Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×
Desktops (Apple)

Submission + - Sealed-box Macs: should computers be disposable? ( 2

An anonymous reader writes: Apple's new Retina MacBook Pro is essentially completely non-upgradable, a sealed-box, following a trend started with the MacBook Air in 2008. It's a given that hardware companies are in the business of selling hardware, and would love for computers to have iPhone-like replacement cycles of 1-3 years, but does this mean we're moving irresistibly into an era of "sealed-unit computing," even for power users?
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sealed-box Macs: should computers be disposable?

Comments Filter:
  • Traditional mainstream computers will become disposable. The advent of mobile device apps which connect directly to back-end severs are becoming so prominent that app developers will continue this to push this model of software delivery onto the desktops and laptops of users. It is a good bet that the hardware vendors will attempt to align themselves with this industry change. It makes sense for them as it is much cheaper to develop and build a non-modifiable platform than one which is "compatibile with

  • For better or worse, Apple has increasingly led the industry in many ways, especially in terms of design. If Apple goes "sealed-unit" even for high-end machines, others will follow suit. At the same time, in large part because of Apple's efforts, the market is increasingly dominated by consumer-class devices. How much incentive is there for Apple (or any other hardware vendor) to cater to power users, who are a diminishing proportion of the revenue picture?

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (8) I'm on the committee and I *still* don't know what the hell #pragma is for.