Microsoft's Stock Market Value Pulls Ahead of Apple's (reuters.com) 119
Microsoft's stock market value surpassed Apple's and pulled ahead by as much as $3 billion on Wednesday as the Windows software maker benefited from optimism about demand for cloud computing services. From a report: Shares of Microsoft jumped 3 percent, pushing its market capitalization up to $848 billion. With the broad market rebounding following a recent slump, Apple also rose, but less than Microsoft. Its 2.17 percent increase put Apple's market capitalization at $845 billion, just four months after the iPhone maker breached the $1 trillion mark for the first time. Microsoft and Apple briefly traded at about the same level after the bell on Monday, but Microsoft's intraday lead over Apple on Wednesday was more substantial. Further reading: 'This is Not Your Father's Microsoft': CEO Satya Nadella On Helping a Faded Legend Find a 'Sense of Purpose'.
This should last... (Score:1)
About as well as the windows phone...
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be interested to see what percentage of Microsoft's money comes from installs v consumer products. Microsoft probably makes most of their money from companies having it on the server, and collecting desktops to domain servers, collecting seat licenses of $100s of dollars per year for Office, Outlook, seat licenses for various packages, etc. Obviously, every machine shipped by all of the computer makers gives some money to Microsoft, but when you can go a decade between replacements, that drops your annu
Re: (Score:2)
It's not about direct competition, it's about who is spending the money. With Microsoft, a huge portion of their revenue comes from companies who have to spend the money to make money. It's just another cost of business, when the next market downturn happens, they'll lose companies that go bankrupt, but the rest of their customers will still have to spend to use their computers. Now, I was just reading an article on with an analyst who is thinking along the same lines as myself:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/2 [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft latest line of success seems to be offering services outside of what Apples normal scope. Sure Apple may have a competing product, but it is often second or third fiddle to the company.
Nearly everyone who I met who had a Windows Phone, actually liked it. However I think its biggest problem wasn't technical, but the fact we suffered too much from the Microsoft Monopoly, and being Microsoft main grab was the fact that all your programs worked in Windows. And Windows Phone didn't run windows deskto
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft latest line of success seems to be offering services outside of what Apples normal scope. Sure Apple may have a competing product, but it is often second or third fiddle to the company.
Nearly everyone who I met who had a Windows Phone, actually liked it. However I think its biggest problem wasn't technical, but the fact we suffered too much from the Microsoft Monopoly, and being Microsoft main grab was the fact that all your programs worked in Windows.
Most non-technical people probably paid a lot more attention to hype than anything else. Windows Phone was ridiculed from day one. I never used one so can't comment on it's features but it simply wasn't "cool" and as much as we'd like to believe that doesn't, or shouldn't matter- it does... for many many people. When smart phones began to take off Apple was at peak "cool" and Microsoft was at peak "establishment meh" - now neither company is considered cool... they're both "establishment meh". Microsoft
Re: (Score:2)
Ultimately I decided they were still too expensive for the actual experience. The issue is that all these mobile OS's are still bringing down performance and taking up more and more storage and memory space with each iteration. The phones around the $100 mark today would be an easy buy if you could still run a mobile OS from 8 years ago, but ins
Re: (Score:2)
About as well as the windows phone...
Might last longer. Apple is losing it's niche. The Apple phone and tablet used to have the perception of better quality to android (arguable I'm sure) - now it just looks like an uncool old person phone. Apple phone is no longer cool or perceived as better quality.
Laptops- they've not really had much innovation in a long time.
Unless they have a new idea or new product I can see their star waning. They've got enough capital to last forever though and still very profitable so they're never going away in o
Re: (Score:1)
You are sorely underestimating the power of the iOS installed base.
~1 billion active users.
Re: (Score:2)
You are sorely underestimating the power of the iOS installed base. ~1 billion active users.
Android still sells over 1 billion handsets per year even with the flat smartphone market. What do you think that's going to do to Apple's installed base?
Re: (Score:2)
Shrink, shrink, shrinking away.
Re: (Score:1)
The more Apple shrinks, the better for everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
What happened to that trillion dollar market cap?
Re: (Score:2)
You are sorely underestimating the power of the iOS installed base. ~1 billion active users.
Android still sells over 1 billion handsets per year even with the flat smartphone market. What do you think that's going to do to Apple's installed base?
Well, Apple's marketshare increases, Android's drops.Everyone but you gets the picture.
Really? Android has now reached 88% worldwide market share and still climbing, how does that square with your wishful thinking?
Re: (Score:2)
Fact: Apple global smartphone share = 12% [counterpointresearch.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Fact: Apple global smartphone share = 12% [counterpointresearch.com]
Slightly going up YOY from 11.8% to 12.4% while Android's going down (because nothing else could have gone down) - thanks for disproving yourself.
You didn't actually understand the numbers, right?
Re: (Score:2)
12% global share is eensy weesny. The slightest bit of downside price pressure translates to big revenue collapse. Merry Christmas.
Re: (Score:2)
12% global share is eensy weesny.
No, your dick is eensy weesny. What's your point? Your dick.
You know what's fucking huge? Your insecurity about Android's ever more rapidly declining market share. Almost as big as the insecurity about your tiny dick.
Re: (Score:2)
Poster child for the Apple community ------^
Re: (Score:2)
Looking forward to single digit I-phone share
Re: (Score:2)
Poster child for the Apple community ------^
So you admit having posters of Apple users hanging over your bed when you play with your tiny dick and when you don't admit you are wrong. Typical self-hating Apple-Hateboi.
Re: (Score:2)
As you know, Apple just cut back its I-phone parts orders by 30%. Merry Christmas to you too.
Re: (Score:2)
You're quite the denier.
Re: (Score:2)
As you know, Apple just cut back its I-phone parts orders by 30%. Merry Christmas to you too.
Say the same people who said the same last couple of years - when it obviously turned out to be false. So it must be right this time. Because they can't always be wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are sorely underestimating the power of the iOS installed base. ~1 billion active users.
You're welcome.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple failed to defend its smartphone monopoly (luckily for everybody) while Microsoft did defend its PC monopoly (unluckily for everybody).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
For most stock trades you are correct. However market cap is a good indication on the health of the company and its size compared to others.
Stock Traders may not care, but if you are going to do business with a company and you see they have a large market cap, you can probably expect you can deal with a long term business plan with them.
Now comparing MS with Apple, Google, and Amazon is more just grandstanding.
Everything is Made up and the Points Don't Matter (Score:2, Insightful)
This is just as true regarding Internet Karma and Stock Values.
I guess we'll see some Microsoft Executives unloading their stock shortly.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
This is the top 5 market cap according to wikipedia [wikipedia.org]:
1. Apple (1091B)
2. Amazon (976B)
3. Microsoft (877B)
4. Alphabet (839B)
5. Berkshire Hathaway (523B)
When you realize none of these companies have heavy industries, that's just crazy. Even Apple that sells products does not have any factory. All of their money is made without owning much actual physical matter. How come does a website has more value than, for example, a plane factory? You're right, the global economy is just as meaningful as karma points on th
I question Apple not having much physical matter (Score:2)
Apple probably has very large amounts of actual matter that they technically own - at least in terms of materials.
Not to mention Apple has a huge real estate holding at this point due to store locations.
At some point I heard they were planning to build a fab even, though have not heard much about that since.
Considering Apple's death is mostly from physical products I think they should be looked at almost the same as a company that owns more factories than they do, Apple is reliant on physical production.
Re: (Score:2)
Typical (Score:2)
Computer geeks understand websites, and make money. Therefore the profitability of, say, Amazon, must be measured by its website.
Do you have any idea how complicated and far-reaching Amazon's shipping, warehousing, tracking, and packing infrastructure is?
Computer geeks understand software. Therefore the profitability of Apple must be measured by its software.
Do you have any idea how involved Apple is in the manufacturing process of its products? Any idea how involved it is in the sale of its products - t
Re: (Score:2)
Back in the 1990's people wanted to be the Next Microsoft.
Microsoft is falling into the IBM type of company. Old, Traditional, Predicable. May not be the best, but isn't that bad either.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except at Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
Spam filtering? I get at least twice as much spam at work on Outlook than I do at home without it.
Remember (Score:3)
Stock values are according to what stock broker's computers think they can buy at in order to sell for a profit, according to a genetic algorithm nobody understands. Prices have no relationship to what the brokers think the stocks are worth, or what the company itself thinks it is worth. There is a slight negative relationship to what the company is actually doing. Real research and new products are more dangerous than playing it safe.
Although brokers are often thought of as investors, they invest nothing in the companies they buy shares of. They're just buying and selling shares. None of that money is seen by the company itself, unless the company itself sells shares it holds in reserve. Directors selling shares can become rich, but that money doesn't go into the company. Company finances and director finances are kept seperate.
So what this means is that a computer has decided Microsoft shares will go up in value by enough to make day trading in Microsoft shares highly profitable.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Laying off employees is a reliable way to get a temporary boost to stock prices.
Re: (Score:2)
None of these algorithms would work were it not for the boundary condition that many people invested in the market are investing for value, i.e. a future share in the underlying profit stream.
The second stable semi-stable pool are the people busy hedging their bets to create a stable business environment. A proper hedge is conceptually a moving target. He
What is it with this stupidity? (Score:1)
Clearly MS is in steep decline. They have nothing new of any real value. They have lost technological control of their flagship OS win10 and stumble from one tech failure to the next. Large enterprises (I know at least one Fortune 100 that plans to do this) plan to not ever move to win10, but move to a web-client and at least seriously consider dropping MS Office as well in the process. And the stock becomes more valuable? Are these morons creating the next big bubble?
Re: (Score:1)
Um, I don't think the problem is Microsoft, I think the problem is that you don't know anything about what Microsoft does.
They've seen massive growth in important areas in recent years, such as in cloud computing where they're now the biggest player, or second biggest (depending on which source you believe, but either way there's not much in it) alongside Amazon.
But they've also acquired GitHub and become the largest contributor to open source products on the planet. They've had a lot of success with develo
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft still enjoys significant lock-in with office software, games and OEM control. Microsoft's revenue is still increasing while its operating costs are not. I would not call that steep decline. Maybe later.
Re: (Score:2)
They dont have OEM control, nor do they need it. All the big OEMs have at one time or another sold Linux...
No, you're wrong, they still do it, they are just marginally more subtle about it. Try and find a big OEM that sells a Linux system running the exact same hardware as their Windows box. Try and find a big OEM win a configuration menu that lets you select Windows or Linux. You can't because Microsoft contractually prevents it, using the same old thugish license pricing threats they always used.
Re: (Score:2)
Correlation is not causation, you think big OEMs aren't offering PCs with Linux because of OEM lock-in
I didn't say that at all, troll. I said that when OEMs do offer Linux, which is quite often these days, they do not offer it on configurations that you can directly compare. Microsoft enforces this because Microsoft doesn't want customers to be able to easily determine the exact Windows tax they are paying.
$3 Billion for them is like $20 to you and me (Score:2)
Wow! A WHOLE 3 Billion?!?
Color me completely unimpressed.
By the time this article posts, Apple will probably be back on top.
Plus, the entire stock market is extremely volatile right now.
Non-News.
Re:$3 Billion for them is like $20 to you and me (Score:4, Informative)
> By the time this article posts, Apple will probably be back on top.
a quick check on google shows apple is up by $6 billion right now.
Re: (Score:2)
> By the time this article posts, Apple will probably be back on top.
a quick check on google shows apple is up by $6 billion right now.
Yet of course, Apple Hating Slashdot won't make an Article out of THAT; nor even UPDATE the original Article...
Re: (Score:2)
Yet of course, Apple Hating Slashdot won't make an Article out of THAT; nor even UPDATE the original Article...
But if we didn't "hate" on Apple then you would be bored out of your mind and would leave. And we would miss you.
Re: (Score:2)
Yet of course, Apple Hating Slashdot won't make an Article out of THAT; nor even UPDATE the original Article...
But if we didn't "hate" on Apple then you would be bored out of your mind and would leave. And we would miss you.
Actually, when I originally joined /. In 2004, I was initially attracted by the fact that there was a generally SUPPORTIVE attitude towards Apple and OS X. As an engineer and log standing Apple supporter and user myself, I found it gratifying that other "techies" recognized the power and elegance of OS X, and so I stayed.
Then, over the next few years; something happened: With increasing frequency, posters, almost ALWAYS posting as AC, would create posts alleging the MOST ridiculous, over-the-top "Motives" o
Re: (Score:2)
I have faith (Score:3)
Once the leadership at Microsoft green lights the plan to make Windows a subscription only service coupled with the fact that they can't seem to get a software update right to save their f*****g life, that stock will collapse so hard it will create a singularity.
Apple will likely fall off a cliff as well, ( just not as quickly ) due to the fact that innovation doesn't appear to be in their interests any longer and they have far too many competitors in an already saturated smart phone market.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has been brilliant in diversifying their income streams. Azure and business cloud services, Office and business software, and personal computing such as the Surface and XBox each got about a third of revenue. Windows OEM sales were actually up! So even if Windows stumbles, well, what, are you going to see Linux finally reach the desktop in 2019? I wouldn't bet on it, buddy.
https://venturebeat.com/2018/0... [venturebeat.com]
Also! (Score:2)
Also the earth will eventually tumble into the sun! Or get eaten by it, depending on your point of view.
You heard it here first!
Re: (Score:2)
Embrace, extend and extinguish the stock market?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think Microsoft is the good guy. They are a For Profit company, they will do what will make them money.
However they found out they lost their monopoly hand. Not every device runs Windows, and the device that Runs Windows may not be users may not be using IE/Edge, and they will could be switching to other devices depending on what they are doing.
Microsoft is playing the Good Guy Card, because their old game plan isn't viable.