Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Security Apple

Apple Disables Walkie Talkie App Due To Vulnerability That Could Allow iPhone Eavesdropping (techcrunch.com) 35

Posted by msmash from the privacy-woes dept.
Apple has disabled the Apple Watch Walkie Talkie app due to an unspecified vulnerability that could allow a person to listen to another customer's iPhone without consent. From a report: Apple has apologized for the bug and for the inconvenience of being unable to use the feature while a fix is made. The Walkie Talkie app on Apple Watch allows two users who have accepted an invite from each other to receive audio chats via a 'push to talk' interface reminiscent of the PTT buttons on older cell phones.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Disables Walkie Talkie App Due To Vulnerability That Could Allow iPhone Eavesdropping More

Apple Disables Walkie Talkie App Due To Vulnerability That Could Allow iPhone Eavesdropping

Comments Filter:

  • As far as I remember Walkie Talkies ... (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    ... everybody could listen to you. So this app is quite realistic

  • just disable a paying customer's communication, what could go wrong

    • I'm sure the 6 people who use this are pretty bummed out...

      • you're off by a factor of about five hundred thousand

        • I've seen literally one person wearing one of those abortions, but that aside, how many people are using that specific app? Or well, were using it

          • quite common to see them in places where people make low six figure salary... you know, real jobs

            • I see Teslas, I see Porsches, but I don't see Apple Watches.

              Maybe that's because I'm where there's money and class.

              I might be broke, but I live in an area with loads of money running around. Nobody wears that shit. It's not a status symbol like one of those shiny lumps of metal and gears are.

          • I use it like if I'm grilling outside and my wife is inside and I need her to bring me something so that I can continue keeping an eye on the fire/food. It has real use cases.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Apple is doing the responsible thing. Feel free to buy Android phones if you don't care about security.

    • just disable a paying customer's communication

      They disabled a walkie-talkie feature. Meanwhile, phone calls, FaceTime, e-mails, text messages, iMessage/WhatsApp/etc., Digital Touch (i.e. haptic taps sent to another Watch), and all other forms of audio, video, and haptic communication currently available on the Apple Watch (even the ability to send your heartbeat as haptic beats to another Apple Watch) remain unaffected, so it's a bit of a stretch to suggest that they've disabled "communication" when all they've done is disabled one seldom-used feature

    • Yes, they should continue allowing people to listen to other people's iPhones.
  • I mean, is it really that difficult of a decision. Or, isn't a real Walkie Talkie cool enough?

    • Re:If you want a walkie Talkie, why not just buy o (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Anubis IV ( 1279820 ) on Thursday July 11, 2019 @11:41AM (#58908190)

      If you want a phone, why not just buy one? Or a calculator? A compass? A GPS unit? The other physical devices that smart devices have largely obviated?

      Perhaps we should flip your question on its head and ask why would you buy a walkie talkie or any other form of unitasker [wiktionary.org] if you already have its functionality provided by a different device? Isn't that wasteful?

      To be sure, there are reasons for doing so (e.g. you have specialized needs not covered by the built-in functionality), but for most people's needs, their smart device is already good enough, so having separate devices for each piece of functionality makes no sense. I remember my parents having walkie talkies when we moved halfway across the country so that we could talk between our cars. We also had a "TripTik" and other paper maps provided by AAA, notebooks that had details about hotel reservations and the like, flashlights, a compass (my mother was quite the outdoorsman and liked to be prepared), a camcorder, stacks of books, and travel versions of board games. These days, all of those (as well as a number of other things that were available at the time of that move, but which we didn't own at the time, such as Gameboys, portable DVD players, and cell phones) are apps or features on my smart phone, and that one device replaces more and more physical devices in more and more situations as developers write more apps and as new features are pushed down through software updates.

      And if we're talking about what's "cool", isn't the cool thing these days go with "retro" devices in favor of smart ones?

      • This is not an anti apple rant, so please do not take it this way. And I will admit, I presented my position wrong. I doubt anyone will go out and purchase any phone, no matter what manufacture just to have one specific feature like the Walkie Talkie.

        But the loss of that feature, if truly needed. Can be replaced with a simple off the shelf retro item.

        Also, just like any other feature of any given cell phone. Battery drain. So, maybe a retro device will better serve the purpose of that single functi

        • doubt anyone will go out and purchase any phone, no matter what manufacture just to have one specific feature like the Walkie Talkie.
          But the loss of that feature, if truly needed. Can be replaced with a simple off the shelf retro item.

          It cannot. Walkie Talkie is an app, not a feature. PTT is the feature. PTT uses the cellular or wifi network, not CB, FRS, etc. It's fundamentally different from an actual "walkie talkie", although it behaves superficially similarly.

    • Because the range of a walky talky is far less than that of VOIP. And the walky talky doesn't have a nice interface where you can associate contacts to frequencies. And it's broadcast, rather than point to point. And why carry multiple devices? Do you walk around with a pocket watch, standalone GPS unit, a Tom Tom, a pager, and a netbook?

  • Not an option for Apple, they will let others app taking avantages of it like the NSA's one

  • Is it like some souped up toy 'gi-joe' walkie talkie, or is it like the PTT feature on old Nextel phones?
  • was gov approved?

Slashdot Top Deals

Whoever dies with the most toys wins.

Close