Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Iphone

Apple Product Event Highlights 508

samzenpus writes: The Apple product event just finished, read below for the highlights.
  • Apple Watch:
  • Adding Facebook Messenger.
  • iTranslate — speak into the mic and hear translations in over 90 languages.
  • Physician app AirStrip can monitor vitals.
  • New band options, two new finishes gold and rose gold.
  • Watch OS 2 comes out September 16.
  • iPad:
  • iPad Pro announced: Screen is 12.9 inches, 5.6m pixels, A9X chip, with 2x memory bandwidth, storage and graphics performance, 10-hour battery life, 8MP camera, 802.11ac with MIMO, 150Mbps LTE modem, TouchID, 6.9mm thick and 1.57 pounds.
  • Smart Keyboard connects magnetically.
  • The Apple Pencil stylus: "Highly responsive sensors built into the tip of Apple Pencil sensor pressure, tilt, and stroke."
  • Corporate VP from MS Office, Kirk Koenigsbauer talks Microsoft Office for iPad.
  • New suite of Adobe apps.
  • Apple Pencil is $99 and Smart Keyboard is $169, all available in November.
  • New iPad mini 4 $399.
  • Apple TV:
  • New remote with glass touch surface. 10mm tall, A8 chip, Bluetooth 4.0. Built-in accelerometer and gyroscope, 3 months per charge, charges over lightning. 32GB for $149, 64GB for $199.
  • iTunes, Netflix, Hulu, HBO, and Showtime are searchable.
  • New cleaner looking UI with Siri integration.
  • New OS: TV OS.
  • new games and game collections for the family, using your iPhone or iPod Touch as a controller.
  • MLB app, NHL Game Center live in 2016.
  • tvOS developer beta available today, available to consumers in late October.
  • iPhone:
  • iPhone 6S and 6S Plus, Silver, gold, space grey, and new Rose Gold. 4.7-inch 6S and 5.5-inch 6S+.
  • 3rd-generation A9 chip 70% faster CPU than A8, 90% faster GPU than A8.
  • New pressure-sensitive 3D Touch.
  • New Taptic Engine
  • New Siri feature allows you to speak to your iPhone whether you're powered on or not.
  • New 12 megapixel iSight camera. 50% more pixels and 50% more focus pixels for faster autofocus.
  • 4K video
  • 5MP FaceTime HD Camera.
  • Retina Flash, display can light up 3X brighter than usual to be a flash for the front-facing camera.
  • Live Photos: Press with 3D Touch and pictures will move.
  • iPhone 6 $199-$399, iPhone 6 Plus $299-$499 all on two-year contracts.
  • New iPhone Upgrade Program for a new iPhone every year, choose your carrier, unlocked phones, 24-month installment plan starting at $32/month.
  • preorder Saturday, Sept 12. Available September 25th.
  • iOS 9 available September 16th.
  • New iCloud storage pricing: 50GB for 99 cents a month, 200GB for $2.99/mo, 1TB for $9.99/mo.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Product Event Highlights

Comments Filter:
  • iBore 6.0 (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mlw4428 ( 1029576 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:23PM (#50489043)
    None of this seems "revolutionary" or "magical". Some of it looks like a rip off of Amazon TV, Google Translate, and the same look as last year's model which was nothing more than a larger look of the year before that's model. What happened to Apple supposedly "leading" the way? Did the sheep cause the shepard to fall behind?
    • Re:iBore 6.0 (Score:5, Interesting)

      by bondsbw ( 888959 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:28PM (#50489085)

      I agree with all of that, with two exceptions:

      1) force touch on the iPhone for activating contextual functionality (such as peek and context menus)
      2) live photos

      To be clear, the only one of those I care about is #1 but I could see a lot of people liking #2.

      • Re:iBore 6.0 (Score:4, Interesting)

        by pushing-robot ( 1037830 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @04:05PM (#50489487)

        I feel the same.

        I don't take many photos but I can see the attraction with making them feel more 'alive' without the trouble of shooting a proper video. Often innovation isn't based on entirely new technology but simply using what you have in a clever, simpler way.

        Pressure sensitive touchscreens could be huge. The fatal flaw of touch interfaces (IMO) has been the lack of context, there's no 'hover' or 'right button'; a touch is a touch. The ability to distinguish between an accidental brush of the screen, a light touch, a tap, and a firm press could really push the usability of touch interfaces up a few notches.

    • None of this seems "revolutionary" or "magical". Some of it looks like a rip off of Amazon TV, Google Translate, and the same look as last year's model which was nothing more than a larger look of the year before that's model. What happened to Apple supposedly "leading" the way? Did the sheep cause the shepard to fall behind?

      Piss and moan, piss and moan...

    • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:51PM (#50489341)

      Let me tell you why the 6s is the first iPhone "S" update I'm not skipping over:

      * Higher res camera sensor, but not just higher res- also has improved photosite separation.

      * 4k video (hopefully for slo-mo too?)

      * Significantly faster performance ("up to" 70% faster than old model iPhone 6).

      * Force touch (useful for quicker multi-tasking and other actions).

      * Live Photos - anyone who likes photography is pretty excited about this, especially as it captures just a bit before you press the capture button...

      * Motion coprocessor is always-on now so using that feature heavily comes with no battery penalty.

      * Taptic hardware on device for better user feedback than mere vibration (as a developer I'm particularly excited about that).

      * Front screen brightness can increase 3x normal for short period of time to act as a flash.

      Also faster WiFi support and more LTE bands, but I can't seriously so those are features compelling enough for me to upgrade - it's really the ones above, especially related to photography... the newer sensor alone would not have done it, it's the conjunction with other features.

      • What about the NSA-approved always-on spy mode?
      • by Toshito ( 452851 )

        What's the use of a higher res camera sensor with this itsy bitsy small lens with a microscopic apperture?

        • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @04:23PM (#50489645)

          What's the use of a higher res camera sensor with this itsy bitsy small lens with a microscopic apperture?

          The sensor does not just have higher res as I said but better separation under the CFA.

          I have a real DSLR with a number of lenses that cost north of $1k so I know what truly professional images look like. I am telling you, what Apple is doing is THE future of mass photography. The images already look great for most uses, and even beyond the resolution increase Apple is doing a great job of software that handles mixed WB, low light, super quick focus, and all sorts of other things.

          The future I see for any other still camera that does not support Live Photos (or non-trademarked equivalent) is a role relegated to producing images for print. Now I personally enjoy that, which is why I have a DSLR. But I think it's insane to not realize how vastly the camera market will contract as the phones push quality and ease of use inexorably forward and upward.

          At some point very soon, being a serious photographic amateur will mean you have a set of attachment lenses for your phone...

          • by Toshito ( 452851 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @05:06PM (#50490051)

            There is a physical limit as to what a lens can resolve, and going to insane pixel count on the sensor cannot overcome this physical resolution from the lens itself...

            The only other way to increase resolution is to have a bigger sensor, like in medium format cameras.

            There's no way (appart from rewriting the laws of optics) to attach a humongous telephoto lens to a phone camera and expect to have the same resolution as in a full frame DSLR or medium format camera (which are in the 50 to 80 megapixels as we speak).

            Sure some software tricks will give an image clean enough for Joe Public to print some 8x10" but I can't see any pro using a phone for serious photography.

            And Live Photos? It's a gimmick already available on Nokia Lumia phones since 2012 with the Cinemagraph app, I had it on my Nokia 920. It's fun for a day or two but it quickly becomes boring.

          • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

            by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @06:46PM (#50490749)
            Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • by amicusNYCL ( 1538833 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @08:10PM (#50491213)

        Motion coprocessor is always-on now so using that feature heavily comes with no battery penalty.

        That's a pretty funny way of saying that if you don't use the motion co-processor you're now going to have extra battery drain anyway. You sound like you paid attention in marketing school. Framing a negative as a feature, well done.

    • The amusing thing behind your whinge is that you EXPECT Apple to do something revolutionary and magical every year.

  • by nmb3000 ( 741169 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:24PM (#50489049) Journal

    This made me laugh more than it probably should have:

    Apple Pencil is $99 [imgur.com]

    I just hope they don't start requiring an #2 Apple Pencil for standardized tests.

  • 2 year contracts? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Dorianny ( 1847922 )
    All the major operators are moving away from the 2 year contract yet apple still list the iphone prices in terms of a 2 year contract. I am guessing even Apple knows that many customers are going to balk at the iphones true starting price of $650.
    • Re:2 year contracts? (Score:5, Informative)

      by pushing-robot ( 1037830 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:43PM (#50489249)

      Apple mentioned that in the keynote and quoted both contract prices and monthy payment plan prices, which is what you see on US carrier sites now.

    • If they start selling $200-ish phones, sell your stock. That market is a total black hole for profits.

    • by Karlt1 ( 231423 )

      The major carriers are moving away from 2 year contracts where if you break the contract you have to pay an ETF.

      The major carriers are moving toward a 2 year payment plan where if you leave early you have to pay for the remainder of the cost of your phone.

      • Welcome to the new boss, same as the old boss...

        However, this new system has many benefits, such as "buy a used phone for less, get cheaper service", and "keep your phone past the end of the payments, watch your service price drop", etc.

        So actually this is an improvement.

    • For those that don't want carrier contracts but do like new phones every year, Apple now has an upgrade plan.

      But really carriers have already been starting to have similar plans anyone, no contract lock-in but you pay for a phone in installments.

    • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

      No phone provider is ever going to advertise the true price of their phones unless required to do so. They're too ridiculously expensive, no matter what brand they are.

  • by Stele ( 9443 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:28PM (#50489093) Homepage

    iTranslate — speak into the mic and hear translations in over 90 languages.

    That would be hard to understand. Did they mention an option to only hear once language at a time?

  • by CSHARP123 ( 904951 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:33PM (#50489147)
    Hence apple introduced new thing called "Pencil" for $99. They had to bring in MS to demonstrate how to use that thing.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    "New Siri feature allows you to speak to your iPhone whether you're powered on or not."

    Which means that the iPhone is never really "off". Which means that it's ALWAYS listening to you. Which probably means that the NSA is listening too.

    No thanks.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Or, perhaps people don't really care...

        My GMC truck has OnStar, it tracks where I drive. My phone has GPS and knows where I go. None of this is new.

        Frankly, one of these days we're all going to get chipped and while some people will fight it, they'll grow old and die and the rest of us will be fine with it. When you end up with a CPU in you that provides all the power and information of the world and you don't even need a phone, that becomes a quite useful thing.

        And yes, they'll be able to track you.

      • Amen to that. It is amazing that in this day and age, no one at Apple seems to have noticed just how bloody creepy this "feature" sounds.

        It's only "creepy" until you stop to think about how it works.

        The PHONE is responsible for interpreting the "Hey, Siri" phrase. That's why it isn't customizable. They have some little, dedicated custom IC who's ONLY job is to listen for "Hey, Siri", and THEN wake up the rest of the Phone to gather up the command.

        That's why the first generation of the feature only worked with the phone plugged in. Because they hadn't gotten the custom "Hey Siri" chip back from the fab-house, and had to keep the main SoC

    • by macs4all ( 973270 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @05:49PM (#50490431)

      "New Siri feature allows you to speak to your iPhone whether you're powered on or not."

      Which means that the iPhone is never really "off". Which means that it's ALWAYS listening to you. Which probably means that the NSA is listening too.

      No thanks.

      I GUARANTEE it isn't "listening" until it hears "Hey, Siri", which it detects LOCALLY.

      Can you imagine the standby power requirements to run the WiFi 24/7 JUST to hear you utter one, non-customizable, phrase?

      Think before you hate.

      • "New Siri feature allows you to speak to your iPhone whether you're powered on or not."

        Which means that the iPhone is never really "off". Which means that it's ALWAYS listening to you. Which probably means that the NSA is listening too.

        No thanks.

        I GUARANTEE it isn't "listening" until it hears "Hey, Siri", which it detects LOCALLY.

        Can you imagine the standby power requirements to run the WiFi 24/7 JUST to hear you utter one, non-customizable, phrase?

        Think before you hate.

        I GUARANTEE it isn't "listening" until it hears "Hey, Siri", which it detects LOCALLY.

        I GUARANTEE it isn't "listening" until it hears "Hey, Siri"

        "listening" until it hears "Hey, Siri"

        Think before you post.

  • by Eloking ( 877834 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:39PM (#50489205)

    Look like they didn't only copied the spect of the Surface pro 3, they also copied the price.

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Except not really, because the Pro comes with the pen(cil). So you'd have to throw in an additional $100 on top of that. Not to mention the Surface Pro is worthless without the Type Cover ($120) so you might as well throw in that cost as well for the iPad ($170) meaning that you're looking at an additional $150 to bring the iPad Pro up to spec with the Surface Pro. So, yet again, we're looking at an even more expensive, less powerful Apple device that's competing with superior, cheaper opponents solely on h

      • I like the neat new features like having two apps on the screen at the same time and photos that include a short bit of video! Apple has caught up with the Winphone and Surface I've been using for the last two years.
  • Apple TV is now 10mm tallER than the old model, not 10mm tall.

  • by andyring ( 100627 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:47PM (#50489299) Homepage

    Lame. I've had a Roku3 for a couple years and it does this very nicely. And yes I have an AppleTV 3 also. I rarely use it. The Roku does everything the AppleTV does, and significantly more.

    OK, the Roku won't mirror my iPhone, but that's a pretty minor thing.

  • Good:
    - more powerful CPU/GPU
    - app store (yeah, games!)
    - costs USD$50 less than an iPod touch and runs the same apps from what I understood
    - entry-level has 16GB, same as the entry-level iPod touch

    Bad:
    - the remote has a touch area, which is bad for gaming and annoying for surfing. Swipping makes sense when it's part of the display and you touch what you see, otherwise not so much. There's a disconnect between your movements and what's going to happen on the TV.
    - too expensive (more than twice the cos
    • costs USD$50 less than an iPod touch and runs the same apps from what I understood

      Not at all, it's a different SDK. All apps must be built specifically for the Apple TV. I think I do remember them saying if you bought an app for the phone you'd automatically get an AppleTV version if there was one, but I'm not sure about that.

      the remote has a touch area, which is bad for gaming and annoying for surfing. Swipping makes sense when it's part of the display and you touch what you see, otherwise not so much.

      Fro

  • The question is: Will there be other controllers? Game controllers for games like Xbox? Seriously this seems like a massive miss. Of 3rd parties will make one, but seriously it will never get the traction of an Apple sponsored controller.

  • Too many choices (Score:5, Insightful)

    by crgrace ( 220738 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @04:11PM (#50489555)

    I'm an Apple fan and I'm concerned they are falling into the trap of customer confusion. For example, when I bought my iPad (which I love) I went to the Apple Store and picked up the iPad. It was done quickly and I was a happy customer. Now, there are *5* different iPads.

    Which one do I pick? Christ, I have to research this now? What's my use case? How important is screen size, battery life, cost, etc etc etc.. This is why I hated buying anything from Dell.

    On a related note, which Apple laptop should you buy? MacBook, Air, Pro? What's the difference? Customer confusion leads to customer paralysis.

    Apple's been down this road before. In the mid 90s there were so many different Apple models, Performa, Centris, Quada, God knows what else, that I had no idea what to get. You know which one I got? None of them. That's when I finally went to PC.

    In my opinion, Steve Jobs' genius when he returned to Apple was to make it EASY to buy a Mac. Just get an iMac. Pick the color and you're done. Want an iPod or an iPhone? You didn't need to research and weigh the pros and cons of 5 different models. Now you do. I strongly believe a good part of why Apple revived was a clean product line with minimal choices.

    I fear Apple is making a mistake that may come back to bite them.

    • This is the only valid complaint of Apple I've read today. It's mostly in the naming scheme, though.

      They should have
      iPad Mini and iPad Mini Pro
      iPad Air and iPad Air Pro
      iPad Plus

      That naming scheme conveys a lot better what you get. Pro is faster, mini is smaller, plus is bigger. Done.

    • by 0123456 ( 636235 )

      You've got the iPad Mini to carry around, the iPad Air to use on the sofa, and the iPad Pro to use on a desk. Then you just have the current version or the older, cheapo version.

      Doesn't seem like a huge problem to choose between them, to me. At least the Mini 4 is a real upgrade, rather than 'let's throw in a fingerprint sensor and add $100 to the price'.

  • by swb ( 14022 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @04:18PM (#50489611)

    I've been thinking of replacing my iPad 3 and I like the idea of a larger screen iPad, but could they puhleeze add support for a bluetooth mouse?

    RDP sessions from an iPad work fine now, but touch just doesn't translate well into Windows UI. A mouse would make an iPad quite useful for a lot of remote admin tasks.

    I don't care if you couldn't use the mouse with the home screen or even as a touch replacement, just make it so it can be paired and developers can see mouse events.

    I know, I could just buy a regular laptop but they're not nearly as couch/bed friendly as an iPad is, and it's casual settings where I use it most now. But those marginal times where there's a chance I might need to do some kind of work, I find myself bringing my laptop as well because touch is such a shitty way to do Windows UI.

    No, a Surface Pro is not a viable replacement. Yes, I do own one and I can't stand the Windows "tablet" mode or its micro-sized app collection, which makes any touch Windows device nonviable.

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by tomxor ( 2379126 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @04:53PM (#50489947)

    I find the idea of an iPad "pro" stupid enough as it is, but the joke used to be about how predictably Microsoft copied Apple's moves.

    So much product fragmentation that is feels a lot like the John Scully years before Jobs came back... ah well they did some good things i guess.

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...