Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×
Advertising Businesses Government The Almighty Buck The Courts Apple

After Trademark Dispute, Mexican Carriers Can No Longer Use iPhone Name In Ads 53

An anonymous reader writes "The Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) on Thursday announced it has absolved Apple of wrongdoing in a trademark lawsuit surrounding the iPhone's infringement of a local telecommunications company marketing the phonetically identical 'iFone' brand. The logic behind the ruling was based on the difference in the two companies' markets. While iFone sells telecommunications services, Apple sells smartphones (but not actual telecommunications service). Because cellular carriers offer telecommunications services, the IMPI ruled that carriers have to remove the word 'iPhone' from all marketing materials within the next 15 days."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

After Trademark Dispute, Mexican Carriers Can No Longer Use iPhone Name In Ads

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Seems correct (Score:4, Insightful)

    by hey! ( 33014 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @07:13PM (#47192171) Homepage Journal

    Er... Why would Apple sue vendor using the Apple trademark to sell Apple products? That's what trademarks are *for*.

    This is more like, imagine the iPhone was called instead the SpryntPhone. Sprint, the *carrier*, would object to Verizon and AT&T selling "SpyrntPhones" because it sounds like "Sprint Phones". They wouldn't object to those carriers selling "Samsung" phones because that doesn't affect their trademark.

  • Re:Seems correct (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sribe ( 304414 ) on Sunday June 08, 2014 @08:37PM (#47192451)

    I'm not familiar with Mexican law either but these laws are pretty well unified by international treaties. You cannot use another company's trademark in your advertising material unless you have permission.

    Bullshit, actually. You can use trademarks all day long without permission, so long as you are referring to the actual products instead of some knock-off, nor using them in any other misleading way.

"Only a brain-damaged operating system would support task switching and not make the simple next step of supporting multitasking." -- George McFry

Working...