Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Desktops (Apple) Portables Windows Hardware

Could the Best Windows 10 Laptop Be a Mac? 435

dkatana writes: Now that Windows 10 is finally out there many people are looking for the best laptop with the power to make the new OS shine. The sweet spot appears to be in $900-$1500 machines from Dell, Asus and HP. But Apple, the company that has been fighting Windows for ever, has other options for Windows 10: the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air. According to InformationWeek there are many reasons to consider purchasing a MacBook as the next Windows machine, including design, reliability, performance, battery life, display quality and better keyboard. Also MacBooks have a higher resell value, retaining up to 50% of their price after five years.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Could the Best Windows 10 Laptop Be a Mac?

Comments Filter:
  • by pubwvj ( 1045960 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:31PM (#50349081)

    Yes, the Best Windows machines are Macs. This has been the case for a looong time. Not only are they less expensive for the lifetime of ownership, longer lives, more powerful, more fully featured but as a bonus you get to use the MacOSX and better integration with iOS. Total win.

    • by real gumby ( 11516 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:43PM (#50349191)

      I have mod points but don't know how to use them in this case: Funny? Insightful? Informative? Flamebait? It's like an all-in-one post!

      • by war4peace ( 1628283 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:49PM (#50349241)

        When in doubt, +1 Funny.

      • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:03PM (#50349365)

        Like Apple or not, they've done a fair amount to force notebooks to be as good as they are today: very high resolution IPS panels, thinness, aluminum bodies, etc. I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

        The only real competitor were the IBM ThinkPads but since those have been sold to Lenovo, Apple is about the only computer make who is capable of creating a decent notebook computer without just blatantly ripping off someone else's design.

        Consider the Dark Ages of notebooks just a few short years ago. Crap from Dell and the others were sporting 1024x768 resolutions on crap LCD displays and were thick, heavy pieces of garbage. My ThinkPad T43 from 2004 had a 1400x1050 IPS panel and 5 years later, outside of CPU, the enterprise class machines actually had worse specifications!

        • Just to be the contrarian, they're also responsible for chiclet keyboards everywhere. The Commodore PET 2001 was panned for having one!

        • And yet, work got done on those old crappy Dells. Many of them still work just fine, for their owners of them at least.
          • You can say that again. This is the first year the Holy Grail of Dell XPS 512 meg XP's being the defacto standard of work for me.

            Those things lasted forever well past what should have been retirement. Shoot I remember 1 gig of ram being standard by 2005/2006 so these are probably from 2002 which ran for 10 freaking years

        • by rsborg ( 111459 )

          I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

          You'd be wrong then. Mac laptops are some of the few remaining that even support 16:10 while most PC laptops are 16:9. I mean, yeah, I prefer 4:3 but it's actually a huge difference to lose the last 10% of vertical space as you go to 16:9.

          • by TWX ( 665546 )
            That's why they can have my Alienware M17 when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          The best win7 boxes were Macs, I'm disappointed they stopped supporting Win7 via bootcamp, but I can't imagine the other players in the field will beat them for Win10. The PC industry is mostly now focusing on large buying corporate customers who want cheap, and don't care if things break, don't quite work right, or annoy users (read employees) who are being paid to put up with it.

          The gauntlet is there for someone to make a quality laptop and desktop that is not Apple, and provide full system test & sup

        • Like Apple or not, they've done a fair amount to force notebooks to be as good as they are today: very high resolution IPS panels, thinness, aluminum bodies, etc. I will ding Apple for seemingly starting the widescreen fad.

          I ding Apple for designs that discourage serviceability: Non-removable batteries, very difficult to access HDD / RAM, etc.

        • by Mousit ( 646085 )

          ...very high resolution IPS panels...

          Consider the Dark Ages of notebooks just a few short years ago. Crap from Dell and the others were sporting 1024x768 resolutions on crap LCD displays and were thick, heavy pieces of garbage. My ThinkPad T43 from 2004 had a 1400x1050 IPS panel and 5 years later, outside of CPU, the enterprise class machines actually had worse specifications!

          I was with you right up to that part. Apple lagged woefully behind in screens for a very long time, unless you're forgetting that the 15" MBP was 1440x900 right up to mid-2012, long after other laptops had gone to at LEAST 1680x1050 (or 1600x1200 for 4:3) for the same size screen, with some even using 1920x1200. The 17" model was better, at 1680x1050 to start out with and then quickly moved to 1920x1200 in late 2008. However 1920x1200 had been fairly common on other 17" laptops already by that time. At

    • Although you can boot Windows on a Mac, you don't have to do that. Windows, including Win 10, can be run safely in a Parallels or VMWare sandbox.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      And, as a bonus, I can finally move up in hipster rank from "Outsider" to "Posuer."

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward

        You still have a long way to go, young padawan:

        Level 0 -- Outsider
        Level 1 -- Poseur
        Level 2 -- Johnny Come Lately
        Level 3 -- Mainstream Trend Follower
        Level 4 -- Whatever, dude
        Level 5 -- Tolerated
        Level 6 -- Hipster
        Level 7 -- Douchebag
        Level 8 -- Pretentious Douchebag
        Level 9 -- Uber Douchebag
        Level 10 -- Shia Labeouf

    • Wrong (Score:5, Informative)

      by Luthair ( 847766 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:54PM (#50349809)

      They do not last any longer than any business class hardware, they are no faster than any other laptop (I guess other than a pcie SSD which really doesn't translate into noteable improvements)

      As someone who has spent the last 5-years using macbooks with windows installed for work there are massive downsides. The keyboards are awful (bad layout and bad feel), they run very hot, and the battery life is poor. Both the last two points are Apples fault for disabling various power CPU states and using a proprietary GPU switching solution which they do not provide a driver for leaving Windows with access only to the integrated GPU.

      If you're a Windows user you should not by Apple unless you absolutely need to have access to OSX, and even then you should consider a Windows laptop and a mac mini which combined will probably cost less.

    • I'm a pro-Linux bigot and don't buy any Apple products, but in all honesty --- Apple hardware is probably the best anything for anything, if you don't mind the price (and don't want to do your own mods/repairs). They make solid stuff that lasts and IMHO no one comes close.

  • by t0qer ( 230538 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:31PM (#50349093) Homepage Journal

    There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP. My HP Envy Beats laptops have a nice aluminum case.

    • by American AC in Paris ( 230456 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:42PM (#50349177) Homepage

      There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value. A lot of PC makers are starting to make machines that look *almost* as nice as a MBP. My HP Envy Beats laptops have a nice aluminum case.

      One reason is that they've poured a lot of effort into materials design, visual design, and industrial design, and have been doing so for years. We laugh at the Toilet Seat, the Cube, and various other goofy flops they've had in their history, but it demonstrates a) just how far back their design efforts go, and b) just how much they've learned since. A lot of other companies are getting into this now, but Apple has a pretty big head start, and they're not showing any signs of abandoning this practice any time soon.

      • A lot of other companies are getting into this now, but Apple has a pretty big head start, and they're not showing any signs of abandoning this practice any time soon.

        It's important to compare apples with apples :)

        I'm only partially in agreement. While HP appeared to continue dumping crappy products 7-8 years ago, it's competitor Lenovo has done a bang up job for a little more money. OS aside, Lenovo has had a decent lineup of laptops if you look at the $700+ price point. Where all laptop manufacturers failed is at providing an affordable SSD option. It took until 2015 to start seeing decent price point offerings for laptops with SSDs.

        The fact is that the Laptop manufact

      • by Osgeld ( 1900440 )

        metal box = effort, got it

      • Funny part is that at least in one case, even the flops have turned into massive sellers later on - the Cube (I owned one) eventually became the Mac Mini (and I would argue that it also became the 'trash can' Mac Pro, given how everything is jammed in there).

        Even their biggest flop, the Newton, had probably laid the misty design foundations for the iPod and iPhone...

        That's the thing, though - they actually pay attention to design, almost to the point of religion. Most other OEMs might at most throw one or t

    • I think part of it is in the nature of OSX. in my experience, and from what I hear from others, windows operating systems tend to be much more demanding with each generation, so you may only get 2 generations of windows on a machine before performance degrades. eg you buy an XP system, it runs vista, it struggles with win7 but barely gets by, and then the machine is tapped out. But due to the way apple designs the OSX upgrades, from my personal experience a new version will run better on my old machine that

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by Solandri ( 704621 )
      PC laptops are nearly always labeled with easy-to-identify model numbers that you can search for on Google or eBay. Apple makes it very difficult for the average buyer to identify which year a Macbook was built, so the neophyte buyer just sees "Macbook" and assumes it's reasonably current. My cousin almost got suckered by this into buying a Core 2 Duo Macbook during the Sandy Bridge days (just before Ivy Bridge's release). His school store was selling it at a "massive" $200 discount. An appropriate disco
      • by Farmer Tim ( 530755 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:45PM (#50349741) Journal

        Incorrect: Apples also have a model number, it's printed in small type on the back/underside along with the power requirements and FCC compliance statement, and looks like A####. For example, I'm typing this on a model A1416, punch that into google and you'll see exactly what I'm using without even having to leave the search result page.

      • OK seriously is that a joke? I have a T61 Lenovo Thinkpad sitting right here. I haven't a clue how to figure out what year it's from. Googling "T61 thinkpad" sure doesn't help.

        With a Mac you just go to "About this Mac" in the always-visible Apple menu, and there you are... "MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013)". They could not make it any easier to tell, unless they etch the year number into the damn aluminum chassis (and who would want that?).

        Apple "makes it difficult" my ass.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by vux984 ( 928602 )

      Three major reasons:

      1) Apple don't make an inexpensive model. They start at around $1000 and go up. People who can't afford a mac but want mac will buy a used mac.

      You can buy a new PC for $300.

      2) Apple only has few SKUs. This makes it pretty easy to know what you are buying. It's overwhemling buying a new PC ... but a used one ... much harder to find out whether that Sony SGH-5512-T(C)-A2 is any good or not, or what it even has. Buying a macbook on craigslist... "early 2012 macbook pro, 2.4GHz 4GB RAM" ...

      • There are iFixit guides for random laptops, and for something as recent as 5 years you tend to get "accidental" cross-vendor compatibility for LCD panels (the 1366x768 15.6") and PSU so you can actually mix parts from different laptops. But brands like HP etc. are dicks and use an identical PSU with a different connector, and all your other points stand.

    • There was a time I understood this during the PPC era of mac, but now that macs run on commodity, non specialized CISC based x86, I have no idea why they retain their value.

      Well, for instance, I have a 17" 2011 MacBook Pro. It's still running strong on Yosemite, despite only having 8 GB RAM & 512 MB Video card. I don't do a whole lot of gaming, but I've been able to still play games like Civilization: Beyond Earth & Deus Ex: Human Revolution Director's Cut, etc. without issue. I mostly use it for writing apps with Xcode nowadays, but it works fine for all other tasks (email, web browsing, etc.) as well. It meets my needs and will probably continue to function well for

      • Well, anecdotal evidence, a guy had some PC laptop with the very first i5 (32nm Westmere, dual core, four threads) which implies year 2010 or 2011 at best, 4GB RAM. Bare Windows 7 with malware. I installed Windows 7 32bit (don't care) with proper security, and the thing just didn't choke ever even when running what's apparently the most heavy task for a Windows PC : Windows Update.
        Damn thing is better than my linux desktop. Powerful hardware is powerful.

    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      Making them out of metal helps. A five year old mac looks pretty good, unless there are actual dents in it. The plastic cased notebooks tend to have the colour start wearing off and/or fading, more delicate plastic bits like vent louvres break, etc.

      Also, having faded, half peeled off stickers for all the hardware manufacturers all over it doesn't help.

  • If you're interested in using windows, keep it on your desktop. In my experience, macbooks mesh a little better in research/workplace environments than windows laptops. For desktops on the other hand, where you might actually need some power (for gaming, design, personal computation, etc), windows is still king of compatibility.
    • If you're interested in using windows, keep it on your desktop. In my experience, macbooks mesh a little better in research/workplace environments than windows laptops. For desktops on the other hand, where you might actually need some power (for gaming, design, personal computation, etc), windows is still king of compatibility.

      So, you're actually going to post on Slashdot that Windows is more "powerful" than UNIX?

      • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:01PM (#50349345)

        I hope your job doesn't require any reading comprehension skills.

      • Are you really going to argue that a desktop isn't more powerful than a laptop?

        The comment was that Windows is the king of compatibility and that desktops are where the power is (faster/more drives, more powerful processors, more memory).

        • by jedidiah ( 1196 )

          > Are you really going to argue that a desktop isn't more powerful than a laptop?

          Mine is. But then again, I don't buy Apple laptops or laptops that try to be Apple wannabes.

          Mac laptops "powerful"??? as if...

        • Are you really going to argue that a desktop isn't more powerful than a laptop?

          Depends on the Desktop and the Laptop, now doesn't it? Are you really going to argue that a $600 Dell POS desktop is more powerful than a tricked-out $3000 MacBook Pro?

          BTW, in case you didn't know, Apple makes at least 3 "desktop" machine-lines; and one of them is pretty damned powerful, and the other isn't so bad, neither. The third one is the economy model; but for a lot of uses, it does just fine.

          And I notice you didn't address the relative "power" of a UNIX-based OS vs. Windows. Wonder why?

  • by QuietLagoon ( 813062 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:34PM (#50349113)
    .... so that might be beneficial if this is correct: A Traffic Analysis of Windows 10 [localghost.org]

    Some Czech guy did a traffic analysis of data produced by Windows 10, and released his findings the other day. His primary thesis was that Windows 10 acts more like a terminal than an operating system -- because of the extent of the "cloud" integration, a large portion of the OS functions are almost dependent on remote (Microsoft's) servers. The amount of collected information, even with strict privacy settings, is quite alarming. ... All text typed on the keyboard is stored in temporary files, and sent (once per 30 mins) to:...

  • Be wary of this if you are used to a windows laptop because not having a dedicated second mouse button takes some getting used to.

    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      Be wary of this if you are used to a windows laptop because not having a dedicated second mouse button takes some getting used to.

      The Apple Bootcamp drivers make it so two-fingered click is right-click. Have to admit, it's pretty damn easy and convenient to use once you get used to it. or if you're using a Mac, it comes naturally.

      • by wbo ( 1172247 )
        The problem is, until very recently the Apple touch-pad driver for Window had a nasty bug that would cause a blue screen of death at random times (usually immediately after a two-fingered click.)

        Fortunately the latest driver update appears to have fixed the problem, but Apple has had numerous bugs in their Bootcamp drivers that have resulted in catastrophic blue screens so I typically try to avoid using them whenever possible. I have much better luck using drivers directly from Intel, nVidia, etc than t
        • Apple's Windows drivers are, and always have been, a total shit-show. Gaping security holes allowing trivial local EoP, lack of power management support so Macs run noisier and have substantially less battery life under Windows than under OS X, lower-performance graphics drivers than the ones from the GPU maker, and (as you say) stability issues.

          Apple has made Windows on a Mac a decidedly second-class experience, and that seems to be by design. Even their user-space software shows it; iTunes for Windows (or

  • by LichtSpektren ( 4201985 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:45PM (#50349209)
    why not advertise for System76 and other companies that sell good hardware with Linux pre-installed?
  • by mamono ( 706685 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:45PM (#50349213)
    There are no MacBooks with touch screens (and unlikely to be one any time soon). All newer Windows versions are so heavily touch-oriented I don't see how the TFA could be true. Even with a keyboard and mouse attached, the touch interface has it's advantages. I often find myself occasionally trying to use my finger to navigate a non-touch laptop and then remember "oh yeah, no touch interface".
    • I wouldn't call Windows 10 heavily touch-oriented. The touch stuff is there, but only in tablet mode. Otherwise, the whole interface, and that includes the "metro" apps, is closer to Win7 than Win8.

      That said, with my touchscreen laptop, it is nice to jab my finger at onscreen buttons occasionally rather than drag the cursor all the way over there.

      • As you say, touch is very helpful even when not using a "touch-oriented" interface. When my girlfriend and I are watching Netflix on her machine, it's a lot easier to poke the screen where the play/pause button appears than to move the mouse pointer to that button, click it, and then move it off again so the playback controls vanish. When using a trackpad, it can actually be easier to do things like swipe up on a taskbar icon (check it out: this does the same thing as right-clicking on the icon, displaying

  • by PopeRatzo ( 965947 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:46PM (#50349219) Journal

    "Could The Best Chevrolet Be A Bentley?"

    Slashdot, where art thou?

    • I'd love to see the look on some pompous limeys face when he popped the hood on a Bentley and found a thumping rat.

      • I'd love to see the look on some pompous limeys face when he popped the hood on a Bentley and found a thumping rat.

        Where I live, the only Bentleys I see are driven by Chicago Bulls players (I live a few blocks from a Bulls practice facility. When I first moved here, I noticed a lot of very tall, very well-dressed black men driving Aston Martins, Bentleys, and a shorter guy (probably a point guard) driving an Audi A8. Once I even saw a Koenigsegg and the guy was coming out of the gym and I was walking th

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • "Also MacBooks have a higher resell value, retaining up to 50% of their price after five years."

    They may maintain up to 50% of their price, but most certainly don't retain 50% of their usability. You're stuck on obsolete programs and OS updates.

    • They used to retain up to 50% of their resale value, before Apple started aggressively obsoleting their own hardware every year or two. They certainly don't now, at least for the former high-end MacBooks that now only match specs with current mid-end MacBooks.

  • I wanted to buy a macbook, but sadly for us french canadians Apple with their great wisdom have chosen the completely retarded https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QWERTY#Canadian_Multilingual_Standard/ [wikipedia.org]

    At least on Windows laptops they still use the old https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QWERTY#Quebec_French/ [wikipedia.org] layout. Like I have on my desktop at work, and everywhere else...

    I've been typing with this layout for the last 25 years, I don't want to change...

    Now get off my lawn!!

  • Nothing more.
    • by WSOGMM ( 1460481 )
      [e-arnold]

      Noo it iz all about da powah. I djust find back-propah-gating weights and pumping ions to be orgasmic.

      [terminate joke]

  • by Sowelu ( 713889 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @02:59PM (#50349327)

    I cringe every time I have to use a Mac keyboard. They're awful. In what universe are they better? They're usually not even full keyboards. The one I'm stuck with at work doesn't even have pgup/pgdn, not even with the fn key. There's holes where you could put them near the arrow keys, too, like a sane laptop, but nooo.

    Okay, I like the extra bucky bit, but that's an OS thing and it isn't worth the price of "nothing on a macintosh has accelerator keys".

    • by Kergan ( 780543 )

      Fn + Up/Down for Page Up/Down works fine on my end. Not sure what you did with your device.

  • by MSTCrow5429 ( 642744 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:03PM (#50349357)
    Nothing makes up for lack of a Trackpoint. Also, the article gives no evidence that Macs retain up to 50% of their value after 5 years, which is a sketchy claim, considering how fast things are improved.
    • by HornWumpus ( 783565 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:09PM (#50349409)

      'Up to' is a weasel phrase. Like 'some scientists believe', anything qualified by this is sure to be pure BS.

    • I used to think so too, but then I tried apple's touchpad. The fact that it's quite large, and handles a variety of gestures make it quite useful. (Not as nice as having an actual mouse, but we're talking laptops, after all.)

      • I used to think so too, but then I tried apple's touchpad. The fact that it's quite large, and handles a variety of gestures make it quite useful. (Not as nice as having an actual mouse, but we're talking laptops, after all.)

        Agreed, I have both a thinkpad and a macbook on my desk right now. The macbook touchpad is much easier to use (assuming you have the drivers... note that bootcamp 6 just landed with drivers for Win 10)

  • Certainly not for the fr-CA locale, where Apple uses a keyboard layout that nobody else uses.

  • People don't buy apples to run windows on them. They buy apples because they cost 1.5x more, hating windows is hip, and the millennial hipsters thrive on conspicuous consumption.
  • by KlomDark ( 6370 ) on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @03:17PM (#50349481) Homepage Journal

    No

  • "According to InformationWeek there are many reasons to consider purchasing a MacBook as the next Windows machine"

    translation: Windows is rapidly losing market share ..

    Wouldn't it be simpler for Apple to pay Microsoft a 'license' for every version sold, similarly to Microsoft extorting an Android 'license' out of the hardware manufacturers. I know of no one on the planet who goes 'OS X is terrible must upgrade to Windows' ..

Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. -- Henry David Thoreau

Working...