:2)
Now that you mention it - yes. The traditional arrangement made sense twenty years ago, when
Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
In about five minutes, I'll let you know if IE takes advantage of this feature yet. I'm betting that it won't without an update.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Office X.1 does in fact seem to take advantage of the new text smoothing in Carbon -- but it appears to me that there's still two separate text smoothing functions going on. To demonstrate, try setting Entourage's "list view" and "email text" to the same font. The "list view" version of the font seems smooth and Cocoa-text like, whereas the email body text is better than before but distinctly different looking.
But hey, who cares -- I use Mail.app anyway and what a great update! My iBook/300 feels much, *much* faster. And love that new eject button/F12 translucent effect!
~jeff
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
So far, I agree. Mail.app feels significantly peppier on my iMac (400 MHz G3). I've got about 130 MB of mail on my IMAP server, so I guess I'm exercising Mail.app a little bit. It was never slow, but it feels quite a bit faster now.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
No, it isn't. What gave you that silly idea?
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
Really? Surely Chimera [mozdev.org] should be your dad. Or at least your mum.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Nope, sorry. OmniWeb 4.1 beta [omnigroup.com] is faster than Chimera. It launches faster (2 bounces as opposed to about 8 for Chimera) and it renders a lot faster. It's also rock-solid stable-- I haven't used Chimera enough to speak for its stability.
But OmniWeb has this one tiny feature that I simply will not live without: you can filter web addresses based on regular expressions. For instance, I have images2.slashdot.org filtered; no more banners or... uh... whatever you call those big square things that I see in the middle of an article when I'm not using OmniWeb.
No, sorry, OmniWeb is truly my dad.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
ObMozEvangPlug: Mozilla (and Chimera at some stage, I assume) does let you do some image blocking, not by regex, but it is good enough for me.
8)
/mike
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
i'll be damned if i'm going to pay for it, though.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:3, Insightful)
i'll be damned if i'm going to pay for it, though.
I don't mean to make fun, but I'll be damned if this isn't the perfect Slashdot comment. "Loved your software. Use it every day. I'll never pay you for it, ever."
Sheesh. Some of us make our living writing and selling software, you know. You could be just a little more tactful.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Besides, I was pretty drunk when I posted that. And since when is tact part of the
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Since never... you pig!
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Although there is an IE service release/update coming soon, or so I heard.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
errrr... I assume you're referring to ATSUI text rendering [apple.com], which has been available in the Carbon API for quite some time. Apps like Chimera [mozdev.org], a Cocoa version of Navigator that uses Gecko, compile with ATSUI rendering, but apparently not before taking a healthy speed hit.
So while this has been available to developers for quite a while, not all apps enable it, and from what i've seen, that's chiefly because of speed concerns. Hopefully Apple has gotten on the ball and sped up the ATSUI rendering code, but until Jaguar, when Quartz Extreme offloads everything to a graphics card, we probably won't see any serious speed improvements in antialiased text rendering.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
I'm no Carbon expert, but according to Apple's release notes, 10.1.5 includes support for Quartz text rendering in Carbon apps. I don't know literally what that means, but it's obviously not ATSUI/Carbon, since that was available before 10.1.5.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
Apple has been heavily updating its international language support with each subsequent release; it is reasonable to assume that this is more relevant for internationalized versions of OS X.
Unsanity hack to enable Quartz AA. (Score:5, Informative)
Dear friends,
When we saw MacOS X 10.1.5 out this morning, we got all excited about the ability of Carbon applications to use the native Quartz text rendering for ultra-smooth, antialiased text display. In order to take advantage of this feature, however, every Carbon application needs to be updated
"That's not fair" - we thought, so we sat down and wrote a small freeware haxie, called Silk (smooth as silk, get the feeling?). Silk enables the Quartz text rendering and smoothing introduced in Mac OS X 10.1.5 for all Carbon applications. This means antialiased text in Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla, and many others. And if it doesn't look right in some application, you can add it to the Exclude list to get it to the way it looked before.
So, grab it now:
http://download.unsanity.com/silk-10.sit
More information and some pretty screenshots:
http://www.haxies.com/silk/
Thank you for your support and participation!
Re:Unsanity hack to enable Quartz AA. (Score:2)
Why and how do Carbon apps need to be updated to use Quartz text smoothing? If Silk (apparently written in less than one day) is able to enable Quartz text smoothing for all apps, why couldn't Apple do the same?
Re:Unsanity hack to enable Quartz AA. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:1)
Third party utility SmoothType [kaleidoscope.net] by Greg Landweber has existed since 24 June 1995. And now offers the same Subpixel Smoothing (as invented by Apple [tech-report.com]) as the ClearType found in Windows XP.
Adobe Type Manager has also provided anti-aliasing for a while.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
Fucking ACs.
First of all, Mac OS had OS-level text antialiasing long before Windows did.
But that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about Quartz antialiasing, which is a superior antialiasing algorithm to anything else out there. I believe it has to do with using a floating point coordinate system for subpixel rendering, but I'm not sure about that.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
I do apologize. It was late, and I got all confused between QuickDraw support for antialiasing (way back in '87 or so) and OS-level text antialiasing, which came in OS 8 around 1998. My bad.
But... uh... Windows sucks!
There are indeed two kinds of antialiasing in the MacOS, and with Quartz Extreme there will probably be three, if I am correct.
I don't believe so. I think Quartz Extreme just uses the same algorithm as regular Quartz, but implemented in OpenGL for advanced hardware acceleration.
Then again, I haven't had any coffee this morning, so I should evidently be careful what I say.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:3, Informative)
Sigh. That's not what subpixel sampling means. When you antialias, you render the image at a higher resolution than you can actually display. For example, you might double the effective resolution, and each pixel on the screen would be represented by four pixels in memory. Each of these rendered-but-not-displayed pixels is called a subpixel.
That trick with using only the red, green, or blue parts of an LCD pixel to display edges of type ("ClearType," I think it's called) is a pretty lame attempt at increasing apparent visual resolution. In an informal survey of about 15 people around my office, nobody liked the little colored flecks around the letters. One person said it made him feel like his eyes were going in and out of focus.
So, first, you and I are talking about two different things. And second, ClearType is not superior.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:2)
No, I am not incorrect. The word "subpixel" has been used to refer to pixel-splitting, but it's not true to say that it only refers to pixel-splitting.
I happen to have here on my desk a whitepaper written by Kurt Akeley of SGI about the Reality Engine graphics system. I can't seem to find a date on it, but it definitely pre-dates "ClearType" by many years.
One representative quote:
Alpha antialiasing of points and lines is common to second generation architectures. Alpha antialiasing is implemented using subpixel and line-slope indexed tables to generate appropriate coverage values for points and lines, compensating for the subpixel position of line endpoints.
So the use of the term "subpixel" clearly can refer either to pixel-splitting techniques (which date back to the Apple II, by the way; remember "double hi res?") or to multisampling at a resolution higher than final display resolution. The person to whom I responded thought I was talking about pixel-splitting when I used the word "subpixel," and I cleared that up. For you to come along behind and say that I had it wrong is just... well, wrong.
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps? (Score:4, Informative)
There are about 3 ways to do anti-aliasing:
The very expensive way is to examine the actual paths you are rendering, how they intersect the pixels, and calculating the actual coverage of the pixels directly with math. This is probably what the original poster meant by "floating point". This is easy for infinitely long straight lines but very difficult for any other shape to do correctly.
A less expensive way is subpixel sampling, which is to use the normal black & white algorithim to render the letter about 4 times larger and then use 16 pixels (or sometimes weighted overlapping areas for better quality) to calculate the resulting gray from how many pixels are filled in. This can be done by hardware today and I believe is what is used by Quartz, the older Mac AntiAliasing, the new Windows AntiAliasing, and by Xrender for AntiAliasing. Note that some algorithims do the summation at the same time they calculate the subpixels, so there never is any "high resolution bitmap" in memory, but this does not change the basic algorithim.
The third way is to render at normal size and guess by looking at adjacent pixels. This is what Windows "Font Smoothing" did, I believe. A variation on it (producing shapes rather than grayscales) was used by early Macintoshes to render bitmaps onto higher-resolution printers. The primary advantage of this scheme is that it is fast, but otherwise it sucks.
ClearType is subpixel sampling with some multliple of 3 horizontally (not necessaryilly 1x3 as many people think, doing a higher resolution would result in better antialaiasing). These samples are then weighted-summed down to an image with 3 "subpixels" horizontally and one vertically. This is followed by a step I call "error diffusion" which is the clever part, to change the image by adding or subtracting some subpixels so the total amount or red, green, and blue are equal.
Okay, everybody, got it? "subpixel sampling" was used before Bill Gates first saw a computer, incidentally. It is NOT a MicroSoft invention, so stop making fools of yourselves.
Much Faster on an Ibook (Score:2, Interesting)
I cant wait till 10.2 comes out. that is supposed to be much snappier on slower g3 based systems.
Thank You apple
Re:Much Faster on an Ibook (Score:2)
While I'm a Mac user, I find this funny. It's like when a retail joint marks everything up 30%, and then has a "massive!! one time!!" sale, everyting 20% off. Consumers, not knowing better, rejoice. Apple gives us a slow OS, and then makes it a little faster, and everyone sings praises.
Last week, OS 9 ate my HD. So I've been using my NeXT cube- 25 MHz 68040, 24 MB RAM, running NeXTSTEP 3.3. The sad thing is, it feels as fast as my iBook 500 MHz running OS X 10.1.4 most of the times, sometimes faster. So, no, it didn't have to be this way. Alas, it's still good that they're improving it!
My experiences with the update: (Score:1)
I must say tho, that I can always count on looking foward to Apple updates. They always add stuff while fixing things. Never just a fix/patch up holes release. They always sweeten the deal just enough to keep ya comming back for more. Unlike MS updates, which we all dread and regret in some cases....
Oh, and my friend that has a 700Mhz G3 (yes THREE) iMac is reporting huge performance increases (iTunes loads in one bounce) and says it's friggin awesome. Maybe cause they optimized for the Rage Pro and not the Radeon like my PBook has. Oh well, WHENS JAGUAR GETTING HERE! I want it now, dammit!
You were right! (Score:1)
When you press eject button (F12) you see eject icon on the screen,
New option in Energy Saver preference, "reduce processor performance" on my iBook.
Access to iDisk is so much faster, not as fast as Goliath but really fast now.
itunes should get better CPU usage instead ! (Score:1)
I'm reading 27% cpu as I'm typing this. While it rarely skips on my powerbook G3/400 firewire, I really could use the CPU cycles when I'm compiling stuff with ant...
Please do not exagerate load times when other performance issues are a lot more important.
I've run a copy of the Jaguar prerelease and it's much better performance wise in a lot of area's.
Terminal is just one bounce in 10.2 , which is crucial for us *nix lovers ! Quicktime 6 is a huge improvement over 4 and the finder is much quicker and even more productive with the excellent integrated find !
Can't wait untill it ships
Re:itunes should get better CPU usage instead ! (Score:1)
To avoid countless posts about this fuckup
I MEANT "OVER QUICKTIME 5" - LOL
Kernel Panic for DoubleCommand users !! (Score:5, Informative)
Delete the folder in your Library/Startup Items folder !!
Re:Kernel Panic for DoubleCommand users !! (Score:2)
I'm not 100% sure on this as I'm not sure when DoubleCommand is loaded... but if it's loaded after user login (and you have login enabled) then you can try logging in as user name '>console'. That will drop you to a console and allow you to delete the folder before aqua is loaded.
I always keep login enabled just for cases like this where things could mess up.
This should be the right solution (Score:2, Informative)
Because I booted into Jaguar and removed the folder that way, I can't say this works. But if DoubleCommand doesn't get loaded when booting in single usermode this will certainly work:
The only way to fix it is to boot in single user mode using holding cmd-s while booting. And then remove the folder in
See this [macosxhints.com] page for more boot and startup commands
Download 'em while you got 'em (Score:1)
10.1.6 (Score:2)
And semanticly, I'm sure there will be plenty of free updates beyond 10.2 (such as 10.2.1).
Re:Download 'em while you got 'em (Score:2)
Re:Download 'em while you got 'em (Score:2)
One wierd change (Score:3)
When I launch my terminal.app this the prompt:
[elliot\032johnson\226\149\146s\032compu
but if I "pwd", it reports that I'm at:
/Users/elliotj
Wierd. Any ideas?
Re:One wierd change (Score:2, Interesting)
Notice that if you convert them, it'll say
[elliot johnson's computer:~] elliotj%
which is the name of your computer, followed by the current directory (~), which is equal to
if you don't want it to say "elliot johnson's computer", then you can rename it in the Sharing Preferences panel under System Preferences.
but this change isn't really a change at all - I've had a similar prompt (sans login) on all OS X versions, including 10.1.5.
Hibernation with SCSI PCI Card (Score:2, Informative)
There was a problem in previous versions where (if I recall correctly) the OS didn't know what to do about supplying power to SCSI PCI cards when the system tried to hibernate, so they just disabled the feature. With the upgade to 10.1.5 it now goes into a deep sleep, which is a big improvement!
Update breaks Radeon 7000 support (Score:2)
An incompatibility with Beige G3 systems has been corrected but now the video gets scrambled [obzorg.org] when the system wakes from sleep.
qmail users take note (Score:2)
This is a problem on FreeBSD as well - every upgrade reinstalls sendmail. It may be a popular MTA, but it's not the only one out there in wide use on these OSes.
Re:qmail users take note (Score:2, Informative)
You can avoid that in FreeBSD just by putting "NO_SENDMAIL=TRUE" in /etc/make.conf.
The biggest disappointment... (Score:4, Funny)
(back to recompiling darwin on 68k for me... 3 months & seventeen days and gcc's STILL going...)
a grrl & her server [danamania.com]
Iomega CDRW USB works!! (Score:2, Informative)
I have been emailing Iomega support and bitching about the lack of drivers
Installed the update, and toast now sees the Iomega drive in OS X
Happy Happy Joy Joy!!
Re:Intel? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Okay, from you posting history [slashdot.org] you don't appear to be a troll, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and treat your question seriously.
The answer, of course, is "never." Duh.
But what I'm much more interested in is why you, and lots of other people and trolls, seem to think that such a thing might happen? Even the phrasing of your question-- when is it planned?-- implicitly assumes that such a port will appear eventually.
What possesses you to think such a thing?
Re:Intel? (Score:1)
The source of this questioning is probably the Darwin 1.4.1 ISO image for x86 [apple.com] that's available....
Re:Intel? (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure, Darwin has been available for IA-32 for a long time. But Darwin isn't OS X. The question remains, why would anybody think Apple would port their flagship operating system-- meaning OS X, not Darwin-- to a different architecture? Isn't that kind of like asking when Tivo is going to port their software to Replay TV's hardware?
Nope, poster was just a dope (Score:1)
If the original poster had even known to look at the Darwin x86 ISO's, s/he might have focused the original dopey question a bit more. The only thing even closely relevant in the release notes says: "Darwin 1.4.1 should not be installed onto a Mac OS X partition. It is a goal for a future release of Darwin to be easily interchanged into a Mac OS X system."
To then read into this that "Aqua will be easily compiled into a x86 system" is rather a long leap.
What the note is really pointing out is that on a *Mac*, for now you can either compile and run Darwin, or you can run MacOSX, but you can't do both. Copying a Darwin module you've compiled yourself into an OSX system is gonna fsck you up.
Re:Nope, poster was just a dope (Score:2)
Re:Nope, poster was just a dope (Score:2, Interesting)
I thought OS X would totally crawl on it but I went ahead and tried for the perverse pleasure of saying I did it. It actually works decently if you aren't in a big hurry. I moved it to the side of my desk and it plays my music, chat and general webrowsing while I'm working on my main system. Probably wouldn't like it for my primary system.
Re:Intel? (Score:2)
Maybe because it already happened before but was killed because Apple did not want to sell Mac OS for x86?
Re:Intel? (Score:4, Interesting)
Sure, the Star Trek [macspeedzone.com] project. That project failed for the obvious reasons:
1. Apple didn't think it likely that PC vendors would choose to bundle a Mac OS for Intel with their systems, and Apple didn't like the odds of trying to sell an after-market OS to customers that already had one for their computers.
2. Apple didn't want to start a political battle with Motorola by appearing to endorse Intel's CPUs over the PowerPC.
3. Apple was-- and is-- a hardware company, not a software company. Porting the OS to another platform would do nothing but reduce Apple's hardware revenues, which would very quickly be self-defeating.
Same reasons Apple wouldn't want to port OS X to any other architecture. So the question stands: why would anybody assume that Apple would want to port their OS to a non-Apple hardware platform?
Re:Intel? (Score:1, Interesting)
Of course, then Motorola went and did it to themselves. Their corporate IT folks mandated an all Intel PC corporate policy - effectively outlawing anyone using computers based on their own processors.
Bloody brilliant, that move....
Re:Intel? (Score:3, Interesting)
This statement is posted quite often, but I have to (somewhat) disagree. Apple is not just a hardware company. Apple is a COMPUTER company. They make the whole shebang, the hardware, the OS, and a lot of the best software for the platform. Very few other companies can say that. (Sun, IBM, HP, perhaps... with various Unices in ONLY the server market)
I am glad that Apple doesn't port to x86. As a long time windows/linux user, I can say that I was surprised at how much I love my Mac systems. OS X, how I love thee.
Re:Intel? (Score:1)
Didn't Wanna Sell It? Why Could It Be? (Score:1)
> Maybe because it already happened before but was killed because Apple did not want to sell Mac OS for x86?
Apple makes money because it has differentiated itself as a boutique brand. That brand includes a boxen with noticeable industrial design and the label on the side.
Going software only would be a radical move for a company that's profitable, and stockholders of profitable companies hate radical moves. They rarely suceed, and are a sign of desperation.
No matter what cpu Apple runs with, it will control the form and function of the boxes that go around it, and be the exclusive distributor. You are never, ever going to load OSX into a generic Intel box and expect it to boot.
Re:Intel? (Score:1)
It's been going strong for decades now...I wouldn't expect it to fail anytime soon.
...Though I don't own a mac, I wll say that the G4 is a fairly respectable cpu, I very much look forward to seeing the G5...though it may be some time...
Re:Intel? (Score:1, Insightful)
Perhaps he was just blowning wind up my shorts, but I don't think so. Steve is a smart businessman (especially since NeXT taught him a thing or two) Be ready. It's coming. I expected it a macworld in January, but MWNYC is coming up, and I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him announce this wonderous piece of silicon.
Re:Intel? (Score:2, Interesting)
I once saw an interview with a venture capitalist who said he wouldn't invest a dime in a company unless the founder had had at least two failures prior to starting it. Failing, and learning from the experience, is part of the path to success.
To bring this back at least somewhat on topic, the inclusion of better Rage Pro support in the 10.1.5 release, and the release of the eMac to the general public, is evidence that Jobs has learned from his failures, and is a better CEO for having been through them. The "old Steve" would have stuck to his guns and defended his decisions in these areas to the last. The "new Steve" better understands the price of stubbornness.
Re:Intel? (Score:1)
Re:Intel? - No Transmeta (Score:2)
Transmeta would be validated as well since they would become the hardware to go for if you want to protect your investment. After all, if MS and/or Intel implodes under a Supreme Court ruling, you have maximum flexibility to the point of changing your emulation layer to the new most viable chip line.
Re:download ? (Score:1)
To respond to the second part of your comment... That's not my problem.
Re:faster? (Score:1)
Re:faster? (Score:1)
Or, were you referring to some other "speed problem?"
Re:faster? (Score:1)
si, it's faster on my G4 400mghz/Rage128/1.1GB (Score:2, Interesting)