Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Iphone Apple Hardware

Apple Replaced the Headphone Jack On the iPhone 7 With a Fake Speaker Grill (businessinsider.com) 248

Not long ago, Apple CEO Tim Cook explained why the company felt a need to remove the headphone jack from the new iPhones -- the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. He said, "that jack takes up a lot of space in the phone, a lot of space. And there's a lot of more important things we can provide for the consumer than that jack." His colleague Phil Schiller cited "courage" for the same. As people learn to live in a world where they have to use a dongle to use their existing pair of headphones, gadget repair community iFixit found today that Apple isn't really using that "extra space" it got after getting rid of the headphone jack. BusinessInsider reports: "In place of the headphone jack, we find a component that seems to channel sound from outside the phone into the microphone... or from the Taptic Engine out," they write. Yep -- in the place where the headphone jack used to be there's a piece of molded plastic. "No fancy electronics here, just some well-designed acoustics and molded plastic," iFixit writes.iFixit adds, "Closer inspection shows a new, second lower speaker grille that leads ... nowhere? Interesting." Update: 09/16 21:21 GMT by M : Apple says it's a "barometric vent." The Verge reports: Apparently adding all the waterproofing to the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus meant that it was more of a sealed box, and so to be able to have an accurate and working barometer, Apple used that space. The barometer is the thing that allows a phone to measure altitude, and Apple points out that on the iPhone 7 it can measure even minor changes like climbing a flight of stairs.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Replaced the Headphone Jack On the iPhone 7 With a Fake Speaker Grill

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    You absolutely need to know how high you are.

    • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) *
      The CIA needs to know which floor you are on to direct the drone's missile properly.
    • You almost made me snort my coke... The 'vent' they are talking about is a GoreTex vent. It lets air and water vapor through, but not liquid water. It helps to keep the inside of the phone dry.
      • You almost made me snort my coke..

        Liquid or line?

      • by NotAPK ( 4529127 )

        "It helps to keep the inside of the phone dry."

        It can't unless it is magically one way (see Maxwell's Demon [wikipedia.org]) and only lets water vapor out and not in.

        In a warm damp environment water vapour will enter the phone through the vent.

        On transition to a cold environment that water will condense and you now have liquid water inside the phone.

  • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:22PM (#52903929)

    Having a barometer built into a phone is more useful than you would think, especially when measuring elevation changes.

    • by Grim Beefer ( 946632 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:27PM (#52903971)

      Guess how much more useful that bullshit is than a 3.5mm headphone jack? That's called a downgrade.

      • by Joce640k ( 829181 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:47PM (#52904161) Homepage

        Wouldn't it have been better to keep the headphone jack and sell a bluetooth barometer?

        • This is really silly. All a barometer needs is either one or two tiny holes (depending on the design of the sensor). The sensor would need to be sealed to the sensor and water tight, of course, but that is required by any sensor they might use. This story is simply an excuse.

          I'll guess two possible reasons for this:
          1. Force more use of Apple patented and licensed tech for headphones
          2. Allow DRM implementation at the headphone jack to further control what can be played on the iPhone

          • by jafiwam ( 310805 )

            This is really silly. All a barometer needs is either one or two tiny holes (depending on the design of the sensor). The sensor would need to be sealed to the sensor and water tight, of course, but that is required by any sensor they might use. This story is simply an excuse.

            I'll guess two possible reasons for this: 1. Force more use of Apple patented and licensed tech for headphones 2. Allow DRM implementation at the headphone jack to further control what can be played on the iPhone

            The iPhone6+ (and possibly others) already has a barometer in it.

            Barometer on a chip has been a thing for decades already. No "sealed box" needed.

            They may have added the vent and moved the sensor for the existing barometer, but it's not a new feature. Gortex venting will probably greatly slow down the sensitivity so make it less useful for stuff they claim it might do.

      • by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 16, 2016 @06:09PM (#52904313)

        You can't know if its a downgrade or an upgrade unless you have a barometer!

    • by The-Ixian ( 168184 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:27PM (#52903981)

      It's almost as useful as a headphone jack...

    • Having a barometer built into a phone is more useful than you would think, exclusively when measuring elevation changes.

      Fixed that for you

      • Never seen a weather station? Any idea what hey are measuring?

      • Having a barometer built into a phone is more useful than you would think, exclusively when measuring elevation changes.

        Fixed that for you

        This might just be the most complicated method for turning the phone off when you get on a plane so the battery doesn't ignite. Now that they have become the first manufacturer to innovate a way to make water resistant phones, they have added elevation resistance as well!

    • Isn't the GPS receiver already doing a better job of that?

      • by sexconker ( 1179573 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:42PM (#52904123)

        Unless you're in a lab kept at 1 STP. Of course it is.

        Using a barometer to measure altitude is retarded to the point of it being a cliche physics exam question (measuring the height of a building with a barometer).
        Are you rapidly climbing stairs or is there a storm a comin'?

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

        Isn't the GPS receiver already doing a better job of that?

        No, GPS is not a better job.

        GPS' horizontal accuracy is good - about 1m. But its vertical accuracy is horrible - anywhere from tens of meters to a hundred meters or more. GPS was never made with vertical accuracy in mind.

        Even pilots using VNAV rely on airports to transmit a vertical guidance signal to give a precise vertical signal.

        And altitude is just one use of a barometer. You can also use it for weather - in fact, that's why you don't use a barom

        • by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 16, 2016 @07:08PM (#52904627)

          In this case, it probably was 3.5mm jack, or sealed case for waterproofness. I'm guessing waterproofness won out.

          Nope. There are other waterproof smartphones [digitaltrends.com] that have a higher rating (IP68) than the iPhone 7, yet they all have a headphone jack. What won out was a way to push customers into either buying headphones that use the lightning port or bluetooth headphones that use Apple's W1 chip. Either way, Apple gets paid when others make accessories with their proprietary crap. "Oh, but there's a dongle", you say. Indeed there is. Apple knew there would be an even bigger shit-storm if not for some way for people to still use non-Apple headphones, but genius lies in the inconvenience of using the dongle. Which is exactly what will make iPhone users more likely to purchase Apple taxed headphones in the future.

        • GPS' horizontal accuracy is good - about 1m. But its vertical accuracy is horrible - anywhere from tens of meters to a hundred meters or more. GPS was never made with vertical accuracy in mind.

          GPS vertical accuracy is just as good as it's "horizontal" accuracy. It is just that the GPS receiver does not have accurate topological data, which is difficult to comeby. Early GPS receivers didn't have any topological data at all.

    • What would it do any different than GPS?
    • E.g.: A barometer can give more accurate elevation data than GPS, so that when you are in a high-rise building and make an emergency call, first responders know what floor you are on.

      Not sure this is why it is included, but it's a possible application.

      • Um, no.

        Air pressure varies with weather/temperature/etc.

        • by unimacs ( 597299 )
          I have no idea what the barometer inside the iPhone is for and it may well have more than one purpose. However I can say that lots of fitness apps use GPS to record elevation changes and they are notoriously bad. I've also used a combination temperature / pressure sensor to measure altitude in model rockets. You have to set the base altitude. It wasn't foolproof but much more reliable than GPS is. I'm sure you could use both to get more accurate results than one or the other.

          Pressure changes due to movem
          • Airplanes, skydivers, and hikers have all used altimeters that relied on pressure changes

            Yes, I'll keep that in mind next time I use my phone when I throw myself out of airplane.

            Sorry but I see zero benefit to this on the phone. Fitness apps? Who gives a crap. It's a phone. You can't wear it swimming it doesn't monitor your heart rate, and if you're remotely interested in any kind of accurate fitness you will have an additional device to do all this stuff anyway.

            • by unimacs ( 597299 )
              Not to monitor your body, - to monitor what you do. Mileage, elevation change, pace, pace this mile compared to last mile, pace compared to your personal best on that segment, pace compare to others who have done the same route. If you're a runner, cyclist, etc, these apps are a great training aid but those that rely solely on GPS to track elevation changes don't do it very accurately.
              • Again, if you're serious about it, tracking your exercise on an iPhone is the wrong way to go about it. And as a marathon runner myself I can categorically say there's nothing worse than running with something heavy slapping around in my pocket. Things like the Garmin forerunner are far better than any phone, and to be perfectly honest there is no need to accurately track elevation when running. I could see this being useful when climbing or downhill mountain biking ... neither of which I would do with a ph

                • by unimacs ( 597299 )
                  I've run marathons and most recently triathlons. Sure, you may prefer not to use a phone and that is totally up to you. But a lot of people run and bike with phones. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the value of what a smartphone can provide vs something like a low-end Garmin.

                  As far as comfort goes, people will bike with a phone in a jersey pocket or mounted to the stem/handlebars. Most folks I see running with a phone use an arm strap. Personally I wouldn't want to run 26 miles with one on my arm but f
      • You must not live in a part of the world where the weather forecast includes phrases like "Snow and sleet above 3,000 feet tonight." This is very common in the western U.S. That's the reason that interstate highways are frequently marked with signs reading "Elevation 2,500 feet."

        If I'm driving on a road that doesn't have elevation signs, but I know that there is going to be bad weather above a certain altitude, shouting "Hey, Siri, what's my current altitude?" in the car is going to make for far better tr

        • You must not live in a part of the world where the weather forecast includes phrases like "Snow and sleet above 3,000 feet tonight."

          Nope. Illinois, elev. 600±not a whole hell of a lot unless you're in a tall building.

        • I live in Colorado where accurate altitude data is nice for hiking and orientation on maps.

          Because if you did live in a state like Colorado you wouldn't just sit in a car ossifying, but actually enjoy nature.

          Kind of amazing to me how many people on Slashdot are clamoring for less accurate data, just because it would make Apple look bad.

    • Having a barometer built into a phone is more useful than you would think, especially when measuring elevation changes.

      I've worked with barometers in embedded devices in the past. They're shitty at measuring all but the largest elevation changes. There are many environmental factors that could trick the device into thinking the elevation has changed. Ever go into a building and hear air rushing past the doors? That's because there is a pressure differential between the inside and outside of the building. Just walking inside could make the phone think it has changed altitude by several hundred feet.

    • Having a barometer built into a phone is more useful than you would think, especially when measuring elevation changes.

      If a "barometer" measured the quality of the bars in which I was drinking, then I would agree, but I don't think it does.

    • Some of us go out to sea on a boat. Having a barometer always on your person is handy, even if it's just for redundancy.

      Just because you don't find it useful doesn't mean everyone else doesn't as well. If it doesn't detract from the phone aside from the few cents it costs to add, why not add it? 99% of people never run Linux on their PC, but I'm sure most people here would cry foul if Intel used that as an excuse to do something to make their processors incompatible with Linux.
    • Having a barometer built into a phone is more useful than you would think, especially when measuring elevation changes.

      Many phones had barometers at some point including 2 of my 3 previous smartphones.

      No one cared, no apps used them, and most vendors have removed them as the utterly uninteresting devices they are. Having a barometer in my phone is about as interesting as having a 3.5mm headphone jack on my drone.

    • What is the market for people who want/need to know how high up a flight of stairs they are?
      Is about the same as people who use wired headphones?
  • by H3lldr0p ( 40304 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:24PM (#52903951) Homepage

    A more perfect barometer was needed to accomplish what exactly? The device can now tell that I've ascended stairs more accurately. This will lead to what? And this change was as valuable as the headphone jack, how? Sure, more waterproof will probably help some people but overall? It just seems like a dick move.

    • It is for the wide number of un-pressurized plane pilots so they can have an extra altimeter.
    • by unimacs ( 597299 )
      Fitness Apps, - cycling, running, etc.

      There are tons of them for mobile phones. They do things like tell you have far you've ridden, what you're average speed is/was, if your pace was faster or slower than the last mile or the last time you did it, or how it compared to the best time anybody has recorded on that route. AND they record elevation changes because those make a big difference. The problem is that GPS does it badly.

      Since pressure is used in things like altimeters, it's not hard to see why i
    • I recently worked on a project where knowing the height of an object within 1ft was critical to the project. It failed because it wasn't possible to accurately determine that height with any barometer we could find (at least not one that could be affixed to a drone). The barometer excuse is utter bullshit. The best that a barometer that can fit on a phone can do is determine a general trend in elevation change. And any basic one will do that just fine.

    • People die when the police can't figure out what floor of a high rise building they are on, after calling 911 and passing out. You can find plenty of news reports about the numerous times it has happened.

    • A more perfect barometer was needed to accomplish what exactly

      No, it's just a lie. A complete, outright lie. Have you seen a SMT baro? I've got a shitload of them here, mostly on flight controllers and IMUs. The hole in them is smaller than 1/16".

  • by kimvette ( 919543 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:46PM (#52904153) Homepage Journal

    Somehow Android phone manufacturers have managed this for years (with even more sensors) with LARGER batteries, and maintaining water resistance all while not eliminating the headphone jack.

    This is all about generating new earbud+headphone sales.

  • Between a standard headphone jack and a barometric sensor, I know which I'd find WAY more useful in day-to-day life.

  • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:58PM (#52904233)

    Is that Apple-speak for "hot air"?

  • Fortunately, now there's a sensor that can measure whether the phone has gone up or down.

  • Wrong Headline... (Score:4, Informative)

    by friedmud ( 512466 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @06:26PM (#52904381)

    Should read: Apple Replaced the Headphone Jack On the iPhone 7 With a Huge Taptic Engine

    Just look at the pictures:

    https://www.ifixit.com/Teardow... [ifixit.com]

    (Look at Step 6)

    It's obvious that the huge Taptic Engine is right in the line of fire for where the plug would go.

    That said: I do this it's a bit BS to put a "speaker grill" there. It might be aesthetically pleasing (balance) but it's a bit underhanded. I'm not really buying their "it's for the barometer!" schtick either...

    • With the addition of tri-point screws, many iPhone 7 repairs will require up to four different types of drivers.

  • Just imagine how much space Apple could use if they made the phone thicker. They could have a bigger battery, headphone jack, barometer... there are all kinds of possibilities.

    • by SeaFox ( 739806 )

      But then people would complain about how thick the phone will be -- while simultaneously taking their existing thinner one and putting it into a thick battery case to get any useful life out of it.

    • by jez9999 ( 618189 )

      That phone already exists, it's called an LG G3. Oh and it comes with a better operating system. ;-)

  • by sootman ( 158191 ) on Friday September 16, 2016 @07:33PM (#52904745) Homepage Journal

    Because OF COURSE a millimeter-thick grill has the same volume as an entire headphone socket. WHO WRITES THIS SHIT?

    http://www.firstpr.com.au/rwi/... [firstpr.com.au]

  • Hot off the press: iPhone 8 will come with a rooster weather vane permanently attached to the top.
  • Decisions, decisions...a standard universal headphone jack that literally millions of devices will plug into, or a barometer.

    Gee, which one would I use more? It's such a puzzle.

  • I'll just leave this here and bow out of the silly clickbait shit.

    Over the years, I've submitted some stories Some on popular stuff, and some on tech stuff.

    As Slasddot jumps feetfirst into the world of What this Pennsylvania Housewife Found out that is Driving Dermatologists Crazy, I can fully understand exactly why they were rejected.

    tl;dr version. Apple removed the headphone jack, and replaced it with something.

    Now I'll take the discretion to post in less obviously stupid stories. Peace out.

  • Apple is just trolling their customers at this point. Might be some sort of social experiment to see how long they can convince people to buy this nonsense. The next iPhone probably won't have a screen.
  • Look ... The headphone jack is gone on the iPhone 7 series because Apple wants it gone. It's as easy as that. If a 1/8" stereo headphone jack is THAT big of a deal to you? You obviously need to start considering other smartphone products. I'd say chances are real close to 0% that Apple will decide to bring it back again in a future iPhone.

    Despite the uproar, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus phones achieved record sales. T-Mobile said they sold more of them the first day than they've ever sold of ANY phone in their

  • Had a barometer 5 years ago. It'll report altitude changes as little as 1M.

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...