Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media (Apple) Media Microsoft Music

iPod Most Popular Music Player on Microsoft Campus 1017

bblazer writes "Wired is running an article about how despite the displeasure of management, the iPod is the most popular music player on the Microsoft campus. The article states that 80% of those who have digital music players have an iPod. Employees have even started using different headphones to be a bit more stealthy about it."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

iPod Most Popular Music Player on Microsoft Campus

Comments Filter:
  • headphones (Score:4, Informative)

    by Darth_brooks ( 180756 ) <[clipper377] [at] [gmail.com]> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:06PM (#11551714) Homepage
    Employees have even started using different headphones to be a bit more stealthy about it.

    Could be, or maybe they just don't want to get mugged. White iPod headphone do a great job of saying "I've got an expensive, easy to steal piece of electronics on me."

    Also, iPod headphones suck. after half an hour my ears started hurting with the old ones.
  • by jo_ham ( 604554 ) <joham999@noSpaM.gmail.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:07PM (#11551725)
    Good god, this old chestnut again.

    Microsoft bought a small amount of non-voting stock in Apple some time ago as part of a deal that kept IE and Office on the Mac platform.

    Microsoft has long since sold those shares, at a fair profit I might add.

    Microsoft doesn't own any part of Apple at present.
  • Re:Why iPod anyway? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Jheaden ( 169061 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:14PM (#11551818)
    Two words... Battery Life

    Most PDAs I've used just don't have the battery life that a dedicated device has. I know mine doesn't (HP iPAQ 1945), although that is the low end of PDAs anymore.

  • Re:Why iPod anyway? (Score:2, Informative)

    by foo12 ( 585116 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:14PM (#11551826)
    To match the capacity of an iPod, you'd need to buy 20, 1GB cards. That's about $1500 for media alone.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:19PM (#11551900)
    And I highly doubt anyone on this team would cut in line at the cafe because someone had an iPod. Many of us have iPods and other players. We don't discriminate.
  • Re:headphones (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:21PM (#11551916)
    you do know that it was made up...?

    Well, I am inclined to disagree [timesonline.co.uk].
  • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) * on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:26PM (#11551978)
    The link in the article that the manager pointed employees to, http://experiencemore, doesn't seem to resolve to anything here - I wonder if that's an internal site, and what is on it? Or perhaps they just messed up the URL.
  • by bigdaddyhame ( 623739 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:27PM (#11551996) Homepage
    Umm... the article said that 80% of M$ employees WHO OWN MP3 PLAYERS use iPods.

    ""About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod," said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous. "It's pretty staggering.""

    then Kahney goes on to contradict himself:

    "The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player -- that translates to 16,000 iPod users among the 25,000 who work at or near Microsoft's corporate campus."

    It doesn't translate to that - it translates to 80% of 16,000 which would be 12,000. Still a significant number.
  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Golias ( 176380 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:30PM (#11552031)
    They did. They also paid an "undisclosed" ammount of money under the table to settle any remaining possibility of litigation over stolen technologies, and agreed on a plan which would allow MS to make future purchases of Apple's OS breakthroughs.

    However, in their haste to hype a "Microsoft buys Apple" story, the press often ignores three important facts about the purchase:

    1. They were non-voting shares.

    2. $150 Million is a very tiny percentage of Apple's publicly-traded shares.

    3. Microsoft has already sold them off, and made a huge profit doing so.
  • Re:I wonder... (Score:5, Informative)

    by soft_guy ( 534437 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:38PM (#11552134)
    I wonder if Microsoft employees use a disproportionately large number of MACs, or are more likely to be Firefox users.

    No, they are not disproportionately Macintosh users compared to the rest of the software industry (unless they work for MacBU). No, they do not hate their employer. No, they are not more likely to use Firefox compared to other software professionals at other companies.

    I base this on having worked there in the past.
  • by The Hobo ( 783784 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:40PM (#11552156)
    If a website contains no TLD or main site name (for example microsoft.com) it assumes it's on a local intranet, so yes it is an internal site, for example here I can type http://ece/ and it will show me the page you would see at http://www.ece.uwaterloo.ca [uwaterloo.ca] since I'm on the uwaterloo.ca domain's computers

    http://experiencemore is likely just an internal pointer to this site [microsoft.com]
    For your information, the same applies for mail servers, so if I send an email from this mail server using the local email service (not a webmail thing like hotmail) I can send an email to a person by sending it to user@engmail for example which, to a person outside the University network would have to user@engmail.uwaterloo.ca

    Hope this was helpful, if you already knew, I'm not trying to sound condenscending...
  • by gunnk ( 463227 ) <{gunnk} {at} {mail.fpg.unc.edu}> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @01:54PM (#11552325) Homepage
    No --

    80% of MS employees have a player.
    80% of those employees have an iPod.
    Total number of employees on campus is 25,000.

    (0.8)(0.8)(25,000)=16,000

    The original article is correct.
  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:5, Informative)

    by AstroDrabb ( 534369 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:02PM (#11552412)
    the only way it threatens MS is in the fact that it totally ignores their pointless, me-too, proprietary .wma crapmat.
    Huh? How is that not significant? Do you have any idea how much money MS spent on their WMA format and DRM? Tons of development cash and marketing cash went into their media format/platform? MS is hoping to get a bunch of royalties off of their media/DRM platform. If their platform is not widely adopted or replaced by AAC/FairPlay, it puts a big dent in potential revenues for MS from multimedia.

    There is also the other factor of exposure to Apple products. The more consumers that buy Apple iPods, the more that may just buy a Mac Mini, eMac, iMac, iBook or PowerBook. That means less revenue to MS for their OS cash-cow.

    I personally hope Apple kicks their butt with the iPod and become the defacto digital music format. The latest home DVD player I bought can play MP3's and WMA files. Maybe the next-gen of DVD players will drop WMA and pick up AAC w/FairPlay.

    MS has a lot to lose if they don't control the major digital music format.

  • by gellenburg ( 61212 ) <george@ellenburg.org> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:08PM (#11552486) Homepage Journal
    The automobile was invented by Mr. Daihmler in Germany.

    Henry Ford invented the assembly-line which made mass-production of automobiles possibles.

    That is, if you wanted one in black.

    Apple did not invent the MP3 player.

    Apple mass-marketed an MP3 player that looekd good, was easy to use, and had the features consumers were craving.

    And no, the iPod doesn't *just* work with the iTMS.

    I use mine regularly with sites such as eMusic, Magnatunes, and other MP3 sites. iTunes likes those files just fine.
  • by sootman ( 158191 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:22PM (#11552671) Homepage Journal
    >Well, it also asumes that 100% of all Microsoft employees have a music player, which I seriously doubt.

    No, it doesn't. God, how many times do we have to do this? The article may not be perfectly written, but here's what it says.

    "The source estimated 80 percent of Microsoft employees have a music player."

    and

    " 'About 80 percent of Microsoft employees who have a portable music player have an iPod,' said one source, a high-level manager who asked to remain anonymous. 'It's pretty staggering.' "

    Got it?
  • by OhPlz ( 168413 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:23PM (#11552683)
    TiVo may be a dead duck soon. DirecTV did not renew their contract with them. Their chairman and president just bolted. His example does support his thesis.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:25PM (#11552714)
    Apple does own the patents on 'quicktime'. But all in all, this wasn't even a patent issue, so much as a copyright issue. Direct lines of code were removed. Its the same with the old wave files were simply recoded apple standard files (those *WEREN'T* owned by apple, but used by them) with reverse byte orders to make them unplayable -- this was before WAVE became WAV and as much of a container file as Quicktime is.

    This is the thing with Quicktime, it is a container file. It is HEAVILY patented on many layers. Steve Jobs didn't own the patent, but he had the inside scoop while he was with NeXT as a former Softie that have moved on to this company had wanted to give him a laugh about his former company that fired him.

    As for owning a patent, you can buy and sell patents at will. The inventors name will be on it, but seriously, you don't know what you are talking about.

    As for bankruptcy -- Apple was never near bankruptcy. This is an urbal legend. They own quite a bit in Silicon Valley propery -- the physicial dirt. At the worst, this dirt was worth almost as much as the intellectual properties and the products they had -- but they could have lived off the rent at the time. The dirty secret of all this is that when their stock was at its lowest, the hard cold properties were worth far more than all the stock valuation combined. It was said that the family of al Saud had actively tried buying the company because it would have been like buying the land for pennies on the dollar. They could have stripped the assets and turned the company back over and still made a lot of money.

    As for extortion, yes and no. If you tell your sister you are going to publish naked photos of her and her boyfriend if she doesn't pay you $100, thats extortion. If you advertise these same photos to the highest bidder -- or merely the first $100 that lands in your lap with your sister having the right of first refusal, its not. Big difference for what ammounts to the same thing. Throw a lawyer into the mix, and most likely it is extortion, but legal extortion. Very few settlements actually ever make it to court. The preferred method to dealing with civil cases is to have it mediated outside the court first, before the courts will ever look at it. If this isn't the case, many judges will order a mediation and order the proceedings closed until such time as both sides meet privately -- and generally with a stern warning that they are not to waste the courts time again.

    As for Apple Fan-boy, I might be. I've also been a consultant to both Microsoft and Apple at a number of times over the last 10 years. I was in Cupertino a three weeks ago. I like dealing with Apple far more than I like dealing with Microsoft, but at the same time, I like the checks Microsoft pays out a little more. They pay on time, and generally don't negotiate on the bill. But its all good.

    Again, I am a Coward, so take this as you might.
  • by naelurec ( 552384 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:27PM (#11552766) Homepage

    I was curious, so I looked up the 10-Q [edgar-online.com] for Apple in summer of 1997..

    Even though they were struggling (year over year), they still had over $1 billion in cash assets, $212 in short term investments, $1.2 billion in A/R .. this compared to around $1.9 billion total current liabilities.

    Granted, compared to the latest 10-Q [edgar-online.com] you can see they are definitely more financial secure right now.. but at the time, I don't think they necessarily needed the cash infusion to stay afloat -- they still had quite a bit of flex room.

  • Re:I wonder... (Score:5, Informative)

    by NaruVonWilkins ( 844204 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @02:32PM (#11552837)
    Excuse me - I'm in the media group, and the only people I know of on my team who have a portable media player have an iPod. In fact, some of the people who work on portable devices have an iPod. I can't speculate as to the reason, but I will point out that Apple is still ahead of the curve in releases. Sure, you can find a little Samsung device that has the same features as the Mini, but it's hard to find. Apple has their own store, and they're a much more recognized brand.
  • by yourexhalekiss ( 833943 ) <herp@nosPAm.derpstep.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:02PM (#11553250) Homepage
    The iPod headphones scream yuppie. I know people who have been mugged for wearing them; if they've got an iPod, and don't mind showing the world how hip and tech-conscious they are, who knows what more expensive gadgetry they have on them?

    /Owns an iPod, loves it, is scared/too embarassed to wear the headphones.
  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:3, Informative)

    by hunterx11 ( 778171 ) <hunterx11@g[ ]l.com ['mai' in gap]> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:09PM (#11553349) Homepage Journal
    The iPod "locks out" the music by putting it in an invisible folder. The directory structure is pretty unintelligble, though, and it relies on an XML database for locating the songs and information. There are third party programs to transfer files, and even a Perl script could probably do the trick.
  • by Reverberant ( 303566 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:15PM (#11553465) Homepage

    Sigh... we've been through this before [slashdot.org]

    Apple demanded $1.2 billion from Microsoft for alleged patent infringements...

    The negotiations that resulted led to a strategic agreement between the two companies in August 1997, one part of which called for Microsoft to invest $150 million in Apple and for Apple to install Microsoft's Internet Explorer as the default Web browser for its customers... As part of his videotaped deposition, however, Microsoft Chairman and CEO Bill Gates testified repeatedly that his primary goal was to resolve the patent issues with Apple and obtain a patent cross license.

    Straight from the horse's mouth [archive.org].

  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:26PM (#11553634)
    I'm getting one instead of an iPod because it's just a portable hard drive that doesn't use any drivers

    To use the ipod as USB storage you don't need any drivers (it's just a normal usb disk). To copy songs from/to the ipod, you do need an application that handles the ipod's music database (a few simple files on the ipod's usb-mounted disk), but there are several which you can put on the ipod itself [yamipod.com] and therefore have available to you where ever you go. Even if you really can't get any sort of program to run (e.g., a solaris box mounting it as a usb volume), you can still copy the music files normally, though you'll have a slightly harder time finding them, because the ipod renames/moves them to speed up the UI.

    Honestly, if your player doesn't have a centralized database, it will have a slow UI. The only way to quickly display meta-information (song title, and so on) is to have it in a central database. Otherwise you spend several seconds waiting for a menu to show up each time you make a selection.

    Ofcourse, if you're looking at the DMC offerings, likely you just want something to tinker with, and the ipod is definitely not good for tinkerers.
  • by nine-times ( 778537 ) <nine.times@gmail.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:34PM (#11553731) Homepage
    I agree that I don't see the purpose of restricting users ability to listen to music CDs, except for two things. First, in the abstract, it's their property and they have the right to do it. That doesn't mean it makes sense, but you have the right to do nonsensical things with your own property. Second, it's possible that there is a good reason for this restriction you and I aren't thinking of.

    I've disabled and even removed CD drives from machines. Usually, it's because I was making a kiosk that would sit in a public place. However, I can remember one instance where the employee kept loading games onto his machine (ones that could be run after copying, without an install, so locking down permissions didn't help).

    The guy complained his computer was slow and getting errors, and it turned out to be a bunch of games running in the background. When we told him to close his games, he complained to his supervisor that we wouldn't "fix" his computer, and we explained to the supervisor that he was playing games. Rather than fire the guy outright, the supervisor asked us if we could keep him from playing games. I disabled his CD drive.

    So all I'm saying is, having worked in IT but not knowing the specifics of this situation, I can't completely rule out the possibility that there's a reasonable (non-draconian) explanation as to why they wouldn't allow employees to use their computers for playing music.

  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Dav3K ( 618318 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:53PM (#11553980)
    Interesting. 'cause I have heard quite the opposite. MS employees are often forbidden to touch linux or anything GPL'ed so that there is no possibility of their code being influenced by it.
  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:3, Informative)

    by clarkcox3 ( 194009 ) <slashdot@clarkcox.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @03:58PM (#11554055) Homepage
    You read wrong. The iPod shows up as a standard USB or FireWire hard-drive.
  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:2, Informative)

    by kmudrick ( 523998 ) <kevin@furhurts.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @04:49PM (#11554678)
    The reason that would be important to me is because Apple does not have a Linux iTune client so I would have no way to get music onto an iPod from Linux.

    gtkpod [sourceforge.net] is a GPL'd program that does just that. Works quite well with my 4th generation ipod and linux.
  • M$ paid for my iPod (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @05:50PM (#11555315)
    I was intern at Microsoft in Summer 2003. At the end of the summer, my group bought me a 15GB iPod, and it was paid for with the group's morale budget.

    I don't think this is a big deal on campus, and I suspect most people replace their headphones because the ones that come with the iPod aren't all that great.
  • by very ( 241808 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @06:04PM (#11555482) Journal
    Paul "The Microsoft's Whipping Boy" Thurrott sez:
    "Hide The Truth, Here Comes Leander Kahney
    Leander Kahney is a reporter for Wired News. I've been doing a little research into him lately, after being hugely disappointed with his book "Cult of Mac," which is a collection of his Mac-oriented Wired articles. The problem? Kahney's not into facts. Instead, he likes to sprinkle his articles with anecdotal evidence and quotes from a single source, which he then sells as facts. No big deal, right? I mean, that's what most bloggers, tech new aggregator sites, and Mac news sites do too. Sure. But the problem is that Kahney writes for Wired. And thus, he is representing a respected source. That is, people believe this crap."


    Read more @: http://www.internet-nexus.com/ [internet-nexus.com]

    Honestly, who in the right mind would want to believe Paul Thurrott?

    Has Paul Thurrott even realized that he is the Rush Limbaugh of Microsoft?
  • by Leo McGarry ( 843676 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @07:46PM (#11556708)
    Also, the silly wheel metaphor is OK I suppose, but at least on the 4g is way too sensitive on some menus and not sensative enough in others. Tuning is required here.

    Or, possibly, reading the fucking manual.

    The scroll wheel is shaped like a doughnut, right, with an inner edge and an outer edge. If you run your finger around the inside edge of the wheel, the cursor moves quickly. If you run your finger around the outside edge it moves more slowly. If you run it in the middle, it moves at a speed between the two extremes.

    Back when the Mac was first introduced, it came with a fairly lengthy tutorial on how to use the mouse. It taught people things like "if you reach the edge of your desk, pick the mouse up and move it back to the center." If you didn't have this instruction, you'd be just as frustrated with a mouse as you are with a scroll wheel.

    (As for the rest of your blather ...in your opinion, everything that's good about the iPod and iTunes is really bad, and everything that's bad about the competition is really good. I'm starting to suspect that you're just trolling.)
  • by Thaelon ( 250687 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @08:10PM (#11556992)
    Bullshit. Those crappy white headphones that come with it suck balls and you should only use them if you think the iPod is a status symbol rather than a solid device. People aren't using other headphones to hide the fact that they're using an iPod. They're using other headphones because the white ones suck ass.

    They hurt and if you have to take them out - which, being a portable device you probably will frequently - they have to be held onto or something so they don't flop to the ground. Get a set of headphones that have some sort of connection between the two earpieces so they can be quickly hung around your neck and then replaced just easily.

    Newsflash Apple, people's ear canals aren't round.

    I prefer Sony MDR-A44L's over anything but currently it costs half as much to have another pair shipped (mine finally broke after 5 years of abuse) as it does for the headphones themselves. Like $15 headphones with $7 shipping. grrrrr

    My second favorite pair is are these Yamaha studio-like ones that are remarkably light and comfortable enough to wear for 8+ hours (as are the MDRs), but with a 6' cord. However they are basically like a pair of ear muffs they can make your head too hot in a hot room (my office is).

    I miss my MDRs.
  • Re:Bill buys Apple? (Score:3, Informative)

    by The Infamous Grimace ( 525297 ) <emailpsc@gmail.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2005 @10:07PM (#11557985) Homepage

    I thought the iPod locks out the music section and only allows you to use iTunes to transfer files to/from the iPod.

    Yes, it does, although I believe that with Windows you can still see the 'hidden' folders. To get around this with OS X, you can:
    Launch Terminal
    Type 'ln -s /Volumes/your_iPod_name_here/iPod_Control/Music/F* /* ~/Desktop/My_Temp_Files/'

    You now have shortcuts to all the music on your iPod via the 'My_Temp_Files' folder, which is located on your desktop, for convenience.

    To copy, again from the Terminal:
    cp -R /Volumes/your_iPod_name_here/iPod_Control/Music/ /full_path_to_destination_here

    (tig)

Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.

Working...