Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Microsoft Tries a "Switch" Campaign

Posted by pudge on Mon Oct 14, 2002 01:49 PM
from the huh-huh-she-said-switching dept.
Twirlip of the Mists writes "There's a new page on Microsoft's web site that tells the first-person story of an unnamed 'freelance writer' who made the switch from the Mac to Windows XP. The author of the page -- who never identifies herself, and who could very easily be fictional or a composite sketch -- says 'Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility.' How, you ask? Why, through Microsoft Office, Internet Explorer, and modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user and easy access to the Internet, of course. Maybe somebody should email Microsoft and let them know that the Mac has had all of these things for years now ... nah. It'd just embarrass them. Anyway, it's an entertaining read that's good for a laugh." Update: 10/14 21:12 GMT by P : Apparently, Microsoft has taken the page down, but Google has it.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Microsoft Tries a "Switch" Campaign | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 1224 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4
  • yeah right (Score:5, Funny)

    by sujan (464326) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:50PM (#4447250)
    If you can't beat'em, copy'em.
    • Re:yeah right by Neon Spiral Injector (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:52PM
      • Re:yeah right (cheap shot) by lynx_user_abroad (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @03:30PM
      • Re:yeah right by neuroticia (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:54PM
        • Re:yeah right by HowardTheDolphin (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @04:23PM
        • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Interesting)

          by susano_otter (123650) on Monday October 14 2002, @04:33PM (#4448850) Homepage
          You might want to read the article. It doesn't seem likely that it's a real story in any sense of the word ("real" or "story"). Massive chunks of it were obviously written by professional marketers, and much of the last few paragraphs appear to be the work of MS support personnel.

          Advertisements may be obvious, but they can still have a kind of life to them. Judging from the responses (both positive and negative), the Apple "Switch" campaign seems to be pretty lively.

          Even a cursory reading of the MS article shows that while they've downplayed the obviousness of the advertisement (and not very well, after all), they've also failed to imbue it with any sort of liveliness. It reads like a second-rate brochure for life insurance policies.

          I've been told it's a lot like my posts.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Informative)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2002, @09:03PM (#4450578)
            The AP already picked up this story [sfgate.com], and tracked down the marketing company hired to create this fake ad. The woman, Valerie G. Mallinson of Shoreline, Wash works for a public relations firm, Wes Rataushk & Associates Inc. Microsoft hired Rataushk to produce fake testimonials when their own research turned up no usable customers. Yahoo peoplefinder lists: Steve and Valerie Mallinson, (206) 367-1953, 2203 N 106th St, Seattle, WA 98133, if you want to call and ask her about the ad in question.

            At 5foot3 and 200 lbs, I'm sure Valerie is not the woman in the stock photo.
            [ Parent ]
            • Re:yeah right by Big Ryan (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @03:03PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:yeah right by tobyvoss (Score:3) Tuesday October 15 2002, @03:30AM
          • Re:yeah right by mbogosian (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @04:28AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:yeah right by Mononoke (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:42PM
        • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Funny)

          by KillerKane (260666) on Monday October 14 2002, @04:56PM (#4449023)
          "I'm not saying that MS products are better than Apple products--just that the advertising is MUCH more intelligent."

          Oh, right. I forgot that XP will enable me to fly. Madonna told me so.

          Yeesh.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:yeah right by neuroticia (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:43PM
        • Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:14PM
        • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Informative)

          by DavidRavenMoon (515513) on Monday October 14 2002, @08:42PM (#4450459) Homepage
          I'm not saying that MS products are better than Apple products--just that the advertising is MUCH more intelligent.

          I'll agree the Apple ads are kind of dumb, they have no substance, but look at what MS had up:

          More Software Flexibility

          AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

          Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict. Searches are faster; the History feature makes it easier to find that site from last week; and I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want.

          They didn't mention that both MS Office and Internet Explorer are available for the Mac, and in fact IE is the only browser that comes preinstalled. Also almost every review of Office v.X said it was better than the Windows version. Same is true of IE for Mac.

          I wont even get into that Mozilla is every bit as fast as IE. ;)

          This "switch ad" was just bogus. I guess that's why they pulled it! I'd wager someone at MS wrote the story and the photo of the woman was is just a stock photo. This is the kind of thing they pulled sending letters to newspapers and congressmen!

          She also wrote:

          " I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing."

          Can't get much better than a PowerBook G4 if you ask me! Besides the fact that most best selling writers use Apple laptops.

          MS ads are not more intelligent, they are less fluffy, but also less factual.

          And Sara, we know OS X is better than XP! It does show more copying on MS' part... got to get that X in the name! :P

          [ Parent ]
    • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Funny)

      "If you can't beat'em, copy'em."

      So true... [all-windows.com]

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:yeah right by CrystalFalcon (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:11PM
      • Re:yeah right by SomeGuyFromCA (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:46PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:yeah right by Jucius Maximus (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:30PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Funny)

      by WildBeast (189336) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:04PM (#4447417) Journal
      True, that's the reason why Apple switched to FreeBSD code.
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:yeah right by Jucius Maximus (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @02:45PM
    • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Insightful)

      by rseuhs (322520) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:56PM (#4447982)
      Isn't it amazing that some people still fall for something like that?

      I mean, the Mac switcher ads are already pretty - well let's say "unlikely to have really happened that way".

      For Bill Gates not unlikely enough, it seems. How high is the chance that a Mac to PC convert writes down her confessions and includes:

      "See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information."

      Complete with link to the right Microsoft page?

      I find some UFO stories more believable.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:yeah right by jcr (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:45PM
        • Re:yeah right by rixstep (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @09:46PM
      • Re:yeah right by tabby (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @09:44PM
    • Re:yeah right (Score:5, Funny)

      by killmenow (184444) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:58PM (#4447996) Homepage
      I can hear it now...

      Apple: Stop copying us!

      Microsoft: Stop copying us!

      Apple: Bitch!
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @09:14PM
        • Re:yeah right by killmenow (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @11:03PM
      • Re:yeah right by hype7 (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @02:48AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • More "Innovation" by hammarlund (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:04PM
    • Re:yeah right by panaceaa (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @04:17PM
      • more likely by commodoresloat (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @07:26PM
    • Re:yeah right by EvilAlien (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:23PM
      • Re:yeah right by Empty Threats (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:57PM
    • Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:59PM
    • Re:yeah right by ericdano (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:09PM
    • Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free OS by MamasGun (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @03:12PM
      • by MoneyT (548795) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:37PM (#4448376) Journal
        While those are indeed reasons to switch, they aren't quite compelling.

        Freedom from DRM.
        So far, there is no DRM in Mac OS, and untill there is, that isn't a reason to switch.

        Freedom to use the OS however you want to. I want to use my OS to get my daily work done. There isn't much beyond that that the OS has to do. This isn't really a clear argument, can you be more specific?

        Freedom to tweak and change, even at code-level.
        I rarely have the desire to do this. Most programs work perfectly fine for me, and for those that dont, I get an alternative program. Even still, this argument is only compelling for a minority of computer users, I believe the original poster's intent was compelling reasons for other people to switch.

        Freedom to install the OS on any machine you want to without asking "Mother May I?"
        Not quite. I can install it on any machine I want to, assuming that the machine is compatable with the OS hardware support. The main issue of course being that there are still seperate distros of Linux (PPC, x86, SPARC). When will we see a distro with all the nessesary code in one package, and a universal install?

        Freedom from bullshit licenses and other nightmares.
        I'll give you that one. But again, the argument could still be made that for most intents and purposes, Apple provides the same freedom to it's users.

        Freedom from the vast majority of viruses and exploits.
        Seems to me that that's a better argument to switch to mac than to linux.

        Like I said, they're all very good reasons, but none of them are compelling to most users.
        [ Parent ]
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • And then like (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2002, @01:51PM (#4447252)
    And then like.. my computer was like... uhh... beep beep... BSOD... and like halfa my paper was gone....
    • Re:And then like (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2002, @01:59PM (#4447347)
      she is hot.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:And then like (Score:4, Funny)

      by TehF0X (616757) <(ten.puoslerriuqs) (ta) (toor)> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM (#4447362) Homepage
      She's also astute enough to include step by step instructions on setting up an internet connection, cuz that's what I like to tell people about when I praise their OS..
      [ Parent ]
    • Was this written with AppleWorks? by stretch0611 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:40PM
    • Ellen Feiss, cultural icon by burgburgburg (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @02:45PM
    • Re:And then like by Zane Edwards (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @09:30AM
    • Re:And then like (Score:4, Insightful)

      Ouch. I have had several similar experiences, but fortunately no permanent filesystem damage (I run ext3 and find it to be reliable).

      X is the Achille's heel of Linux.

      I hear talk of other windowing architectures being developed (the guy who wrote Enlightenment is rumoured to be working on one), but have not seen them make it into any mainstream distributions yet.

      I can't tell you how many times my machine appears to have crashed, because of X. I've had to reset, because X refused to accept any keyboard or mouse input (even Ctrl-Alt-Backspace), and I didn't have a second machine handy to telnet/ssh in and kill the X process (a very good strategy for dealing with an X lockup, if you have access to a second machine nearby).

      X is as bloated and buggy as anything Microsoft puts out.

      People have been whining about X since at least 1989 [rahul.net]! It is the one thing holding Linux back on the desktop. KDE, Gnome, Enlightenment, every GUI depends on X. We really need to fix this!

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:And then like (Score:5, Insightful)

        by aardvarkjoe (156801) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:06PM (#4448099)
        The real problem is that all of the commonly used video drivers aren't as stable as they should be. (It doesn't help that most of the latest and greatest video hardware is flaky as well.) Replacing X doesn't fix the driver problems, and so isn't going to prevent lockups.


        Now, what would be nice would be a way to have a 'panic button' that restarts X or kills it and sets the video mode to a known state. The fact that a broken video driver can lock up keyboard input as well is rather annoying.


        Oh, and I don't buy that X is "the one thing holding Linux back on the desktop." You're honestly trying to argue that people who use Windows every day don't switch solely because the windowing system crashes occasionally? I can come up with a long list of reasons not to switch, but X wouldn't make the top 25 in my book. If anything, X is a plus rather than a minus, because it can be used over a network.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:And then like by WWWWolf (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:50PM
      • Re:And then like by Ambassador Kosh (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:33PM
      • Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater by DunbarTheInept (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @05:38PM
      • Re:And then like by a_p_irwin (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:16PM
      • Re:And then like by zorander (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @07:47PM
      • Re:And then like by Josh Booth (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @08:23PM
      • Re:And then like by brsmith4 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @09:53PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:And then like by xtremex (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:51PM
    • Re:And then like by Cybrr (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:03PM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • to paraphrase (Score:5, Funny)

    Yes®, it's® true®. I® like® the® Microsoft® Windows® XP® operating® system® enough® to® change® my® whole® computing® world® around®.

    {Stuff deleted}
    © 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
    • Re:to paraphrase (Score:5, Insightful)

      I think that the silliest part of all of this is that they actually believe that they're going to convert Macintosh users to Windows.

      Now don't get me wrong, I have never owed a Macintosh and, until a few years ago, used nothing but Microsoft operating systems.

      The thing is that Apple users have heard all the anti-Apple flack for years and know where their loyalties lie. The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists. It's easy to convert or at least influence a Windows user who hasn't developed any real loyalties.

      But Mac users, on the other hand, are hardcore about their loyalties and know what their OS is and why they like it. They have used PCs in public labs, at school, libraries, whatever for years and will be able to see through the the Microsoft FUD as they have been doing for years.

      I suspect that the marketing brass at Apple will be (or currently are) having a good hearty laugh over all of this.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:to paraphrase (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Jhan (542783) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:12PM (#4448156) Homepage

        The thing is that Apple users have heard all the anti-Apple flack for years and know where their loyalties lie. The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists.

        Hear, hear. They can have some pretty absolute opinions about other OS's though, without ever having used them, or even seen them.

        I've been a pretty avid alternativist for the last two decades. I used to be (still am in some ways) an Amiga nut. I dived into BeOS when it was new. I was an early adopter of Linux, and have had one or two BSD machines.

        My father (without actually bothering to look at any of the machines for 10s) would always say "Give it up! There is no alternative! Windows has won! No-one will ever use anything else!"

        Well, the last time Pops came over, I showed him my new flat-panel iMac. I just did some basic demoing, like showing him the zooming dock at the bottom, window shadows, speach recognition, and of course the fish in the background [serenescreen.com] (yes, any OpenGL screen saver can be run as a desktop background).

        Response? We'll, he looked a bit shocked. Then he looked a bit flabbergasted. The he looked stunned for a while. Then he said "I want that in my computer".

        At which point I explained "You can't have that in your computer. It's nigh impossible in Windows. But if you got a Mac..."

        May be one more convert for the Gray Side.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:to paraphrase (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Rebel Patriot (540101) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:16PM (#4448185) Journal
        The thing is that Apple users have heard all the anti-Apple flack for years and know where their loyalties lie. The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists. It's easy to convert or at least influence a Windows user who hasn't developed any real loyalties.

        You just missed the entire point of this article. Microsoft knows they're not going to convince hardcore Apple users to switch. This copy of Apple's switch campaing, is for MS users who might be tempted to switch. If a user is considering switching to Apple, then sees that some other people are switching from Apple to MS, the user might very well decide to stay right where he is. The theory of course, is that a user who is easily persuaded to try Apple could be easily persuaded not to try Apple; get it?
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:to paraphrase by Skuld-Chan (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:52PM
      • Re:to paraphrase by SomeGuyFromCA (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @07:18PM
      • Re:to paraphrase by Qaseem (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @04:43AM
      • Re:to paraphrase by joshsisk (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:47PM
      • Re:to paraphrase by pediddle (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @12:36AM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:to paraphrase by chopper749 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:41PM
    • Re:to paraphrase by scrote-ma-hote (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:55PM
    • Re:to paraphrase by tauntalum (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:40PM
    • Re:to paraphrase by cicatrix1 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:13PM
    • Re:to paraphrase by MaxVlast (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:15PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Wait one damned minute! (Score:4, Funny)

    by RatBastard (949) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:52PM (#4447261) Homepage
    Hey! She's not funny looking! Can't those twits at MicroSoft do anything right?
  • I'm sticking with MS (Score:5, Funny)

    by scott1853 (194884) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:52PM (#4447262)
    Their users are much better looking that the Apple ones.
  • Hmm by Avalerion (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM
    • Re:Hmm by GutBomb (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @06:32PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Just another ploy by Trinton Azaleth (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM
  • Choices and Flexibility? (Score:4, Funny)

    by rocjoe71 (545053) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM (#4447273) Homepage

    Choices: You can select which security flaw to patch first.

    Flexibility: Your choice of anti-virus program.

  • Mac versions? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by lpret (570480) <lpret42 AT hotmail DOT com> on Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM (#4447274) Homepage Journal
    Aren't there Mac versions of Office and Internet Explorer? Wait, that means they're just boasting about the "wonderful" OS. Oh well...
    • Re:Mac versions? by CyberSnyder (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
    • Re:Mac versions? by dissy (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:05PM
    • Re:Mac versions? by filmsmith (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
    • Re:Mac versions? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by pimpinmonk (238443) <diego.pontoriero@NoSPam.gmail.com> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:13PM (#4447542) Homepage
      AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict. Searches are faster; the History feature makes it easier to find that site from last week; and I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want.
      (Just incase M$ deletes the site)

      I find it more amusing that despite AppleWorks being a little less feature-rich than Office XP, it is about $300 cheaper (as in $0 for Apple to $300 for Office).

      And of course there's the fact that M$ sells Office X for Mac, and Internet Explorer is the default browser for OS X. I can guarantee that the entire M$ advertising team that proofed that page isn't even aware of this fact.

      The point? I dunno about everyone else, but every day I'm getting closer and closer to wanting a Mac as my main PC (and by PC I mean PC, not Server ;))
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Why yes, there are by burgburgburg (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:01PM
    • Re:Mac versions? by cappadocius (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:14PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Reload. by echophase (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM
    • Re:Reload. by echophase (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Hysterical! (Score:5, Funny)

    by PCM2 (4486) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM (#4447278) Homepage
    This person claims to be a "freelance writer." It's a riot! Don't you get it?

    Don't you figure that he/she might just be the freelance writer ... that Microsoft hired to write this advertising copy?

    I love it!

    • Re:Hysterical! (Score:5, Funny)

      by Capt Dan (70955) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM (#4447304) Homepage
      I like the how the technical bit about how to set up XP is prefaced by "here's the skinny".
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Hysterical! (Score:5, Funny)

        by Tofuhead (40727) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:14PM (#4447554)

        I also found that little tidbit, well, precious. It's like, "Hey, slick. I'm a cool cat and I'd like to rap with you about this smooth new deal. Now here's the skinny, man. Outta sight."

        For various other reasons, I also liked "Girl Scout's honor," "Less Dough," "And Now for the How," "accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet," and "I discover more treats daily."

        < tofuhead >

        [ Parent ]
    • On her career (Score:5, Funny)

      by Bouncings (55215) <ken&kenkinder,com> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:21PM (#4447618) Homepage
      No, she clearly is a free-lance writer.
      • Windows XP gives me more choices and
      • flexibility, and better compatibility with the rest of the technology world.

        ...

        I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.

        There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work.
      Mobile computing? Versatility? I could swear she was the free-lance writer who wrote the mission statements of a dozen busted dot-coms. No wonder she's looking for cheaper hardware!

      I wonder if the switch helps her utilize her verticle portals too!

      [ Parent ]
    • The identity of the writer has been revealed by Ethelred Unraed (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @06:35PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It Must Suck... (Score:4, Funny)

    by naNoox (223207) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:53PM (#4447280)
    It must suck to be a "freelance writer" and to not even get a credit on your "submission" to Microsoft's site...

    Nanoox
    • Re:It Must Suck... (Score:5, Funny)

      by taniwha (70410) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:02PM (#4448045) Homepage Journal
      but 'her' name is on there - look at the dialoig box - she's really 'Don Funk' (donfu@microsoft.com) .... and as has been pointed out below Don chose his photo from some publically available stock photos so that he could show a little more of his feminine side
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Here is the reverse, sort of: by Neil Blender (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:54PM
  • To all MS employees trolling today... by CSG_SurferDude (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:54PM
  • Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by stratjakt (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:54PM
  • I should submit (Score:4, Funny)

    by The Pi-Guy (529892) <wiseguy586.yahoo@com> on Monday October 14 2002, @01:55PM (#4447294) Homepage Journal
    my story about how Microsoft Lindows has made my life easier after switching from Windows 2000. That oughta make someone explode at M$.

    XD
    --j
  • Linux Switch (Score:5, Funny)

    by anonymous coword (615639) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:55PM (#4447298) Homepage Journal
    Linux gives me more choices and flexibility.' How, you ask? Why, through OpenOffice, Mozilla, and modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user and easy access to the Internet, of course.
    • Re:Linux Switch (Score:5, Funny)

      by slagdogg (549983) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:12PM (#4448149)
      and easy access to the Internet, of course.

      With Windows, I had to go through ... like ... three ... or like ... four menus to find the "automatically configure my network" button. With Linux, it's like ... I just need to add 'iface eth0 inet dhcp' in /etc/network/interfaces and a couple of ifconfig commands later, I'm up and running ... like, it's so easy!

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Linux Switch by geekee (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:21PM
    • Re:Linux Switch (Score:4, Informative)

      by cioxx (456323) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:45PM (#4447827) Homepage
      Here's the real comedy: Linux doesn't actually offer any of those things! Enjoy your positive moderation from outrightly lying.

      The moderation is on target. You sir, are mistaken.

      Red Hat 8 has separate account creation for each user right from the control center. And guess what? It's all GUI point-and-click. It's more intuitive and useful than WindowsXP scheme.

      You lose. Play again.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Linux Switch by cioxx (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @02:51PM
    • Re:Linux Switch (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Dalcius (587481) <dalcius@gmail.GINSBERGcom minus poet> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:55PM (#4447965)
      "too bad that Mozilla doesn't have close to the amount of success that IE does w/the web"

      Well, we all know that the number of users using a tool is directly proportional to the quality of the tool, right?

      ---
      "including speed of loading tables, program"

      IE loads faster in a sense because it's integrated into the OS; the libraries are loaded when you boot your system. That can be seen as a good thing or a bad thing.

      While I admit that Mozilla doesn't have the spunk at rendering as some other browsers do, you should try Phoenix.

      ---
      "support"

      For what? Bad HTML standards?

      Name something Mozilla doesn't support that I'm going to miss on the web.
      [ Parent ]
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • End Note (Score:5, Insightful)

    by prsabc (111655) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:55PM (#4447299)
    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    So does this mean that they converted "the microsoft writer to M$" Wow they got their own employee to use their product after how many years, hmmm I am guessing at home she is still a MAC user....
  • The Mold of Microsoft (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jamie (78724) <jamie@slashdot.org> on Monday October 14 2002, @01:55PM (#4447300) Homepage Journal
    This "person" is obviously an invention of Microsoft marketing... no name. (Apple made a great move to have everyone in their "switch" ads identify themselves at the end. Microsoft didn't even try.)

    The added touches of this "person" being 5-foot-3 and her husband six feet, and the "Lexus we rented once," was predicted by Philip K. Dick in his short story The Mold of Yancy [google.com]. If you've read it, go read the Microsoft ad with an eye toward the similarity. It's creepy.

  • For years? by PhysicsGenius (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM
    • Re:For years? by HeghmoH (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:08PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:For years? by anti-drew (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:01PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • No really, it's a feature! (Score:4, Funny)

    by The Great Wakka (319389) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM (#4447305) Homepage Journal
    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

    Nooo! Not the hidey menu thingy! That thing drove me insane! And here it's listed as a plus? I'm sorry, what?

    All the Mac hardware--including my printer, broadband cable, Zip drive, and Palm handheld--works perfectly with my Windows-based PC.

    Really? You don't say? What about your internal hard drive? And your old applications?

    Well, really. From a company with a huge marketing budget, I expect something that isn't (1) a cheap copy of your competitor's and (2) can't be picked into little bits in 15.32 seconds.
  • Must be composite/fake (Score:5, Insightful)

    by azaroth42 (458293) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM (#4447307) Homepage
    No one talks like that apart from marketdroids. I mean really:

    I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing. ...
    See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information.


    Who talks in Hyperlinks?

    At least the Mac ads are believable.

    --Azaroth
  • IE6 is rather good by dazdaz (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM
  • Soooo Fake... (Score:5, Funny)

    by vex24 (126288) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM (#4447309) Homepage
    Part of her "testimony" is this classic line:

    My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it. See Which Edition is Right for You? [microsoft.com] for more information.

    Hilarious... like an actual customer would go hunt down links to recommend people buy the most expensive workstation OS they sell. God Microsoft, keep 'em coming, soon you'll be as funny as the Onion!
  • Crappy Job by Wyatt Earp (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM
    • Re:Crappy Job by WildBeast (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:57PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • shocking. (Score:5, Funny)

    by 3prong (241218) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM (#4447315)
    This makes Ellen Feiss and baby jesus cry.
    • Re:shocking. by meeotch (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:50PM
  • Odd move for Microsoft... by forau (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:56PM
  • errr by SeanWithoutPants (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:57PM
  • *Could* be fictional? (Score:4, Funny)

    by sophits (590745) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:57PM (#4447319) Homepage
    Real people don't say things like:

    I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.

    That just wreaks of marketing monkey dung.
  • Missing the point (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Mr Krinkle (112489) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:57PM (#4447320) Homepage
    I think the most interesting point isn't that someone switched, but that this is a MICROSOFT writer that was using a Macintosh for 8 years. They just got her to convert.
    "*Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"
    I think the better story would be "Bill forces last Mac user to switch!"

  • by ravemax (452708) on Monday October 14 2002, @01:57PM (#4447327) Homepage
    Just a few quotes:
    "AppleWorks (...) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP." - isn't there Office X ?

    "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did" - I wonder what happens when I start my IE on my Mac ... (Mozilla is better anyway).

    "The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers" - to be honest: i never installed drivers on my Mac - it just worked out of the box.
  • What's next? by FooBarWidget (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:58PM
  • Embrace and Extend by kasparov (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:59PM
  • FUD by Ashish Kulkarni (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:59PM
    • Re:FUD by badboy_tw2002 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:16PM
      • Re:FUD by nevershower (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:30PM
  • Switch to M$? by Twintop (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:59PM
  • question by quigonn (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @01:59PM
    • Re:question by suman28 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:32PM
      • Re:question by CoolVibe (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @07:52PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Switching... by br0ken2o0o (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It's just not appealing by futuresheep (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM
  • Tell me you're kidding (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jfedor (27894) <jfedor@jfedor.org> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM (#4447360) Homepage
    I have a question to the guy who submitted this story: do you honestly believe that the people featured in Apple's Switch campaign are real? I mean, I know Tony Hawk is a real person. Ellen Feiss could be real, too. But when they speak about how cool macs are and how uncool PCs are, they do so because they got money from Apple. Their confessions are just about as real as those of the "fictional" and "composite" person from Microsoft.

    The difference is that Apple paid someone to lie on TV and Microsoft put their story in the mouth of an imaginary person. Now who's more honest?

    -jfedor
  • You know what MS calls it, right? by Timex (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM
  • hahaha! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by 3-State Bit (225583) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM (#4447368)
    I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor.
    Translation: It took me most of a day, i.e. many grueling hours, just to get up and running.

    Sure, "more hardware is available for less dough", but you get what you pay for...
    • Re:hahaha! by RatBastard (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:28PM
      • Re:hahaha! by dvdeug (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:51PM
      • Re:hahaha! by xtremex (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:38PM
        • Re:hahaha! by RatBastard (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @05:09PM
    • Re:hahaha! by Anonvmous Coward (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:22PM
      • Re:hahaha! by damiam (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:18PM
        • Re:hahaha! by Anonvmous Coward (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @04:26PM
    • Re:hahaha! by xmnemonic (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @07:38PM
    • Check the screenshot in the ad! by dcavanaugh (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:45PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Yeah I laughed a lot to this post by i_luv_linux (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:00PM
  • Lockin is fun by steveha (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:01PM
  • "fictional or a composite sketch" (Score:5, Informative)

    by Blondie-Wan (559212) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:01PM (#4447376) Homepage
    "The author of the page -- who never identifies herself, and who could very easily be fictional or a composite sketch"

    IIRC, Microsoft targeted such an ad campaign at Mac people a couple years ago, albeit to get them to use IE & Office for Mac, not switch altogether. The campaign featured what were purported to be testimonials from satisfied customers, but M$ tipped its hand when it launched the ads too quickly, and had "customers" discussing their experience with the latest versions of M$ wares a few days before said versions actually shipped.

  • In the publishing industry by ebuck (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:01PM
  • "Better Virus Protection" too (Score:3, Informative)

    by Dejohn (164452) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:01PM (#4447387) Homepage
    Microsoft has had this report potsted on their Exchange website for a while. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/outlook /FerrisOutlook.asp.

    Some research company with "evidence" suggests that you're less vulnerable to getting hit by email viruses if you use Outlook rather than anything else. This report is shoddy, even for Microsoft. I'm amazed they would even post this!
  • At the end of all the switch campaigns... by bsdparasite (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Less Dough? by Cutriss (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • She's Also a Photodisc Model! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by obidonn (590065) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM (#4447391)
    Not only is she a freelance writer, but she also models for stock photography - check it out [gettyimages.com]. Or maybe they just threw in a stock image of a person...
  • An interesting thing about the source (OT) by Ari Rahikkala (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
  • Translation by wraithgar (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
  • Confessions of a Linux to Windows Convert by jukal (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:02PM
  • Clearly (Score:5, Funny)

    by jjoyce (4103) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:04PM (#4447421)
    she is a freelance fiction writer.
    • Re:Clearly by avgjoe62 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:56PM
      • Re:Clearly by jjoyce (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @02:01AM
  • all that Mac hardware... by Shadow2097 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:04PM
  • The thing is... by jsav40 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:04PM
  • I only had to..... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:05PM
  • Cute, but not very smart. by Fished (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:06PM
  • Hmmm....Did you notice at the bottom by slattont (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:06PM
  • I was gonna post something... by aengblom (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:06PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Separate user accounts by fleppir (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:07PM
  • overplayed and too late by asv108 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:07PM
  • Is it really that much better when apple does it? by nonweasel (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:07PM
  • This won't work (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anenga (529854) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:08PM (#4447464)
    I'm sorry, but it will near impossible for MS to get back the marketshare/mindshare they've lost from Apple or Linux.

    Why? Because those people had a reason to "switch". It's like saying they learned that Soilent Green is people, then have the people that make it say "Come back to Soilent Green! Really! New flavors, fat free!". It just won't work. They know there are alternatives to Windows, to the BSOD, to the annoying Clippy, to the oodles and oodles of unexplained problems and security issues.

    The users who came from Windows and now are on the Mac are like the people that swam across the ocean from Cuba, I don't think they're going back anytime soon.

    What Microsoft should do is improve it's software NOW so that there won't be any incentive to switch. Besides, the portion of users who switched or even using Apple products are very marginal anyways.
  • Office for Mac OSX conspiracy? by TheConfusedOne (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:08PM
  • I'm not laughing by Eric Damron (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:08PM
  • Multiple Users Simultaneously by breadbot (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:08PM
  • a freelance writer that can take a screenshot? by RestiffBard (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:08PM
  • hmm.. by greenskyx (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
  • I was blind but now I GUI! by FrostedWheat (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
  • Apple started it, methinks by nugneant (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
  • my name is by americanFatCat (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
  • Uhh... by scot4875 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
    • Re:Uhh... by mabinogi (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @06:12PM
  • You know they are lying! by StarTux (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
  • My lord! by aengblom (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM
  • Ahh... what gems by interstellar_donkey (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:11PM
  • LOL, what a joke by dh003i (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:11PM
  • Look at "How to steps" and compare by Arcturax (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:11PM
  • What a comparison! by Tinfoil (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:11PM
  • HW cost part rings true (Score:3, Insightful)

    by verch (12834) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:12PM (#4447532)
    The article as a whole is as funny as any of the mac switch parodies I've seen. A thousand times funnier actually because it's real. There is one point that I don't think you can argue with however. There are many more choices for hardware, and at the risk of making a sweeping generalization, PC hardware is cheaper. This is the only reason I haven't made the switch already. I can't afford to invest $2k right now for a decent mac system, plus however much to gather the suite of software that I rely on on my PC.

    PS. Someone should mention to the MS marketing dept that they also produce Office for OSX.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2002, @02:14PM (#4447548)
    The switcher writes:

    The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware. Windows XP or your computer manufacturer will pre-install most of them. If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.

    This seems to defeat the entire purpose of the campaign.

    Anyone who knows what the heck she's talking about and can correctly find, download, and install drivers has good reason for being on the OS that they're on and will not fall for this homegrown "I'm happy switching" rhetoric.

    Everyone who can't do that -- 98+ percent, probably -- fall exactly into Apple's target market: people who know their computer went "bleep bleep bleep" and want to go somewhere where they won't HAVE to know how to find, download and install drivers.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Bill Gates switch a while back.... by StarbuckZero (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:14PM
  • And Now for the How... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:15PM
  • Microsoft Ad by terbor (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:15PM
  • by nordicfrost (118437) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:16PM (#4447566)

    MS Wrote: "The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware."


    I'd argue that it is not only the key, but the biggest headaches of Windows. Sadly, I have used a lot of Windows in my life (and Linux). Sp when my mom bough an iBook, it was a revelation. I mean, so many digital cameras functioning on it without ANY drivers? Amazing. Also, it seems that the drivers made for OSX is more stable in the long haul than the Windows drivers.

  • That's some freelance writer by starforce_chipster (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:17PM
  • Didn't sony try this already? by cetan (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:18PM
  • I love Office XP too! by Blacklotuz (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:19PM
  • my favorite piece of irony... by JoeGrind (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:19PM
  • Oh, I'm gonna have fun with this one. by JoshWurzel (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:20PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Mac hardware? by cschmidt (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:21PM
  • Haw Haw Haw! by Oliver Defacszio (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:21PM
  • Drivers by Dominic_Mazzoni (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:22PM
  • STEP 4 : by painehope (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:22PM
  • Snippet from Revision 1... by iphayd (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:23PM
  • another warezing of mac by microsoft by pmineiro (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:24PM
  • Writer? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Shadow Wrought (586631) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:24PM (#4447648) Homepage Journal
    "Yes, it's true. I like the Microsoft® Windows® XP operating system enough to change my whole computing world around."

    She's a freelance writer who begins her "story" by ending a sentence with a preposition. I wonder if she writes for anyone other than M$?
    • Re:Writer? by Capt_Troy (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:33PM
    • Re:Writer? by glenebob (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:10PM
    • Re:Writer? by BorgCopyeditor (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:42PM
    • Yes, Writer. by tswinzig (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @03:45PM
    • Re:Writer? by qengho (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @05:36PM
      • Re:Writer? by charon_on_acheron (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @04:34PM
  • They'd be embarassed? by sfeinstein (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:25PM
  • She's right...but that's only half the story by Call Me Black Cloud (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:26PM
  • Wait wait wait! by deadhammer (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:27PM
  • Entertaining??? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by RAMMS+EIN (578166) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:28PM (#4447671) Homepage Journal
    ``Anyway, it's an entertaining read that's good for a laugh.''
    You think this is fun? This is FUD. Lies. Crap. Misinformation. Cheating. BAD BAD BAD.

    I mean, advertising is one thing. Advertising the things you stole from others is quite another. XP is more multiuser than OS X? You'll make me laugh. Office XP has more features then Claris? Yes, it's called bloat and decreases usability. Besides, office runs on Mac, too.

    MicroSoft Internet Exploiter faster does more for her than Netscape ever did? Yeah, popping up ads, loading up the borked MSN ActiveX control, loading Word documents inline so that people get the idea that they are a replacement for webpages. Searches go faster? Maybe if you are looking for the crap that M$ search comes up with...give me Google any day! And it's not like Netscape doesn't have history, either.

    Connection Wizard - yes an old pal of mine. It's always the first program I removed. Not that removing is easy, you have to actually delete the directory it's in, or iexplore.exe will run it for you. WTF? I asked for _Internet Explorer_ not _Connection Wizard_. Why I get rid of it? Because setting up access to any provider I've used is easier without it, and because sometimes I just want to satrt a browser, without having to click away a bunch ow wizards first.

    `` I started with Outlook Express for e-mail, because it's included with Windows XP.'' Here we have the fatal flaw that got us all those lovely email virii. I understand that the vulnerabilities have *finally* been fixed in the XP version, but God, did that take a long time.

    ``I copied hundreds of Web Favorites from the Mac onto a Zip disk, then into the Favorites folder on the PC. Internet Explorer has an Import/Export Wizard that you can use to import Netscape bookmarks, but I found it faster to do it this way.''
    ROFL. Copied them to a Zip disk? Hilarious. It's called Linux. It can mount _your_ filesystem. You don't even have to buy a new computer to run it! And the OS is Free, as is most of the software you will want to use!

    ``Both Outlook Express and Outlook will import contacts and messages from other programs.''
    Yes, and I trust that M$ have taken care that they are then saved in a proprietary format so that others can't pull the same trick on them...

    ``Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook''
    Yes, welcome to Windows...

    ``The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers''
    Indeed. And M$ have been so good as to make the XP driver interface incompatible with previous versions of Windows, so that if you install it on older hardware, you may not be able to get drivers for your components. A problem that Macs don't seem to have, but I might be rong.

    ``If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.''
    And download a 10+ MB file from their site that loads a lot of visual violence, advertisements, bells and whistles, and then tells me that I downloaded the wrong driver, even though the name of my device is almost exactly like the one the driver is for? Or worse, not being able to find out where to go for the driver, because all Windows has to say about it is ``PCI Multimedia Device''? Where is lspci -vv when you need it??

    Pfff...it's been a while since I've been able to blow off so much steam...
  • Godfather Bill (Score:5, Funny)

    by Mignon (34109) <satan@programmer.net> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:28PM (#4447674)
    Scene 1: Godfather Bill is sitting with his trusted goons.

    Godfather Bill: What's this I hear about one of our freelance writers using a Mac? Make her an offer she can't refuse.

    Scene 2: Anonymous writer's bedroom.

    (The anonymous writer tosses and turns in bed, and rolls over, waking up. She notices something in the bed next to her and pulls back the sheet to reveal the severed LCD screen from her beloved iMac.)

    Anonymous Writer: Aaaaah! Aaaaaah! OK, I'll switch!

  • MS should of said.... by ToasterTester (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:29PM
  • funny by minus_273 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:30PM
  • Hillarious...... by sharph (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:30PM
  • lmfao by sub_pop_culture (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:31PM
  • Mac Switchers... by tsmit (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:31PM
  • Fake as fake gets by bobbv (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:32PM
  • Why Apple is like Communism! (Score:3, Funny)

    by Brian_Ellenberger (308720) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:32PM (#4447710)
    Flame note, this is intended to be humor. I haven't gotten a chance to play with OS X, but it looks pretty cool.

    Top 10 reasons Apple is a bit like Communism

    10) Lots of cool intellectuals and artsy types seem to like it.

    9) Fun to stick it to "Evil Abusive Capitalistic Monopolies".

    8) Ton of zealots constantly proclaiming the beauty of the new revolution.

    7) Everything seems to work together easily. However, you have to give up some choice.

    6) Stores on the other side always seem better stocked and have better selections.

    5) Goal is to make life as easy and fair as possible.

    4) Hides much of the inner workings of the system so the people don't have to worry about them.

    3) Although they do not admit it, most of their competitors have used at least some of their ideas.

    2) While it looks like they were beaten in the 80's, may just be making a comeback.

    1) Given history of past practices for the "greater good", scared to death of what the world would look like if they actually took over.
  • Importing Files from your mac by LucianTheMad (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:32PM
  • It's not aimed at Mac users by aengblom (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:33PM
  • Problem for M$ and Apple... by Loki_1929 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:33PM
  • OH MY GOD this is funny... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:33PM
  • Fake by bytesmythe (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:35PM
  • Cheese by yanbusa (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:37PM
  • Slashdot Effect by davidstrauss (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:38PM
  • switch campaign lame to begin with by Malcreant (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:38PM
  • Strange instructions on migrating links by joeflies (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:39PM
  • She USED to own, now she's owned by crovira (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:39PM
  • Makes me a better author by jlazzaro74 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:40PM
  • Something else fishy about this by CreepyNinja (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:41PM
  • by Lonath (249354) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:41PM (#4447793)
    Wow, that's quite an innovation. I wonder how they thought of that. I get a little tired of having to use this "root" account that came with my Linux package. It's kind of a stupid name and I wish I could change it to my name. Maybe someday Linux will have separate accounts for each user.
  • Sounds familiar by glenebob (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:42PM
  • But, why switch when I already run XP on OS X? by l0ungeb0y (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:42PM
  • Internet Explorer/Netscape Navigator - which one? by csnydermvpsoft (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:43PM
  • They can't even get s/IE/Netscape/g to work! by Masque (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:43PM
  • *single tear* by xingix (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:43PM
  • by Dr. Spork (142693) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:43PM (#4447814)
    I can't believe you guys are taking this thing at face value. Are you nuts? Do you really think that MS has a fertile source of new money inside the Mac crowd? I've seen figures (can't attest to their reliability) that an Apple customer pays more money to MS than the average x86 customer. I'm sure this figure isn't far off. I mean, MS Office is on just about every Mac, it's much harder to find pirated copies, and it costs more to buy at the store.

    This whole thing is a charade that Apple is a willing participant of. The whole point of the "switch" campaigns is to give the appearance of competition in an industry that effectively has none. Microsoft must be thrilled, because a totally leashed, client company (Apple) is making it look like competition is nipping at Microsoft's heels. Last week they tried the "Windows and Mac users can get along" campaign, which was spooky but not surprising, given the antitrust battles going on now.

    Remember that the allegation made against MS is that they don't compete fairly with their real competiton. There are boxes of evidence to support this. On the other hand, there is the supposed couterexample of Apple: A high profile, low danger company that gives MS absolutely nothing to worry about. MS is in fact crying: "see, we are running a fair race! Look at Apple! We're not bullying them at all! We're really, really competing with them using--fair methods like advertising. And oooh, we're soooo scared that they would eat into our market share, so we find it imperative to run ads which prevent this! Our position on the desktop is soooo vulnerable!"

    Well, I hoped that at least the slashdot crowd could see through this. I mean, we know that once Microsoft aputates both of your legs, they are perfectly willing to run a fair race against you. Witness that Internet Explorer is now finally uninstallable. However, suddently the Windows Media Player isn't. That's because RealMedia still (sort of) has its legs. Once they're off, the uninstallability problem will suddently disappear. My point is that Apple lies somewhere between Netscape and OS2 in terms of being a threat to Microsoft. However, there is much good PR to be gained by making it appear that the two companies are locked in fierce competition. So MS are milking it. The only surprise is that nobody is calling them on it!

  • This is a joke... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by seamus_waldron (304343) <{ku.oc.jpa} {ta} {nordlaw_sumaes}> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:44PM (#4447822) Homepage
    The article looks as though it was written by somebody who has never, ever, touched a MAC.

    Frankly, I'd like to see a MAC formatted ZIP disk work instantly on a PC. I'd also like to see why the writer didn't compare Microsoft Office to Microsdoft Office v.X. I'll tell you why, v.X is in my opinion the best Office implementation at the moment. Also, why not compare IE 6 PC to IE on the MAC?

    The whole thing is just laughable.
  • My favorite quote: by teamhasnoi (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:45PM
  • first they ignore you.. by matt4077 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:45PM
  • On Markets and Market Leaders (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Zech Harvey (604609) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:47PM (#4447859)

    I find it surprising that Microsoft feels the need to use this style of marketing campaign. Not for the fact that is blatently copying Apple's Switch campaign, my surprise for MS copying other people's work ran out years ago.

    What surprises me is that it has been found that market leaders need not identify themselves in their campaigns -- it is implicit that most consumers will choose said market-leader. For example: Campbell's doesn't need a campaign that says "Buy Campbell's" It just needs to say "Buy Soup" and most consumers will choose their soup. This marketing push of their OS by name in a popular style, at least to me, says that Microsoft is really getting worried over any change in market-share. Enough so to nitpick over a few percentage points and retaliate with a campaign like this. (Tell me, at the height of the pre-bundled, defacto-standard Windows Empire -- How often did you see their OS advertised?)

    (by the by, how do tactics like this by Microsoft strain their relationship with Apple? I would think Jobs, being an artist at heart, would hate a blatent copy like this.)

  • Other submissions you haven't seen yet by Whatsmynickname (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:48PM
  • Ha ha! by cybercuzco (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:48PM
  • funny... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by LinuxWoman (127092) <damschler@m[ ]city.com ['ail' in gap]> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:48PM (#4447866)
    how the "convert" keeps speaking using microsoft marketing jargon.... like the average user automatically thinks in terms of "oooo visit this handy tool at microsoft.com"
  • font size by pjrc (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:49PM
    • Re:font size by Coke in a Can (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:14PM
      • OK, nevermind by Coke in a Can (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @06:37AM
  • Alternate stock models by Call Me Black Cloud (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:51PM
  • Nice... by Izang (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:51PM
  • How you know she's not a real person by catfood (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:54PM
  • Microsoft more faster New Technology is! by dubious9 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:55PM
  • switcher@winaddict.com by WinAddict (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:55PM
  • Parodies of the switch commercial... by f97tosc (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:56PM
  • Reasons I like this ad (Score:5, Funny)

    by guttentag (313541) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:58PM (#4448002) Journal
    • The woman in the picture looks like she's in the middle of a commercial for a yeast-infection or genital-herpes remedy. "With Windows, I don't have to be afraid to tell people what operating system I use. And that's a weight off my shoulders, so I can spend more time enjoying life."
    • "It's about more and better." Wow. That's substantial and profound. I thought she said she was a "professional writer."
    • Most of the page is devoted to explaining how to use wizards. If you need to explain how to use your wizards, your need to fire your usability team.
    • She finishes her pitch by talking about installing drivers and finding more programs to convert her Mac documents every day: "I discover more treats daily. For example, Word Converters are helping me transfer old document files, Microsoft Works files, and even AppleWorks files. It will be an ongoing process, but I'm thrilled so far." In other words, she still hasn't been able to convert all her documents, and she expects it to be a long, ongoing process... and this is why Windows is "better?"
    Personally, I don't think Microsoft wrote this. I think someone from Saturday Night Live broke into the MS server room and uploaded this.
  • Moronic no matter who uses it by kakos (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:58PM
  • by gosand (234100) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:00PM (#4448025) Homepage
    OMFG, that was hilarious! The underlying message was "Microsoft makes switching from bad ol' expensive Macintosh to their happy, puppy friendly technologically superior Windows XP platform so easy, even a dumb girl like me can do it. Tee-hee."

    How low can you get? Does anyone really BELIEVE this story? I sure hope not.

    But at the end of the article, there are forms in PDF and Word (natch) where you can send in YOUR experiences with Windows. Come on Slashdotters, fill them out and send them in! PDF [microsoft.com] and Word [microsoft.com]

    Here is the text of the document. It gets better...

    Show Off Your Skills

    Are you a whiz at using a Microsoft product at home or in the office? Are you the one everyone comes to when they need to know how to do something? If so, we'd love to see what you can do.

    A whiz? ha ahaha I think they mean wiz. Oh brother.

    We're collecting ideas for articles on the Microsoft Insider Web site. Some of your work or submissions may be included in a gallery on the site, featured in press releases, or developed into how-to articles.

    This just in: Microsoft invents user-friendly HOWTO documents.

    Note: We will not feature any of your work without first receiving your permission.

    And having you sign away the rights to any experience you may have, or have had in the past to the sole ownership of Microsoft.

    To participate, please send us:
    Your first and last name
    Name of your company or organization (if applicable)
    Brief description of your company or organization, including industry and size
    Brief description of which Microsoft product you use and how you use it
    Personal contact information, including address, phone number and e-mail address
    Samples of your work--either hard copies of your marketing materials or a Web site address where we can view your work. Please be sure to include any user names or passwords that might be needed.

    WTF???

    You can submit your sample(s) one of two ways:
    1. For online materials, send an e-mail message with the subject line Microsoft Publisher Customer Stories to insider@microsoft.com. (Note: Please do not send any attachments over 1 megabyte in size.)

    Or with any malicious VBscripts attached


    2. For printed materials, send hard copies to:
    Microsoft Insider Customer Stories Microsoft Corporation 9931 Willows Road Redmond, WA 98052 Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law.

  • The problem is... by briancnorton (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:01PM
  • Are There No Microsoft Zealots? by roboneal (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:02PM
  • She's Real !!! by Kommet (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:02PM
  • It's not the choice by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:04PM
  • There's no one home on slashdot by (void*) (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:05PM
  • Have any Slashdotters switched from Mac to Win? by MrCaseyB (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:06PM
  • She's not Real. Here's the URL of her photo by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:07PM
  • by phillymjs (234426) <slashdot@NOspAm.stango.org> on Monday October 14 2002, @03:08PM (#4448111) Homepage Journal
    ...someone has to track her down and discover that she is also a Mac user in real life-- she probably has a CRT iMac or an iBook or something, if she's like the models I know.

    It always cracked me up that the Blue Man Group shill for Intel but run their shows with Macs. [apple.com]

    ~Philly
  • Who is by sirsampson (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:10PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Separate accounts for each user? by msblack (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:10PM
  • Another Outlooker... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Ektanoor (9949) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:11PM (#4448143) Journal
    Importing Messages. I upgraded to Outlook when I installed Office XP. I chose Yes when Outlook asked whether I wanted to import messages from Outlook Express. Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook, but all was not lost.

    Hmmm. In the way she writes her excitement on using this piece of crap, it looks she is another outlooker that says yes, Yes, YES to every Klez juicy flavour and every LOVE YOU letter... Probably the new, fresh and exciting BugBears will make her dreams sweet... I imagine the ride of joy she'll have when some Barby/Trojan will salute her in one more of these exciting [censured] M$ gifts...
  • Let's submit stories! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Lethyos (408045) on Monday October 14 2002, @03:14PM (#4448170) Journal
    Here's what I submitted as my XP switch story. :-)

    You can use my personal photo from this web page:

    http://delivery.gettyimages.com/comp/AA046139.JP G? x=x&dasite=GETTYIMAGES&dareq=1A0C1F181E0
    80314025 D2337394D32324055454243585F414E

    My name is Linda Lee and here's my story!

    "WindowsXP is great!"

    OKay, I admit it! I've been a Linux user for years! You know, one of
    those communists who thinks that everything should be free and forgets
    to use deoderant. Recently, I was reading a totally unbiased
    technical article in a magazine that informed me that the competition
    just cannot stand up to Microsoft's (r) Windows (r) XP operating
    system.

    Let me tell you how lost I have been all these years, using free,
    open-source software! What a waste of my life! As soon as I read
    about all the great features, I threw some clothes on (shoes too!) and
    ran out to my nearest CompUSA to buy a copy of Microsoft (r) Windows
    (r) XP Professional for about 400$US. I got home, ripped the
    shrink-wrap off, read over the draconian EULA (I don't mind giving up
    some freedoms, Windows (r) is just too great), and immediately got to
    installing.

    After installation, I was unable to activate my copy of Microsoft (r)
    Windows (r) XP. Sure, there was a little hic-up here, but after all,
    you sometimes have to make sacrifices for quality! After about a
    month of not being able to use my computer, customer support finally
    just said I could use a "back-door" activation code. How wonderful
    that Microsoft are helping me out at their own peril!

    It only took me about three months to get me up and running! Girl
    Scout's honor!

    More Crashes, Less Work

    Microsoft (r) Windows (r) XP lets me relax more through my busy work
    day. With continuous crashes and reboots, I can spend more time
    sipping coffee than doing my job! Microsoft (r) Windows (r) XP also
    ensures that the work I do manage to get done is of the highest
    possible quality. I demand that I be empowered to rewrite a document
    I lost four times so I can be certain that it is very refined.

    More Software Flexibility

    Previously, I had access to hundreds of thousands of free software
    products. But they were free, and we all know that anything that's
    free is worth nothing! Now I can go out and spend anywhere from 50$US
    to 5000$US dollars on a box with a CD-ROM disc in it! With a cost
    like that, it ought to be some really good software!

    Final Comments

    If it wasn't for Microsoft (r) Windows (r) XP, I wouldn't bathe, use
    deoderant, or wear clothes all day. I would just sit around and
    stink, rotting in my house, getting fat! Thanks to my switch to
    Windows (r), I'm healthy and have a great life! Thanks Microsoft (r)!
  • Cute girls using XP? Yeah right! by moenispiekni (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:14PM
  • A Lexus? by RailGunner (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:18PM
  • Oh this is RICH! by psychopracter (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:20PM
  • Palm??!!?? by Pyrosophy (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:20PM
  • I thought this was hilareous... by bhsx (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:22PM
  • by Uttles (324447) <uttles@@@gmail...com> on Monday October 14 2002, @03:27PM (#4448300) Homepage Journal
    "resistance is futile" campaign?
  • Truth in advertising??!!! by asscroft (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:28PM
  • Feels like a Knowledge Base article by parnasus (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:29PM
  • Are they totally incapable of original thought ? by oreilco (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:34PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • MacOS wasn't all that great by geekee (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:38PM
  • Switch To Linux/BSD Campaign by nurb432 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:38PM
  • So... by Anonvmous Coward (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:46PM
    • Re:So... by BeeShoo (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:48PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Why does her husband have 6 feet? by BassettHound (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:47PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • HUH?!? by Warlock7 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:50PM
  • While this certainly is funny... by uradu (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:52PM
  • Know what's funny? by NanoGator (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:55PM
    • Re:Know what's funny? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonvmous Coward (589068) on Monday October 14 2002, @04:21PM (#4448741)
      "Linux isn't living up to any of the claims that MS or Apple are making."

      LOL!!

      I can see the Linux ads now:

      "So.. like, I bought this Firewire Video camera, and I like shot some footage of my dog and stuff... and like when I plugged the camera into my Linux laptop.. uh.. well it didn't work. So first I went to find a firewire driver. And uh.. well I couldn't find one of those, but I find a kernel update that had firewire support. So I downloaded and recompiled and typed this in and that in and that kind of worked. Then.. then I had to find a free-app that'd do DV-capture and editing. After a few days of posting news groups, I eventually did find one that sort of worked. Of course, I had to fix a bug or two for it to be useful. But hey! It's free!! Isn't that the great thing about Open Source? Fixes happen like really really fast. Anyway, so I sort of got that running... and uh now I can get video from my camera to my laptop. It only took a few weeks! So like there's no way I'm going back to Windows now because I put all this damn effort into this and finally got it working.

      My name is Ronald and I'm a Linux Zealot."


      It's a joke, laugh.
      [ Parent ]
  • ZIP disk really? by oolon (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:56PM
  • More supported warez? by kyoko21 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:00PM
  • Ad campaigns by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:02PM
  • More Software Flexibility by webdev (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:03PM
  • Webpage got pulled... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by *xpenguin* (306001) on Monday October 14 2002, @04:04PM (#4448607)
    Looks like they deleted it out of shame.
  • Page is down now by miltimj (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:05PM
  • Page Not Found? by jonesvery (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:07PM
  • Actually this is not the real story by Zakabog (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:08PM
  • switch? by thriver (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:09PM
  • M$ Needs U!!!! by Glanz (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:10PM
  • It's gone :( by AstroPup (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:10PM
  • Page Removed by Xandu (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:11PM
  • "Bill, we're on slashdot again!" "Shit!" by iMacGuy (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:12PM
  • Looks like they thought better of it by Merls (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:14PM
  • Karma whoring in the Google cache by untulis (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:17PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Still got it here. by aedan (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:18PM
  • Future Onion article... by jaysones (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:18PM
  • Link Is Gone; Use This by Myopic (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:19PM
  • And now the MS page is gone... by softsign (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:20PM
  • No-Talent-Ass-Clowns! by holmbrew (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:25PM
  • Page removed! LOL by ruiner13 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:25PM
  • uh, Duh. by smblion (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:28PM
  • Mirror by Giraf_DK (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:28PM
  • Any google cache copies? by htrn (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:31PM
  • GoogleCache! by civik (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:33PM
  • Original Article & Girl still available by DanLake (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:36PM
  • Google Cache by entrylevel (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:37PM
  • 2:38 PM PST by Juanvaldes (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:38PM
  • Copy of the article by prostoalex (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:39PM
  • cached copy on google @ by BrodieBruce (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:40PM
  • Fabricated article... and stated as such: by Hyped01 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:44PM
  • Why bother? (Score:5, Funny)

    by DaveOMatic (557945) on Monday October 14 2002, @04:48PM (#4448964)
    I think the Apple switch campaign was the best advertising they could have gotten. Every time I see one of those smug, smarmy bastards talking about why they switched, it just makes me cling to my cvrappy Windows box more, out of spite. It's like those "The Truth" anti-smoking ads, that make you want to start going at a pack a day, just to shut the little punks up.
    • Re:Why bother? by Malcreant (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @12:09PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Missing Step by Transcendent (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:57PM
  • Ooo, /. aqua-ized ... by UnknownSoldier (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @05:00PM
  • Mirror: Two Words "Google Cache" by PalmKiller (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:00PM
  • Microsoft's "ShowYourSkills" form by cascadefx (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @05:07PM
  • *poof* by mstra (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:13PM
  • Another "Cache" by Squidgee (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:20PM
  • Explanation (Score:3, Funny)

    by sg3000 (87992) <`sg_public' `at' `mac.com'> on Monday October 14 2002, @05:26PM (#4449243)
    > Update: 10/14 21:12 GMT by P: Apparently,
    > Microsoft has taken the page down, but Google
    > has it.

    She must have switched back
  • In Other News by fire-eyes (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:45PM
  • by kalidasa (577403) on Monday October 14 2002, @05:49PM (#4449405) Journal

    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

    So a laptop with 512 MB of ram, Office XP, Windows XP pro, and all the other features this thing is talking about was $450.00 cheaper than an iBook? Sorry, but that is very unlikely. If you're comparing a Windows computer to a Mac, and you're saying that Office XP is better than AppleWorks, you'd better be including the $500 for Office XP in that comparison, or you're going to get burned by legal.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • *snort* by BiOFH (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:50PM
  • A web page = a campaign? by geekee (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:08PM
  • They got it all wrong... by onyxcide (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:08PM
  • M$ is remarkably clueless as to who uses and why by crovira (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @06:24PM
  • Wow... by superdan2k (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @06:29PM
    • Re:Wow... by BlacKat (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:44PM
  • The obvious by nyseal (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:38PM
  • What I love by rikkards (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:46PM
  • by Aqua OS X (458522) on Monday October 14 2002, @07:02PM (#4449808) Homepage
    What a horrid little article.

    Wow, that was bad. I personally loved when that fictional woman was bragging about Office having more features then Appleworks. Well, all I have to say is "duh." AppleWorks was designed to be a simple office productivity suite, not the huge beast that is MS Office.

    Moreover, did Microsoft forget that they sell Microsoft Office for MacOS? And did they also forget that the Mac versions of Office (at least 98, 2001, and Office X) have typically had cooler features and a better interface then their Windows counter parts?

    And, hey don't get me started on all of the free Open Source Productivity suites that have tons of features and read DOC and XLS files for free. I think Microsoft forgot about those as well.

    Other things that Microsoft seems to have forgotten about include:
    Microsoft develops a version of Internet Explorer for Mac OS complete with tons of Mac specific features.
    Mozilla(netscape) has more features, and -actually- does more then IE has ever done.
    Every browser on the face of the earth comes with a history and organizable favorites, bookmarks, etc
    A lowend iBook will remain functional a hell of a lot longer then a lowend notebook running windows.
    Wizards are horrible little things that should rot in a firry pit of hell. Users should never 'need' to look for a wizard for simple setup procedure. They are a crutch for poor interface design.

    God I hate Windows.
  • Beaten to death by derubergeek (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @07:07PM
  • yeah, but by cygnusx197 (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @07:19PM
  • Submitting Story Ideas by VB (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @07:20PM
  • Oh and of course Apple's confessors must be real by xmnemonic (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @07:20PM
  • How Microsoft has made my life easier by hansroy (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @08:14PM
  • Free market research? by theBrownfury (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @08:16PM
  • To be fair... by Matthew Weigel (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @08:24PM
  • The biggest crock.. by EvilStein (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @08:34PM
  • 1000th post? by Alien Being (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @09:08PM
  • Right... by bugiled (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @10:06PM
  • Nationwide News by Joe Jordan (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @12:02AM
  • I really like my XP... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by forgoil (104808) on Tuesday October 15 2002, @02:17AM (#4451962) Homepage
    ...but the multiuser part of Windows sucks worse than NFS in Linux. The separation of users settings works as long as it is Microsoft's software, but many 3rd party software sucks ass big time (for instance ICQ).

    Multi-user works a hell of a lot better in different unixes, even though it is very basic and cumbersom (I can't spell today) at times.
  • Well, errrm, yea... by kernelistic (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @02:29AM
  • http://www.ibike.org/bikeafrica/malawi/ by Wookye (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @02:45AM
  • Shes hot! by muffen (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @04:19AM
  • (ClarisWorks) vs. Office XP by djtripp (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @04:27AM
  • Stop putting Bill Gates as Borg by anandcp (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @06:13AM
  • Switch by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @10:31AM
  • Ms. MoXie - a REAL Microsoft Lady by superflippy (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @10:53AM
  • Oops, there goe's the savings by galego (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @11:34AM
  • CNN story by gerardrj (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @04:20PM
  • A sincere regard for truth by EnlightenmentFan (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @08:42PM
  • NPR has a blurb by NewSodEnt (Score:1) Wednesday October 16 2002, @06:01AM
  • Boring! by mynameisnobody (Score:1) Wednesday October 16 2002, @11:11AM
  • Also very funny: Migrate from Unix to Windows by theevil (Score:1) Thursday October 17 2002, @03:32AM
  • Here's a copy of the fake "ad" by KWIJIB0 (Score:1) Thursday October 17 2002, @04:40PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:As says Janie Porche by 90XDoubleSide (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @01:58PM
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2002, @02:01PM (#4447373)
    It's newsworthy-- in the Slashdot sense of "news," of course-- because it's funny. Microsoft's response to the Switchers campaign is so lame and so fake that it's funny.

    Nobody has their "panties in a bunch." We're just kicking back on a Monday morning and enjoying a good joke. The fact that Microsoft made the joke-- inadvertently, at that-- just makes it that much more enjoyable.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by pmz (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:01PM
  • Re:As says Janie Porche by MissMyNewton (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @02:03PM
  • Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) (Score:4, Funny)

    by FooBarWidget (556006) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:03PM (#4447408)
    Seperate accounts for each user? Didn't Unix had that since the late '60s?
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:4, Interesting)

    by pizza_milkshake (580452) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:04PM (#4447429) Homepage
    This strategy has existed for decades and I find it not funny nor worth getting your panties in a bunch about.

    I think you're missing the point. It's not the strategy that's amusing, it's the fact that it's such a poor effort. Microsoft doesn't offer one reason to use XP that doesn't also exist in Mac OS X. Microsoft Office? They have that for OS X. Multi-user? Yeah, OS X has that. Etc, etc.

    it's like an ad from Iraq's tourism industry trying to lure beach-goers away from Florida:

    Sun? We have that. Sand? We have lots of that too!

    This is almost as silly as Microsoft hosting the "we have the way out" anti-unix site on freebsd. but i digress...

    [ Parent ]
    • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Scratch-O-Matic (245992) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:15PM (#4447563)
      Microsoft doesn't offer one reason to use XP that doesn't also exist in Mac OS X. Microsoft Office?

      From the botom of the article:

      Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

      I'm pretty sure that what's going on here is that Microsoft found a freelance writer to write glowingly about XP in exchange for free hardwaree and OS. Similar to the old tactic of giving aluminum siding to a family for free so the neighbors can see it in action. 10 bucks says she's on the MS payroll. Also, in response to the posters above who remarked that she is so much better looking than the women in the Mac ads: I'll bet the picture shown is not the writer of the article.

      Could be totally wrong on both counts, but that's my impression
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by cioxx (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @02:32PM
    • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:5, Insightful)

      by dirk (87083) <dirk@one.net> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:48PM (#4447875) Homepage
      think you're missing the point. It's not the strategy that's amusing, it's the fact that it's such a poor effort. Microsoft doesn't offer one reason to use XP that doesn't also exist in Mac OS X. Microsoft Office? They have that for OS X. Multi-user? Yeah, OS X has that. Etc, etc.

      But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have. You can burn cds and dvds, which you can do on WinXP. You can make movies, whihc you can do on WinXP. Neither sides has any really good arguements, because people wouldn't respond to the good arguements (things like the cariety of software on Windows vs Mac or the better usage of the power of a Mac vs WinXP). Neither side really will convince someone to switch, it will just hopefully make them check out both and make a decision after looking at both of them.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Gropo (Score:3) Monday October 14 2002, @03:16PM
      • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by VValdo (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:26PM
      • Re:Welcome to Consumer Satisfaction (Score:5, Insightful)

        by mcc (14761) <amcclure@purdue.edu> on Monday October 14 2002, @04:32PM (#4448844) Homepage
        But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have.

        And you've completely missed the exact same thing that Microsoft missed about the Switch campaign.

        The point isn't to show these people talking about all the things they can do with their macintoshes. The point is to show how happy that all these people are about all these things that they can do with their macintoshes. The point is demonstrate to all those disgruntled windows users in the Great Unwashed, using real people, that computing can actually be a pleasurable experience.

        Apple doesn't want you to pay attention to what any of those people in the Switch ads are saying. What they want you to pay attention to is the quiet, joyful glow in Ellen Feiss' eyes as she talks about how happy she is that she doesn't have to worry anymore about the computer going all, like, BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP and deleting, like, half her paper. (And it was a really *good* paper.)

        They want people to see these Switch ads and go, "Wow. These people all seem to actually enjoy using their computers. I don't enjoy using my computer at all. Maybe if I bought an apple, I'd enjoy using my computer too."

        (Of course, usually the ACTUAL effect is that people see that quiet glow and they go "Wow. Maybe if I started smoking pot, I'd be happy too". Or they start stalking Ellen Fiess. But the point is the intent of the whole thing.)

        This is why the switchy-PR thing on MS's website is such a joke. [S]he's describing how "great" her experience with WinXP has been, but the experience that she describes sounds about as fun as a trip to the DMV in which the line was short and you managed to get in and out and get everything you needed done without particularly any hassle. Meanwhile, any emotion that there is in the article feels about as real as Anne Coulter.
        [ Parent ]
      • It's not about features, but convenience by zenyu (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @04:36PM
      • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Razzak (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:24PM
      • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by kitzilla (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @09:39PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by kimgh (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:08PM
    • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Zoop (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:35PM
    • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by MacGod (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:44PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by Hrothgar The Great (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:09PM
  • observation (Score:4, Interesting)

    by GunFodder (208805) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:10PM (#4447502)
    I don't have any formal training in marketing besides having watched maybe 10000 hours of TV :) In many categories the market leader does not mention the competition. For instance, you don't see commercials where MacDonalds even mentions Burger King or their other competitors. Nike and Budweiser do the same thing. Up until now Microsoft has only compared their newest OS to previous versions of Windows.

    If I was an Apple user I would be encouraged by this bit of marketing. It implies that Microsoft is concerned about their image compared with Apple and is willing to violate this empirical rule.
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:observation by leroybrown (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:38PM
      • Re:observation by Charlton Heston (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:50PM
      • You missed the point by burgburgburg (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:54PM
      • Re:observation by Hater's Leaving, The (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:34PM
      • Whoa... by srvivn21 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @06:05PM
        • Re:Whoa... by leroybrown (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @06:57PM
        • Re:Whoa... by toriver (Score:2) Tuesday October 15 2002, @03:49AM
          • Re:Whoa... by srvivn21 (Score:2) Friday October 18 2002, @07:19PM
    • Re:(flawed)observation by Schart (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:38PM
    • Re:observation by Dr. Spork (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:05PM
    • Re:observation by alue (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @07:42PM
    • Re:observation by Ninja Programmer (Score:1) Tuesday October 15 2002, @12:43AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:5, Funny)

    by Incongruity (70416) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:30PM (#4447686)
    Being a Marketing Director, I can tell you that there is nothing surprising (or news worthy) in this story. Its simple. Competitor explains why there product is better than yours. You can either A.) Do nothing B.) Fight Back

    See, the great part is that Microsoft tried doing A and B *together*! Now that's novelty.

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:As says Janie Porche by anti-drew (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:31PM
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:4, Insightful)

    by squiggleslash (241428) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:31PM (#4447700) Journal
    It's newsworthy in the sense that it'd be if Chevy's all-new campaign against Ford were to have the MD of GM chatting to the camera about how his granddad, Thomas Edison, and "whoever the President was at the time", would go to Yellowstone Park in their Suburbans.

    That's the amusing bit. That MS is copying Apple's campaign. It's doubly amusing because it's a well known MS-bash that, supposedly, MS copies everything Apple does anyway.

    [I dunno. Windows 1 through 3 weren't remotely Mac like. Even Win95 and up has no meta data yet. But the point has been made]

    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It's not capitalism, it's promotion (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sg3000 (87992) <`sg_public' `at' `mac.com'> on Monday October 14 2002, @02:37PM (#4447753)
    I work in marketing too, and I think it is newsworthy because it shows that Apple's campaign is a success.

    Since one can't generally can't make a correlation between an advertising campaign and increased sales (too much of a lag and too many factors), there are a few milestones for promotions that indicate success:

    1. A coined term being adopted by the industry. In this case, "Switcher" is being used in all sorts of contexts, albeit in articles talking about Apple. But if someone in the computer industry uses the term "Switcher", most people in the know will think "Apple". I guarantee you someone in Intel's marketing department grins whenever an analyst talks soberly about "Moore's Law".

    2. Grass roots movement/fan clubs: Exhibit A is Ellen Feiss [gloriousnoise.com]. I doubt if anybody outside of Dell' marketing department builds fan sites for that annoying geek they're using

    3. The competition is forced to respond to you. Pepsi constantly mentions Coke, but Coke never mentions Pepsi. But Pepsi's marketing department would love to see that happen. If anything, it's free advertising, because your product is being mentioned without you having to pay for it.

    4. Finally, some sort of parody exists. I've seen a few on the web, but Apple would hit pay dirt if Saturday Night Live or someone painfully mainstream would do a parody. That would show that Apple's Switchers campaign has become a small zeitgeist, like the Mastercard "Priceless" ads.

    The Microsoft ad was so bad because it was so easily dismissed. All the talking points could be dismissed just as easily as they are brought up. Make no mistake, someone in Apple's promotions department saw that pathetic Microsoft ad and grinned from ear to ear.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Overt Coward (19347) on Monday October 14 2002, @02:38PM (#4447767) Homepage
    The newsworthy part of the story is that a market leader apparently thinks it has to produce an ill-disguised clone of a market follower's ad.

    You're right in that Microsoft had the choice of doing nothing or doing something. But doing something this stupid is to lend credence to your competition rather than building interest or confidence in your own product.

    The Ford/Chevy analogy does not work because they have reasonably equivalent market share. The better anaolgy would be if there were ads for a Yugo featuring former Ford owners, which Ford countered with an ad featuring former Yugo owners. That would have been a massively stupid move for Ford, because all they are doing is equating the two makes in peoples' minds.

    (The Yugo/Ford analogy is not intended to imply any correlation between quality of produts, just strength of market share...)
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Dalcius (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:42PM
  • Re:As says Janie Porche by User 956 (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @02:55PM
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by TheWickedKingJeremy (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:27PM
  • Great, just what I need... by Wah (Score:2) Monday October 14 2002, @03:33PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:dude, I think that *is* Molly Culver by ddkilzer (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:36PM
  • Excuse me? by waltc (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @03:48PM
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by LostSinner (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @04:01PM
  • Re:Welcome to Capitalism by tonekids (Score:1) Monday October 14 2002, @05:20PM
  • 65 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4