Apple's iPhone 8 To Replace Touch ID Home Button With 'Function Area' (appleinsider.com) 114
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Apple Insider: Apple will ditch the home button when it debuts a new 'iPhone 8' model later this year, and will dedicate the extra screen real estate to an area for virtual buttons, according to KGI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. Adding detail to his previous predictions regarding the next-generation handset, Kuo in a note to investors obtained by AppleInsider said the full-screen design will allow Apple to integrate a "function" area never seen in an iPhone. The device is expected to adopt a 5.8-inch OLED panel in a form factor similar to the current 4.7-inch iPhone 7. Despite having extended screen real estate as compared to current iPhone models, the actual active display area on "iPhone 8" will be closer to 5.15 inches on the diagonal, with the remaining bottom portion dedicated to system functions like virtual buttons. While Kuo failed to elaborate on an exact implementation, the note suggests Apple plans to hardcode a set of always-on, static system controls into iOS. Whether the so-called "function area" is capable of switching to an active display mode for in-app activities like watching videos or playing games, remains to be seen. With the deletion of current Touch ID technology, Kuo believes "iPhone 8" will incorporate new bio-recognition assets to take over device security and Apple Pay authentication duties. The analyst did not offer predictions on the type of biometric tech Apple intends to use, but a report earlier today said the company could integrate a 3D laser scanning module capable of facilitating facial recognition and augmented reality applications. Kuo in a note last month said Apple might integrate a dual biometric system utilizing optical fingerprint readers and facial recognition hardware.
Still playing catch-up (Score:4, Insightful)
Once again the latest iPhone introduces revolutionary new ideas Android has had for years.
Re: (Score:3)
Still, it means /. gets to fill up it's front page.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, although I guess they will claim it's based on the touchbar on the new Apple laptops. It's about time they did something about having only one button and a lack of standard controls in the UI.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure they'll miss you.
Re: (Score:2)
Biometrics work awesome for phones.
Why ? My nieces 3-4 year olds could figure out pins, that stupid android but drawing thing, etc but they can't duplicate my thumb easily. (Yes it isn't that hard but it requires skills and tools not found in most homes)
The iPhone thumb has a 48 hour timeout where if you haven't typed in your password in 48 hours the thumb doesn't work. Police in the USA can hold you for 24 hours so odds are the police won't be able to unlock your phone and will be locked out by password
Re: (Score:2)
The police can force you to physically touch your thumb or other biometric to the phone to open it. They could easily do this within your 48 hours time limit.....
So far to point, they still cannot pry into your mind to
Re: (Score:1)
The police can force you to physically touch your thumb or other biometric to the phone to open it. They could easily do this within your 48 hours time limit.....
So far to point, they still cannot pry into your mind to get your code(s)....
That and I just would rather NOT share my fingerprints anymore than I have to, especially with a company....who knows what database that will end up on.
Fingerprint data never leaves the TouchID Chip built into the Home Button. And I don't think it even keeps an image of the fingerprint(s), per se; just some sort of ID-hashing code.
Re: (Score:2)
And you trust them to keep to this...?
Re: (Score:1)
And you trust them to keep to this...?
Yes. Yes I do.
Re: (Score:3)
Touch ID has always been optional. You're not forced to use it (in fact, you can't enable it without enabling some other more secure authentication first - even a 4 digit PIN is considered more secure).
I would expect iOS 11 to have a new feature to disable Touch ID quickly - not only after reboot, 48 hours or 3 failed attempts (requiring use of the alternate authentication system) so if the p
Re: (Score:2)
They do allow for good old-fashioned passwords (of any length). The biometrics just make it so you don't have to enter it more than once a day. Or after restarting (hint hint for those at airport security).
Re:Still playing catch-up (Score:5, Interesting)
Tons of them got it right. (Score:2)
My android phone has two "soft" buttons next to a physical home button, and I hate those little fuckers.
Other device did it better :
- more recent android device have no physical button or touch zone, just a bigger screen. It's either 3 clickable button displayed at the bottom of the screen.
Or full screen, with the button appearing if you touch the screen (used for gaming and movie watching). They are handled by the same code that handles most UI button on the OS, so a little bit better handled than the "a fly could click on it" older softbutton you mention.
- before that, Palm/HP WebOS used to produced device
Re: (Score:2)
So you blame Android but you mention a problem with your very specific implementation of it. It's quite possible that there are companies other than Apple who have solved this problem.
but they probably will; they usually pay a lot of attention to this stuff.
You're assuming that this is a problem for most people that needs to be addressed.
Re: (Score:1)
And hopefully Apple will get it right.
With Apple's track record of implementing Android features, they'll do it completely wrong.
I've never encountered an Android phone "doing it wrong", this goes from the first HTC Dream to my latest Nexus 5X. If you're accidentally pressing the soft buttons, you're doing something horribly wrong as they need to be pressed properly to work and have no function if held down too long. In fact, I'd prefer the soft buttons to be more sensitive on my 5X.
Re:Still playing catch-up (Score:4, Interesting)
WTF is this obsessive need to get rid of physical buttons with tactile feedback?
They already removed the physical home button in the iPhone 7. It's now a software button that just looks like the old Home button. Instead of "clicking" it now vibrates the phone.
If you're physically holding the phone, it does almost feel like a button. If you're not, or if you're holding it wrong (why does that sound familiar), the physical feedback is just off and the phone just sort of shakes.
Oh, and because it's a software button, it now occasionally just doesn't work and does nothing, with no ability to tell whether or not you're pressing hard enough or that the phone has crashed. Because Apple fired their QA staff, generally the phone will have crashed and now you get to do the new "reboot the phone" gesture which had to change because the home button isn't a button any more.
Re: (Score:3)
Cost - the components themselves plus assembling them. It can add up to whole tens of cents!
As a rule, if it has a touchscreen then two revisions down the line it will only have a touchscreen.
Lolz! (Score:1)
so true! [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:1)
The real problem is that iOS tends to copy the shitty features of Android where as Android tends to take the good features from iOS.
The virtual buttons are a shitty feature. WTF is this obsessive need to get rid of physical buttons with tactile feedback? Its great that they can be changed, but I'd like to be able to do a few things without 100% attention to the screen constantly.
I'm a physical being. Not everything has to be software.
Benefits Annoyances
The physical button is taking up quite a bit of potential front-panel area.
Think about it: The button on my iPhone 6 Plus is about 9 mm in diameter. That's bad enough; but the real issue is that it sits in an area that is completely unused on either side of that button. If the "button" is emulated by the already touch-sensitive display, then the ENTIRE area can be used as DISPLAY area, with a simple Gesture, or small on-screen button used to bring up Springboard (the App Launcher) and its dedicated, emula
So..... (Score:1)
Borrowing features (Score:1, Insightful)
Once again the latest iPhone introduces revolutionary new ideas Android has had for years.
We get it. You don't like Apple. We'll all pretend for your benefit that the Android ecosystem hasn't "borrowed" any features from Apple and the Android is the one true system from which all good things originate.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Have you never seen a commercial for any Android device?
Re: (Score:2)
It's the exact sort of crap that Apple would have sued for if the roles were reversed.
Both borrow (Score:2, Insightful)
It's not a question of whether or not someone likes Apple.
Sure it is. Otherwise he wouldn't get any pleasure out of making snarky comments about how some feature in an Apple product was done somewhere else first despite the fact that very few people actually care.
Many of the "all new, we just created this and it's never been seen before!" additions to iOS have been blatant rip-offs of features in use for Android for months, if not years before Apple claims it is "all new".
Yeah yeah, Apple doesn't do anything new. Blah blah blah. Old argument. Here's the thing. Whether or not Apple is first to market with a given feature is more or less irrelevant. Very few people care if Apple or Samsung or HTC actually put the feature in a product first. What matters is A) whether
Re: (Score:2)
So which is The One True Ring?
Re: (Score:2)
Otherwise he wouldn't get any pleasure out of making snarky comments
For many of us we don't get pleasure about pointing out other people's bullshit. Actually it saddens me a bit that this is "news". Quite the opposite of pleasure.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? What's stopping the Android handset makers from suing?
Not patenting trivial utter shit like OMG I CAN SLIDE MY FINGER ON A SCREEN!
Re: (Score:2)
We get it. You don't like Apple. We'll all pretend for your benefit that the Android ecosystem hasn't "borrowed" any features from Apple and the Android is the one true system from which all good things originate.
I think claims that Android stole from Apple tend to be wildly overblown. Now Samsung stealing ideas from Apple? Now you've really got something.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple went from 10 years ahead to 4-5 years behind. First screen sizes, then the "thin wars", now removing physical buttons in favor of tactile screens. What's next? Slightly larger screen with a Wacom digitizer a-la Samsung Note series?
Re: (Score:2)
Completely agree. The last time I saw a major leap in iPhone was from 5s to 6, when they brought in Apple Pay, and enlarged the phone a bit, allowing for more icons per screen. Had I bought my phone a bit later when 6 came out, I'd have avoided any upgrades - depending on the storage that I bought.
I recently upgraded from the 5s to a 7, and the loss of the aux slot hasn't hurt, since I don't use the music aspect of the phone. However, that's the last upgrade I've done. I don't plan to ever go w/
Re: (Score:2)
Not to be that annoying android fan boy guy but if you had gone with android, you could get a different launcher (the thing that manages the home screen basically) and customize how many icons are on it. Some launchers even completely change the way the home screen works. I'm not saying you should have gone android by the way, you're probably happy with your phone and that's great.
Re: (Score:2)
I have good news for you. I have 3 phones - one of each type. One iPhone 7, which I described, and which I use for purely personal uses - family, relatives, my doctors, et al. One Moto X w/ Lollipop, which I use for anything work related. I also have a Lumia 550, which I use as a travel phone, and which is actually pretty good.
On top of that, I have 2 tablets - one iPad mini, and one Verizon Ellipsis 10. The latter, as you can guess, has Lollipop as well, but it recently gave me an update that allow
Re: Still playing catch-up (Score:1)
Like rounded rectangles?
Re: (Score:2)
Like rounded rectangles?
WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHA! Damn that was a funny joke!!! Have you considered a career in comedy? You'd doubtless end up as one of the all time comedy greats in all of recorded human history.
I only wish it were a joke, but sadly that's the reality we live in.
Re: (Score:2)
Palm?
Re: (Score:2)
The Handspring Treo?
Re: (Score:2)
No to you and all your ancestors. Try again.
Re: (Score:2)
So, what's this?
Palm Treo 180 [gsmarena.com]
Re: Still playing catch-up (Score:2)
Re: Still playing catch-up (Score:2)
Doubtful. Ubuntu phone is designed around various side swipes. This is probably a case of Apple designers not wanting anything spoiling their pretty mockups. Apple: fuck usability, it's fucking pretty.
Facial Recognition... (Score:2, Insightful)
So, I have to re-register every time I shave in order to use apple pay? Oh, you are wearing a baseball cap, so you have to take that off to pay? Oh, you want to unlock your phone while walking down the street. Better take off your sunglasses... Apple, why you gotta keep losing desired functionality?!?!
Re: Facial Recognition... (Score:1)
I'm sure they've taken facial hair into account considering their general apple geniuses appearance.
Re: (Score:3)
Not gonna happen. They are also incorporating wireless charging. Wireless charging (a) takes a lot of space (relative to a phone) and (b) increases the heat of a battery requiring either a much slower charge or a smaller battery design. So either all of this happens and you are getting a microprocessor with the same speed as an iPhone 7 (think Kaby Lake for phones) or you are not getting all these fancy bells and whistles until the iPhone 8s
-dk
Re:Facial Recognition... (Score:5, Insightful)
So, I have to re-register every time I shave in order to use apple pay? Oh, you are wearing a baseball cap, so you have to take that off to pay? Oh, you want to unlock your phone while walking down the street. Better take off your sunglasses... Apple, why you gotta keep losing desired functionality?!?!
I know that venting your outrage over everything that Apple does is great fun but please do not trash talk facial recognition just because Apple is using it. You are severely underestimating what modern face recognition algorithms can do. If you set out to do it and if this: http://www.webrok.com/news/201... [webrok.com] is your taste in sunglasses, you can certainly screw up facial recognition systems but modern facial recognition software has pretty impressive success rates even with subjects wearing headgear, different hair styles, 'normal' sunglasses or regular eye glasses and obscured faces (beards, scarves, veils). engineers@google.com already tried integrating face recognition login into Android and it turned out to be an embarrassing fail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] because the Android camera could not distinguish between an actual 3D face and a 2D picture of one. Hence the mention of 3D laser scanning module for the new iPhones in the article summary because 3D scanning is what you need for pattern recognition based security features that are hard to fool regardless of whether you are talking about face recognition or fingerprint scanning. On an unrelated note a 3D laser scanning module sounds like a pretty awesome addition to a smartphone for all kinds of reasons having nothing to do with facial recognition and a lot to do with a long standing desire on my part (as, I am sure, many others here) to own a fully functional Start Trek tricorder. A 3D laser scanning module built into your phone would be a major step in that direction. Being able to scan an object on my kitchen table with a smartphone and then sending it to a 3D printer after a short stopover on my laptop to clean up the scan would be nothing short of awesome.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow you say how good it is and then give an example of how the leading tech company darling royally fucked it up. That doesn't instill confidence. Also I don't want to have to face this thing toward my face to unlock it every time. What about all the times you're not wanting to angle your phone toward toue fully in obscured face? I link that I can do that now with a 100% reliable solution and functionality that I can feel and not look ata a fucking physical button. Trust me this shit will be apples undoimg, just look at the "touchbar" on the new Macs and tell me how this is faster to do anything. It isn't because it takes something that can be accomplished through touch memory with keys and makes you take your eyes off the thing you need to look at to look at a different thing. It's fucking hunt and pecking.
Woosh!... I also explained why Apple's approach with the 3D laser scanner module is betteer and more secure than Googles attempt using only 2D.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want it to have to have line of sight to my face. What a fricking step back. I can reach my hand into my pocket and touch the button to unlock. I can unlock in the dark. It is retarded and as someone who has owned every generation of iphones and ipads, I will quit buying them because of that stupid feature.
Re: (Score:2)
No, WHOOSH to you! I don't want it to have to have line of sight to my face. What a fricking step back. I can reach my hand into my pocket and touch the button to unlock. I can unlock in the dark. It is retarded and as someone who has owned every generation of iphones and ipads, I will quit buying them because of that stupid feature.
Your personal preferences are immaterial to this discussion. You tried to make the claim that Apple's 3D facial recognition ID would be every bit as insecure as Googles 2D facial recognition ID and you are wrong. So, one more, time if Apple's implementation of face recognition unlocking includes a 3D laser scanning module it is going to be by many parsecs more secure that Googles 2D implementation was that is a mathematical fact. Do you get it now? ... Oh, and you forgot to check the 'Anonymous Coward' box.
Re: (Score:2)
You are severely underestimating what modern face recognition algorithms can do.
I can't speak for the GP, but face recognition should only be able to be called face recognition when it works like nature. ie Humans can recognise a familiar face under all sorts of weird circumstances. But 'modern' facial recognition algorithms still only work under specific circumstances and then only sometimes. How many times has a friend or family member come up to you to say hello and you've responded, "I'm sorry I do not regonise you, please try again?
We have these AI conversations in here all the
Re: (Score:2)
Great (Score:2, Insightful)
Can I still use a password?
I'm unsure if I'm in a minority of people who don't like all this biometrics stuff or the majority are just told to like it.
Re:Great (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. Handing out biometrical data to american companies with all that NSA stuff going on seems kind of dumb.
Do you not have a driver's license? The NSA (government) can get your fingerprint from its own databases much easier than trying to get it from your phone.
I wish Android would copy the iPhone's ... (Score:1)
... reliable update feature. The need to purchase a new phone just to get the latest version of Android is starting to get ridiculous.
Frankly, I blame Google for open sourcing Android in the first place, instead of keeping it closed source, and providing OEMs with ways to build kernel extensions, and leverage a built-in theme engine.
The only way Google can fix this mess now is to come up with a new OS, which is "Android compatible". Then again, they'll probably do just that, open source it, and we'll be rig
Make Siri more useful (Score:5, Funny)
Yesterday, I needed to turn on the iPhone's flashlight and for some bizarre reason, it wouldn't let me swipe up from the bottom of the screen to turn it on. So I asked Siri to do turn it on and she said, "I can't do that." Siriously? A while back, the speedometer cable in my truck broke so I couldn't tell how fast I was going. I asked Siri thinking that she would be able to use the GPS to figure it out. "Hey, Siri, how fast am I going?" She said, "I've been wondering that for a while." Yeah, um, hey Siri, quit being a smartass millenial and do some work.
Re: (Score:1)
Siri is seriously lacking. You can use the Harry Potter "light" spells to toggle the flashlight on Android, but you can't toggle it at all on iOS. There are a lot of edge cases where you can do things with Siri but only if you phrase it in the exact correct way. And then there are weird things, like where Siri will let you enter Airplane Mode, which leaves Siri disabled because that kills the Internet connection.
The funny thing is that for things like your current speed, your iPhone does calculate that. It'
Re: (Score:2)
I heard that and tried saying "Lumos Maximus" but all Siri wanted to do is search for limousine services in the area. She does know what the fox says even though that's a pretty dated joke.
Re: (Score:2)
Make it thinner (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
I remember his initial iPhone announcement/unveiling, where he talked about phones with hard keyboards built into the display and how much it sucked that display space was taken by these buttons you only sometimes used.
Re: (Score:2)
It's called the iPhone SE. 5 form factor but close enough. That's what I got to replace the 5S I've had for the last few years. I don't like the bumpy 6, and really dislike the 7 for dropping the headphone port. Maybe Apple will pull their heads out their asses on the 8S/9 when I'm next ready to upgrade, or maybe I'll end up leaving their ecosystem. I'm already one leg out the door due to their recent shenanigans with the MacBook Pro/Air lines.
Pity, their hardware really is very good.