How the iPhone Led To the Sale of T-Mobile 276
Hugh Pickens writes "Kevin O'Brien writes that Deutsche Telekom's announcement to sell its American wireless unit, T-Mobile USA, to AT&T for $39 billion ended a decade-long foray into the American market that was undermined, in part, by the advent of the iPhone (reg. may be required). Deutsche Telekom had been generating decent sales from its American operation, but after the iPhone went on sale, sold exclusively at first for AT&T in the United States, T-Mobile USA began to lose its most lucrative customers: those on fixed, monthly plans, who defected to its larger American rivals — AT&T and Verizon Wireless. 'The iPhone effect cannot be underestimated in this decision,' says analyst Theo Kitz. "Without being able to sell the iPhone, T-Mobile was in an unsustainable position and T-Mobile USA became a problem child." Ironically, AT&T's acquisition won't help T-Mobile customers get access to the iPhone anytime soon, as T-Mobile will remain independent, albeit under AT&T's stewardship, for around a year, and won't offer the iPhone to its customers during that period."
this is the weirdest story ever (Score:5, Interesting)
the iphone has zero to do with tmobile being sold, which, in case people haven't noticed, still has to be approved by the government. This deal actually might not be, in which case a lot of people will be happy.
What a joke of an article. It only looks at customers lost from the iphone, and not customers gained once tmobile picked up the G1, their first android phone. Talk about spin.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing to do with the iPhone. (Score:2, Informative)
According to the business sites, AT&T is going after T-Mobile for their spectrum - AT&T is hoping that T-Mobile's spectrum will help them with the connection and quality issues.
It has nothing to do with the iPhone or the Android.
Re: (Score:2)
From AT&T's side, yes. But why should T-Mobile sell it to AT&T in the first place, if it is so wonderful?
You are only looking at the AT&T side of the deal, while the article was looking at the side of T-Mobile.
Re: (Score:3)
What a joke of an article. It only looks at customers lost from the iphone, and not customers gained once tmobile picked up the G1, their first android phone. Talk about spin.
Maybe because the sales of the iPhone are so much larger than the G1. Overall, Android phones outsell iPhone however those sales are spread across different manufacturers and carriers. Until recently iPhone was only on AT&T which was GSM.
Re: (Score:2)
What a joke of an article. It only looks at customers lost from the iphone, and not customers gained once tmobile picked up the G1, their first android phone. Talk about spin.
Spin? This is common sense. The G1 sold maybe a million or thereabouts. Meanwhile, AT&T alone sold about 16 million iPhones last year alone.
On a related note, this is the first time I've felt the need to "hate" the iPhone, as it will directly affect me as a T-Mobile customer.
Re: (Score:2)
Somewhat ironically, the iPhone got me to switch from ATT to T-Mobile - I had a first gen iPhone on ATT, but the service sucked so abysmally in my area that I jailbroke my phone and used it on T-Mobile, the only other compatible network in my area.
I'm on Sprint now, however - they made me an offer I couldn't refuse (hi, 4 lines for 4 HTC evos, unlimited everything including data/"4g" for under $180 USD/month!). I wish Sprint and T-Mobile had merged - Sprint's massive bandwidth that often goes unused + T-Mob
Re: (Score:2)
Are you moronic? If the G1 sold a million (which it has sold far more, but that's besides the point), the question is, what is the ACTUAL loss from iphone versus the gain from the G1?
If Tmobile lost a million people form the iphone and gained a million from the G1, guess what? The iphone had no significance at all.
The "16million iphones" doesn't mean all 16 million people are from Tmobile, dumbass.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you here on a discussion forum to discuss, or just spew? Goodness, manners.
I never said that T-Mobile "lost" customers. I also never said that the G1 didn't "gain" them customers. But on balance, the G1 sales were - in the US - about 1/16 that of the iPhone. Clearly, the iPhone drew more customers to AT&T than the G1 did to T-Mobile. And it seems reasonable that the iPhone also retained more customers for AT&T than the G1 did for T-Mobile.
Re: (Score:2)
What a joke of an article. It only looks at customers lost from the iphone, and not customers gained once tmobile picked up the G1, their first android phone.
And how many did they gain from the G1? Do you have any figures or are you just assuming that a bunch of people will just agree with you without asking for evidence? Anyway, it took 6 months for the G1 to even reach 1 million sales for T-Mobile. The original iPhone, on the other hand, had sold 1 million units in 74 days for Apple and AT&T in the US. So sorry, I don't buy your claims of the G1 being some huge customer gainer when it had anemic sales in comparison to the iPhone. But if you have some
ATT infrastructure (Score:2)
Actually, I think the deal had to do with the iPhone, just not how the article presented it. When AT&T's infrastructure struggled with the high demand of usage for bandwidth since the release of the iPhone, AT&T had to scale up in a hurry. TMobile has a large 4G infrastructure rolled out already, AT&T is working on it. I think that was probably the most important factor in deciding to purchase them.
Re: (Score:2)
I would have liked to see comparable data on Verizon and Sprint defections after AT&T released the iPhone. I don't find this argument at all convincing. It sounds more like either a post-hoc rationalization for dumping an unprofitable investment, or a way to convince Telekom investors that their US problems were all Apple/AT&T's fault.
As an AT&T customer who was recently considering switching to T-Mobile, I'm not very happy about the proposed merger. Now we'll have only one GSM provider in t
The G1? Really? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, the story is hyperbole and conjecture, because most tech articles online are based on dramatic declarations rather than facts. However, your comment is also a bit hyperbolic.
Think about business here. The iPhone wasn't the sole reason but it helped a lot. In terms of subscribers and money, the carriers right now are 1) Verizon, 2) AT&T, 3) Sprint 4) T-Mobile. Verizon has differentiated itself by running on it's reputation of reliability. AT&T differentiated itself by getting the iPhone first. It remains to be seen if AT&T can remain #2 but it has done a good job of locking some people into their service by getting a boost from the iPhone. Sprint and T-Mobile are a distant 3 and 4, because they aren't differentiating themselves well, and because AT&T was stealing their high end subscribers while local smaller outfits like MetroPCS, Cricket, Boost, Amped and others were stealing their low end subscribers. So what you end up with is a smaller T-Mobile and a larger AT&T with lots of cash to start making business deals.
Now ultimately the reason why T-Mobile is being sold is because AT&T bought them. The article makes it seem like AT&T handed T-Mobile a crushing defeat and Deutch Telekom whimpered for mercey and sold their meager T-Mobile branch. Far from the truth. Deutch Telekom saw a money making opportunity, better than what they were making now. There are probably lots of business reasons surrounding it, and DT saw they were getting their asses kicked since 2007. They could continue to operate and try to come up with something new, but quite simply they cashed out when someone made them an attractive offer. DT saw they weren't as competitive as they wanted to be, so they took their money and went home. They might be able to make more money by investing that $39 in their European wireless market... or just invest it in oil futures or something.
As for the G1... seriously? Don't make me laugh. T-Mobiles subscriber base has shrunk since 2007. Period, regardless of what technology AT&T and T-Mobile are offering. You can hardly say T-Mobile gained as many customers from the G1 as AT&T did from the iPhone.
Re: (Score:2)
It hardly is attributed to the iphone for that matter, either. What I was trying to point out was, if tmobile is shrinking, there is more to that picture than the iphone, especially considering that android has more marketshare than iphone now anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually you originally said: "the iphone has zero to do with tmobile being sold". Now you are saying: "there is more to that picture than the iPhone." which is it? In fact the latter is my point, not your point.
And to address your statement: "It hardly is attributed to the iphone for that matter". Actually as I stated it is a large point. The iPhone gave AT&T a large infusion of cash and took away subscribers from T-Mobile, helping to shrinking the T-Mobile user base. One company got bigger, anot
Re: (Score:2)
Where do you think the 39 billion came from? Trees? iPhone tree people then!
AT&T definitely wouldn't be so arrogantly entrenched and flushed with money unspent on coverage/towers without the iProducts sheeple/monkeys.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody can say whether Tmobile gained as many from android as it lost from iphone because nobody has any fucking clue. Only this moron who you replied to believes in the fud.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually you can easily get a clue on this. Just Google [google.com] it. You'll see that the 1.5 million figures first estimated were not corroborated and people think that's the FUD. Also, there are articles about how in 2008 the G1 was the 5th most popular phone, behind the iPhone 3G and 3 blackberry models.
And yet I'm not really trying to prove the iPhone outsold the G1. If you follow my statement, I said it was a fact that the T-mobile subscriber base has shrunk since 2007 overall. The original poster's positio
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, I was one of those folks who switched from T-Mobile to AT&T because of the iPhone. Reception in our neighborhood was bad enough, and after waiting for a couple of years (and seeing how my friends using the iPhone with T-mobile had their own set of problems), I decided to switch.
Ironically, my wife (then girlfriend) also switched from Sprint to AT&T for the same reason.
Re: (Score:3)
In a presentation to market analysts, ATT said this purchase would increase average revenue per user, decrease churn, and improve margins. In other words, they will take more money from each of us, we will be less likely (able?) to switch to another carrier, and they will see more profit from each of us.
None of those give any hint of benefit to the customer. If ATT is brazenly presenting these facts to wallstreet in a public fashion prior to the merger, they must feel their lubricating lobbying activities
Re: (Score:2)
Unlocked? (Score:2)
So why couldn't people buy the iPhone unlocked? As I understand it T-Mobile is the only network in the US that doesn't penalise you for using your own phone.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So you can use a iPhone on TMobile, but it will only be Edge. Same goes for a lot of phones bought with TMobile when trying to use them with AT&T or outside the US.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not a matter of locked-vs-unlocked. It's a matter of frequency. Specifically, AT&T uses 850MHz and 1900MHz for UMTS/3G. Most other countries use 1900MHz and 2100MHz for UMTS/3G. T-Mobile's spectrum happens to be 1700MHz and 2100MHz. IPhone can't do 1700MHz, ergo an iPhone -- even unlocked -- on T-Mobile is never going to get better than EDGE.
It's not a permanent situation. Chipsets supporting T-Mobile's frequencies have been around for at least a few years. The only real question is whether the cro
Re: (Score:2)
That's true. You can actually even get cheaper monthly plans and no contract if they don't subsidize your phone. There's quite a few iPhones on TMO's network.
If you already own your own phone, this is true. A while back I did a side-by-side with comparable plans* from within T-Mobile and with comparable plans from Verizon. For the total cost over a 24-month period, it was cheaper to get a subsidized phone and pay the higher monthly fee than it was to lay out the unlocked phone cost and pay the slightly lower monthly fee.
* Family plan with shared minimum amount of minutes, 2 smart phones, both with data packages, no texting or other add-ons.
Well, T-Mobile (Score:2)
You said no to the iPhone. You and all other US carriers
AT&T said yes
So cry me a river...
Re: (Score:2)
Reminds me of the 6 or 7 publishers who turned down Harry Potter.
Or the studio that let a young director whose name rhymes with "Greedo Shot First" keep sole merchandising rights on a little space-based movie because they figured it had zero potential.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, I didn't rush out and load up on AT&T stock when they got the iPhone, did you?
Re: (Score:2)
No, I don't live in the US and have no personal state in the well being of one of its cellular carriers.
Re: (Score:2)
Because it debuted on AT&T. Then other operators saw the potential.
Don't get me started on German management!!!!!
Also, T-Mobile is much stronger on Germany than in the USA (because it's a subsidiary on the USA), probably like Orange on France
Re: (Score:2)
This was while the iPhone was in development, all Steve Jobs had were some prototypes and 'it's going to be like this and that, etc'
T-Mobile Germany probably only knew about it after the keynote
When they dropped the Palm phones (Score:2)
It would have taken longer for Palm users to switch to iPhones if T Mobile had continued to support them. A lot of Palm users still are on with the $10 data plan, but no help from customer service, you have to work it out yourself. I wonder if I can move my SIM to an iPhone? My Centro is dying.
One word - Flexpay (Score:2, Informative)
The iPhone was a piece of it (Score:5, Informative)
But it wasn't the whole puzzle. Sure, T-Mobile lost some customers to the iPhone over the years, but so did Verizon. The problem is that they were impacted more because they had a smaller number of customers to begin with.
T-Mobile had a particular niche that they served better than anyone else - the deaf community. Rag on the Sidekick all you want, but not only did they work better for the deaf community through pervasive TTY services, they had a specific plan for it, too. They just killed that service, effectively making enemies of some of their most fiercely loyal customers. Similarly, T-Mobile was known for not putting pressure on the handset OEMs to provide Android updates; it's among the most common complaints of Samsung owners.
T-Mobile tried competing with AT&T on the same merits that AT&T used to compete with Verizon. This was foundationally problematic, because they didn't stick to their strengths. "No data overage fees, ever" - that's all they had to say, and they would have had PLENTY of people who have had the pleasure of disputing $300-$800 of data overages. They could have implemented a spending cap to prevent outrageous bills, better advertised their international wi-fi calling, better advertised their bring-your-own-phone programs, and done something like "If you don't love us in 60 days, we'll refund every dime and help you go back to your old service, no questions asked". While I've heard a bad customer service story here and there for T-Mobile, my eight years of being a customer there have been an absolute pleasure. If they advertised that aspect of it, they might have been able to change some minds instead of trying to say "we can do what the iPhone does too"
It probably wouldn't have hurt to make it known that all the handsets they featured in their commercials run Android, just like the Verizon handsets, because lots of people think Android==Droid==Verizon Exclusive.
The fine article is correct in saying that T-Mobile couldn't compete with the iPhone at the hip-handset level. It fails to mention that there were plenty of other places where T-Mobile could have competed against AT&T and Verizon and won out, but didn't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I find it interesting that market analysts consider _handset exclusivity_ to be a credible reason for a network operator to be an unsustainable business.
It's further evidence, in my opinion, that handset exclusivity is tremendously damaging to the health of the American mobile data/voice marketplace. In some countries, tying handset availability to specific network service providers is actually illegal under trade practices acts. It's pretty clear that the current toxic American phone marketplace is greatly
Re: (Score:2)
T-Mobile had, what I thought was, a very innovative feature of their network. They supported a technology called UMA (which T-Mobile marketted under various names; I think most recently as "Unlimited Hotspot Calling").
The idea was that phones that supported it, could make calls over a Wifi broadband internet connection - it used the same basic digital protocols as the regular GSM network, I believe, but just routed the data over Wifi when available, instead of over the cellular network. If you left the wifi
Here we go again... (Score:2)
My wife and I payed good money to get out of an AT&T contract several years ago and went over to T-mobile. We can't seem to get away from that company.
Rate hikes for everyone in 3... 2... 1...
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that worries me. I pay a relatively small amount for 4 phones. Under AT&T's rate plans, I can see my rates go through the roof.
Also, T-Mobile will unlock your phone on request. Lastly, I really like T-Mobile's customer service. They are polite and professional.
The only time I had a billing issue they fixed it, no problem. I've been with them 8 years, and I can see that under this deal I am going to get raped.
I pay $125 a month including all fees. The closest plan I can find with AT&T wil
Anticapitalism. (Score:2)
T-Mobile is cheaper than AT&T. If acquisition = cost performance, everyone will pay less than current T-Mobile rates. But we know that will never happen. Macro business is all about leverage. AT&T had enough of it to make the government cave. Next victim is the consumer who has none of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So quit whining on ./ and send email to the FCC. Don't forget to include name address, and phone #.
Include hard numbers, quoting rate plans and service levels.
http://www.fcc.gov/contacts.html [fcc.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry to burst your bubble, but if emailing, mailing, gathering signatures, or even peaceful protests worked, we'd all have cheaper cable.
T-Mobile customers don't care about the iPhone (Score:3)
"ironically, AT&T's acquisition won't help T-Mobile customers get access to the iPhone anytime soon"
Anyone who really cared about the IPhone, has long ago defected. Those smartphone users who stayed likely have other priorities (like having an antenna that works?).
Re: (Score:2)
"Those smartphone users who stayed likely have other priorities (like having an antenna that works?)."
It was so very hard to make the decision to switch in 2009 knowing that in 2010 Apple would release a phone with a bad antenna.
Another One-Sided Article (Score:2)
I know why AT&T bought them (Score:3)
I think AT&T was just tired of those commercials pointing out how bad AT&T is. Luke Wilson probably wasn't available to run counter ads, so it was just cheaper to buy them.
The more things change... (Score:2)
My first mobile phone was an OKI bag phone ( I was the second most active user in Maine for a while, thanks to the guys at Maine Wireless for all the free minutes), but some time in the 90s I got my first paid-for phone from AT&T WS. I lived through the change to Cingular, then when they went back I bailed to T-Mobile in 2006.
So now I'm being driven back? Like I'm gonna hook up with VZW? And Sprint, the red-headed stepchild of the industry? No.
I got nowhere else to go. 2012 will mark my teturn to t
This is why handset exclusivity is bad (Score:2)
Exclusive partnerships, by their very nature, lock out competition and as such are innately anti-competitive.
Rather than seeing AT&T buy up besieged T-Mo (I use a T-mo prepaid sim in my smart phone, btw. No data plan, I use wifi hotspots for data.) I would rather see handset makers barred from signing exclusive backroom deals-- the whole "Give us $$$, and we'll partner exclusively!" shit has to end.
If the iPhone had been readily available on multiple carriers from the go, then at least two things would
Re: (Score:2)
Hindsight is 20/20.
Remember that it was Cingular that originally had the exclusive iPhone deal, and AT&T bought them out right before the original launch.
No one else *wanted* to carry the iPhone, least of all Verizon, it took too much control away from the carriers, who were used to nickel and diming for every single handset feature like Bluetooth and custom ringtones. Though restrictive in other ways, the iPhone was instrumental in breaking the carrier's grip on power in the US and paving the way for A
How can this happen? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is there no anti-trust regulation left remaining in the the U.S.? Did they throw 'em all out in the trash bin while no one was looking? I am genuinely puzzled.
Nothing. Antitrust does not imply there must be a specific number of competitors in a market; rather it looks at market power and how company(s) exercise it. At any rate, there is more to he US cellular market than ATT/VZW/SPRINT/TM - with various prepaid and other competitors (MetroPCS for example) that give people a choice. You want unlimited calls/text/web for cheap with no contract - it's available just most people don't consider anyone but the big 4.
I was one of them :( (Score:2)
T-Mobile where? (Score:2)
I had considered going with T-Mobile. They had plans that I was interested in. But then I did a search using their site for retail locations and found they had no stores in my state, only payment drop boxes. Apparently they only wanted my business if I wasn't from here originally.
Re: (Score:2)
I had considered going with T-Mobile. They had plans that I was interested in. But then I did a search using their site for retail locations and found they had no stores in my state, only payment drop boxes. Apparently they only wanted my business if I wasn't from here originally.
I've been a T-Mobile customer for 3-4 years now, and have never been in one of their stores.
Mabye not (Score:2)
Maybe it was, specifically, the iPhone, but maybe not. As a long-time T-Mobile customer, my main complaint has always been Tmo's available selection of phones. If I wanted a good phone, I had to buy an unlocked GSM model from outside their usual offering. So, I'm sure the iPhone influenced the situation, but it may have been less the fact that the iPhone was only available on AT&T, and more the fact that it added more contrast between other carriers' good phones and Tmo's selection of crap.
The Nexus
Re: (Score:2)
That may be the direction I go as well. I love my Android phone but I don't like the required data plan. Once the opportunity to break away is given I will just go prepaid and use WiFi only.
Also, I am looking into ways to use WiFi or Google Voice for some other fun and interesting tricks as I want to keep the number I have now. (It's a cool number!... wife's is too)
Re: (Score:2)
Same boat here. I was on a prepaid Nokia e71 before I was lured over to Verizon by the Droid 1. My wife is on the Eris. I absolutely hate paying for two data plans. I can't help but think there are so many better things we could be doing with that money. I regret signing up for the 2 year contract, and will probably jump ship as soon as that is up in November.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Why would a business in this environment bother trying to do something like give people what they want when their audience has essentially no other choice when it comes to getting those services except to do without? What are you gonna do, move to Europe to get a better deal on your mobile service?
How, exactly, would a start-up that was more competitive price-wise even begin to get started and compete when they'd have to either have stupendous amounts of cash to build up their own infrastructure or have to
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm right there with you. I spent quite a bit of time trying to look for another plan that allowed me to either have no data plan or a very minimal and cheap one.
I recently acquired an "older" Verizon phone (slightly more than 2 years old) . I'm content to just use it as a phone that can access wi-fi access points only. However, Verizon told me I wouldn't be allowed to use it with Verizon without buying a data plan. They wouldn't let me do just voice only, and their voice plans were overpriced already b
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd have bought a smart phone if I could get it without a data plan. Instead, the requirement induced me to buy a feature phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is it, that every time I read or hear "data plan", I hear it again in Lenny's voice:
"data plan"
"Lisa needs braces"
"data plan"
"Lisa needs braces"
"data plan"
...
Have been prepaid for years now (Score:5, Interesting)
I switched to prepay about two years ago, having had my share of $50 plus per month cell contracts. Watching people pay $80 or more per month for their phones both amazes me and depresses me. They are still too much status symbol than need so the price doesn't have to be justified in the minds of many. Figure nearly a thousand a year just to have a 'smart' phone, for some its more.
Once you adapt to prepaid phones; this means adapting your friends to the fact you have one too; you rack up a lot of free time. By free I mean, not stuck on the phone or jumping at every e-mail/etc notification. Then to top it off with $50 or more in savings a month you start getting into the habit of looking at other expenses (monthlies) and realizing there is money to be saved everywhere, let alone time. Take that $1000 a year and put it into an IRA. You will get more from that than your cell phone could ever return.
Re: (Score:2)
Prepaid data is available (Score:2)
Prepaid data plans are available [wikia.com], however most are not any cheaper than contract plans, so all you gain is not being locked-in for three years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you get text messaging in that plan too? And does your data plan include navigation? The reason I switched to Sprint because their everything plan including navigation, so I figured using that instead of a standalone GPS was cheaper and worth it. But I would be up for going to VM if it is what you say it is.
And as the other reply asked, how are you on Sprint's network with VM? Not calling you a liar, just curious. Thanks.
Re: (Score:3)
When I'm at the airport, I read the internet without paying to connect to some ridiculous wireless portal.
When I'm on a flight, I'll have about
Re: (Score:3)
When I travel (frequently!), I get public transit info without having to decipher a new set of maps in every city.
When I'm in the grocery store, I can immediately see if what I'm buying is cheaper at the store across the street. (I probably save $25 per month just in comparison shopping this way.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it's nice that prepaid works for you.
But for some of us, prepaid would be the difference between a $130/month phone bill with unlimited voice, data, and text and a $400 - $600 phone bill just for voice with prepaid.
I use the cell phone for work and it's my only home phone, so I'm saving home and business phone bills, and while I suppose I don't have to talk on the phone, it's kind of nice to be able to make enough money to pay my bills, so while the free time might be nice, sleeping under a bridge wou
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's a feature, not a bug. Quit yer bitching.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. Just because a company you used to like goes bad doesn't mean you have to stick with it. Everyone isn't caring an iPhone Being an early adopter was a lot of fun back in the day, when it was about technology and not IP/marketshare gaming. There are two many ways to skin this cat, we can't be forced to do what they expect. There is not a killer app or a killer product. Marketing as though every customer is "typical" or the same won't work because most customers are not "average".
Re: (Score:2)
But, I can understand how the stratigit in Germany would think, "If it helped us so much here, it must be hurting us there. No need to wait for the numbers to organie this deal, they'd only make our market price go down.,"
Re: (Score:2)
No more 3G (Score:2)
T-Mobile supports the iPhone... just no 3G service....
3G service in the US is still pretty close to nonexistent outside of a couple of major metropolitan areas, anyway. If the network isn't there, it doesn't really matter what your phone supports.
And one of the most disturbing prospects of a merger between the two GSM/UMTS network owners is that it's actually going to reduce the incentives for any provider improve that situation with new infrastructure buildout, which is pretty dangerous when the existing incentive is already zero [ibiblio.org].
And we're not just talking
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine you have been handed an iPhone with no instruction manual and no prior experience of it.
The UI is completely unintuitive and non-discoverable. That sucks.
I don't have to imagine. I got mine and started using it without reading any instructions. Oh, except my sister in law had to show me how to open the SIM tray, but that's tricky on just about all phones if you don't know how.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:AT&T paid too much (Score:4, Insightful)
I wonder why the prices are so high in the U.S. when it comes to mobile phones. Currently I am on a plan for 12 €/month incl. taxes (~US$17) with 2000 minutes free.
Re:AT&T paid too much (Score:4, Insightful)
Because what are we going to do, move to Europe to get a better deal on wireless?
The have a captive audience here and the carriers have huge warchests to make sure that strong consumer protections aren't enacted.
Re: (Score:3)
No, I only pay for outgoing calls. And calls within the same carrier are free for me too. SMS is not included. I never got the hang of SMS anyway, so it doesn't make a difference for me. If I was interested in SMS too, I would upgrade to a 19 € plan which includes 1000 free SMS and 1 GByte of data.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
If the article is true, then Sprint has no chance of surviving and it will be two cell providers. I don't really believe the article, but 80% of the market in two carriers pocket is not good.
Does anyone else think it funny/interesting/sad that Deutsche Telekom bought Tmobile USA for $50.7B in 2001, plus another for $2.4B in 2007 and is only getting $39B?
Re: (Score:2)
The handsets sold in the US that accept SIM cards (not all do, as CDMA technology (Verizon and pals) does not make use of them) typically are "Branded"-- EG, they have been sublicensed and resold under the carrier's name, and have advertisements branded on the phone itself. (EG, your apple Motorolla phone also has an ATT logo on it.) Part of that branding practice is to "Touch" the phone's firmware so that it will outright reject any SIM card not made by that carrier.
This is why there is a big underground m
Re: (Score:2)
Damn typos. That should have been "Apple or motorola", not "Apple motorola". Gah.
Carry on.
Re: (Score:3)
In most countries in the developed world, the cellular networks, the towers and backhauls, are built by the government or a quasi-government monopoly and access is leased to retailers who then sell the SIM cards. As a condition of the lease the retailers agree to a regulatory regime that's much more stringent than in the US-- they can't bundle services, they must provide open access to the network, their ability to set prices and services are sometimes subject to legal restrictions, etc., and the system is
Re: (Score:2)
Virgin is just a way to rebrand Sprint's network.
A fast Virgin is OK by me...