Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
IOS Apple

iOS 10 Is Surfacing Hardcore Porn GIFs in iMessage (theverge.com) 181

Apple has found itself in hot water once again. The company's revamped iMessage -- and the inclusion of a range of extensions -- isn't rendering the best of results. Hours after the release of iOS 10 -- which caused issues for some users -- news outlets noticed a "highly sexual" My Little Pony GIF was appearing in searches when curious minds searched for the word "butt". But that wasn't the end of it. The Verge explains the horror: A woman who emailed The Verge this afternoon says her eight-year-old daughter, while trying to send a message to her dad, was presented with "a very explicit image" of "a woman giving oral sex to a well endowed male." Her daughter hadn't searched for anything explicit, just the word "huge." I see the image come up like, holy shit, whoa whoa whoa, that's a hardcore porn image," Tassie Bethany, whose daughter discovered the image, tells The Verge by phone. "I grabbed the phone from her immediately. She typed in the word 'huge,' which isn't sexual in any nature. It's just a word, not like butt or anything else." GIF search is one of the new features built into iMessage in iOS 10. Apple has been prohibiting searches for most sexual terms, but it's a real problem for porn to slip through for an otherwise normal term like "huge."Reminds me of Apple's old porn problems.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

iOS 10 Is Surfacing Hardcore Porn GIFs in iMessage

Comments Filter:
  • The internet is a filthy place, always has been.

    • Re:ewww (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:05PM (#52895057)

      Worse than that, the internet is a huge place.

      • And it seems that her daughter has been exploring it...

      • Not just huge; one might almost say it's web-scale.
    • Re:ewww (Score:4, Funny)

      by kuzb ( 724081 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:10PM (#52895099)

      ...and most of us wouldn't have it any other way...

      • Damn straight! Look at the size of my smile (but excuse [m]y long nose) - the filth just makes me too happy! 8===D
  • Courage (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 15, 2016 @01:49PM (#52894925)

    That's all.

    • iOS 10 is turning out to be even MORE fun than Windows 10.

      Awesome job, Tim!
      • Yes, I agree. I really don't see why all these users are complaining about bonus content. There are lots of people in the world that still have to pay for it!

        • by jeremyp ( 130771 )

          Yes, I agree. I really don't see why all these users are complaining about bonus content. There are lots of people in the world that still have to pay for it!

          You mean boners content.

      • Shouldn't they call it iOS 10"?
  • What, what?!? If you search for the word 'butt', wouldn't you complain if you DIDN'T get an explicit image? Or is the problem that the My Little Pony image wasn't explicit enough? Maybe one really does have to go to the 2nd page of search results from time to time.

    • Yeah because typing an extra "t" is so hard to do on an touch keyboard....

      • It searches the whole internet.

        Not sure what else you expect.

        Well, it did until they blocked 'butt' and 'huge'. I'm guessing there are other people gaming it right now with other words.

        'MLP' doesn't show anything 'huge'

    • Simpsons (Score:5, Funny)

      by Joe_Dragon ( 2206452 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:03PM (#52895043)

      Reverand Lovejoy: [throws Bart out] Don't you ever come near my daughter again! Never have I heard such gratuitous use of the word "butt"!

      Bart Simpson: [pleading] But-but-but, but-but-but...

      Helen Lovejoy: [covering her ears] Make him stop! Make him stop!

    • by Barny ( 103770 )

      That's just the thing, that MLP image wasn't explicit, it was a parody image.

  • by mi ( 197448 ) <slashdot-2017q4@virtual-estates.net> on Thursday September 15, 2016 @01:53PM (#52894971) Homepage Journal

    Her daughter hadn't searched for anything explicit, just the word "huge."

    My kid told me, their elementary school teacher would not say "Hate". If she needs to refer to the emotion at all, she'll say: "H-word".

    Maybe, we ought to find an euphemism for "Huge" too now — but, obviously, it can not be "H-word", since that's already taken.

    And then we time, how long it takes porn-producers to linking the euphemism to the same porn-images — thus forcing us to search for yet another replacement.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by epyT-R ( 613989 )

      Are you serious? Perhaps it's time to find a new school for your child...or at least a new teacher.

      • by mi ( 197448 ) <slashdot-2017q4@virtual-estates.net> on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:59PM (#52895509) Homepage Journal

        Perhaps it's time to find a new school for your child...or at least a new teacher.

        Unfortunately, the government monopoly on education prevents most people — including myself — from doing so.

        That said, the school is not bad. And, having grown up in the USSR myself, I know very well, how to prevent the damage, which the state would do to a child's mind, if allowed to... After all, American ideologues are still amateurs compared to the Soviet ones.

        • by Bob the Super Hamste ( 1152367 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @03:26PM (#52895739) Homepage

          After all, American ideologues are still amateurs compared to the Soviet ones.

          Of all the day to not have mod points.
          That said the American education system is also rather good at making learning suck. Things like science, history, math, are all taught in the most boring way possible. I have frequently seen this with the kids in my son's scout den. Thankfully myself and the other den leader try to make learning a lot more fun and actually do things. For example in class the kids learned about the 3 different types of rocks and how they were made. In scouts we went and spent a couple of weeks on geology and found a bunch of rocks, examined them to see which of the 3 types they were, broke them open to see some of the structure, looked at them under magnifying glasses, put some in a rock polisher, etc. The thing the kids got the biggest kick out of was making our own rocks from ones we found. We melted them in my forge and poured it into some crucibles to cool at different rates. The next week we broke those new rocks open to see what effect the rate of cooling had on them with the grain size. We have done similar things for other topics in science, math and history so that they get to have lots of hands learning that also goes into more depth.

        • IAAE(conomist) and you don't know what monopoly means.

          There are many school options where I live and far from all of them are run by the government.

          • by mi ( 197448 )

            There are many school options where I live and far from all of them are run by the government.

            Whichever school your (and mine) children attend, we both are still paying for the government's one.

            That makes it a monopoly — and of the worst kind too. You can avoid lesser monopolies by simply foregoing whatever service they provide. Unfortunately, government's "offerings" are not so easily escaped...

        • by Megol ( 3135005 )

          Claiming a monopoly of education in the US just shows that you are a shitty liar or retarded. Even in Communist* Sweden parents have the right to select which school they want their children to attend, in the US it is "trivial" to arrange for home schooling if anything else doesn't fit. That is considerably harder in e.g. Sweden as children have the right to a good education and if one want to home school one also have to prove they will get a good education.

          (* it is absolutely not communist however for the

      • Yeah, I would really h8 that kind of nonsense.

    • Sounds like a huge problem.

    • Siri, search the web for images of ungood girls and doubleplus unsmall dongs.

    • I propose "yuge" </trump>

    • by citylivin ( 1250770 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:37PM (#52895315)

      Ha! reminds me of my mom (who came of age in the 60s) when i was a kid:

      "hate is a very strong word"

      shes right though, my mom, not the teacher. I assume the teacher meant something similar though. Kids (and people in general) are always saying they "hate" everything when really they just mean dislike. Hate is a much stronger word and children should be taught the difference.

      I dislike eating fish. I hate slavery.
      There is nothing wrong with children being taught to use language correctly.

      • by mi ( 197448 )

        I assume the teacher meant something similar though.

        Whether or not a particular feeling is merely a "dislike" or an actual "hate", there is no reason to substitute the word with a weaselese expression like "H-word".

        There is nothing wrong with children being taught to use language correctly.

        Full agreement. I told my child, she has my permission to use the word — in all of our three languages — if she feels it appropriate.

      • Can we teach them that language changes over time? That it evolves? Or is that not allowed either?

        • Can we teach them that language changes over time? That it evolves? Or is that not allowed either?

          BZZZT! You said the E-word. I really H-word that.

        • Sorry, but the language has not evolved so much that dislike is now a synonym for hate (or vice versa). However, the use of H-word instead of hate would seem to be the type of linguistic evolution that you seem to be in favor of.

          So what exactly is your point?

          • Well, if a generation or two is using dislike for hate, then yes it has changed.

            You're just not aware of it. Probably because it's more subtle than the H-word for you.

          • by smelch ( 1988698 )
            What are you talking about? hate verb 1. feel intense or passionate dislike for (someone). "the boys hate each other" synonyms: loathe, detest, despise, dislike, abhor, execrate; More noun 1. intense or passionate dislike. "feelings of hate and revenge" synonyms: hatred, loathing, detestation, dislike, distaste, abhorrence, abomination, execration, aversion; More Please tell me in historical terms when hate wasn't a synonym for dislike.
    • What about H-bomb? Similar to F-bomb. Oh wait...

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      It's a technical problem. Back in the 90s, in fact probably before that, spammers figured out that if they just added as many keywords as possible their stuff would show up in more search results. Search engines quickly learned to filter them.

      Somehow I knew this story would trigger poor mi.

      • by mi ( 197448 )

        this story would trigger poor mi.

        Having lost two out of two recent arguments with me, you really do have little left but refer to me as "poor"... *Plonk*

    • My kid told me, their elementary school teacher would not say "Hate". If she needs to refer to the emotion at all, she'll say: "H-word".

      F-word, that's stupid.

  • by stevez67 ( 2374822 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @01:54PM (#52894973)

    If you don't set the content restrictions in the iOS settings, you'll get unfiltered results. Who'd-a-thought!

  • by rgbscan ( 321794 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @01:55PM (#52894985) Homepage

    The images appear to just be .gif type images originating from Bing. There's even a bing logo in the corner of the search window. I suspect it's similar to searching plain old Bing for .gif's. Even in safe search mode porn occasionally comes up.

    • by asjk ( 569258 )

      The images appear to just be .gif type images originating from Bing. There's even a bing logo in the corner of the search window. I suspect it's similar to searching plain old Bing for .gif's. Even in safe search mode porn occasionally comes up.

      Yep.

  • by __aaclcg7560 ( 824291 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @01:57PM (#52894999)
    It could have been yuge!
  • Well thankfully it wasn't an image of Trump. That would have been really traumatizing.
    • by epyT-R ( 613989 )

      for spineless hipster progressives maybe.. Normal people just laugh at his hair just like they cringe at hillary's gaping smiles..

  • by gurps_npc ( 621217 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:05PM (#52895055) Homepage

    I can see butt giving NSFW images.

    But the word "huge" has no business defaulting to porn.

    I ran it on google and duckduckgo and did not have that problem, but run it on bing and you pics of very well endowed women.

    This is an issue with Microsoft failing to do their job, not an issue with search engines in general.

  • by John Allsup ( 987 ) <slashdot@chal i s q u e.net> on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:07PM (#52895079) Homepage Journal

    100 people trying to write rules to stop 100,000 people trying to share porn, whilst not stopping everybody else. How hard can it be? (I'll leave the question of whether a pun is intended to an internet poll.)

  • by Darinbob ( 1142669 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:09PM (#52895087)

    The immortal words of GOB Bluth, https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

  • It won't stop the cartoon images but it seems like Apple could to save themselves a lot of grief by simply doing what websense does and filtering images with to much area that falls within the range of human flesh tones.

    • by phayes ( 202222 )

      That'll work great when people are looking for gifs like face or forehead or ear, etc...

    • But then you end up with a racist filter. if you go for all possible flesh tones you'll be over-blocking severely.

  • ... huge things.

  • Why did they have to advertise the fact? I just searched for "butt" and "huge" and I go no results at all!

    Thanks for ruining it for the rest of us. :P

  • They must be adding keyword blocks at a breakneck pace right now.

    This sucks thought... NOW how am I going to send pictures of boobies, tits and shags to fellow bird-watchers?

  • The Big Picture (Score:4, Interesting)

    by tinkerton ( 199273 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @03:32PM (#52895787)

    The Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg had an article in the Guardian about how the big media players are getting too much control over the information flow. I think it's a timid and diplomatic article and I would put it in stronger words. But at least we should be able to see that the danger exists that information flow is massaged to suit big powers. If google search buries a link then it does not exist. If google ads decides you're publishing information they don't like, they lock you out and you'll think twice after that. Mainstream media already stick to extremely narrow narratives, it will spread beyond that.

    https://www.theguardian.com/co... [theguardian.com]

    Media consumption today is increasingly digitized, but even more so it is curated. News and social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Flipboard have overtaken traditional news outlets as our primary sources of information, of news, of connection to the world around us. They have become our most frequently visited sites, especially among the younger generations, and have empowered the public to create and share their own content. With this ease of access to information in today’s world, comes a great responsibility to enact policies that make positive contributions to society.

    By exercising such overarching editorial rights, large corporations that ought to bring us closer together as human beings through transparency, end up altering history, and altering the truth. Already, Facebook and other media outlets’ algorithms narrow the range of content one sees based on past preferences and interests. This limits the kind of stories one sees, and in turn restricts access to a holistic outlook for the user. We run the risk of creating parallel societies in which some people are not aware of the real issues facing the world, and this is only exacerbated by such editorial oversight. As we move towards a more automated world, this is not a responsibility that should be surrendered to machines only.

  • that searching for "huge" in iMessage currently returns No Results

    The internet has fixed itself.

  • Summary: iOS10 makes porn easier than ever to access.

    Result: AAPL up $3..80 for the day.

  • by mysidia ( 191772 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @04:07PM (#52896055)

    If my website happens to have a picture on it, and you use image search to "Post" it to a friend
    out of context, that's Copyright Infringement.

    The accidental inclusion of porn should be the least of Apples' worries....

  • - Filters will never block adult content with 100% accuracy, especially if "it was very sexual" thoughtcrime counts.

    - Image fetching extensions are little more than a search engine.

    - Huge is a sexually-associated word to AI, don't argue with numbers.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the fine print for the GIF extension says some "internet user experience may have varied content" boilerplate ala ESRB for online games.
  • by dublin ( 31215 ) on Thursday September 15, 2016 @06:13PM (#52896835) Homepage

    Half of the frustration with computers in the past few years is that they no longer do what we tell them - instead, they try to figure out what we really wanted and guess at what they should provide.

    In the immortal words of Beka Valentine*, "Override Safety Protocols! Authorization code, 'Shut up and do what I tell you!' "

    *And if you don't watch Andromeda, shame on you - it's quality is very uneven in places, but in many ways, it's the the best synthesis of Roddenberry's recurring themes in one show: The nature of humanity of AIs (Data, Questor, etc.) and aliens (Spock, et al), the genetic superman and his culture and realtionship with humanity (Khan, etc.), the heroic underdog, the character of the Captain, and more..

    My manifesto for computing in the 21st century: "STOP TRYING TO HELP ME, DAMMIT, JUST DO WHAT I SAY!"

  • There should be specially curated phones for kids which will let them learn how to use one, including installing apps, in a safe manner.

  • There are many reasons why watching pornography may be bad, but I have never been convinced that seeing pornography is likely to traumatise anybody, especially not a child, who would have no experience against which to interpret what they saw. It seems to me that any trauma that arises comes from adults making undue fuss over it and describing it as "dangerous" and "dirty". When you have no sexual experience and have yet to develop your drives and lusts, porn is more likely to evoke feelings of confusion an

"The vast majority of successful major crimes against property are perpetrated by individuals abusing positions of trust." -- Lawrence Dalzell

Working...