Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Desktops (Apple) Apple Technology

Apple Scraps Work on Mac-Connected Augmented Reality Glasses (yahoo.com) 23

Apple has canceled a project to build advanced augmented reality glasses that would pair with its devices, Bloomberg reported Friday, marking the latest setback in its effort to create a headset that appeals to typical consumers. From the report: The company shuttered the program this week, according to people with knowledge of the move. The now-canceled product would have looked like normal glasses but include built-in displays and require a connection to a Mac, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the work wasn't public.

The project had been seen as a potential way forward after the weak introduction of the Apple Vision Pro, a $3,499 model that was too cumbersome and pricey to catch on with consumers. The hope was to produce something that everyday users could embrace, but finding the right technology -- at the right cost -- has proven to be a challenge.

Apple Scraps Work on Mac-Connected Augmented Reality Glasses

Comments Filter:
  • asked for any of this. Please be *specific*.
  • It's compatible with anything that has an HDMI port, including Macs.

    See? [xreal.com]

    It's not cheap though. And I don't expect Apple can beat this price.

  • by goldspider ( 445116 ) on Friday January 31, 2025 @04:36PM (#65133399) Homepage

    Why don't they refocus on something their customers actually want, like a 27" iMac?

  • by Baron_Yam ( 643147 ) on Friday January 31, 2025 @04:40PM (#65133409)

    First with VR, then scaling back to AR, it's still too much. Mind you, until they got the glasses down to something you could wear in public it was all DOA anyway.

    But still, the killer AR app is the desktop monitor replacement. Give me floating virtual displays of whatever size I want, at whatever apparent distance I want, on something that looks like a normal pair of prescription glasses. Have ear bud(s) and a boom mic as clip-on accessories, give the power/data cable a quick disconnect. That's your business use right there. That alone would sell.

    Once you have that, you can do things like have a small belt pack for some battery and a minimal HUD that'll interface with your phone or your car / motorcycle / snowmobile / boat / bicycle / airplane / toy drone / home security system to throw a dashboard in front of you. There's your personal use.

    No camera required or desired. Leave that on the phone.

    Build that, and the same kind of people who wear a Bluetooth earpiece all the time will adopt it overnight.

    • "No camera required or desired. Leave that on the phone.

      Build that, and the same kind of people who wear a Bluetooth earpiece all the time will adopt it overnight."

      Yeah. Instead of being killer apps, cameras appear to be app killers. It seems that having a camera onboard is a drawback for social acceptance.

    • yeah, i think the 'do everything' is probably the failing here. I like Visor's concept, just do the basics, people can put in airpods or over the ears of their choosing if they want. Just make really great floating screens.

    • by necro81 ( 917438 )

      First with VR, then scaling back to AR, it's still too much. Mind you, until they got the glasses down to something you could wear in public it was all DOA anyway

      You're right! They should just stick to eyeglasses and sunglasses!

  • just asking
    • by leonbev ( 111395 )

      Probably 20 years from now, when he gets sick or dies. He's making boatloads of money, and that's what the shareholders really care about.

  • The Vision Pro is an amazing piece of technology, that costs too much. has too short of a battery life and weighs too much (though I'm fine with it). I think just a chip swap to m4 would have done wonders for the battery I think even the OS updates since seem to have helped. I think if they just revise it they can fix the latter two problems partially and as they've bought technologies from it's R&D too other products if they account for the dev accounts by paying them off with device and the subsequent
    • by Octorian ( 14086 )

      The Vision Pro is an amazing piece of technology, that costs too much. has too short of a battery life and weighs too much (though I'm fine with it).

      . . .

      The biggest thing the Vision Pro suffered from was too much hype and too many people that couldn't afford it who bought it to return it to make content, in which they blamed it for the return not that they aren't well off.

      And the sad part is that anyone could have come to this exact conclusion the moment the product was unveiled. We all kinda assumed it was more of an early-adopter demonstrator at that point, and not something that Apple would quickly give up on the moment reality set in.

  • One assumes they resigned in disgrace?
  • There's your first mistake. Nobody wants AR that requires you to be tethered to your desk. For the same reason that using Vision Pro as a display for your Mac is a crappy experience, a lightweight AR headset that connects to your Mac would also be a disaster.

    Paired with an iPhone, though, something like Google Glass with a better interface would be pretty cool. For example, use facial recognition to remind me of who this person is who just walked up to me and started talking to me like I should know him

  • Being a business analyst means never having to say your sorry. There's no disincentive to publish whatever unsourced rumor comes their way.

    Does anyone have any FACTS?

"Open the pod bay doors, HAL." -- Dave Bowman, 2001

Working...