A Few Baaaaaad Apples 321
SONET writes: "Why aren't all laptops made like this? I'm always putting my lappie in my otherwise empty briefcase. Even if it's just Photoshop/GIMP vapor, I really like the idea of a more rugged shell ... and the design is exceptionally clean. I know there are ruggedized laptops for the military and the like, but they really aren't for the average consumer as I envision something like this could be. The page is in Japanese, but the images really speak for themselves." I'm assuming it's just a mockup, the nicer to be proved wrong about ;) For the Exacto knife-and-firesale crowd though, an anonymous reader whispers that "Some guy modded his G4 Cube to have a Propaganda tile mapped inside the case. Looks excellent. That it does.
Cool... (Score:1)
Old IBM Laptop (Score:2)
Re:Old IBM Laptop (Score:1, Insightful)
And in complete opposition to recent trends in car manufacturing. Huge-assed gas guzzling SUVs anyone?
Feel free to moderate me off-topic :-)
Re:Old IBM Laptop (Score:1)
Re:Old IBM Laptop (Score:2, Insightful)
Minivan
Re:Old IBM Laptop (Score:2, Funny)
Jolly good show! Let's mount an expedition at once. Our destination shall be the Quick-E-Mart on the corner. I'm afraid we'll have to bring our heavy gear, as this is darkest suburbia. Bully!
Ah, yes, and chaps... we'll refill our gas again on the way back to tide us over on the way back.
Re:Old IBM Laptop (Score:1)
My "rugged" three year old laptop has lasted me that long, and nothing ever broke in it... but it's barely portable. It's almost 10 pounds, and about 1.5 inches thick.
My new laptop, a Sony Vaio SR33, is 2.9 pounds and about half as thick as its own external cd-rom drive. It's completely portable, and doesn't seem too flimsy.
Panasonic Toughbook (Score:5, Funny)
Check out the Panasonic Toughbook. [panasonic-toughbook.com]
Re:Panasonic Toughbook (Score:1)
Re:Panasonic Toughbook (Score:3, Funny)
This guy just used a PowerBook G4 for the look and because he's a Mac user. It's not that the PowerBook wasn't rugged to begin with. Of course, now it looks like it's indestructable.
Re:Panasonic Toughbook (Score:2)
Agreed. It's clearly a former iBook. The PowerBook G4 Titanium has black keys on the keyboard, while the iBook (previous and future version) has white keys.
Additionally, extracting a PowerBook G4 from its titanium enclosure with wide-aspect screen and sticking it in an aluminum suitcase with a regular screen would be a crime against nature.
Yeah, I own one. Makes that Mac looks like a toy. (Score:2)
Re:Panasonic Toughbook (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Panasonic Toughbook (Score:2)
Yeah
Our sales force loved those GRiDs. And they weren't astronomically expensive, either.
Re:Panasonic Toughbook (Score:2)
It's been done before (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:It's been done before (Score:4, Funny)
I still have mine around, somewhere.
Re:It's been done before (Score:2)
Very cool (Score:2)
why? (Score:2)
So the first thing you do is rip it out of it's case into something you built? If you're going to risk destroying a computer, why not start with cheapo x86 hardware instead? You don't even have to buy a case!
Re:why? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm not trying to sell Apples here, I'm just saying, I work with them every day, and they're not overpriced, especially considering the greater number of features you get. Come on, even the Sony laptop doesn't have a standard CDRW (or even CD-ROM), you have to add that on.
Re:why? (Score:2, Flamebait)
1. No PC card slots.
2. Can't drive an external monitor at high resolution (1024x768). Apple has intentionally crippled this computer and it's a shame.
As to the TiBook, sorry, it is overpriced. I'll even agree that the G4 is twice as fast as an equivalent x86. That makes it equal to the 800-1ghz range. A Dell with 1600x1200 screen, FireWire, ethernet, and wireless networking can be had in that range for $600 less than the Ti.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
The thread is not about how crappy dell is (they are), the thread is about how the only way to get decent pricing from Apple was to buy through their educational store.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:5, Informative)
1. Don't need PCMCIA cards on the iBook. It has USB, firewire (IEEE1394), 56k, and 10/100 ethernet.
What PCMCIA would you commonly need besides this. (you say token-ring and I kill you.
2. Incorrect. The iBook does drive external monitors at 1024x768. It does this in a video mirroring method where the same display on the LCD is echoed on the monitor. If you could turn off the mirroring function, the external display could get 1600x1200 at millions of colors.
The Ti wasn't meant to compete with bland ole Dells, it was meant to show up the sleek VAIOs. Comparing Apple to Dell is like comparing apples and lemons. (yes, I meant lemons. Dells have consistently gone bad on me, in laptop, desktop, and server form. Lousy hardware that a Dell tech has to come running to replace while I sit in downtime.)
Re:why? (Score:2)
That's right, but you can't. Thus, you can only get 1024x768, no matter how big a monitor you have. Let's not dance around the issue, the issue is it should work, but it doesn't.
Re:why? (Score:2)
They are a way of 'future proofing' your computer. They really can help extend the lifespan of your computer.
Sure, you have a 10/100 and 56k built in - but what about next year's tech?
A perfect example would be 802.11b - 3 years ago, no one had heard of it, now it's commonplace. Thanks to PC card slots, you can easily add that technology to your laptop.
The same goes for USB and Firewire... now they are commonplace, but not on older machines. You can easily add them via PC cards.
The iBook, 3 or 4 years from now, will be a lot less viable due to Apple's ommission of the PC card slot.
Finally, I will point out 56k internal modems are standard on almost every PC laptop, and internal 10/100 can be had on many as well (Leaving you with 2 free PC card slots).
Re:why? (Score:2, Insightful)
The iBook also has USB and Firewire built in. I don't really know what an iBook would need a PC card slot for.
It seems to me that the PC card has been used mainly to cope with the inadequacies of PC laptops, such as the lack of 10/100 and 56k. I think that some of the VAIOs still don't have 10/100, or else they need a dongle.
I'm not so sure that I'll suffer for the lack of a PC card slot. Much more important is the slowed down bus.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2, Informative)
Well: USB 2.0, FireWire 2, faster 802.11, gigibit ethernet etc
Those are just too fast for USB/Firewire
btw, the iBook does have a PCMCIA-slot, the Airport socket. It's internal, so you wouldn't be able to connect something to it like a network cable.
(I own one of those dual USB iBooks)
Re:dell w/ firewire? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:1)
But it's best features are the fact that it's 2.9 lbs. and extremely thin.
That, and its a few hundred dollars cheaper than the iBook... about $1063 after tax and shipping.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Without looking more closely at the specs, I'd also bet that the PC card laptops can all drive an external high resolution monitor, which the iBook cannot (it only goes up to 1024x768) since Apple broke the video out on purpose.
Re:why? (Score:2, Interesting)
The MacOS has been proven again and again to be more reliable in the sense that it's more secure and takes less steps to get the same job done compared to any Microsoft OS.
I read from somewhere that in a years time, the average PC user will spend more than 50 hours tech supporting their system, while the average mac user spends less than 5. I'm not too sure about the windows side of the equation, but I'd say that's pretty accurate for the mac side. I've spent maybe...umm..lemme think here. ok. It's been so long that I can't remember. 10 minutes maybe. In a worst case senario, it might be 2-3 hours in a year.
Besides that, MacOS X looks like it has some real potential. 10.1 looks like a winner. They've got about a month to perfect it. Even on that ram retarded icebook it should run semi-decent after the upgrade to 10.1.
It's not just the hardware which commands the premium price, it's all the stuff that comes with it. MacOS 9, MacOS X, itunes, imovie, Appleworks. All of those are in the price of the computer.
Beyond all of that crap I just typed, a lot you guys seem to be making price your first priority when buying something. I don't know about you guys, but USER SATISFICATION comes first for me, then comes price. I always pay a lot of money for stuff I want, but my reaction is always something like, "Yup. I paid a lot of money for this, but I'm damned glad I did!"
Re:why? (Score:2)
station is nothing more than a Lucent/Orinoco bronze 802.11b PCMCIA card in a fancy
enclosure?
Airport is nothing more than slightly-repackaged normal 802.11b, which was around (and also as 802.11) a long time before Apple thought of including it in their products.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:Airport $ (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
Re:why? (Score:2)
It sure is, and that's our point. The CHIPSET is the exact same thing. However, Apple has crippled the computer, either in firmware or software, breaking the ability to use that chipset to output to high resolution displays!
Do you see what we are complaining about now? The capability exists in the chipset, but Apple has intentionally broken that capability. Do you see Sony, IBM, or Dell doing that? No.
Re:why? (Score:2)
I'm not arguing that Apple is the only one doing it, rather, simply that it's a poor decision in this case.
People with $1299 to spend on a laptop aren't going to buy a TiBook, no matter right, right?
So given that they have a budget of $1299, which do you think will sell more - iBook with functional video out, or iBook with crippled video out? Apple's cost is the same in either case. Seems like an easy decision to me!
Apple could sell more systems at the same price, with the same costs, if they hadn't made this decision.
Re:why? (Score:2)
Each may have a 1024x768 external display, but I can assure you they can do a much higher resolution when attached to an external display... if the specs seem to imply otherwise, they are probably in error.
All the IBM's and Dell's at the office can drive high resolution displays, regardless of the internal resolution. It's a neccessity for business presentations. Unfortunately, that is not true of the iBook.
Re:why? (Score:2)
I'm sorry, but you are wrong. There are two facts about the iBook that can be verified by a quick visit to Apple support. (The URL is linked elsewhere in this article.)
1. The iBook supports only up to 1024x768 on an external display. Got a nice 21" monitor? Too bad, it goes up to 1024x768, and no higher, no MATTER WHAT.
2. The iBook does not do dual display, it can only do video mirroring. (Same content on both displays.) Dual display is crippled on the iBook, reserved for the TiBook.
Mockup? Nah. (Score:3, Informative)
It seems to be a working model. There's a picture of it working here [geocities.co.jp]
I don't think it looks so great. (Score:1)
Re:I don't think it looks so great. (Score:1)
Oh, wait, Ive already got one
Mockup? (Score:1)
You know the speaker works . . . (Score:3, Funny)
Where to order the cases (Score:4, Informative)
Ahh, that's nothing... (Score:1, Troll)
Kaypro [ucdavis.edu] comes to mind, and you didn't have to worry about "sad mac" errors, StuffIT files, or all that jibber-jabber.
Plus, it weighed so much, if you dropped it on anything or anyone, it was destroyed, period. Try doing that with your neat little Photoshop laptop!
Rugged? Try Titanium (Score:1)
Titanium? Tough? Hah. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Rugged? Try Titanium (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Rugged? Try Titanium (Score:2)
The main body of the machine is very very sturdy but unfortunately only cover the outer edge of the machine, not the bottom.
A friend dropped his machine rather spectacularly and broke the screen and the titanium frame. Everything else survived but he had to pay $$$ to get the broken parts replaced.
Re:Rugged? Try Titanium (Score:3, Interesting)
Check out the cool Ti bike stuff at Litespeed [litespeed.com]
Ti is nice, but there is nothing necessarily indestructable about it.
P.S. If you really ran a TiBook over with a car, it would be completely destroyed. You can flex the screen a scary amount by hand. (not that x86 laptops are any different).
how protective is the titanium (Score:1)
not as perfect, not as clean, but... (Score:1)
shit -- this is what i meant (Score:1)
www.auburnskies.com/briefcase.jpg [auburnskies.com]
Actually it is not a mockup but a real computer (Score:1)
It's all about the benjamins! (Score:3, Flamebait)
Most consumers want a small, light portable computer which pretty much eliminates ruggedness from the design (the current iBook and a few others being partial exceptions to the rule). You make up the difference with padding - ie, a really nice tote that provides the extra protection. It's a good enough compromise for most.
iBook Clamshells are quite durable as well. (Score:4, Insightful)
I stand firm behind my assertion that Apple makes the most durable and usable consumer grade notebooks available. OS X is still a little rough around the edges, but to have Mac classic and BSD running at the same time without major hakkij you can't beat it.
Re:iBook Clamshells are quite durable as well. (Score:2, Flamebait)
Don't worry, you aren't missing much. The new iBook can only drive an external display at 1024x768, and no higher, even though the ATI video chip supports much higher resolutions.
Why? Because Apple intentionally crippled it to make you buy the TiBook. Unlike Dell, Apple can't justify the cost of the higher end with faster chips (they don't exist), so they have to cripple the low end to make the top end look good. Shameful. Makes me sad to be a shareholder.
Re:iBook Clamshells are quite durable as well. (Score:2, Interesting)
The TiBook has a G4 chip. The iBook has a G3 chip. Even though they are both 500 MHz, the different architectures = a sizable speed difference. Also, Apple makes up to a 800? MHz G4 chip.
Of course, this makes it all the more pathetic to dumb down the iBook in other ways. Not only is the display an issue, but also the slow bus. Apple is not a friendly company.
Re:iBook Clamshells are quite durable as well. (Score:2)
Re:iBook Clamshells are quite durable as well. (Score:2)
To reiterate - the iBook will do 1024x768 on both it's internal and external display, but no higher, even if you have an external monitor capable of 1600x1200.
Although the video chipset is capable of 1600x1200, Apple crippled it so it won't work at anything higher than 1024x768. That is a verifiable fact.
Re:iBook Clamshells are quite durable as well. (Score:2)
I concur (Score:2)
I miss my handle on the new iBook. I understand that the display hinge precludes one, and given the choice I'll take the extra 1" the hinge gets me, but I still miss the handle.
Selling a Book (Score:1)
Also, the Japanese version of Mac Wire has an article [zdnet.co.jp] about it. (But I have no idea what it says)
I did a search for "Halli Mac" on google. Apparently, the Japanese Mac-enthusiast sites are all over this. But I have no idea what they say either.
Probably just another neat case mod.
Yes, it's real. (Score:3, Insightful)
But seriously, WFT is that "Bad Apples" story title? Seems to me this is a GOOD Apple, or is
Re:Yes, it's real. (Score:1)
Re:Yes, it's real. (Score:1, Offtopic)
"He's a bad mother--"
"Watch your mouth!"
"I'm just talkin' 'bout Shaft."
"And we can dig it!"
Dig a Shaft, get it.. wooboy.
Do your best moderators! I'm woefully off-topic and I don't care!
Re:Yes, it's real. (Score:2, Insightful)
For some reason the word "bad" has started being used to mean "very good". As is "bad-ass". Ah, kids today...
Re:Yes, it's real. (Score:3, Funny)
Well you're probably Japanese, so I'll cut you some slack. Go rent Pulp Fiction or Shaft, and picture Samuel L. Jackson saying, "Those are some Baaaaaaaaaaad apples!"
Actually, he'd probably say, "Those are some baaaaaaaaaaaad motherfuckers!" But they can't print that on Slashdot.
Tupperware (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Tupperware (Score:4, Funny)
It would sure make those 3am Taco Bell cravings much easier to deal with the next morning.
Commercially available here (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.dolch.com [dolch.com]
The metal briefcase style fall under their "rugged laptops" category. I haven't used the laptop, but I've used the "rugged portable with slots" style case, and can vouch that it is very high quality (filtered fans, shock mounted everything, etc.).
-- Chris Caudle
Well, they do exist... (Score:3, Interesting)
Doesn't look too bad either..
Some features:
* Shock-restistance
* Spill-resistance
* Vibration-resistance
* Dust-restistance
* Magnesium casing
http://www.panasonic.com/computer/notebook/Defaul
Just wait to type... (Score:1)
Sure, neat, pretty. Practical? Not really... that'd be a complete bitch to type on unless you used an external device.
Looks pretty old (Score:1)
I will be impressed when... (Score:1)
Ruggedize this (Score:1)
This reminds me of... (Score:4, Funny)
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~tw/serv.jpg [cmu.edu]
Re:This reminds me of... (Score:2, Interesting)
The aluminum (well, metal covering some cheap fiberboard) cases they sell for $10-$20 at Home Depot. They are _exactly_ the width of the motherboard + 1" (leaving enough room for you to mount the motherboard backplate inside). They are tall enough for whatever peripherals you want inside, and are long enough to fit everything comfortably.
They aren't too hard to cut up, and you end up with a sheilded, easy to lug about computer that only has to be opened (via the EZ-open latches) for servicing!
Best $10 I spent in quite a while.
Re:This reminds me of... (Score:2)
Though for LAN boxen, yes, those large toolbox suitcases do work pretty well.
Haha (Score:2)
some translation (Score:2, Informative)
CD-RECORDER DRIVE
It has a cd-r drive for imac, CDR-I420/IM(SONY CRX510E), made by Melco.
It is very useful when I work aborad. It makes it easy to transfer large data to Windows-using clients.
POWER KEY
The power key is solid aluminium. The same for the reset key.
SPEAKER
The speaker consists of a mesh of aluminium and a ring made of solid aluminium.
TRACK PAD
The button is made of solid aluminium. It feels wonderful when you click. Also, it prevents miss-clicks.
SLEEP LAMP
I made the sleep lamp out of a solid acrylic. It flashes when the mac is sleeping. Together with the apple mark, this is important for the look.
APPLE MARK
I made this apple mark by casting graphite-colored epoxy-resin into a mould I made with silicone by taking the shape of the apple mark on a blueberry ibook.
It glows softly by the light of the LCD backlight. (put your mouse pointor on the picture --novastyli)
PORT
The USB connector, whose position is a shorcoming of an ibook, was moved to the back, beefed up to a four-port hub. Of course, all other connectors are also on the back.
AIR MAC (Mech Mushroom)
It contains an air-mac inside. It works great when I work at places near my home, such as a park or a cafe.
Something On Topic (Score:2, Informative)
Anyway, some real info:
First, I read through the whole thing including his guest book (BBS link) and it looks like the real thing. He claims that his making of section will be in the August edition of Mac Life (Japanese Mac magazine). I will see if I see it on the stands before I head back to the states. Ok, just searched the web real quick and...presto:
Mac Life [bnn.co.jp] does have an article about this! So it is real.
Also, in the guest book section he says that he is working on a Halli Mac 2 based on the new iBook.
Cool - 17 years late (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:how (Score:1)
Re:how (Score:1)
Re:how (Score:1)
Re:here's why (Score:1)
Re:here's why (Score:2)
However, the price/performance ratio is still horrible. Let's say a G4 tower really is twice as fast as a Pentium IV 1.4ghz. The Pentium IV is half the price! So it still has double the cost-effectiveness. Athlon is even better.
Apple would have to market the G4 as "four times as fast" to make them price competitive.
Re:here's why (Score:2)
You're right. Thank you for completely ignoring the topic at hand and validating my statement.
The price difference is awfully huge if your only reason for buying one is to be "unique". If that's all you care about buy a $30 PC case and paint it.
Re:here's why (Score:2)
Example - G4 733mhz is as fast as a Pentium IV 1.5ghz. Sounds great, right? Except that the G4 tower STARTS at $1799! You can buy an 'equivalent' speed Dell for 1/2 the price.
My point is that even if you accept the fact that Apple's are twice as fast per Mhz, you cannot ignore the fact that they are still more expensive to get an equivalent machine.