Mandrake 8.2 for PowerPC is Out 29
ulbador writes "From the Linux Mandrake PPC site: Mandrake Linux 8.2 PPC is now available for Macintosh users. This newest release offers G3 optimization, user-friendly configuration tools, and the most up-to-date software.
Visit your local mirror."
Re:Non-Apple PowerPC Support? (Score:1)
Re:Non-Apple PowerPC Support? (Score:2)
OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:1)
Re:OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:2)
Also, does this support my TiBook 667? Most Linux distro's do not support the newer TiBook's Radeon Video card. I've heard of many headache's from people who have funky resolutions and what not since the card is not supported.
Please answer my questions!!
Re:OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:1)
Because there is already a (better IMHO) nix that runs optimized on the G4. Linux on G3s is great....If you have a G4, use OS X. You will not be disapointed.
Re:OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:1)
I know there are developer tools available with osx - apparently they should have included the CD with devtools when I bought the powerbook. I didnt get them. Then I had to order an OS upgrade (10.0.4 to 10.1 for $25 - I couldnt get the "free" upgrade anywhere nearby). Then I could finally download the devtools.
Unfortunately for Apple by that time I had a beautiful system with mandrake 8.0, an apache 2.0 beta, a mysql compiled from source and a whole test environment that I can work with anywhere on the planet and that shows what a great processor the G4 is.
I must say OSX is a wonderful OS when you compare it to windows, but it doesn't come close to a BSD or GNU/Linux running a suite of development applications under X. So much depends on what you want the os to do. Maybe I am also one in a long line of new apple customers that isnt used to paying for a lot of software, is used to tweaking the OS, and is making assumptions about installed software and OS requirements that are novel to Apple.
Now I am running MDK 8.2ppc beta on the powerbook and I can most definitely recommend MDK 8.2 on ppc. And I hope apple will port OSX to intel!!
Re:OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:1)
I run the MDK 8.2 installer here with the aty128fb - thats for the ATI Mach 64 Mobility M3, you might have more recent video hardware in yours and I would strongly suggest checking out mandrakeforum.com to see what they have to say about it.
MDK 8.2 works very well on this powerbook - if it doesnt work at first please see if there are any known issues and/or workarounds having to do with the vid subsystem, it's very much worth it to have a dual boot osx/mdk8.2.
Re:OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:2)
Thus the phrase:
Linux for development
Mac for production
Palm for mobility
Windows for Solitaire
Re:OSX, Linux, BSD (Score:1)
I'm sure I've read that it does, although I can't find a link to prove it. It has the 2.4.18 kernel and XFree 4.2 so it certainly should work. (Same for YDL 2.2.)
Choice is Good (Score:3, Insightful)
If you like Mandrake's work at providing a feature-rich Linux distro for the Mac, be sure to give 'em some money (ie, consider buying [mandrakestore.com] some CDs) so they'll see reason to keep up the excellent work!
Re:Choice is Good (Score:1)
Ontopic:
This is awesome, great to see how linux is moving in on MS from every angle, however, now we have to think about, if Linux on the MAC picks up, what will be Apples response to this? Will they back off their "open" architecute and go around the world giving speeches about how open is bad and "unamerican"?
dam(asdd)
Re:Choice is Good (Score:2, Insightful)
The only way it could negatively impact Apple's bottom line is by lengthening the upgrade cycle; a useable Linux system is less resource-intensive than a tricked-out OSX system, thus keeping "older" Macs in use longer rather than requiring the users to buy new hardware. Even then, one could argue that those "older Mac" users are people who wouldn't have the money for a newer system anyways - so it simply increases the number of Macs in use.
On second thought, an exceptionally strong Linux presence on Mac might pull some open source development muscle away from OS X development. But that kind of impact would be several years in the making...
kde 3 (Score:1)
KDE3 and Yellowdog (Score:1)
rpm -e `rpm -qa |egrep ^kde` --force --nodeps
and then from the kde3 download dir:
rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps *rpm
Starts right up without an issue
Re:KDE3 and Yellowdog (Score:2)
rpm -e `rpm -qa |egrep ^kde` --force --nodeps
and then from the kde3 download dir:
rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps *rpm
ROTFL!
Good grief! I seriously mean no disrespect to you or to the good people at Yellow Dog or KDE...but the above quote truly exemplifies why Linux doesn't have any desktop presence to speak of. I myself installed YDL on my TiBook last weekend and was seriously shocked at how
Re:KDE3 and Yellowdog (Score:1)
We're working on putting together a standard for UI/GUI with definite focus on OSS Desktop environments.
Any help/suggestion is welcome.
Re:kde 3 (Score:4, Informative)
Next version will be good: KDE3, Gnome 2, GCC 3.1, LSB compliant.
Remember debian. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Remember debian. (Score:1)
Re:Remember debian. (Score:1)
I have been thinking of trying Debian, but right now YellowDog 2.2 is what I am using and I love it.
Mandrake was ok, but seemed rather slow and missing some tools I like. Actually Mandrake is more than OK, I'd say you should make room for both Mandrake and YDL. bTW, YUP is not much different from apt-get. I haven't explored enough to see if it is just a frontend.
Gentoo Linux (Score:2, Informative)
Run on POP? (Score:1)
Or, do these just run on Macs. Shouldnt linux distros like Mandrak, Gentoo (i see someone said up there) Yello Dog and others all make strides to get their OS working on open, non propietry PPC hardware? So that it might be possible to bring down prices?
Re:Run on POP? (Score:1)
Maybe you could provide some info via a few google searches or the like?
Does this Support the New LCD i-Mac's (Score:1)