Apple Launches iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max Featuring Titanium Bodies (theverge.com) 101
Apple just announced its new high-end iPhones: the iPhone 15 Pro and 15 Pro Max. The Verge: They're made of titanium, they have Action Buttons, and Apple promises they're the most powerful smartphones Apple has ever made. The 15 Pro starts at $999 with 128GB of storage, and the Pro Max at $1,199 with 256GB of storage. Both will be available for preorder this Friday and on sale September 22nd. This year's Pro has a 6.1-inch screen, and the Pro Max has a 6.7-inch display -- same as the new iPhone 15 and 15 Plus. Both are powered by the A17 Pro chip, which Apple says has the fastest performance in any smartphone and can even challenge some high-end PCs. Along with a redesigned GPU, Apple seems to think these devices could be poised to level up the kinds of games you can play on your phone.
OOh, heavier than Al and more embodied carbon (Score:3, Informative)
Proving that you can't beat marketing, now we have Apple swapping Aluminum for Titanium.
Aluminum is less dense than Ti and only lags Ti in specific strength (and some other physical properties that don't matter for a phone). Titanium takes a lot more energy to make, too.
None of that matters when you have to put it in a case to protect those camera lenses.
Marketing wins!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
That's why I bought the original Z Flip years ago. I ended up spending over a month in the hospital after the fact.
Yeah, I'd want nothing to do with that phone when the act of purchasing it causes you to spend a month in hospital.
Glass (Score:5, Funny)
Aluminum is less dense than Ti and only lags Ti in specific strength
Which does not really matter at all when half the phone is a large glass screen. It's not the aluminium body of a phone that fails if you drop it. What they need is transparent aluminium.
Re: (Score:2)
I always appreciate that they needed this exotic, un-invented material as opposed to just buying some 1" steel plates just so we can see the whales when they're in the ship. What a great movie (no sarcasm, i love it even with the gigantic time travel holes).
Re: (Score:2)
I always appreciate that they needed this exotic, un-invented material as opposed to just buying some 1" steel plates just so we can see the whales when they're in the ship. What a great movie (no sarcasm, i love it even with the gigantic time travel holes).
Exotic? I guess.
Un-invented? Um...you do realize that transparent Aluminum exists, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
It was obviously a plot element in the movie but there's plenty of use cases IRL where plate steel is not a viable substitute for a transparent ceramic.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was talking from the in-universe the movie is taking place in. In the film the material is in fact un-invented thus why Scotty had to show the guy it even existed.
Didn't realize I was in the semantics dome here.
Common Movie Feature (Score:3)
I always appreciate that they needed this exotic, un-invented material as opposed to just buying some 1" steel plates just so we can see the whales when they're in the ship.
Yes, but most good movies have at least one transparent plot device.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And let's not forget all of those antique toys made of pig iron which today just need a new coat of paint (preferably non-lead) to make them look new.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the gameboy that actually fit in your hand, lasted days (weeks?) on a set of swappable batteries, could be disassembled for repair, and even had a headphones jack?
Today they'd slim that puppy down and remove all the empty space so it's impossible to hold comfortably, make it of shiny metal and fragile glass, glue everything together and...oh wait.
Sarcasm aside, it's this never-ending quest for sleek, shiny, and smaller that's done it. I wouldn't really prefer an OG gameboy-sized phone but somewher
Re: (Score:2)
>Aluminum is less dense than Ti and only lags Ti in specific strength
Yeah! Who need higher density and strength on incredibly thin, expensive electronics that get routinely dropped sat on!
Re: (Score:3)
Proving that you can't beat marketing, now we have Apple swapping Aluminum for Titanium.
Aluminum is less dense than Ti and only lags Ti in specific strength (and some other physical properties that don't matter for a phone). Titanium takes a lot more energy to make, too.
None of that matters when you have to put it in a case to protect those camera lenses.
Marketing wins!
Sorry dude, but the previous iPhone frame was made of steel, not Aluminum. heavier than Ti, but about the same strenght.
And even if it were made of aluminum , the tradeoff is a sensible one on a luxury product, aluminium is softer, so a drop would dent or deform the fram, with titanium, that is less likely*
* And yes, I know that a hit with enough force to defor the luminium will crack the screen or glass back, or both... but still, is a nice marketing point ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The only thing that can scratch it is tungsten.
If you jab it with a steel screw driver it will damage the screw driver while the titanium is unharmed
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Mohs scale just measues what materials can sctrach each other. It's what you want for this question.
However, the GP seems to have forgotten that steel can be hardened, which pretty easily makes it harder than titanium. Just about any rock, including the sand and grit that's probably in your pocket, is also going to be harder.
Anodized titanium, particularly under the right conditions, can be a lot more scratch resistant though, because it has a thick layer of much harder oxide on the surface.
Re: (Score:2)
Titanium grade 2 watches are made from pure titanium. Lovely to wear but utter scratch magnets
Titanium grade 5 is a much more scratch resistant alloy.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's kind of weird to claim it's all marketing and not, you know, respond to what their marketing says. From what I can tell, they literally only make one claim about it:
"Titanium has one of the best strengthtoweight ratios of any metal, making these our lightest Pro models ever. You’ll notice the difference the moment you pick one up."
Is that not true?
The main complaints I can see is that its cost isn't worth shaving off a tiny bit of weight, but it isn't all marketing, it's still just fact that no o
Action button (Score:4, Interesting)
It would be great if they could move that action button to the middle-bottom of the display, around where my thumb naturally gets positioned. Then I could use it for things like quickly exiting the current app to the home screen, fast switching between apps, etc.
Re: Action button (Score:1)
Hopefully It's only a matter of time before they come full circle back to that.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, you can swipe up from the bottom to do that. It's not that much of a different gesture.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
USB-C (Score:1)
Both phones, of course, have a USB-C port on the bottom rather than the old Lightning port. But in the Pro’s case, it could be for more than charging: Apple says the 15 Pro is the first phone with 10Gbps transfer speeds, which will make getting photos and videos (or large files of any kind) off your phone vastly easier.
But I thought Lightning was just superior and that being mandated to use USB-C was a shitty evil thing for the EU to do to poor Apple who is only trying to include the best solutions for their customers?
Are the Apple Fanboys gonna come in here and admit they were massively wrong now, or are they just going to ignore all the stupidity they've been hosing out for the last few weeks and start gaslighting everyone like this was the master plan all along and everyone that thought otherwise is an idiot?
Re: (Score:2)
In my experience, the tight fit of the lightning connector coupled with its thin connector blade, means that if you trip over the cable there is a chance of breaking the wafer off in the slot (I have seen it happen). USB-C is a much sturdier connector.
Re: USB-C (Score:1)
The USB-Câ(TM)s connector has a similar wafer in the freaking connector. Not only very stupid design, but if it breaks, now you get to replace the whole device. Your situation, which for most cables would require quite a bit of force, can be solved with a pair of tweezers and a new cable.
They shouldâ(TM)ve kept the lightning (they have another year to comply anyway) and either go portless or give people in the EU a USB-C insert or converter cable.
Re: (Score:2)
The USB-Câ(TM)s connector has a similar wafer in the freaking connector. Not only very stupid design, but if it breaks, now you get to replace the whole device.
Except that I've abused the h*** out of USB cables, up to the point of literally snapping off Apple-branded USB-C cables, and I've never actually broken a single USB-C port; the shell and structure of the ports protect the wafers really, really well. I've also broken Lightning cables. Lightning is much easier to break, and much harder to deal with when that happens, because it leaves only a wafer stuck down inside the connector, whereas USB-C cables shear off where the wires solder onto the back of the pl
Re: (Score:1)
A shock hazard at 5V? Please.
Contacts on both sides actually. Hard to take your arguments against Lightning seriously when you've patently never even seen one.
USB is faster, yes, but it's a phone not a portable HDD. Tell me honestly (if you can manage a little honesty) how often you need to pull files off your phone, never mind them being large enough that fast I/O makes a difference. I mean this is like complaining that your car can't do 200mph even though you'd never drive it that fast anyway.
You can quit
Re: (Score:1)
A shock hazard at 5V? Please.
I didn't say electrocution. I said shock. It hurts like h**l if it hits the bare skin on your arms, back, etc.
Contacts on both sides actually. Hard to take your arguments against Lightning seriously when you've patently never even seen one.
No, it most certainly does not. The *plug* has contacts on both sides, but the connector inside the device has contacts on only one side, and this is a big part of what causes its reliability problems.
USB is faster, yes, but it's a phone not a portable HDD. Tell me honestly (if you can manage a little honesty) how often you need to pull files off your phone, never mind them being large enough that fast I/O makes a difference. I mean this is like complaining that your car can't do 200mph even though you'd never drive it that fast anyway.
You've obviously never tried to sync Lightroom with an iPhone that has tens of gigabytes of photos. It is utterly miserable. The bigger the devices get capacity-wise, the more USB 2.0 speeds suck
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
5v can't shock you. Not even 12v. you start feeling a tingle around 15-20v.
On a dry hand, that's typically true, but the resistance of your skin drops dramatically when it is wet (e.g. after a shower or from sweat), falling from about 10k to only about 1k. 5V passing through 1k of resistance is 5 milliamps, which is enough to cause pain [osha.gov]. In my experience, it feels a lot like somebody pulling a hair.
12V on wet skin would actually be enough to potentially cause involuntary muscle contractions.
Re: (Score:2)
You're not feeling the 5V DC, it's the mains AC coupling through the charger.
If AC ripple were responsible, you'd also get shocked when you touched any metal on the device, because the only way that could happen without your device catching fire the second you plugged it in would be if the power and ground were 5V apart from each other, but with both power and ground at a large AC offset from the true earth ground, which would means that the ground plane on the device, and thus the case would also be at that voltage.
So that explanation seems *incredibly* unlikely to me. By contrast
Re: (Score:2)
Instead of arguing with (legitimate) facts, just ask anyone who's tested a 9v battery with their tongue if 10 volts can shock someone or not...
I've had devices with offset grounds causing minor shocks on metal desks or work-benches before. It's mostly annoying and not really dangerous but still technically a shock.
Re: (Score:1)
Most 2-pin USB chargers have a small capacitor coupling the AC side to the DC side and this definitely leaves a tingling sensation when any metal chassis of a device being charged is touched. Similar thing happens with a laptop charger if its earthing pin is not connected to the switchboard earth - touch any of the metal parts of the laptop and you will feel a vibration on your fingers/palm.
Re: (Score:1)
A 9V battery on your tongue doesn't hurt, it gives a weird taste, that's about it. Mechanics touch 12V battery terminals with their bare hands all the time. A potential 5V/2A is nothing compared to the 12V/2000A potential from a car battery. A very cheap charger from China may pass/leak 110/220V, that's dangerous, if you touch ANY charger end and you 'feel' something, throw the charger out.
Re: (Score:1)
Cheap USB chargers do. Coupling capacitors between AC and DC is not permitted by UL/CE. A noisy DC output should be grounded or capacitively connected to ground.
Re: (Score:2)
Cheap USB chargers do. Coupling capacitors between AC and DC is not permitted by UL/CE. A noisy DC output should be grounded or capacitively connected to ground.
Pretty sure this is an Anker charger, so not cheap, but I could be wrong. Either way, whether it is the 5V itself or caused by cheap chargers coupling the DC side to a not-quite-grounded neutral on the AC side, you can still get shocked by exposed contacts.
Re: (Score:1)
2-pin chargers do not have 3rd pin for grounding.
Re: (Score:2)
I am aware, hence why some (very cheap) designs use 'neutral' as ground rather than properly implementing a circuit and then when people reverse the plug, hilarity ensues.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You only get 20v out of USB-PD after device negotiation. You won't ever find that sitting at the end of an unplugged USB cable (unlike old school barrel connectors)
Re: USB-C (Score:5, Insightful)
The lighting is, without question, the superior connector
Based on what measure? It has much slower data rates, much slower charging speeds, and it's designed so that the springs are in the port, which means the port wears out long before the cable would, which is just plain stupid, and is exactly the opposite of USB-C. USB-C (24 pins) also has a lot more room to grow than lightning (8 pins.)
Yes, a USB-C cable will wear out before a lightning cable, however, a USB-C port will outlast a lightning port. This is a trade-off that's well worth it, unless you want to sell more devices or repair services, which is only something Apple benefits from.
If lighting was really better, then why was everything else apple made, including the ipad, moving to usb-c long before the EU got involved? Even if apple have lightning to the USB-IF, they wouldn't use it anyway because USB-C has it outclassed in every way. No matter what, if lightning needed to be modernized, you'd already have to toss out the form factor anyways.
The only way you could possibly believe what you just said is if you literally believe every word, no matter how false, that comes out of Apple's marketing.
Re: (Score:2)
I said the connector, not the electronics. Nuance is important. As others have pointed out, if you break the lightning connector, you buy a new cable. If you break the USB-C connector, you buy a new device. The EU has now kindly helped future iPhone users find a new failure mode, and while I think it's the right choice given reality, it's not the optimal one. As far as I'm aware,
Given that the other end of a lightning cable is USB2, I think we know what protocol is being spoken and what the data-rate limit
Re: (Score:2)
I said the connector, not the electronics. Nuance is important.
That's wonderful, because those familiar with the spec already know that I'm actually talking about both (well actually, connector vs mode/protocol to be more precise, and it sounds like you're referring to the later when you say electronics but you don't know the difference.) More on this later.
As others have pointed out, if you break the lightning connector, you buy a new cable. If you break the USB-C connector, you buy a new device.
That's just something ifans like to speculate on. And depending on the circumstances it ranges between incredibly far fetched to downright false. There's only two ways you'll realistically break it, one is where you
Re: (Score:2)
I said the connector, not the electronics. Nuance is important.
Then you should re-read the parents post because it was mostly about the connector.
As others have pointed out, if you break the lightning connector, you buy a new cable. If you break the USB-C connector, you buy a new device.
Except that is false. Both are capable of breaking when abused. You just have a lot more USB-C devices on the market (by several orders of magnitude) so you hear about it happening more.
The EU has now kindly helped future iPhone users find a new failure mode
The EU's done nothing of the sort. Apple was already transitioning to USB-C before the EU passed the rule. Apple switched most of the iPad lineup to USB-C 3 years ago. They were already transitioning away.
Given that the other end of a lightning cable is USB2, I think we know what protocol is being spoken and what the data-rate limitation is based upon.
The data rate limit is due to the elec
Re: (Score:3)
On the flip side, it's virtually impossible to clean a USB female socket. Connectors are magnets for pocket lint. With the lightning connector, I can just clean out the connector with a paperclip or a thumbtack or similar.
Re: (Score:2)
On the flip side, it's virtually impossible to clean a USB female socket. Connectors are magnets for pocket lint. With the lightning connector, I can just clean out the connector with a paperclip or a thumbtack or similar.
So you're saying you enhance the failure mode of your lightning connector as much as possible? I've never had a phone connector collect so much lint I couldn't fit the cable in and ... sticking a paperclip into the port is likely to bend the contact pins.
When your phones port dies 'because you can't clean it well enough anymore' please understand that it's actually because you bent the pins to sh*t.
Just use a sewing needle (Score:2)
I have no trouble cleaning USB type C sockets with sewing needles.
Re: USB-C (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So the iPad Pro from 2018 (Model A1980) [gsmarena.com] sitting on my desk came about after the EU passed regulations in spring of 2022 [europa.eu]?
I had no idea that Apple had a functional time machine allowing them to ship devices from today into the past!
Stop sucking off Apple. Lightning only continued to exist because it made them so much money on licensing and sales of cables that fail way too early.
Re: USB-C (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, except all of that is tangental and coincidental.
The reason that Apple moved the iPad 5 years ago to USB-C was because they could put double the wattage through it than they could with Lightning, and they already had implementation experience of USB-PD from Macbooks.
As it turns out, people didn't want to take hours to charge their 7000+ mAh tablet battery on a shitty 30W max charger when USB-PD supports up to 100W on a connector that is approximately the same size.
They knew it was a better connector 5
Evidence suggests the Opposite (Score:2)
The lighting is, without question, the superior connector.
Then why have I had multiple lightning cables fail and (so far) no USB-C despite generally using USB-C more since that's what my phone and laptop uses vs. my iPad? These were not third party lightning cables either but genuine Apple ones while the USB-C have been a mix of vendor supplied (DELL and Samsung) plus some third party. My kids found the same as well. All the evidence I have is that lightning is a vastly inferior connector to USB-c
Titanium body is kinda cool but (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
bla bla bla, Apple Arcade, bla bla bla bla bla bla.
Re: (Score:1)
The top ten Apple Arcade games at this moment when I check the app store:
1. Hello Kitty Island Adventure
2. Solitaire
3. Retro Bowl+
4. NBA 2K23 Arcade Edition
5. Bloons TD 6+
6. Snake.io
7. Sneaky Sasquatch
8. Angry Birds Reloaded
9. Stardew Valley+
10. Sudoku
The only one of those that makes even a feint at console-style 3D graphics is NBA 2K23, and its name even outright states that it's an "Arcade Edition". The rest all have highly stylized artwork, some more "2.5D", some with the kind of simplified 3D you'd see
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, actually cares about high-end gaming graphics on their phone.
Sure we do - that high-end GPU makes a phone a great hand warmer in the middle of a Canadian winter.
Titanium yes, leather no? (Score:5, Informative)
Who let marketing loose? Apple says no more leather because why would we want to use all the parts of the animal we just ate?
But they start using titanium? It's one of the most environmentally unfriendly materials available.
1) Take ilmenite ore and boil in sulfuric acid until breaks down leaving you iron in solution and titanium dioxide.
2) Filter and dry the TiO2 then put it into a reactor. Heat to red heat, then add chlorine gas.
3)The reaction is endothermic so ever so often you have to turn off the chlorine and reheat the reactor and remaining TiO2.
4) Now you have titanium tetrachloride in a vapor and you can run that through a distillation column to clean it up.
5) The TiCl4 is now put into a closed container informally called the "the bomb" for reasons that will become obvious.
6) Now you add your choice of metallic sodium or metallic calcium, close up the bomb and light it.
7) The resulting reaction is highly exothermic and after the vessel is done bouncing around you let it cool completely.
8) Open the vessel up and you have salt and titanium metal in sponge form. That gets lightly crushed and the salt washed away.
9) Take the Ti sponge and put it into either a vacuum induction furnace or an argon blanketed induction furnace. Melt it down, add alloying elements if any, and cast it under argon and now you have a useful piece of metal.
One other note, titanium is hard to ignite, but if you do set it on fire you are not putting it out. I've seen the results of two titanium fires and it was spectacular. The result of the last titanium fire was than the company using titanium stopped using it. They went to zirconium ball is the valves (even harder to set on fire) and Ferallium 255 in the shafts. That corroded away, but in a slow and peaceful manner.
I don't know what Apple was thinking.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know what Apple was thinking.
They hadn't redesigned the body of the phone in awhile and clearly had to do something so that the latest, most expensive models would be immediately identifiable as such for the conspicuous consumption crowd.
Car companies do exactly the same thing.
Numbers and context (Score:5, Informative)
These days most industrial titanium production is done with the Kroll process [wikipedia.org], where TiCl4 (obtained as above) is reacted with liquid magnesium in an inert atmosphere, and the resulting magnesium chloride drawn off in liquid form. The bulk of the energy used in the whole process is consumed converting the resulting MgCl2 back into magnesium and chlorine. Current estimates of the end-to-end energy consumption of this process that I could find online suggest between 295 to 420 MJ/Kg. This compares pretty dreadfully to the numbers for the Bayer process [wikipedia.org] for extracting aluminium from bauxite, which Wikipedia puts at between 7 and 21 MJ/Kg. So per unit mass, titanium is 20 or 30 times worse than aluminium.
Having said all that, if you look past the marketing headline at what Apple actually announced, you will see that the iPhone 15 Pro isn't made from titanium. It has an aluminium chassis with a titanium band around the outside for strength. From their press release:
Using an industry-first thermo-mechanical process, the titanium bands encase a new substructure made from 100 percent recycled aluminum, bonding these two metals with incredible strength through solid-state diffusion.
I suspect that the total mass of titanium in the device is pretty small, but provides useful strength. Coupled with using recycled metal for the aluminium, it might even have a lower carbon footprint than previous models.
Re: (Score:2)
Who let marketing loose? Apple says no more leather because why would we want to use all the parts of the animal we just ate?
But they start using titanium? It's one of the most environmentally unfriendly materials available.
[...]
I don't know what Apple was thinking.
Titanium is lighter than the Steel frame it is replacing, and has a marketing "cachet"/allure that is befiting of a luxury product like an iPhone. What you say is 100% true, but then again, I guess people buying iPhones think: If it is good enough for artificial Hips and the SRS-71, it must be ideal for my iPhone...
PS: android user, Blackberry KeyOne to be specific. But Mac user, about to migrate back to Windows
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So now instead of a cable you need to carry a cable AND qi charging puck? Brilliant ideal.
ps. the "usb-c prone to breakage" has been debunked so many times in this thread alone you might want to stop going on about it and read a little.
Yawn. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
'the button'
Wait, did they add a home button back? With fingerprint... ... :)
Got my hopes up there for a second. That was mean!
Buttons? (Score:2)
I'm not masochistic enough to watch the keynote - Tim Cook has the personality of a dead fish, and there haven't been any exciting products in years. But did they replace the real buttons with haptic "buttons", as was rumored?
USB-2 speeds over a USB-C connector (Score:2)
COURAGE!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who gives a shit? I legitimately can not remember the last time I used my iPhone to transfer data to or from a computer using a Lightning cord. Who cares? Maybe like 15 people?
Same here because Apple makes that process as absolutely painful as they possibly can.
With my android phone however, I do this somewhat regularly as it's fast, easy, and you get pictures with usable file names via a straight file copy. Oh, and I can easily put stuff onto my phone if i'm traveling and want to bring some movies with me.
Just because Apple broke it doesn't mean the use case isn't there.
Re: (Score:2)
That's just not true (Score:1)
(if I may copy your style).
The article is about the 15 Pro/Pro Max so the supported transfer speed is 10Gb/s, not 480Mb/s as you suggest.
Titanium products from Apple! What could go wrong? (Score:1)
256GB?? (Score:2)
That's it??
No 1TB option? Obviously no removable storage because apparently that too complicated or whatever..
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure what you're referring to...
I just went and looked and on the iPhone 15 Pro Max, there is an option for a 1 TB storage phone.
I can't wait to play ray-traced games on my phone (Score:1)
Woah, hold on! Newest phone is the most powerful? (Score:4, Funny)