Petition to Get Ximian Connector Ported to Mac OS X 27
babbage writes "There has been some talk recently on various mailing lists about getting a Mac OS X version of Ximian Connector extension to Evolution, which allows Evolution to interact with Microsoft Exchange 2000 servers much as Microsoft Outlook can. It is already possible to build and run Gnome and Evolution on Mac OS X, thanks largely to projects such as Fink. Ximian is aware of this interest, and has indicated that if enough users expressed a serious interest in buying the product -- the target number was 500 paying users -- they would be willing to produce a Mac OS X port of Connector. To that end, I've set up an petition to help gauge user interest."
Nice idea but... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Nice idea but... (Score:1)
Follow-up to my own comment... (Score:2, Informative)
Ximian(TM) Connector is a unique extension to the Ximian Evolution(TM) groupware suite that allows Linux and UNIX users to manage personal information and collaborate with co-workers using Microsoft Exchange 2000. With Ximian Connector installed, Ximian Evolution will function as an Exchange 2000 client, enabling users to manage their email, personal and group calendars, address books and tasks lists using existing company Exchange 2000 servers. As a result, workgroups, departments and companies using Ximian software can cost-effectively enhance productivity, integration and support for their growing populations of Linux desktops.
(emphasis mine)
--Mike
Re:Nice idea but... (Score:2)
Mail may be a nice e-mail client for most but it certainly doesn't do shared calendaring/messaging/folders etc. with Exchange Server.
Outlook for Mac was close but not perfect and M$ stopped development long ago. Another company I remember from a year ago had something that also pseudo worked but had an insane licensing structure ($$$$$).
Shared Calendering? (Score:1)
Assuming one is within a Network running OS X as the installed OS and you are speaking with other OS X boxes and suddenly you have concerns for Meetings, why the hell would you want to integrate that crap within a Mail application? The purpose of Services is to write applications that do specific tasks well, without the added interdependency of other code you have to manage and reduces the risk of bugs.
At NeXT we had several Applications we leveraged through Services that were Networkwide, by design, and Calendaring was one of them. And the application put Exchange's Calendering to shame.
Someone should write a Cocoa calendering application and make such Services available to hook within to Mail.app and bingo your applications remain, lean and if you miss your meeting thats your damn fault. There is a market for it and there are Objective-C developers tenfold more talented than I to do the job well.
So what you're saying is... (Score:4, Funny)
Clarification (Score:3)
A fortune waiting to be made (Score:4, Informative)
But these guys seem to be blinded by the GNU cause and don't want to make money.
Think about it Entourage is priced at $150. And lacks Exchange or group scheduling functionality.
Make a cocoa based PIM with group scheduling and exchange support. You can sell it for $100-$150. Even at a modest 50,000-100,000 units sold that is $5-10 million dollars. This is not improbable given that the number of OS X customers by year end is ~3 million.
Ximian should get off their ass, hire a Cocoa programmer and develop such a product.
Re:A fortune waiting to be made (Score:2)
Browsing other's calendars etc (Score:1)
Priorities... (Score:2, Insightful)
I spent a few days compiling all of the stuff that evolution requires using Fink and it works ok, but it's still a tad unstable, and quite slow.
How many people are even using it under OSX anyways?
In my experience it was too slow under XDarwin for everyday use. Hopefully the project to port GTK+ to Quartz will work out and it can run "natively". Perhaps that would be faster. Perhaps I should just get a G4. Perhaps Apple should make an iBook with a G4 so they're affordable. Oh well...
Would people pay if there was a free MS version? (Score:1)
As soon as MS does that, I think people will more likely use Outlook/Entourage for X rather than Connector, simply because it's free, or came with Office X.
Either way though, I guess Ximian stands to make a bit of money in the interim between their release and MS's, only for the expense of porting their client, which probably isn't *that* difficult in the end.
Re:Would people pay if there was a free MS version (Score:1)
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/events/svspeake r/04-10browne.asp
(microsoft.com)
Entourage.X will talk to an Exchange server via IMAP, but doesn't do calendaring.
Ximian definitely has a chance to make something good for OSX here.
OT: What _is_ a good exchange client? (Score:3, Interesting)
psxndc
Why? Outlook is a free download (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Why? Outlook is a free download (Score:1)
Re:Why? Outlook is a free download (Score:1)
There's nothing wrong with Outlook 2001 if you're still using OS 9.1, but you want to move to Office X as soon as the budget allows - it's a damn good package.
self defeating? (Score:1)
But doesn't it seem a little self defeating in purpose?
I mean, Exchange is a corporate solution, used by large organizations. Large organizations aren't going to buy copies of an OpenSouce solution (if they were so darn OSS-friendly, they wouldn't be using Exchange to start with), not to mention, they won't have very many Macs. Besides, MS has officially announced (in a MBU press conference) that they're working on Exchange support anyway.
I think the project would be better off concentrating it's efforts on Linux, where there's absolutely no support from MS to start with.