Steinberg Cubase SX Release for Mac OS X 23
RemiT writes "Steinberg plans to release a Mac OS X version of Cubase SX, their next generation of professional digital music production software. Indicated release date is after the end of Q2 2002, finally making good on Steinberg's commitment to support Mac OS X. (I wonder how long it will be before Mac stalwarts like Moby are using Mac OS X in concert...)"
Perfect Timing (Score:2)
Re:Perfect Timing (Score:1)
Hey, what's up with that iPod icon? (Score:2)
It's kinda like using an all-blue icon for the 'microsoft' topic.
Back to topic, since this software is not available for Our Favorite Operating System (hereafter known as OFOS), what similar software packages are available?
Re:Hey, what's up with that iPod icon? (Score:1)
>I think it's apt for the mac...
Do tell...
>a nice rip-off of everyone else's ideas (can you say Xerox-Parc)
Can you say "Embrace and extend?" Take your time,
sound it out if you need to...
>Over priced
The iPod? probably, but hey quality costs.
>flashy with no substance
Define substance. They're fucking computers and
mp3 players. If you're looking for substance in a
box of parts, you've been using too many controlled
substances for your own damn good.
>realy only any good if you can't think for yourself (heard any original fan-boy suff lately?)
Hmm, and your argument is original? Sounds like
the same crap Mac bashers have been digging up
for years. Ergo, mistar troll, teh kettle si calling,
you is black! lololol!!!11
>single purpose (can you say beige typewriter?)
Sure, like you do anything other than play games
anyway...
>only admired by the fan boys
Only bashed on by the fanboys of a certain other
architecture. Oh look! Check out the Emperor's
new flashy threads!
>Back OT, i thought the Mac was already the be-all
>& end-all of professional audio? So what has some >thing as irrevant (read: anything wintel is
>irrevant) as Cubase got to do with anything?
Did you bother to follow the link at all? Do you
know anything about Cubase? VST's been running on
Macs for a while now. But then, you're a troll,
your grasp of the facts beyond your particular
agenda are tenuous at best.
Now how about Logic for OS X? Or USB Audio? (Score:1)
Also, does anyone know of an OS X compatible USB audio interface? I have the iLamp, so I can't install a card.
Re:Now how about Logic for OS X? Or USB Audio? (Score:1)
Depends on what you're looking for. The Griffin Technologies iMic adapter is fine if you just need stereo audio. Edirol makes some decent all-purpose USB audio interfaces (many of them have MIDI).
But if you're looking for many more channels than two, go firewire. It's about at generation 1.5, so you might want to wait a bit, but the Mark of the Unicorn 896 is what I'm trying to save up for right now... ASIO drivers exist for most of these products, so they should work with most audio software.
Re:Now how about Logic for OS X? Or USB Audio? (Score:1)
Re:Now how about Logic for OS X? Or USB Audio? (Score:1)
The USB and MIDI products work with OS X, and also come with Win drivers.
BTW, I submitted a story about these interfaces with my Cubase item, but the Powers That Be rejected them...
From what I've read, they want to migrate people from the Cubase 5 line (there is an ugrade policy for existing Cubase users),and this may be their final idea of Cubase (and Nuendo) OS X support.
Re:Now how about Logic for OS X? Or USB Audio? (Score:1)
"What happens to Cubase 5.1? Are you going to continue developing Cubase VST 32? Cubase VST? Cubase VST Score?
We will continue to fix outstanding issues within Cubase 5.1 and you will see an upgrade including VST System Link functionality however, you will not see any other new major feature updates. This is true for all three versions of Cubase 5.1 and the reason is simple: Cubase SX is based on a completely new code base which allows us to do things we cannot do with the older code used in Cubase 5.1. It also marks the beginning of a new era/product line for Steinberg. SX is not a continuation of an older product; it is the start of something new!"
Close, but not perfect (Score:2, Insightful)
The best part about Cubase is the VST plug in standard. There are dozens of freeware VST plug-ins and VST virtual instruments that may never get ported over to OS X. Untill they build up their plug in collection for SX, I'm sticking to 9.2 and Cubase 5.1
I do have to give them praise for their new System Link standard -
http://www.steinberg.net/products/up/vstsl/index.
Now now of my old hardware will go to waste because i can link everything up as one system..sort of a Cubase "Beowulf" cluster...
Which leads us to paraphrase the popular
Re:Close, but not perfect (Score:1)
This is what Steinberg's Cubase SX FAQ says about that (read to the bottom where it says existing VST plugins are supported):
"FEATURES:
How many PlugIns are included within Cubase SX?
There is a huge number of audio and MIDI plug-ins included in SX to cover possibly every demand in your music making and production process such as: Audio Plug-Ins: Flanger, Phaser, Overdrive, Chorus, Symphonic, Reverb B, Reverb A, QuadraFuzz, DeEsser, DoubleDelay, ModulationDelay, Dynamics, Chopper, Transformer, Metalizer, Rotary, Vocoder, StepFilter, Bitcrusher, Ringmodulator, SMPTE Generator, Grungalizer, Mix 6to2, Datube, etc. MIDI Plug-Ins: Arpache 1, Chorder, Microtune, Quantize, Auto Panner, Control, MIDI compressor, Echo Processor, Notes 2 Volume, Track Controls, Track Para FX and Transformer.
In addition, you will of course also be able to continue to use any current Cubase VST Plug-Ins within Cubase SX."
Mac OS X has built-in VST support (Score:1)
Re:iBooks in Concert (Score:1)
Unfortunatly for us music-makin, osx-using folk audio software just isn't there yet on Apple's latest offering.
I am happy to say that the osx verion of macsound just came out yesterday, though it seems to be rather buggy at this point.
Excuse me while I reboot to do some music work...
I want the full experience (Score:1)