Apple-Criticizing Banner Ads Now Added to Some of Facebook's iOS Apps (9to5mac.com) 82
Facebook added banner ads criticizing Apple into some of its iOS apps, 9to5Mac reports, in its ongoing war against Apple's new privacy changes:
By tapping the Learn More button, the app opens an article written by Facebook in which the company says Apple's policies announced at WWDC 2020 with iOS 14 will "harm the growth of business and the free internet." Facebook refers both to the new App Store privacy labels and also an option in iOS 14 that prevents apps from tracking users.
The fact that Facebook is now showing these messages in its iOS apps criticizing Apple demonstrates that the company is trying to get popular appeal to change Apple's mind about its new App Store privacy rules. That's because Facebook is one of the companies that will be most impacted by Apple's new privacy policies as its social networks rely heavily on ads and personal data from users.
In a statement to 9to5Mac, Apple said it doesn't want to force Facebook to change its business model, but the company expects Facebook to be more transparent about how it collects data from users and let them choose whether or not to offer such data.
The fact that Facebook is now showing these messages in its iOS apps criticizing Apple demonstrates that the company is trying to get popular appeal to change Apple's mind about its new App Store privacy rules. That's because Facebook is one of the companies that will be most impacted by Apple's new privacy policies as its social networks rely heavily on ads and personal data from users.
In a statement to 9to5Mac, Apple said it doesn't want to force Facebook to change its business model, but the company expects Facebook to be more transparent about how it collects data from users and let them choose whether or not to offer such data.
I'm loving it. (Score:1, Offtopic)
One of them will end up dead.
If I'm lucky, it will be both. :)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't want either company dead. I want them both *regulated*.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it shouldn't be up to them. They should have to go with C.
Re: I'm loving it. (Score:2)
Re: I'm loving it. (Score:2)
Just repeal section 230. Trump is too stupid to realize that it's repeal would require Twitter and Facebook to ban him - WORKS _FOR_ME.
Unfortunately, I respectfully disagree.
While enabling all sorts of really obnoxious platforms (such as FB, et al, as well as a gogolplex of websites that are, well, devolutionary at best), Sec. 230, like the First Amendment, is actually far preferable to the Timeline where either one of those is absent.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather the US took a note from Poland: https://polandin.com/51388314/... [polandin.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather the US took a note from Poland: https://polandin.com/51388314/... [polandin.com]
We don't need a "special court" for Freedom of Speech issues. It is one of the few things that our Courts still seem to take pretty seriously.
Re: (Score:2)
Except Poland realized that huge companies are exploiting their reach to curb free speech, so it's only fair that companies are treated as part of the US government. Lord knows they get involved in politics.
Re: (Score:2)
Except Poland realized that huge companies are exploiting their reach to curb free speech, so it's only fair that companies are treated as part of the US government. Lord knows they get involved in politics.
IMHO, there are too many differences in the two political systems and countries in general to draw decent parallels, sorry!
Re: I'm loving it. (Score:2)
Yes, I'm assuming that is the same thing. Since there is no part of their "business" that is not harmful to everything that is good.
Some people cannot think far enough to see that.
That is the wave on which they ride to existence in the first place.
Perhaps, one day... (Score:2)
Re: Perhaps, one day... (Score:2)
Re: Perhaps, one day... (Score:2)
Lol. You mean the *advertisement company* Google that also got a few toys on the side, of questionable profitability?
I suggest you check out their coprorate structure.
Facebook's disingenuous posturing (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Facebook's disingenuous posturing (Score:1)
Firefox is in the Apple App Store. Stop with the stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Facebook's disingenuous posturing (Score:1)
The choice to repair or upgrade your devices? The choice to install your own software? The choice to distribute outside of the app store? The choice to install Firefox? The choice to have non-slave labor build my device? You're a brainwashed cultist.
Found the Farcebook shill.
Did Zuck send your paycheck yet?
Re: (Score:2)
No, poor Apple worshipper, I do not like Facebook or Zuckerberg. They're privacy invasive roaches and we'd be better off without the company existing. But Tim Cook is Communist China incarnate. He's put all his users behind a massive tax and prevented innovators from developing anything without an ankle bracelet. Apple think they can own all of computing. It's 90's era Microsoft to the extreme.
Right.
Parent was censored by brainwashed cultists. (Score:1)
Thanks for proving that, by censoring facts, cultists.
Apple does not actually give a fuck about privacy. Only about looks. Woke brownie points. There have been numerous stories here, the in the past, that proved that. Yet the pathetic compensating-with-vanity luddites that follow them, censor everyone stating those facts in the comments.
Re: (Score:2)
You can install Firefox just fine.
As you obviously don't own an Apple Device, you seem not to know that :P
Re: (Score:2)
They have a history of doing this. After the Cambridge Analytica and Russian trolling scandals they started buying up print ads (billboards and newspapers) trying to make out that they were the victims and that they really cared about people abusing you like this.
No idea if it worked or if they just don't have any better ideas.
Negative sympathy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Negative sympathy (Score:5, Insightful)
But by pushing ads on IOS they're just going to make iPhone users even more willing to say "look, here's another example why iPhone is better."
Though everyone who saw the video of the guy who was making a video from an airplane and dropped his iPhone 6 out the window - and used "Find my iPhone" to pick it up from where it landed, and it still works just fine, is going to be impressed.
iPhone 6 - 2014, still getting updates last month. Android - nope.
Re: (Score:2)
iPhone 6 - 2014, still getting updates last month. Android - nope.
It's telling and sad that people think a phone from 2014 still getting updates is in any way notable or impressive. Don't get me wrong, Android is on the whole much much worse. But the laptop I'm writing from is from 2010. It's run ubuntu 10.04, 14.04, and is currently on 18.04. I expect I'll stick with the pattern and move to 22.04 when the time comes.
I might upgrade the RAM or disk during that time.
Re: Negative sympathy (Score:1)
Most people? Maybe on planet iSomething.
In the real world, Apple caters to people that are so.clueless about technology, they would still write paper letters with teir typewriters if they didn't use iPads in the failed atrempt to compensate their empty insides with vanity and their cluelessness with cargo culting.
I don't know where you live, and that may be a thing in LA or New York, but that sure as hell ain't a thing here in Europe or probanly large parts of the US either.
Over here, Apple is known for bei
Re: Negative sympathy (Score:4, Informative)
I think you do not know anyone who owns apple devices.
And requiring people to to be an computer expert to get Windows or an Android tablet properly running is just bollocks. I expect a device to work out of the box. And I expect it continues working without need of any fixing for ever.
Re: (Score:2)
In which country in Europe is it literally illegal for people to walk down a street in a town live-streaming a video of themselves? This sounds like something you've literally made up, because people live-stream videos of themselves legally in Europe all the time.
Hahaha (Score:1)
This is getting good. It would have been funnier if this were happening to some other country's companies, rather than ones my friends and neighbors work at.
Re: Hahaha (Score:1)
Well, why are they your friends then? /like that/ again?
Neighbors I get. Not.everyone has the freedom to just move out of the Silicunt Wasteland. But how do you still talk to them when they are
Or is it because they don't have a choice with their jobs either, and they aren't fans either? Because I smell a business opportunity to employ them, there.
Really? (Score:5, Interesting)
Apple's policies announced at WWDC 2020 with iOS 14 will "harm the growth of business and the free internet."
Where "harm the growth of business and the free internet" means restrict Facebook's ability to watch and warehouse data on every move you make and then sell it to the highest bidder. This is a bit like the international predator association warning prey species about Apple restricting access to fang and claw sharpeners, i.e. not likely to meet with much sympathy. Perhaps Facebook can seek solace in the knowledge that Google is not likely to make similar changes to it's Android OS which holds 90% of mobile OS market since Google is neck deep into the same mass surveillance business as Facebook.
Re: Really? (Score:3)
Facebook lies again. Not exactly news.
Re: (Score:1)
... than alternatives that don't spy on their users.
Which alternatives would those be? Anything anybody's ever heard of?
Re: Really? (Score:2)
Australia is looking into it and potentially banning Facebook.
Re: Really? (Score:2)
Facebook is as good as dead here in Germany. Young people moved on to Crapshat, ThickCock and InstaGrime long ago, and older people are starting to leave "social media" altogether.
Turns out no alternative, including Facepoke, is needed at all. Real life and real friendships has become quite fashinable around here. To a point where students brag about doing something real with friends offline and how bad it is to be on social media (even though they secretly still are, but the mindset breeds a self-fulfillin
Re: Really? (Score:2)
(And I know Instagram and WhatsApp are Facebook. They don't all know that. But we are getting there. Give it some time. They are good kids.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just read Facebook's post (Score:2)
It's pretty obviously targeted at businesses who run on top of Facebook - but they're showing this to everyone? I would think that if the typical Facebook user reads that missive, at best they'd say "I'm not seeing the problem here". At worst, it might serve to inform the user that Facebook is using their data in ways the user may not appreciate.
But, then, maybe I'm giving the typical Facebook user too much credit.
Re:Just read Facebook's post (Score:5, Insightful)
It's pretty obviously targeted at businesses who run on top of Facebook - but they're showing this to everyone? I would think that if the typical Facebook user reads that missive, at best they'd say "I'm not seeing the problem here". At worst, it might serve to inform the user that Facebook is using their data in ways the user may not appreciate.
But, then, maybe I'm giving the typical Facebook user too much credit.
And as an Apple user, I find Facebook's chagrin most encouraging.If they are worried, it means they have a reason to be.And means it's a good thing.
Trolling (Score:2)
Seeing Facebook, a communication platform, to use trolling as a means to get what they want is a terribly stupid idea.
Re: Trolling (Score:2)
Them again, it is their users' modis operandus.
And pleas stop misusing the word "trolling [catb.org]". You are on Slashdot, not on Reddit.
Re: (Score:2)
And pleas stop misusing the word "trolling [catb.org]". You are on Slashdot, not on Reddit.
Why? Is Slashdot your bridge?
Repeat after me: (Score:5, Insightful)
You, as an app developer, do not have an unrestricted right to collect as much information as you can about us from our devices. The fact that users lacked the tools to protect their data did not give you a right to collect it, just the ability. The fact that you built a business that was predicated on the unrestricted collection of user data does not give you the right to continue collecting it. The fact that you’ve done so much to piss off your users that most of them will lock you out at the first opportunity they’re given does not make you a victim, endanger legitimate businesses, or indicate in any way that there is something wrong with the world.
Quite the contrary, their ability to do so is the result of someone finally fixing the thing that’s wrong: your unfettered access to data.
Re: Repeat after me: (Score:2)
s/unrestricted collection of user data/unrestricted and illegal collection of user data/g;
They're just reinforcing the message to Apple users that they made the right choice.
Also, iPhone market share in terms of sales seriously underestimates user share, since iPhones get updates for more than 6 years and survive falls from airplanes.
Less than 4 years to go for this iPhone 6 to hit the decade mark.
My Android phone, bought in 2015, died years ago, and only got 2 years of updates. So just as well it
Re: Heinlein (Score:2)
Try telling that to Trump. His latest brain farts this week were seeing if DHS could seize the voting machines where he lost (nope, lack of jurisdiction) and asking if the military could rerun the elections where he lost (too late, no authority to, etc).
Pitiful senile old man who has nobody left to bail him out - not his father,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Heinlein (Score:2)
Re: Heinlein (Score:2)
Yeah, they already told Trump.
And nobody cares what he thinks, at this point.
So what is your argument again?
Re: (Score:2)
Heinlein really was a smart cookie. I often think of Nehemiah Scudder and how American democracy was subverted in that story.
good advertisement (Score:5, Insightful)
an article written by Facebook in which the company says Apple's policies announced at WWDC 2020 with iOS 14 will "harm the growth of business and the free internet." Facebook refers both to the new App Store privacy labels and also an option in iOS 14 that prevents apps from tracking users.
In other words: We should all upgrade to iOS 14 ASAP, because it shuts down some of FB's worst tracking. Thanks for the information, I'll get on it right away.
Whenever a huge multinational company whines about generics like "harm to small businesses" or "freedom" or "consumers", it all translates to "hurts my bottom line".
Re: good advertisement (Score:2)
Or upgrade to a real OS, with freedoms, as, as usual, both sides here are harmfully evil and evilly harmful. Sure, FB might be a -10 on the bad/good scale. But Apple is at least 7 too. You might believe that is still better, but amything below 0 is still bad and inacceptable, and you do not have to choose *either*.
If somebody thinks a Fairphone without GApps, but with FB/Google blocked right in the OS, isn't good enough because of lacking a bit of speed that they never freaking used or needed, they are the
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer a system that actually works over one that I tinker with all the time these days.
That's why Linux runs my servers and MacOS runs my desktops and iOS runs my smartphones. These are the best choices for the respective platforms and you can disagree if you want, but you won't change my mind unless you have some shocking new information that completely changes everything.
Seems like a waste (Score:2)
Second, you'd have to believe what Facebook says, which also seems like quite a stretch.
Re: Seems like a waste (Score:2)
By removing the identifier, when your device hits Facebook servers, they can't personalize the af.
When you see a "share with Facebook " icon it's already too late. You've been identified.
To prevent this in Firefox, disable downloading images and disable JavaScript.. It'll never hit the server.
Because the web is the weak point of the internet, web browsers are the weak point of the web, and JavaScript is
Sadly, not a stretch. (Score:2)
Research shows, that whoever you are, if it is repeated often enough, from enoigh sides, you start to think it is the case. Without ever consciously making that choice, mind you.
Though, yes, dumber people will hold that belief, even if they are told it is wrong. Unless that is repeated even more. (Because they don't have the means to check for themselves, I presume.)
Crocodile tears (Score:2)
Meanwhile lemme get some popcorn
Pot. Meet Kettle. (Score:1)
Goose. Meet Gander.
Arguing with Apple users (Score:1)
Re: Arguing with Apple users (Score:2)
Is a dumb idea. IF people cared about the issues they would not have bought apple in the first place.
Hi, Zucker-Sucker!
Tool.
Re: Arguing with Apple users (Score:3)
Hello American.
No wonder you got a two party system.
You seem physically unable to think beyond dichotomies.
Re: (Score:2)
Hello American.
No wonder you got a two party system.
You seem physically unable to think beyond dichotomies.
We actually have several parties. But only two "major" ones, unfortunately.
Look into it.
Apple's response (Score:1)
Nice app you've got there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.
[ I'm backing the lesser evil (Apple) in this fight]
Re: Apple's response (Score:2)
The thing is. Apple actually provides a tangible product, albeit overpriced. Facebook provides what?
Re: Apple's response (Score:1)
Escrow (Score:2)
Users DATA in Facebook should be under ESCROW;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]