Apple Refused China Request For Source Code In Last Two Years: Lawyer (reuters.com) 57
Dustin Volz, reporting for Reuters: Apple has been asked by Chinese authorities within the last two years to hand over its source code but refused to do so, the company's top lawyer told U.S. lawmakers at a hearing on Tuesday. Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell made the statement in response to a line of attack from law enforcement officials who have attempted to portray Apple as complicit in handing over information to Chinese authorities for business reasons while refusing to cooperate with U.S. requests for access to private data in criminal investigations. Apple and the FBI returned to Washington to testify before lawmakers about their heated disagreement over law enforcement access to encrypted devices, highlighted in the case of a locked iPhone linked to a gunman in last December's Islamist militant-inspired shootings in San Bernardino, California. Earlier in the hearing before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee, Captain Charles Cohen, commander in the Indiana State Police, repeated the suggestion that Apple has quietly cooperated with Beijing. But when pressed by Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat, for the source of that claim, Cohen only cited news reports. "That takes my breath away," a visibly frustrated Eshoo said. "That is a huge allegation."In some other Apple news, the Cupertino-based company complied with 80% of U.S. law enforcement requests in the second half of 2015, its just released transparency report shows. U.S. law enforcement asked Apple for information 4,000 times, covering 16,112 devices in the second half of 2015.
which is worse (Score:4, Insightful)
Except that China has flagrantly violated copyrigh (Score:5, Insightful)
China routinely ignores copyright when it suits them. If Apple was to hand over the source code, I suspect that there would be, just a few months later, *EXACT* iPhone "clones" complete with 100% compatible operating system, except jail-broken of course, available for $100 each.
And then poof -- Apple is out of business.
And they would sport names such as "Arple IF-one" to really, really, make you wince. Right now, China is producing cars that look like BMWs, for domestic use within China. China is making $30 ham-radios that are clones of a Kenwood design, and the Kenwood is a $150 radio.
How are you going to compete with that? They do almost zero R&D, and then make cheap copies of existing products using the existing R&D of some other firm. When we get to the point of China making everything and all other companies are out of business, expect to see no innovation for decades that follow.
Re: Except that China has flagrantly violated copy (Score:3, Insightful)
We went through this with Japan, eventually the people/companies that become successful start making their own stuff because it's easier.
Regardless if they get there over time without cheating or cheat their way, eventually we are going to have to face a competition of competent Chinese businesses that can do the same things as the rest of the world. They are just shaving some time off of that process.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, your "something" was wrong, in no small part due to the fact that the OP was right.
If you don't do your own R&D, you'll never be able to produce anything *original*.
If you don't do your own R&D, your competitors will *always* make it to market first, so you give up 'first mover' advantage.
Those two reasons (among many others) are how companies build market share.
Re:Except that China has flagrantly violated copyr (Score:5, Insightful)
How are you going to compete with that? They do almost zero R&D, and then make cheap copies of existing products using the existing R&D of some other firm. When we get to the point of China making everything and all other companies are out of business, expect to see no innovation for decades that follow.
Thats pretty much standard for any country trying to catch up to more advanced industrial nations. The US did it when we began industrializing and once we had enough homegrown companies developing technology we all of a sudden became big fans of patent and copyright protection. Once people start stealing form China they'll come around as well.
Re: (Score:3)
The difference is that there wasn't a global economy during those times (at least not on the scale we have today). During those times, If a company in Germany developed a very robust widget and an American company directly copied it, the impact wasn't catastrophic to the German company. Now, with R&D done in one country and manufacturing done in another, if your manufacturer goes rogue, he can cause real and potentially fatal harm to your business.
Re: (Score:1)
The difference is that there wasn't a global economy during those times (at least not on the scale we have today). During those times, If a company in Germany developed a very robust widget and an American company directly copied it, the impact wasn't catastrophic to the German company. Now, with R&D done in one country and manufacturing done in another, if your manufacturer goes rogue, he can cause real and potentially fatal harm to your business.
Solution: Stop outsourcing your production to third world shitbags for pennies -they will screw you to try and make a living.
Produce quality goods locally and sell them at a price that supports local workers.
Re: (Score:2)
The difference is that there wasn't a global economy during those times (at least not on the scale we have today). During those times, If a company in Germany developed a very robust widget and an American company directly copied it, the impact wasn't catastrophic to the German company. Now, with R&D done in one country and manufacturing done in another, if your manufacturer goes rogue, he can cause real and potentially fatal harm to your business.
There was a pretty robust global economy,it just took longer to ship stuff than today but the industrial,reveloutionnusheredcinna new era in global trade as countries industrialized and began mass production of previously hand made items.
Re: (Score:3)
Note the the original patent laws denied protection for foreign patents. For further reading here are two sources:
https://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130228/01324622146/yes-us-industrial-revolution-was-built-piracy-fraud.shtml
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-02-01/piracy-and-fraud-propelled-the-u-s-industrial-revolution
The bottom line is countries do what they feel is needed to catch up with the rest of the world. That's not to say the US wasn't innovation but even so they used va
Re:Except that China has flagrantly violated copyr (Score:4, Funny)
And they would sport names such as "Arple IF-one" to really, really, make you wince.
What would really make me wince is: Aqqle iPhome 6 Prus
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So having its IP copied to lower cost phones that look the same might not eat much into the (maybe limited) market that Apple could capture in
Re: (Score:1)
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
But when pressed by Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat, for the source of that claim, Cohen only cited news reports. "That takes my breath away," a visibly frustrated Eshoo said. "That is a huge allegation."
Considering that this group's main role is to investigate before making allegations, someone should be fired over this comment.
Re: (Score:2)
But when pressed by Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat, for the source of that claim, Cohen [Captain Charles Cohen, commander in the Indiana State Police] only cited news reports. "That takes my breath away," a visibly frustrated Eshoo said. "That is a huge allegation."
As an Indianan, I am not surprised at that LYING BASTARD Indiana State Police "Commander". WTF is he even DOING on this Committee?
can be seen as Treason (Score:2)
can be seen as Treason and if come down to it trump may be the one to fire the shot.
Re: (Score:1)
Impeaching Trump after he gets sworn into office is a real possibility.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/donald-trump-2016-impeachment-213817 [politico.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Now if you are talking about right after he's sworn in, to invalidate his election, well.... That would be political suicide on a grand scale if Trump won with a majority vote. it would set the modern precedent that Congress, if so inclined, could just override and cancel out the election of any president they didn't like. Considering the extremism present in both parties these days this would not be a g
Re: (Score:2)
That would be political suicide on a grand scale if Trump won with a majority vote.
With the Supreme Court being 4-4, I doubt he could get a majority to win the election. ;)
Now if he does something to get legitimately impeached, then well what are you going to do.
So many of his positions are so extreme that Congress might do the country a favor by removing him from office before he could do any serious harm.
Why can't they just copy the firmware? (Score:1)
I can't be that difficult to strip it down in a reverse engineering lab, and get at the binaries to disassemble etc.
The source code means fuck all if you can't recreated it and compare it to what's deployed on devices.
Time for them to be Made in the USA or they can be (Score:4, Interesting)
Time for them to be Made in the USA or they can be black listed from us GOV use.
Re: (Score:2)
You and I would. Everyone else would switch to Samsung.
Where they could all then enjoy that bastion of user privacy and security that is Android...
Re: (Score:2)
Where any technically competent person can protect their data and not rely on Apple, who are known government accomplices when it comes to handing over user data, to protect them. In fact by default the Android passcode system is far more secure than Apple's 4 digit numeric variant.
1. Apple is known government accomplices, hahahahahahaaaa. The Hate is strong in this one...
2. Apple's Passcode allows up to 52 alphanumeric and punctuation character Passphrases using iOS' 104 character keyboard. Here's an article that shows just what that means [kreme.com], time-wise. Add to that the increasing wrong-guess delay (not to mention the 10 try limit), and you have what might be referred to as "your basic impossibility". If you'd spent as much tiime reading the multitudinous posts on Slashdot that point
Re: (Score:2)
You and I would. Everyone else would switch to Samsung.
Which is Made in America?
Re: (Score:2)
No, it wouldn't.
Re: (Score:1)
And when other countries do the same, how many jobs in the USA go down the tubes ?
Quite apart from the fact that that will break a lot of trade agreements, or are you now saying the agreements/contracts the US signs can be broken because you say so. Exactly how does anyone trust the US again if you prove that contracts are worthless ?
Just remember the USA makes up 4% of the worlds population, and many of the large US corporations make more money by dealing with the 96% than they do with US customers. Also b
Re: (Score:2)
"Those jobs are not coming back."
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot: BURMA SHAVE.
Re: (Score:2)
or maybe '...and, whitey's on the moon'.
it even fits the angst, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Watch the TV series "Continuum". No wonder why it got pulled before the story finished. I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did given its stoutly anti-corporate theme.
Very specific numbers (Score:2)
U.S. law enforcement asked Apple for information 4,000 times, covering 16,112 devices in the second half of 2015.
Which equals 4.028 phones per request. So it's like the gov is looking at groups of people more than individuals.
Re: (Score:3)
Any more on that? They got in right? What'd they learn?
Cat videos.