Apple Cancels Apple Expo 2001 237
Ziploc writes: "Apple today announced the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001, which was scheduled to take place at Paris Expo, Porte de Versailles, from September 26th to 30th, 2001.
See the press release here."
Steve Jobs keeps his promise (Score:3, Funny)
Looks like he'll be keeping his promise!
Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise (Score:2)
Eh, I should lighten up.. You're right, this is all really funny. Ha ha. I'm chuckling, really.
I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1, Troll)
Re:I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1)
Re:I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1)
Re:I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1)
Apple is a US company (Score:5, Insightful)
The WTC didn't house many (if any) government offices, they were businesses.
Personally, I also think it's a little too reactionary; they should just beef up security and go on with the show.
There was a report on Marketplace [marketplace.org] on Friday about how many organizations within the US are cancelling their conventions because of the tragedy. The financial impact on the tourism industry of those cities is in the tens of millions of dollars. Think about it, if a convention has 30,000 people, and each person spends an average of $300 apiece on food, lodging, and such, then the loss of that one convention would mean the loss of $9 mil. in revenue.
Re:Apple is a US company (Score:1)
Re:Apple is a US company (Score:2)
Read their press release.
Re:Apple is a US company (Score:1)
By the way, exactly what of their press release do you think I missed? They don't say anything apart from "We're sorry to disappoint our users and developers, but their safety is our primary concern." Not very specific IMHO.
Re:Apple is a US company (Score:2)
Also, today we are announcing the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001,
which was scheduled to take place in Paris on September 26-30. We
are very sorry to disappoint our customers and developers, but their
safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very
visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at
this time would be irresponsible.
Any questions?
Re:I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1)
Re:I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1)
Even if nobody was worried about attacks, there's a more basic practical matter: How will people get there? The airlines have a pretty big backlog of cancelled flights to deal with, and many people will probably be simply unable to make it.
Re:I don't understand the relevance. (Score:1)
When do they announce the new line? (Score:1)
Re:When do they announce the new line? (Score:1)
It wasn't going to. The only new hardware is a revised PowerBook G4, anyway. The real big thing is Mac OS 10.1, which will still be released on schedule.
Figured he'd do that... (Score:1)
Since there was no new hardware to be displayed, I don't really see this as much of a loss anyhow.
Apple really needs to refocus and release tech. info on their older systems anyhow. I've been fighting for 2 years to get driver-level specs for a Powerbook 1400, and have yet to recieve anything but a runaround. MacOS X based on a BSD core is pretty cool, but Apple just like IBM-clones need a choice. BeOS comes close, but neither of these will run on my PB. I'd hate to think I'd wasted my money.
BTW, a 1400 CAN be installed, but PCMCIA and floppy support, you can forget about.
Re:Figured he'd do that... (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple really needs to refocus and release tech. info on their older systems anyhow. I've been fighting for 2 years to get driver-level specs for a Powerbook 1400, and have yet to recieve anything but a runaround. MacOS X based on a BSD core is pretty cool, but Apple just like IBM-clones need a choice. BeOS comes close, but neither of these will run on my PB. I'd hate to think I'd wasted my money.
Like Compaq, Toshiba, Dell and some other company's.
I have a five year old Pentium 90 laptop with 8 mb and Windows XP won't install on it.
Yeesh, get a live.
The powerbook 1400 is almost 5 years old.
And it isn't a PCI machine.
Re: Low-level specs for "dead" Apple tech (Score:1)
Sean Luke has succesfuly ported the Waba JVM to the Newton, and low-level info on how to access the QuickDraw routines in the Newton ROM would really speed up the graphics. It's been done (Fractor, by Jason Rukman - you don't happen to know him?), but I can't find him.. Diddo for how to access the inker directly. And for info on how to make an OSX app to connect to the internal Dock application, or having the source to the NewtonScript byte-code compiler to make a replacement for NTK. Heck, the whole darn source code for the OS would be nice to look at, as I'd think that there's nothing of particularly "strategic value" in there (except for legacy SE QuickDraw routines, which are just that - legacy) On a more ambitious note, info on the hardware specs would be useful, especially with regards to replacing the display, or perhaps putting in a larger one.
I ran across a post somewhere talking about the mounds and mounds of neat techology that Apple is just sitting on - QuickDraw GX, PowerTalk, KeyChain (off the table now, as it's in the OS), QuickDraw 3D (mostly supplanted by Quesa, but they still have some neat 3D-user-interface ideas for a mythical "Quickdraw 3D 2.0") and saying that Apple should release these gems as open-source. Put a moderatly restrictive licensing agreement on it saying that it can't be used in commercial software without written authorization from Apple (but that would invole $$$ on Apple's part to process requests, and you'd have to hire an army of lawyers to go after M$ if they tried to steal it.)
Hmm, any posibility of forming a "Coalition to Free Apple Technology" ("Apple Toys want to be free..."), and the prayer of getting an ear on the board of directors?
Miffed,
Jim Witte
jswitte@bloomington.in.us
Re: Low-level specs for "dead" Apple tech (Score:2)
One easy reason: Apple makes most of its money on hardware sales. They don't want you to keep your old stuff running; they want you to replace it with a new Mac instead.
It would be nice if they released all of their discarded software as public source [apple.com], but hiring someone to sort through the old code files and tech notes costs money that a tech biz is hard to afford in these lean times. Maybe someone could convince Jordan Hubbard to let them do it as a volunteer?
Re:Figured he'd do that... (Score:1)
You're a god damn yellow belly, there has never been strickter security around air travel and you chicken out!
Mac OS Rumors was wrong! (Score:2)
AppleInsider was right! (Score:2)
Re:AppleInsider was right! (Score:1)
Apple donates $1M and iBooks (Score:4, Informative)
Apple will also be donating an iBook to each of these families with children.
Re:Apple donates $1M and iBooks (Score:1)
Re:Apple donates $1M and iBooks (Score:1)
True Colors, Shining Through (Score:1)
Good for Apple.
Good for MS.
Bad for
I can see the logic (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I can see the logic (Score:2)
Good move (Score:1)
Apple Expo 2001 (Score:3, Insightful)
Jobs has an excuse now (Score:2)
The show would have been very weak, with another Jobs keynote just about the Mac OS X upgrade.
Now the terror threat comes in very handy to cancel the fiasco show.
Re:Jobs has an excuse now (Score:1)
Good Move, but... (Score:1)
-Sean
From the press release... (Score:2, Funny)
Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh.
Good work back in the 70's and 80's, but - what have you done for us lately? ;-)
(Yes, that was a joke. When a dual G5 hit's the shelves with MacOS 10.1, I'm probably buying one!)
Careful... (Score:3, Funny)
Hate to say it (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hate to say it (Score:2)
Re:Hate to say it (Score:2)
We cannot allow these dirtbags to change our way of life, both as Americans and as citizens on the world stage. What happened on Tuesday was terrible, but it was (as far as existing data indicates) essentially unpreventable for we Americans living the lives that we do. Freedom comes with a price, and that price is danger and risk.
We could change.
we could close our borders to all Arabs.
We could have full time tracking of all citizens.
We could require people to be naked and locked up on all airline flights.
I don't want to live in that country. I am willing to take the chance that there is some crazy asshole out there who wants to kill me. The reason I am willing to take that chance is because the rewards that I and that the rest of the country get are so very great.
We cannot live in fear. If we do so, they win.
Re:Hate to say it (Score:1)
Certainly not New York, because New Yorkers have been living without most of their personal freedoms since as long as I can remember.
Safety first. Check Maslow's Hierarchy for further reference.
Re:Hate to say it (Score:2)
Re:Then don't... (Score:2)
Jobs's full letter to employees (Score:5, Informative)
Message from Steve
From: Steve Jobs
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Message from Steve
Team,
Last week's devastating and tragic events have touched everyone at
Apple. We are all grieving for the victims and their families.
Thankfully, no Apple team members were among them. I know many of
you have taken time to support various relief efforts, give blood,
and support those around you. We all appreciate your extra efforts
to do so.
I want to let you know that Apple is donating one million dollars to
the families of the firefighters, police and other emergency
response personnel who lost their lives, through the American Red
Cross Disaster Relief Fund. In addition, we will donate one iBook to
each of these families with children this holiday season.
Also, today we are announcing the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001,
which was scheduled to take place in Paris on September 26-30. We
are very sorry to disappoint our customers and developers, but their
safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very
visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at
this time would be irresponsible.
We are also taking extra precautions to insure our safety. Apple
security will remain on heightened alert at all our facilities
around the world for the foreseeable future. Please immediately
report any suspicious events or personnel to security.
It's going to take time for the world to return to "normal", and
some things will never return to the way they were. The next few
months may be rocky. Please take the time you need for your
families, and please lean on one another. Together, we will all get
through this.
I want to commend everyone for their efforts throughout this
difficult time. As always, I am very proud of this team.
Steve
Re:Jobs's full letter to employees (Score:1)
This is stupid, just what these terrorists want! It's not them bringing society on its knees, it's stupid and cowardly decisions like this one of Steve Jobs that is causing the damage.
Security has never been tighter around air travel then right now.
I'm disgusted!
Sigh! (Score:1)
large crowds.
I'm wondering if there's going to be a Superbowl, Academy Awards...
:-(
Re:Sigh! (Score:1, Offtopic)
I'm sure a good many people who will be planning the security have read The Sum of All Fears [amazon.com], and think of it as a worst-case scenario. This year we'll probably see fighter jets patrolling the skies for a good distance around the stadium, and possibly a military presence providing security on the ground. Metal detectors at every entrance. We'll probably see much the same at the Olympics in SLC.
~Philly
Re:Sigh! (Score:1)
The thing is, the French were incredibly efficient about it. Every stadium had a several block area around it cordoned off where only ticket holders could go. To get into the stadium itself you were frisked. They had a set of male and female military types that exceeded the number of lines, so there was no backlogged to be frisked. The people doing the work were unbelievably efficient...I repeatedly saw the smallest Swiss Army knives (the keychain type) caught, and they were given to a booth where they could be retrieved after the game.
It added no time to getting into the game, and it really added a sense of safety within the stadium. Certainly there were games that were tough to control (England/Tunisia, the game where a German hooligan attacked a police officer), but I thought the French did an incredible job.
My point is, done well the extra security is no burden and allows you to enjoy the game. Further, I felt no lack of privacy or violation of basic rights at not being allowed to carry a knife into a game, particularly since I could just pick it up at the booth afterwards.
This reminds me of the 80s (Score:2)
Get back to life (Score:1)
Jobs can't be serious (Score:2, Interesting)
If anything, we should be promoting these kind of event, not just to show that our lives continue on despite the terrorists attempts to change them, but also to help bolster the airline industry. If things don't pick up quickly, even with the gov't bailout, several of the majors may go down this year.
The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. (Score:1)
No, I was going to be flying out tonight. It was starting tomorrow. I doubt that air travel is sufficiently close to normal for most participants to get there. My plan of bringing along my two sons was definitely out and I'm still not sure about the postponed conference.
Re:The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. (Score:2)
They really ought to close it permanently. It's an anachronism. Unfortunately now would be a psychologically bad time to do so.
Protest over France's 'cool reaction'? (Score:1)
disagree (Score:2)
I would confidently say that Apple had no political angle on this. I would suspect that Apple is primarily concerned about the logistics of people travelling all over the world to attend the conference. In addition, a sparcely attended event would only further aggrivate economic troubles that Apple will be facing from this tragedy. Like it or not, the terrorism has taken the wind out our sails for a little bit. I'm sure we will all get along with life once a critical mass of society feels normal again. That time hasn't been reached yet.
Re:disagree (Score:1)
France calls for American 'reason'
By Harry de Quetteville in Paris and Toby Helm in Berlin
(Filed: 14/09/2001)
POLITICAL leaders in France and Germany urged President Bush yesterday to avoid a belligerent response, as fears grew in Europe of the consequences of swift and ruthless military reaction to the terrorist attacks.
Lionel Jospin, the French Prime Minister, said the Americans should be "reasonable" in their response. Alain Richard, his defence minister, said the attacks were "not acts of war".
M Jospin said: "We must vigorously condemn and combat terrorism. But we must not allow ourselves to be led into considerations of a conflict between the western world and the Islamic world, where we have many friends and partners."
The remarks from the Socialist prime minister were aimed at reassuring both the France's political Left and its Muslim population, which numbers six million. But they will be seen as further evidence of disagreements between France and America on big foreign policy issues.
The comments by M Richard will also undermine American confidence in France's commitment to joint reprisals as outlined by Nato members on Wednesday. He said: "I think that this was a terrorist attack of particular gravity.
"American democracy is clearly endangered by such action, but in my opinion a war is something else entirely." France disagrees with US policy on missile defence, the bombing of Iraq and what it sees as American cultural imperialism.
France's maverick health minister, Bernard Kouchner, went as far yesterday as to put the attacks down to a "series of errors" by America. "America's made a real mistake in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which was to train the Taliban," M Kouchner said.
"To think now that there is some kind of consensus of 'honourable' nations against the 'bad' terrorists, is simply not true."
Dissapointed in Apple (Score:1)
I wish Apple would have been a little cooler about the whole thing. At least they are finally catching up.
Yuck.
Re:Dissapointed in Apple (Score:2)
Snapshots from around the Web on 9/14/01 [webwizardry.net]
Re:Dissapointed in Apple (Score:1)
And so did another 800 million Europeans, Wow!
Security concerns? In France?!? (Score:1)
Re:Security concerns? In France?!? (Score:1)
It means: military people under the Eiffel tower. Every trash can in Paris is removed (it's not a joke...) and Jets with missiles at 10min of flight from Paris.
So France should be about as secure as the US...
Quentin
the answer is here : Mod this up (Score:1)
Many major events are canceled because of this very tight security measures.
logistics (Score:3, Insightful)
Many companies nation, and even world-wide have issued directives stating that 'no one will be forced to fly'. Can you blame them for cancelling an event that may have been plagued by the resultant no-shows of the exhibitors? Business-wise it makes sense, and then, given that they are a prominent American corporation, the over-arching safety concern makes it a very sound decision indeed.
also add... (Score:1)
More emphasis on Seybold? (Score:1)
Re:More emphasis on Seybold? (Score:1)
I really don't follow this... (Score:2)
This is the wierdest PR excuse for a chnage of direction I've ever heard. Can ANYONE make sense of it for me??
Frankly the US Airliens need the business, if Apple really was concerned with the fall out from this attack I'd thnk they'd want to help promote intercontinental flight...
Re:I really don't follow this... (Score:2)
I think it is a good call.
Kitten in the mini-blinds (Score:2)
Re:Dumb move... (Score:1)
So be it, the trick is that we'll rebuild the World Trade Centers and surrounding buildings. We'll have Federal security instead of the lousy $6/hr wannabe's that will let you on a plane with a Bowie knife. It will be a safer than it was before, and not giving up any personal freedoms. But now, we all have a common goal to focus on, and this helps keep at bay the internal problems we've had in the past.
Maybe after this is all over with, we can have the military ACTUALLY patrolling the borders and keep more drugs/terrorists/etc. out of our country!
WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:1)
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:1)
Except that passengers can no longer carry even plastic knives or fingernail clippers. Typical reaction to disarm the public to 'protect' them from crime.
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:2)
My guess: nuclear bomb on a boat in NYC's harbor. You read it here first.
-jon
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:1)
I think you're definitely on the right track...however I disagree with you on where--I think they are gonna go West and give up the East for a bit.
See, these terrorists are really big on the symbolism thing...not just any building--but the WTC--not just any airline, but the two big ones--AA and United (in the old days, it woulda been TWA and Pan Am.)
So given that, and choosing something with lots of symbolism, I say the Golden Gate bridge and other areas in SFO.
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:2)
Either way, the US can't win unless we're willing to kill about a billion people first. We're not. We'll lose.
-jon
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:2)
Really? Then Islamic fanatics must be losing their nerve; the wars of conquest which spread Islam killed more, (pro-rated to the current world population).
I don't think the Muslim fundamentalists will stop until every Christian and Jew (and non-fanatical Muslim) on the planet is dead. What they may not realize is that the world will be destroyed by the US response to these terror attacks. Or perhaps they do realize, and want to destroy us all. I dunno.
But if you're right, should you wait for them, or just kill yourself now? Better play it safe. Do it now.
We live to say NO to death. Dying for a cause is easy. Living for one is hard.
-jon
Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants (Score:2)
1. There's no need to clear any sort of customs. The more you move the bomb, the more people might see it.
2. A large cloud of radioactive steam will be created, killing millions more from radiation poisoning and cancer.
3. It's a terror attack. Americans are now scared of planes. A boat-based nuke will make American scared of boats. Slowly, the US cuts itself off from the world, which is what Bin Laden and his ilk wants.
Personally, I think we're doomed to lose this battle because we aren't willing to be nearly as evil as our enemy. It wasn't always like this. As mentioned in an editoral in the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41 213-2001Sep16.html), the US killed 900,000 Japanese civilians (not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki!) in the closing months of WWII. Today, we won't do that, even though the stakes are far higher today than they were against a Japan that was isolated, out of fuel, and starving.
Meanwhile, our enemy hides among civilians, and has no qualms about using anything as a weapon. We have qualms about killing the civilians they surround themselves with. In short, we're fucked. Even after we are nuked and gassed and exposed to smallpox and anthrax, we won't do what's necessary to save our civilization against the Hordes.
Ah well, it was a good civilization while it lasted.
-jon
Re:Dumb move... (Score:1)
ARM was supposed to have a training this week in San Jose, however the same thing happened and the training was canselled...Dumb dumb move.... DUMB!
Re:Dumb move... (Score:1)
Thanks.
Re:Dumb move... (Score:1)
Re:Jobs toys not yet ready? (Score:2)
Re:Apple = USA (Score:1)
Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... (Score:5, Interesting)
After all, they don't have many left as it is...
Strange, they are the only computercompany which didn't made a loss last quarter.
And the iBook and G4 ti is selling like crazy..
Typical anti Apple FUD as always.
Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... (Score:1)
Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... (Score:1)
Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... (Score:1)
The answer is to both questions "If you don't know I'm not going to tell you."
Solution? a lot of coaxing, key/ego stroking and looking in the right places and eventually you'll figure it/them/her out.
Moose.
There are two ways to argue with a woman, neither one works.
Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... (Score:2)
That's right, and they certainly can't afford to give away ONE MILLION DOLLARS and a truckload of laptop computers.
Re:ESR on the WTC Attack (Score:1)
Re:ESR on the WTC Attack (Score:1)
Re:Postponing the inevitable (Score:2)
Well, duh! What did they expect when they decided to use BSD?
Re:Coward. (Score:2)
I predict a lot of large corporations are going to consider following his lead in the very near future.
D
Re:Coward. (Score:1)
Is the FAA allowing private flights yet? They were only allowing commercial flights for awhile...
RE: SGI (Score:1)
As for the next killer app/machine coming from SGI...ha. Thier stock is currently trading at 40 cents a share and are about to be delisted from the NASDAQ.
Apple has shipped many times more machines in the last two years than SGI has, sorry but if anyone is getting a nail in the coffin, it's SGI.
Re:Apple's Future Existance (Score:1)
It absolutely amazes me how someone can talk about nails in Apple's coffin and in the same paragraph reccomend SGI. SGI died when they became SGI (As opposed to Silicon Graphics) They just dont know it yet. Maybe this kind of anti-FUD is enough to raise SGI out of the pink sheets....I doubt it.
Proud owner of 3 mips based SGI's...and 5 macs.
Re:Apple's Future Existance (Score:1)
No deathnails need to be prepaired, Apple has the same market share as Linux. Death, Taxes and Apple. Always gonna be here. They have gone through a lot worse and they always seem to bounce back.
Re:Apple's Future Existance (Score:1)
Re:Apple's Future Existance (Score:1)
Just another half-wit would-be soothsayer fortelling the demise of Apple!
You actually have a problem with an affordable video editing system with dvd burning? If you want to shell out the big bucks for an SGI station, go ahead!
Apple naysayers, like yourself, always find some little nit to pick. "Oh, their hardware is too expensive." Now, you're complaining it's too cheap. Perhaps the only nail being driven into a coffin here is the one that you've hammered in the coffin of English grammar. It's "existence," not "existance"... It sounds like your fiscal abilities are as poor as your English.
Re:I wonder if... (Score:1)
(The canceled Expo announcement was out before the markets closed, and had no effect.)