Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Apple Hardware

Apple iPad is a Faster, Cheaper iPad Air 2 (cnet.com) 104

Say good-bye to the iPad Air, it's just the iPad now. From a report on CNET: Apple announced on Tuesday morning that it will be dropping the price of the 9.7-inch iPad by $70. The tablet's A8X processor will be getting an upgrade too, jumping over to the A9 chip used in the iPad Pro. The upgrade will replace the iPad Air 2, but the iPad Mini 4 will live on, starting at $399. The updated pricing will start on Friday, at $329 for the 32GB model and $459 for the 32GB WiFi with cellular service model. It's Apple's cheapest iPad, after the company decided to replace the iPad Mini 2, which started at $269. Although Apple's iPad is leading the tablet market, it's still a tumbling one as demand takes a decline thanks to people holding onto their tablets longer.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple iPad is a Faster, Cheaper iPad Air 2

Comments Filter:
  • by SirMasterboy ( 872152 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @09:06AM (#54081227)

    The new iPad shares the same 7.5mm thick 1.03lb body as the iPad Air 1. It also shares the same non-laminated screen and no anti-reflective coating as the iPad Air 1. The Air 2 was 6.1mm thick, 0.963lb with a fully laminated screen with anti-reflective coating.

    The new iPad is an iPad Air 1 on the outside, with an A9 CPU (from iPhone 6S) on the inside and the camera and TouchID from the iPad Air 2.

    • Does it have a real headphone jack? Or did they remove that to make it cheaper?

      • by The Grim Reefer ( 1162755 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @09:56AM (#54081519)

        Does it have a real headphone jack? Or did they have the courage to remove that?

        FTFY

      • by Anonymous Coward

        This one INCLUDES the headphone jack - as seen here [apple.com]. Wonder why, though - did they get the message that nobody likes it's disappearing from the iPhone 7?

        • by martinX ( 672498 )

          IMO, Schools. That's all. Students use cheap headphones/headsets, not bluetooth doodads. We discussed BT headphones with our kids, but what killed it for me was having yet another device that needed to be power managed or it wouldn't work. So wires it is.

      • Does it have a real headphone jack? Or did they remove that to make it cheaper?

        No they made it cheaper by redefining cheaper as meaning costing $50 more.

    • Re: (Score:1, Troll)

      by Anubis IV ( 1279820 )

      Basically, yup. The iPad Air 2 was effectively a prototype 9.7 inch iPad Pro, and bears more in common with the current 9.7 inch iPad Pro than it does with the new iPad, for exactly the reasons you specified.

      To be fair, the iPad Air 2 remains a great machine, and by all indications that trend has continued into the Pro line. I still use my iPad Air 2 on a daily basis and have no plans to replace it anytime soon, given that it's still operating just as well today as the day that I bought it. But with a situa

    • by aliquis ( 678370 )

      How does it compare to Galaxy S tab 2, 3 and Asus Zenpad 3S? Lenovo Yoga 3? Sony had one too whatever that one was called ..

      The cheaper ... TrekStor? and C... 12-13" Chinese ones?

    • The O.P. nailed the true up(down)date. The headline should read:

      "New iPad gets faster and cheaper, but it is uglier with lower quality screen."
  • Doesn't the iPad Pro use the A9X processor, not the A9 ?
    • I think it is a typo. The Cnet article mentions "The tablet's A8X processor will be getting an upgrade too, jumping over to the A9 chip used in the iPhone 6S. "
      It does look like a decent tablet for a reasonable price.
  • by fred6666 ( 4718031 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @09:14AM (#54081269)

    It amazes me that they can offer the iPad for so cheap compared to the iPhone. Most components are the same, but the display and battery (probably the two most expensive components) must be much more expensive on the tablet, because of the size.

    We can thank carrier subsidies. A lot of people buy phones they can't afford because of that. I doubt they would be going to the bank to get a loan if it wasn't offered by the carrier.

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by nine-times ( 778537 )
      Sometimes it costs more to get similar performance into a smaller package. A high-end ultrabook might be more expensive than a big clunky laptop with similar computing power, even if the big clunky laptop has a bigger screen.
      • Sometimes it costs more to get similar performance into a smaller package.

        Sometimes, but not in that case. They use the same components. The A9 CPU in the iPhone is NOT a miniaturized version of the A9 in the iPad.

        • First, you're just talking about the CPU. IT says nothing about the other components. But let's set that aside for a second.

          When you actually look at the numbers, the iPhone SE has the same CPU and the same basic functionality as the new iPad. It appears to have a nicer camera, and can also make phone calls. It's about a quarter of the size and weight, which can be good or bad, depending on your needs. When you compare the 32GB iPhone SE with the 32GB iPad with cellular, the iPad is actually $60 more

          • I am not just talking about the CPU. Other chips (RAM, flash) are not smaller on the iPhone.
            The iPhone SE is cheaper, but that's because, as I said, the cellular version of the iPad is overpriced. The cellular radio can't be worth $130 since you can get cheap smartphones at this price. The ability to make phone calls doesn't add any hardware cost since their is already a microphone and speaker.

    • by ledow ( 319597 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @09:44AM (#54081425) Homepage

      It amazes me that the iPad is so damn expensive in the first place, given what it is.

      That they bolt on about 50% profit for the phone model is chickenfeed in comparison.

      Honestly, I bought a GBP 5 Android tablet the other day. Technically it beat most of the iPad Mini specs that are its closest rival. Sure, you can argue "screen resolution" but why would you on such a tiny device to start with?

      • I bought a GBP 5 Android tablet the other day.

        Brand/model?

        • by ledow ( 319597 )

          And that's why your devices are expensive.

          No idea of the brand.
          No idea of the model.
          Just works.

          • by jabuzz ( 182671 )

            I think the concept of asking for brand and model is that a 5GBP tablet is unbelievably cheap. The cheapest I can see on eBay for a new tablet is around 30GBP for a 7" model running KitKat, which is doggy ancient these days.

            • by ledow ( 319597 )

              I've bought at least three 10GBP ones from Amazon Today's Deals.

              There's one hanging in my office window now. No idea of brand (it's just plain and blank, but I think it puts up a logo when you turn it on, I just can't turn it off at the moment as it's on wireless and does stuff all day long).

              We use them as everything from digital signage to server monitors.

          • That's why I'm asking the brand/model, to see if I can find it as cheap as this in Canada.

        • I can't speak for the OP, but as I just posted above - a £35 (sale price, but on sale often) Amazon Fire Tablet does everything any other tablet can do. And if it doesn't, you can side load the google app store. My wife certainly hasn't found anything missing.

          If someone wants to pay 10x the price for a slightly nicer screen then good on them, but I can't see the value for a 7 inch picture.

      • by myowntrueself ( 607117 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @10:28AM (#54081719)

        It amazes me that the iPad is so damn expensive in the first place, given what it is.

        That they bolt on about 50% profit for the phone model is chickenfeed in comparison.

        Honestly, I bought a GBP 5 Android tablet the other day. Technically it beat most of the iPad Mini specs that are its closest rival. Sure, you can argue "screen resolution" but why would you on such a tiny device to start with?

        Don't knock it, its probably more powerful than the Mac Pro by now.

      • by MachineShedFred ( 621896 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @10:36AM (#54081765) Journal

        That's because Apple has been ignoring the iPad Mini for like 3+ years now. Seriously, what have they done with it since putting the Retina display in it? Add the TouchID that all other iOS devices have, and throw us a bone with storage. It's the red-headed stepchild of tablets. If you really want to make it look like shit, compare it to the Nvidia Shield K1 that is now like 14 months old, and better in every way at practically half the price.

        I really like the form factor of the iPad Mini, but Apple seems hell bent on not making products I want, and in fact killing off the line of products that are even close.

      • by aliquis ( 678370 )

        £5 tablet?

        Where?

        I don't know what the devices cost so .. Can't comment, you two seem to disagree on which device have the most profit? No?

      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        by radarskiy ( 2874255 )

        It amazes me that people have already forgotten that Apple is why tablet prices are so low. Just before the iPad came out, people were seriously anticipating $899 or $999 starting prices from Apple and figuring they could sell an Android competitor at $699. The actual $499 base price for an original iPad shocked the tablet industry.

    • by guruevi ( 827432 )

      Not just carrier subsidies but the radio in them is significantly different. Anytime you change a radio around (even if you're changing frequencies for different carriers or modulation), be ready to shell out big time for an FCC certification.

      The iPad on the other hand just has BT/WiFi so much less strict regulations and as long as you keep the board and antenna's the same, putting a different shell on them isn't all that expensive.

      • Even the cellular iPad is less expensive than the iPhone.
        And we all know they make much more profit on the cellular iPad. The radio is not worth $130. You can get stand-alone WiFi/Cellular hotspot for that price. As well as cheap smartphones.

    • The IPhone is sold at a ridiculously high price, one that cannot be justified by the tech but simply by people willing to pay. The Ipad is no different, it doesn't sell at such a high premium as the iPhone as it has a far more competitive and declining market, look at the competitions tablets though and then you will start wondering why the fuck is an ipad so expensive, similiarly if you look at Iphone's competitors you will wonder the same.
  • My iPad 2 is getting long in the tooth after five years. I only use it for the alarm clock app that blast an air raid siren at 4:30AM so I can catch the express bus at 6:00AM to start work at 7:00AM in Palo Alto.
    • I'm still using a first generation iPad mini, which I believe has the same internals as the iPad 2. It still works well enough for what I want it to do - read the web, play games, watch baseball games. And considering it's a a four year old device, the battery life is actually still decent.

      • And considering it's a a four year old device, the battery life is actually still decent.

        I had a first generation iPod Touch that lasted eight years before the battery died. Battery life was touch and go for the last year or so.

    • I am actually looking at this to replace my iPad 2. With the trade in credit I can get, it may be a worthwhile upgrade. At this point my iPad is barely able to open the PDFs I constantly throw at it without pausing to think constantly. Definitely showing its age.
      • With the trade in credit I can get, it may be a worthwhile upgrade.

        Thanks for the heads up. I'm seriously looking into trading in my iPad 2.

  • Weird announcement - no dog and pony show, just a website update and some new info. And there's all the rumors about new hardware. As an Apple-head who wants to replace an older iPad, I'm torn. Get a mostly-better for less, or wait and hope they've got something coming in a month?

    • by shilly ( 142940 )

      Apple has always done some fairly low-key upgrades as well as the big splashy ones.

  • WTF is with Apple's fear of the number 3?

    The iPad 3 was not the 3 - it was the New iPad

    Now the iPad Air 3 is a New iPad, but is neither the Air nor the 3.

    Is this what you get when you have marketers sit around a table and you ask them to brand your new device revision and you just get blank stares back?

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I bought an iPad last year for entertainment purposes for my travel. I had a first generation one, but that one was obsolete long ago because it can't go past iOS 5 and so most new apps won't work. Heck, even old apps won't work. I'm mostly disappointed with my new purchase.

    The problem is that some apps are written for iPhone only...why is there a difference? It's the same goddamn OS. Like, how is there not vector scaling of graphics? Instead, you can view it at iPhone screen size, occupying about 30%

    • by shilly ( 142940 )

      How is it Apple's fault that Southwest Airlines haven't released an iPad-specific version of their app? It's also very clear why Southwest haven't done so: the vast majority of the use case that they're addressing are travellers moving to and through airports, who are much, much more likely to access the app on their iphones than on an ipad.

      There's plenty of business-focused apps that are optimised for iPad because that's what their target market will be using. But they're very vertical-specific, by and lar

  • I was in the market for a smaller iPad. I've had my 16GB iPad 4 for several years, but it seems to choke on newer apps. I really wanted a new iPad Mini, but I'm not buying a model that's two years old at any price. Apple has billions in cash, but they can't seem to engineer regular updates into their product lineup since Jobs died.
    • by Moof123 ( 1292134 ) on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @12:47PM (#54082795)

      Yep, giant "M'eh".

      Macs were outdated by time their did their last refresh. Mac Pro is a farce at this point. Mini is a severely overpriced 2 core puck. Years old mobile guts in fancy packaging at Gucci prices.

      Itunes got mangled beyond recognition to integrate it with Apple Music. hard to search without getting a big screen full of stuff to buy instead of stuff in my library.

      iPhone is the only thing getting any love, and it has become a me-too follower of Samsung (though less fire and bribery prone).

      For a company that has expanded greatly over the recent years they seem to be doing a lot less. Well, a lot less products and a lot more ego stroking anyway. What the hell are all those people doing? Spinning the motherboard yearly to keep everything up to date should be a baseline expectation, and nothing viewed as even innovative, just doing their job.

      Sigh.

The opossum is a very sophisticated animal. It doesn't even get up until 5 or 6 PM.

Working...